Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing 'Prevailing Party' Status in IDEA Administrative Proceedings: Second Circuit's Landmark Decision

Establishing 'Prevailing Party' Status in IDEA Administrative Proceedings: Second Circuit's Landmark Decision

Date: May 11, 2005
Establishing 'Prevailing Party' Status in IDEA Administrative Proceedings: Second Circuit's Landmark Decision Introduction The case of A.R. et al. v. New York City Department of Education represents...
Jurisdictional Clarification on Reviewing Nondiscretionary Immigration Eligibility Decisions: Sepulveda v. Gonzales

Jurisdictional Clarification on Reviewing Nondiscretionary Immigration Eligibility Decisions: Sepulveda v. Gonzales

Date: May 5, 2005
Jurisdictional Clarification on Reviewing Nondiscretionary Immigration Eligibility Decisions: Sepulveda v. Gonzales Introduction The case of Luis Sepulveda v. Alberto Gonzales addresses the critical...
Assignment of Legal Malpractice Claims and Apparent Authority: Insights from Stichting v. Schreiber

Assignment of Legal Malpractice Claims and Apparent Authority: Insights from Stichting v. Schreiber

Date: May 4, 2005
Assignment of Legal Malpractice Claims and Apparent Authority: Insights from Stichting v. Schreiber Introduction The case of Stichting Ter Behartiging Van De Belangen Van Oudaandeelhouders in het...
Establishing Precedents in Class Action Settlements for Unpaid Overtime: Frank v. Eastman Kodak Company

Establishing Precedents in Class Action Settlements for Unpaid Overtime: Frank v. Eastman Kodak Company

Date: Apr 30, 2005
Establishing Precedents in Class Action Settlements for Unpaid Overtime: Frank v. Eastman Kodak Company Introduction The case Alphonse J. Frank v. Eastman Kodak Company (228 F.R.D. 174) adjudicated...
Waiver of Civil Actions in 9/11 Wrongful Death Claims: Virgilio v. Motorola, Inc.

Waiver of Civil Actions in 9/11 Wrongful Death Claims: Virgilio v. Motorola, Inc.

Date: Apr 30, 2005
Waiver of Civil Actions in 9/11 Wrongful Death Claims: Virgilio v. Motorola, Inc. Introduction The tragic events of September 11, 2001, not only resulted in the loss of thousands of lives but also...
Protecting Non-Parties from Undue Burden in Subpoena Compliance: Insights from Travelers v. MetLife

Protecting Non-Parties from Undue Burden in Subpoena Compliance: Insights from Travelers v. MetLife

Date: Apr 29, 2005
Protecting Non-Parties from Undue Burden in Subpoena Compliance: Insights from Travelers v. MetLife Introduction The case of The Travelers Indemnity Company Travelers Casualty & Surety Company v....
Guidelines Advisory Post-Booker: United States v. Fagans

Guidelines Advisory Post-Booker: United States v. Fagans

Date: Apr 28, 2005
Guidelines Advisory Post-Booker: United States v. Fagans Introduction United States v. Fagans (406 F.3d 138), decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on April 27, 2005,...
Reaffirming Defendant's Confrontation and Compulsory Process Rights in Howard v. Walker

Reaffirming Defendant's Confrontation and Compulsory Process Rights in Howard v. Walker

Date: Apr 27, 2005
Reaffirming Defendant's Confrontation and Compulsory Process Rights in Howard v. Walker Introduction Howard v. Walker, 406 F.3d 114 (2d Cir. 2005), is a significant appellate court decision that...
Clarifying Amendment Standards in §1983 Prisoner Rights Cases: Insights from Shell v. Correctional Officers

Clarifying Amendment Standards in §1983 Prisoner Rights Cases: Insights from Shell v. Correctional Officers

Date: Apr 22, 2005
Clarifying Amendment Standards in §1983 Prisoner Rights Cases: Insights from Shell v. Correctional Officers Introduction Shell v. Correctional Officers is a notable case adjudicated in the United...
Rejection of Substantial Compliance Doctrine in ERISA Claims: Second Circuit Establishes De Novo Review Standard

Rejection of Substantial Compliance Doctrine in ERISA Claims: Second Circuit Establishes De Novo Review Standard

Date: Apr 22, 2005
Rejection of Substantial Compliance Doctrine in ERISA Claims: Second Circuit Establishes De Novo Review Standard Introduction In the landmark case of Cecilia Nichols v. The Prudential Insurance...
Second Circuit Affirms Habeas Relief for Due Process Violation in Denial of Justification Jury Instruction: Jackson v. Edwards

Second Circuit Affirms Habeas Relief for Due Process Violation in Denial of Justification Jury Instruction: Jackson v. Edwards

Date: Apr 15, 2005
Second Circuit Affirms Habeas Relief for Due Process Violation in Denial of Justification Jury Instruction: Jackson v. Edwards Introduction Reginald Jackson v. Ernest Edwards is a pivotal case...
Preemption of State Environmental Land Use Regulation by the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act: Green Mountain Railroad Corp. v. State of Vermont

Preemption of State Environmental Land Use Regulation by the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act: Green Mountain Railroad Corp. v. State of Vermont

Date: Apr 15, 2005
Preemption of State Environmental Land Use Regulation by the Interstate Commerce Commission Termination Act: Green Mountain Railroad Corp. v. State of Vermont Introduction The case of Green Mountain...
Monell Protections Sustained: State Statute 24 V.S.A. § 901 Does Not Abrogate Municipal Immunity Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Monell Protections Sustained: State Statute 24 V.S.A. § 901 Does Not Abrogate Municipal Immunity Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Date: Apr 15, 2005
Monell Protections Sustained: State Statute 24 V.S.A. § 901 Does Not Abrogate Municipal Immunity Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction In the landmark case Donald J. Coon, Jr. v. Town of Springfield et...
Legitimate Expectation of Privacy in Search and Seizure: Second Circuit Affirms Denial of Suppression Motion in Watson v. United States

Legitimate Expectation of Privacy in Search and Seizure: Second Circuit Affirms Denial of Suppression Motion in Watson v. United States

Date: Apr 13, 2005
Legitimate Expectation of Privacy in Search and Seizure: Second Circuit Affirms Denial of Suppression Motion in Watson v. United States 1. Introduction Watson v. United States is a pivotal case...
Resentencing Before a Different Judge as a Remedy for Plea Agreement Breach in United States v. Vaval

Resentencing Before a Different Judge as a Remedy for Plea Agreement Breach in United States v. Vaval

Date: Apr 13, 2005
Resentencing Before a Different Judge as a Remedy for Plea Agreement Breach in United States v. Troy Vaval Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Troy Vaval, aka Justice Va, 404 F.3d...
Booker Non-Retroactivity Confirmed in Guzman v. United States

Booker Non-Retroactivity Confirmed in Guzman v. United States

Date: Apr 9, 2005
Booker Non-Retroactivity Confirmed in Guzman v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of Miguel Guzman v. United States, 404 F.3d 139 (2d Cir. 2005), the United States Court of Appeals for...
Fourth Amendment Reasonableness in Post-Arrest Procedures: Insights from Bryant v. City of New York

Fourth Amendment Reasonableness in Post-Arrest Procedures: Insights from Bryant v. City of New York

Date: Apr 6, 2005
Fourth Amendment Reasonableness in Post-Arrest Procedures: Insights from Bryant v. City of New York Introduction Bryant v. City of New York is a significant case adjudicated by the United States...
Concurrent Sentencing Authority of the Federal Bureau of Prisons: Hassan Abdul-Malik v. BOP

Concurrent Sentencing Authority of the Federal Bureau of Prisons: Hassan Abdul-Malik v. BOP

Date: Apr 6, 2005
Concurrent Sentencing Authority of the Federal Bureau of Prisons: Hassan Abdul-Malik v. BOP Introduction Hassan Abdul-Malik v. Kathleen M. Hawk-Sawyer et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Establishing the Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Libel Cases: Insights from DIBELLA v. HOPKINS

Establishing the Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Libel Cases: Insights from DIBELLA v. HOPKINS

Date: Apr 5, 2005
Establishing the Clear and Convincing Evidence Standard in Libel Cases: Insights from DIBELLA v. HOPKINS Introduction In the landmark case of Lou DiBella and Dibella Entertainment, Inc. v. Bernard...
Reaffirmation of Batson Standards and AEDPA Deference in DeBerry v. Portuondo

Reaffirmation of Batson Standards and AEDPA Deference in DeBerry v. Portuondo

Date: Apr 5, 2005
Reaffirmation of Batson Standards and AEDPA Deference in DeBerry v. Portuondo Introduction In DeBerry v. Portuondo, 403 F.3d 57 (2d Cir. 2005), the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert