Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 994(h) in Sentencing Career Offenders: Insights from United States v. Sanchez et al.

Interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 994(h) in Sentencing Career Offenders: Insights from United States v. Sanchez et al.

Date: Mar 1, 2008
Interpretation of 28 U.S.C. § 994(h) in Sentencing Career Offenders: Insights from United States v. Sanchez et al. Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Alfonso Sanchez,...
Second Circuit Affirms Health Plan’s UCR Policy in WHCRA Claims: Krauss v. Oxford Health Plans

Second Circuit Affirms Health Plan’s UCR Policy in WHCRA Claims: Krauss v. Oxford Health Plans

Date: Feb 27, 2008
Second Circuit Affirms Health Plan’s UCR Policy in WHCRA Claims: Krauss v. Oxford Health Plans Introduction The case of Daniel J. Krauss and Geri S. Krauss v. Oxford Health Plans, Inc. addresses...
Absolute Immunity of Law Enforcement Officers in Disciplinary Hearings: ROLON v. HENNEMAN and Moskowitz

Absolute Immunity of Law Enforcement Officers in Disciplinary Hearings: ROLON v. HENNEMAN and Moskowitz

Date: Feb 26, 2008
Absolute Immunity of Law Enforcement Officers in Disciplinary Hearings: ROLON v. HENNEMAN and Moskowitz Introduction ROLON v. HENNEMAN and Moskowitz is a seminal case decided by the United States...
Affirmation of ATS Limitations and Government-Contractor Defense in Agent Orange Case

Affirmation of ATS Limitations and Government-Contractor Defense in Agent Orange Case

Date: Feb 23, 2008
Affirmation of ATS Limitations and Government-Contractor Defense in Agent Orange Case Introduction The case titled VIETNAM ASSOCIATION FOR VICTIMS OF AGENT ORANGE v. Monsanto Co. and others, decided...
Affirmation of Government Contractor Defense in Agent Orange Litigation

Affirmation of Government Contractor Defense in Agent Orange Litigation

Date: Feb 23, 2008
Affirmation of Government Contractor Defense in Agent Orange Litigation Introduction The case of J. Michael Twinam, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Dow Chemical Company, et al., Defendants-Appellees revolves...
Expansion of the Federal Officer Removal Statute to Corporate Defendants: The Agent Orange Litigation Precedent

Expansion of the Federal Officer Removal Statute to Corporate Defendants: The Agent Orange Litigation Precedent

Date: Feb 23, 2008
Expansion of the Federal Officer Removal Statute to Corporate Defendants: The Agent Orange Litigation Precedent Introduction The litigation involving multiple plaintiffs-appellants against several...
Pro Se Litigants and Appellate Waiver in Non-Dispositive Matters: Insights from Caidor v. Onondaga County

Pro Se Litigants and Appellate Waiver in Non-Dispositive Matters: Insights from Caidor v. Onondaga County

Date: Feb 22, 2008
Pro Se Litigants and Appellate Waiver in Non-Dispositive Matters: Insights from Caidor v. Onondaga County Introduction In the case of Junet Caidor v. Onondaga County, decided by the United States...
Ximines v. George Wingate High School: Affirmation of Amendment Rights in ADEA Claims

Ximines v. George Wingate High School: Affirmation of Amendment Rights in ADEA Claims

Date: Feb 21, 2008
Ximines v. George Wingate High School: Affirmation of Amendment Rights in ADEA Claims Introduction Enid Ximines v. George Wingate High School and New York City Department of Education is a pivotal...
Limits of Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction in Enjoining Independent Third-Party Claims: IN RE JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPoration

Limits of Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction in Enjoining Independent Third-Party Claims: IN RE JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPoration

Date: Feb 16, 2008
Limits of Bankruptcy Court Jurisdiction in Enjoining Independent Third-Party Claims: IN RE JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPoration Introduction The case IN RE JOHNS-MANVILLE CORPoration, Debtor, decided by the...
Sentencing Reasonableness in Probation Violations: Insights from US v. Verkhoglyad

Sentencing Reasonableness in Probation Violations: Insights from US v. Verkhoglyad

Date: Feb 15, 2008
Sentencing Reasonableness in Probation Violations: Insights from United States v. Verkhoglyad Introduction In United States of America v. Oleg Verkhoglyad, 516 F.3d 122 (2d Cir. 2008), the United...
Establishing Standards in Unlicensed Money Transmission and Managing Trial Publicity: A United States v. Elfgeeh Analysis

Establishing Standards in Unlicensed Money Transmission and Managing Trial Publicity: A United States v. Elfgeeh Analysis

Date: Feb 15, 2008
Establishing Standards in Unlicensed Money Transmission and Managing Trial Publicity: A United States v. Elfgeeh Analysis Introduction United States v. Elfgeeh, 515 F.3d 100 (2d Cir. 2008), addresses...
Clarifying the 30-Day Dispute Period under FDCPA: Jacobson v. Healthcare Financial Services

Clarifying the 30-Day Dispute Period under FDCPA: Jacobson v. Healthcare Financial Services

Date: Feb 15, 2008
Clarifying the 30-Day Dispute Period under FDCPA: Jacobson v. Healthcare Financial Services Introduction In the landmark case of Gershon Jacobson v. Healthcare Financial Services, Inc., adjudicated...
Setting Aside Default Judgment due to Inadvertent Neglect: Pall Corporation v. Entegris, Inc.

Setting Aside Default Judgment due to Inadvertent Neglect: Pall Corporation v. Entegris, Inc.

Date: Feb 14, 2008
Setting Aside Default Judgment due to Inadvertent Neglect: Pall Corporation v. Entegris, Inc. Introduction Pall Corporation filed a patent infringement lawsuit against Entegris, Inc. on May 4, 2007,...
Ensuring Effective Communication Under the ADA: The Camarillo v. Carrols Corporation Decision

Ensuring Effective Communication Under the ADA: The Camarillo v. Carrols Corporation Decision

Date: Feb 9, 2008
Ensuring Effective Communication Under the ADA: The Camarillo v. Carrols Corporation Decision Introduction In the landmark case Alice Camarillo v. Carrols Corporation et al., decided by the United...
Clarification of Arbitration Awards: Rich v. Spartis Establishes Precedent for Judicial Review

Clarification of Arbitration Awards: Rich v. Spartis Establishes Precedent for Judicial Review

Date: Feb 9, 2008
Clarification of Arbitration Awards: Rich v. Spartis Establishes Precedent for Judicial Review Introduction The case of Elizabeth H. Rich and Donald Rich v. Phillip L. Spartis, Amy Jean Elias, and...
Defining the Scope of Protected Speech for Public Employees: Insights from Ruotolo v. City of New York

Defining the Scope of Protected Speech for Public Employees: Insights from Ruotolo v. City of New York

Date: Feb 7, 2008
Defining the Scope of Protected Speech for Public Employees: Insights from Ruotolo v. City of New York Introduction Ruotolo v. City of New York, 514 F.3d 184 (2d Cir. 2008), addresses critical...
Affirmation of Public Use in Eminent Domain: GOLDSTEIN v. PATAKI

Affirmation of Public Use in Eminent Domain: GOLDSTEIN v. PATAKI

Date: Feb 2, 2008
Affirmation of Public Use in Eminent Domain: GOLDSTEIN v. PATAKI Introduction GOLDSTEIN v. PATAKI, 516 F.3d 50 (2d Cir. 2008), is a pivotal case addressing the limits of eminent domain under the...
Clarification on Waiver Provision under the Speedy Trial Act: United States v. Abad

Clarification on Waiver Provision under the Speedy Trial Act: United States v. Abad

Date: Jan 31, 2008
Clarification on Waiver Provision under the Speedy Trial Act: United States v. Abad Introduction In United States v. Freddy Abad, 514 F.3d 271 (2d Cir. 2008), the United States Court of Appeals for...
De La Vega Reinforced: Scope of Appellate Review in Cancellation of Removal Denials – Barco-Sandoval v. Gonzales

De La Vega Reinforced: Scope of Appellate Review in Cancellation of Removal Denials – Barco-Sandoval v. Gonzales

Date: Jan 26, 2008
De La Vega Reinforced: Scope of Appellate Review in Cancellation of Removal Denials – Barco-Sandoval v. Gonzales Introduction In the landmark case of Byron Barco-Sandoval v. Alberto Gonzales, decided...
Equitable Tolling of AEDPA Limitations Period: Insights from Diaz v. Kelly et al.

Equitable Tolling of AEDPA Limitations Period: Insights from Diaz v. Kelly et al.

Date: Jan 26, 2008
Equitable Tolling of AEDPA Limitations Period: Insights from Diaz v. Kelly et al. Introduction The landmark case Angel Diaz, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Walter Kelly, Superintendent of Attica...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert