Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Zabala v. ASTRUE: Upholding the Treating Physician Rule and Substantial Evidence Standard in SSI Disability Determinations

Zabala v. ASTRUE: Upholding the Treating Physician Rule and Substantial Evidence Standard in SSI Disability Determinations

Date: Feb 12, 2010
Zabala v. ASTRUE: Upholding the Treating Physician Rule and Substantial Evidence Standard in SSI Disability Determinations Introduction Gloria Zabala filed a petition for Supplemental Security Income...
Establishing Precedent on Employment Classification under NY Labor Law §191-c and Service of Process: DeLuca v. AccessIT Group

Establishing Precedent on Employment Classification under NY Labor Law §191-c and Service of Process: DeLuca v. AccessIT Group

Date: Feb 10, 2010
Establishing Precedent on Employment Classification under NY Labor Law §191-c and Service of Process: DeLuca v. AccessIT Group Introduction The case of Jeremy F. DeLuca v. AccessIT Group, Inc. (695...
BOLMER v. OLIVEIRA: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Involuntary Commitment under Substantive Due Process

BOLMER v. OLIVEIRA: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Involuntary Commitment under Substantive Due Process

Date: Feb 9, 2010
BOLMER v. OLIVEIRA: Establishing Rigorous Standards for Involuntary Commitment under Substantive Due Process Introduction In BOLMER v. OLIVEIRA, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. City of New York: Upholding Zoning Restrictions on Outdoor Advertising under First Amendment

Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. City of New York: Upholding Zoning Restrictions on Outdoor Advertising under First Amendment

Date: Feb 4, 2010
Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc. v. City of New York: Upholding Zoning Restrictions on Outdoor Advertising under First Amendment Introduction The case of Clear Channel Outdoor, Inc., et al. v. City of New...
Broadening Anti-Retaliation Protections under Title VII: Insights from Hicks v. Baines

Broadening Anti-Retaliation Protections under Title VII: Insights from Hicks v. Baines

Date: Feb 3, 2010
Broadening Anti-Retaliation Protections under Title VII: Insights from Hicks v. Baines Introduction Hicks v. Baines, 593 F.3d 159 (2d Cir. 2010), marks a significant development in the interpretation...
Mental Illness as Grounds for Equitable Tolling Under AEDPA: Insights from Bolarinwa v. Williams

Mental Illness as Grounds for Equitable Tolling Under AEDPA: Insights from Bolarinwa v. Williams

Date: Jan 29, 2010
Mental Illness as Grounds for Equitable Tolling Under AEDPA: Insights from Bolarinwa v. Williams Introduction The case of Senora L. Bolarinwa v. Elizabeth Williams serves as a pivotal legal precedent...
Unconstitutionally Vague Prison Regulations: FARID v. ELLEN Establishes Clear Legal Standards

Unconstitutionally Vague Prison Regulations: FARID v. ELLEN Establishes Clear Legal Standards

Date: Jan 29, 2010
Unconstitutionally Vague Prison Regulations: FARID v. ELLEN Establishes Clear Legal Standards Introduction FARID v. ELLEN, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit on...
Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Equal Protection Claims Against New York’s Felon Disenfranchisement Laws

Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Equal Protection Claims Against New York’s Felon Disenfranchisement Laws

Date: Jan 29, 2010
Second Circuit Affirms Dismissal of Equal Protection Claims Against New York’s Felon Disenfranchisement Laws Introduction In Hayden v. Paterson, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...
Substantial Compliance with Mississippi Tort Claims Act Suffices to Establish Diversity Jurisdiction: Bounds v. Pine Belt Mental Health Care Resources

Substantial Compliance with Mississippi Tort Claims Act Suffices to Establish Diversity Jurisdiction: Bounds v. Pine Belt Mental Health Care Resources

Date: Jan 28, 2010
Substantial Compliance with Mississippi Tort Claims Act Suffices to Establish Diversity Jurisdiction: Bounds v. Pine Belt Mental Health Care Resources Introduction Bounds v. Pine Belt Mental Health...
First Amendment Protections for Public Employees: Insights from Weintraub v. Board of Education

First Amendment Protections for Public Employees: Insights from Weintraub v. Board of Education

Date: Jan 28, 2010
First Amendment Protections for Public Employees: Insights from Weintraub v. Board of Education Introduction Weintraub v. Board of Education of the City School District of the City of New York, 593...
Enhanced Disclosure Requirements Under Form N-1A: Implications from In re Morgan Stanley Sec. Litigation

Enhanced Disclosure Requirements Under Form N-1A: Implications from In re Morgan Stanley Sec. Litigation

Date: Jan 26, 2010
Enhanced Disclosure Requirements Under Form N-1A: Implications from In re Morgan Stanley Securities Litigation Introduction The case of In re Morgan Stanley Information Fund Securities Litigation...
Preemption of State Law Claims in Holocaust-Era Insurance Cases: Insights from IN RE ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI S.P.A. v. Weiss et al.

Preemption of State Law Claims in Holocaust-Era Insurance Cases: Insights from IN RE ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI S.P.A. v. Weiss et al.

Date: Jan 16, 2010
Preemption of State Law Claims in Holocaust-Era Insurance Cases: Insights from IN RE ASSICURAZIONI GENERALI S.P.A. v. Weiss et al. Introduction The case of In re Assicurazioni Generali, S.p.A., Dr....
Affirming Substantial Evidence in Disability Benefits Denial: Mancuso v. Astrue

Affirming Substantial Evidence in Disability Benefits Denial: Mancuso v. Astrue

Date: Jan 15, 2010
Affirming Substantial Evidence in Disability Benefits Denial: Mancuso v. Astrue Introduction Yvette Mancuso appealed the decision of the Commissioner of Social Security, Michael J. Astrue, who denied...
Expansion of Arbitrator’s Authority Under ICDR Article 30(1): T.CO Metals v. Dempsey Pipe Supply

Expansion of Arbitrator’s Authority Under ICDR Article 30(1): T.CO Metals v. Dempsey Pipe Supply

Date: Jan 15, 2010
Expansion of Arbitrator’s Authority Under ICDR Article 30(1): T.CO Metals v. Dempsey Pipe Supply Introduction The case of T.CO Metals, LLC v. Dempsey Pipe Supply, Inc., decided by the United States...
Establishing Plausibility of Antitrust Conspiracy Claims Under Twombly: Insights from Ke v. n STARR et al.

Establishing Plausibility of Antitrust Conspiracy Claims Under Twombly: Insights from Ke v. n STARR et al.

Date: Jan 14, 2010
Establishing Plausibility of Antitrust Conspiracy Claims Under Twombly: Insights from Ke v. n STARR et al. 1. Introduction Ke v. n STARR, Matt Putman, Cindy Seley, on behalf of herself and all others...
Overshadowing Validation Notices Under FDCPA: Ellis v. Solomon and Solomon, P.C.

Overshadowing Validation Notices Under FDCPA: Ellis v. Solomon and Solomon, P.C.

Date: Jan 14, 2010
Overshadowing Validation Notices Under FDCPA: Ellis v. Solomon and Solomon, P.C. Introduction In the landmark case of Janet Ellis v. Solomon and Solomon, P.C., adjudicated by the United States Court...
Reiseck v. Universal Communications: Defining the Administrative Exemption Under the FLSA

Reiseck v. Universal Communications: Defining the Administrative Exemption Under the FLSA

Date: Jan 12, 2010
Reiseck v. Universal Communications: Defining the Administrative Exemption Under the FLSA Introduction Reiseck v. Universal Communications of Miami, Inc. (591 F.3d 101, Second Circuit, 2010) is a...
Second Circuit Reinforces Evidentiary Standards for Rule 11 Sanctions: Kiobel v. Millson

Second Circuit Reinforces Evidentiary Standards for Rule 11 Sanctions: Kiobel v. Millson

Date: Jan 9, 2010
Second Circuit Reinforces Evidentiary Standards for Rule 11 Sanctions: Kiobel v. Millson Introduction In the landmark case Kiobel v. Millson, the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit...
Issuance of Pre-Arraignment Summons Without Restrictive Conditions Does Not Constitute a Fourth Amendment Seizure

Issuance of Pre-Arraignment Summons Without Restrictive Conditions Does Not Constitute a Fourth Amendment Seizure

Date: Jan 8, 2010
Issuance of Pre-Arraignment Summons Without Restrictive Conditions Does Not Constitute a Fourth Amendment Seizure Introduction In the landmark case of Judith A. Burg v. Colleen Gosselin, adjudicated...
Interpreting 'Punishable by Death' in RICO Murder Cases: Implications for Statute of Limitations

Interpreting 'Punishable by Death' in RICO Murder Cases: Implications for Statute of Limitations

Date: Jan 6, 2010
Interpreting 'Punishable by Death' in RICO Murder Cases: Implications for Statute of Limitations Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Adrian Payne, the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert