Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

2d Circuit Case Commentaries

Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force: Insights from Imani Brown v. City of New York

Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force: Insights from Imani Brown v. City of New York

Date: Aug 20, 2015
Qualified Immunity and Excessive Force: Insights from Imani Brown v. City of New York Introduction The case of Imani Brown v. City of New York presents a critical examination of law enforcement...
Consideration of Nonexertional Impairments in Social Security Disability Analysis

Consideration of Nonexertional Impairments in Social Security Disability Analysis

Date: Aug 15, 2015
Consideration of Nonexertional Impairments in Social Security Disability Analysis Introduction The case of David M. Michaels v. Carolyn W. Colvin addressed critical issues surrounding the...
Enhancing Eighth Amendment Protections: Crawford and Corley v. Cuomo Establishes Updated Standards for Sexual Abuse Claims in Prisons

Enhancing Eighth Amendment Protections: Crawford and Corley v. Cuomo Establishes Updated Standards for Sexual Abuse Claims in Prisons

Date: Aug 12, 2015
Enhancing Eighth Amendment Protections: Crawford and Corley v. Cuomo Establishes Updated Standards for Sexual Abuse Claims in Prisons Introduction The case of James Crawford and Thaddeus Corley v....
Revisiting Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases: Insights from Da v. d ROGOZ

Revisiting Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases: Insights from Da v. d ROGOZ

Date: Aug 11, 2015
Revisiting Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases: Insights from Da v. d ROGOZ Introduction Da v. d ROGOZ (796 F.3d 236, United States Court of Appeals, Second Circuit, 2015) is a pivotal case...
Strict Adherence to Appellate Mandates in Class Action Damages: Insights from Puricelli v. Republic of Argentina

Strict Adherence to Appellate Mandates in Class Action Damages: Insights from Puricelli v. Republic of Argentina

Date: Aug 11, 2015
Strict Adherence to Appellate Mandates in Class Action Damages: Insights from Puricelli v. Republic of Argentina Introduction The case of Eduardo Puricelli et al. v. Republic of Argentina, decided by...
Establishing Judicial Oversight in FLSA Settlements: Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House

Establishing Judicial Oversight in FLSA Settlements: Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House

Date: Aug 8, 2015
Establishing Judicial Oversight in FLSA Settlements: Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House Introduction In the case of Dorian Cheeks v. Freeport Pancake House, Inc., W.P.S. Industries, Inc. (796 F.3d 199,...
Affirmation of Racketeering Conspiracy Convictions: Insights from United States v. Gioeli & Saracino

Affirmation of Racketeering Conspiracy Convictions: Insights from United States v. Gioeli & Saracino

Date: Aug 6, 2015
Affirmation of Racketeering Conspiracy Convictions: Insights from United States v. Gioeli & Saracino Introduction The case of United States of America v. Joel Gioeli and Dino Saracino emerged as a...
Second Circuit Clarifies Statutes of Limitations under CFAA and SCA for Multiple Unauthorized Access Claims

Second Circuit Clarifies Statutes of Limitations under CFAA and SCA for Multiple Unauthorized Access Claims

Date: Aug 5, 2015
Second Circuit Clarifies Statutes of Limitations under CFAA and SCA for Multiple Unauthorized Access Claims Introduction The case of Chantay Sewell v. Phil Bernandin (795 F.3d 337) adjudicated by the...
Second Circuit Clarifies Pleading Standards for Title VII Disparate Treatment and Retaliation Claims

Second Circuit Clarifies Pleading Standards for Title VII Disparate Treatment and Retaliation Claims

Date: Aug 4, 2015
Second Circuit Clarifies Pleading Standards for Title VII Disparate Treatment and Retaliation Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Dawn F. Littlejohn v. City of New York, 795 F.3d 297 (2d Cir....
Munn v. Hotchkiss School: Duty of Care and Liability in Educational Trips

Munn v. Hotchkiss School: Duty of Care and Liability in Educational Trips

Date: Aug 4, 2015
Munn v. Hotchkiss School: Duty of Care and Liability in Educational Trips Introduction Munn v. Hotchkiss School is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Second...
Second Circuit Clarifies Application of Iqbal to Title VII Discrimination and Retaliation Claims in Littlejohn v. City of New York

Second Circuit Clarifies Application of Iqbal to Title VII Discrimination and Retaliation Claims in Littlejohn v. City of New York

Date: Aug 4, 2015
Second Circuit Clarifies Application of Iqbal to Title VII Discrimination and Retaliation Claims in Littlejohn v. City of New York Introduction In the case of Dawn F. Littlejohn v. City of New York...
Statistical Evidence Insufficient to Establish Discriminatory Intent in Equal Protection Claims: Analysis of Burgis v. NYC Dept. of Sanitation

Statistical Evidence Insufficient to Establish Discriminatory Intent in Equal Protection Claims: Analysis of Burgis v. NYC Dept. of Sanitation

Date: Aug 1, 2015
Statistical Evidence Insufficient to Establish Discriminatory Intent in Equal Protection Claims: Analysis of Burgis v. NYC Dept. of Sanitation Introduction Burgis v. NYC Department of Sanitation is a...
Statute of Limitations Enforced in Wrongful Levy Claims: Second Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Lavi v. MOTTAHEDEH

Statute of Limitations Enforced in Wrongful Levy Claims: Second Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Lavi v. MOTTAHEDEH

Date: Jul 29, 2015
Statute of Limitations Enforced in Wrongful Levy Claims: Second Circuit Upholds Dismissal in Lavi v. MOTTAHEDEH Introduction The case of Angela Lavi Mottahedeh v. United States adjudicated by the...
Second Circuit Affirms FAA Requires Stay of Proceedings When All Claims are Arbitrable

Second Circuit Affirms FAA Requires Stay of Proceedings When All Claims are Arbitrable

Date: Jul 29, 2015
Second Circuit Affirms FAA Requires Stay of Proceedings When All Claims are Arbitrable Introduction In Katz v. Cellco Partnership d/b/a Verizon Wireless, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Second Circuit Reaffirms ATS's Extraterritoriality Presumption and Limits Corporate Liability: Balintulo v. Ford Motor Co. & IBM

Second Circuit Reaffirms ATS's Extraterritoriality Presumption and Limits Corporate Liability: Balintulo v. Ford Motor Co. & IBM

Date: Jul 28, 2015
Second Circuit Reaffirms ATS's Extraterritoriality Presumption and Limits Corporate Liability: Balintulo v. Ford Motor Co. & IBM Introduction The case of Sakwe Balintulo, as personal representative...
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Fraud Conspiracy Cases: Romano v. United States

Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Fraud Conspiracy Cases: Romano v. United States

Date: Jul 28, 2015
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Fraud Conspiracy Cases: Romano v. United States Introduction In the appellate case United States of America v. Michael Romano and William Kearney, the United...
Second Circuit Affirms Plaintiffs’ Sufficiency on Securities Fraud Claims under PSLRA in ECA v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters

Second Circuit Affirms Plaintiffs’ Sufficiency on Securities Fraud Claims under PSLRA in ECA v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters

Date: Jul 25, 2015
Second Circuit Affirms Plaintiffs’ Sufficiency on Securities Fraud Claims under PSLRA in ECA v. Green Mountain Coffee Roasters Introduction In the landmark case Employees' Retirement System of...
Second Circuit Clarifies Fraud Pleading Requirements and Amendment Rights in Securities Litigation: Loreley Financing v. Wells Fargo Securities

Second Circuit Clarifies Fraud Pleading Requirements and Amendment Rights in Securities Litigation: Loreley Financing v. Wells Fargo Securities

Date: Jul 25, 2015
Second Circuit Clarifies Fraud Pleading Requirements and Amendment Rights in Securities Litigation: Loreley Financing v. Wells Fargo Securities Introduction The case of Loreley Financing (Jersey) No....
Strengthened Fraud Pleading Requirements and the Right to Amend in CDO Litigation: Analysis of Loreley Financing v. Wells Fargo

Strengthened Fraud Pleading Requirements and the Right to Amend in CDO Litigation: Analysis of Loreley Financing v. Wells Fargo

Date: Jul 25, 2015
Strengthened Fraud Pleading Requirements and the Right to Amend in CDO Litigation: Analysis of Loreley Financing v. Wells Fargo Introduction The financial crisis of 2007-2008 exposed significant...
Retaliation Against Inmate Grievance Representatives Recognized as Protected Conduct Under Section 1983

Retaliation Against Inmate Grievance Representatives Recognized as Protected Conduct Under Section 1983

Date: Jul 24, 2015
Retaliation Against Inmate Grievance Representatives Recognized as Protected Conduct Under Section 1983 Introduction The case of Rory Dolan v. William J. Connolly addresses significant issues...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert