Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Court Approval as a Condition Precedent for Lease Rejections under 11 U.S.C. § 365(a): Analysis of IN RE THINKING MACHINES CORPoration

Court Approval as a Condition Precedent for Lease Rejections under 11 U.S.C. § 365(a): Analysis of IN RE THINKING MACHINES CORPoration

Date: Oct 18, 1995
Court Approval as a Condition Precedent for Lease Rejections under 11 U.S.C. § 365(a): Analysis of IN RE THINKING MACHINES CORPoration Introduction The case of In re: Thinking Machines Corporation,...
Establishing Accrual Date for Section 1983 Claims in Malicious Prosecution Cases: Calero-Colon v. Betancourt-LeBron

Establishing Accrual Date for Section 1983 Claims in Malicious Prosecution Cases: Calero-Colon v. Betancourt-LeBron

Date: Oct 18, 1995
Establishing Accrual Date for Section 1983 Claims in Malicious Prosecution Cases: Calero-Colon v. Betancourt-LeBron Introduction The case of Calero-Colon v. Betancourt-LeBron addresses pivotal...
Reaffirmation of Mandamus Standards in Judicial Disqualification: In Re Cargill, Inc.

Reaffirmation of Mandamus Standards in Judicial Disqualification: In Re Cargill, Inc.

Date: Oct 11, 1995
Reaffirmation of Mandamus Standards in Judicial Disqualification: In Re Cargill, Inc. Introduction In Re Cargill, Inc. is a pivotal 1995 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the First...
Yvonne Alexis v. McDonald's: Defining State Action in Section 1981 and Section 1983 Civil Rights Claims

Yvonne Alexis v. McDonald's: Defining State Action in Section 1981 and Section 1983 Civil Rights Claims

Date: Oct 11, 1995
Yvonne Alexis v. McDonald's: Defining State Action in Section 1981 and Section 1983 Civil Rights Claims Introduction Yvonne A. Alexis, et al. filed a civil rights lawsuit against McDonald’s...
Notice of Likelihood vs. Practical Certainty: Aiding and Abetting Standards in United States v. Spinney

Notice of Likelihood vs. Practical Certainty: Aiding and Abetting Standards in United States v. Spinney

Date: Sep 20, 1995
Notice of Likelihood vs. Practical Certainty: Aiding and Abetting Standards in United States v. Spinney Introduction The case of United States of America v. Jeffrey W. Spinney, decided by the United...
Collateral Estoppel and Permanent Injunctions in Bankruptcy Reorganizations: Insights from Monarch Life Insurance Co. v. Ropes Gray

Collateral Estoppel and Permanent Injunctions in Bankruptcy Reorganizations: Insights from Monarch Life Insurance Co. v. Ropes Gray

Date: Sep 14, 1995
Collateral Estoppel and Permanent Injunctions in Bankruptcy Reorganizations: Insights from Monarch Life Insurance Co. v. Ropes Gray Introduction The case of Monarch Life Insurance Company, et al. v....
Deliberate Indifference in Correctional Medical Care: Insights from Mahan v. Plymouth County House of Corrections

Deliberate Indifference in Correctional Medical Care: Insights from Mahan v. Plymouth County House of Corrections

Date: Sep 8, 1995
Deliberate Indifference in Correctional Medical Care: Insights from Mahan v. Plymouth County House of Corrections Introduction The case of Richard Mahan and Felicia Mahan v. Plymouth County House of...
No Indemnification for Limited Partners in Absence of Attorney-Client Relationship: Hayes v. DEPCO

No Indemnification for Limited Partners in Absence of Attorney-Client Relationship: Hayes v. DEPCO

Date: Sep 8, 1995
No Indemnification for Limited Partners in Absence of Attorney-Client Relationship: Hayes v. DEPCO Introduction In the case Rhode Island Depositors Economic Protection Corp., et al. v. John A. Hayes...
Clarifying Procedural Arbitrability and Attorneys' Fees in Labor Arbitration: An Analysis of SEIU Local 285 v. Nonotuck Resource Associates, Inc.

Clarifying Procedural Arbitrability and Attorneys' Fees in Labor Arbitration: An Analysis of SEIU Local 285 v. Nonotuck Resource Associates, Inc.

Date: Sep 1, 1995
Clarifying Procedural Arbitrability and Attorneys' Fees in Labor Arbitration: An Analysis of SEIU Local 285 v. Nonotuck Resource Associates, Inc. Introduction The case of Local 285, Service Employees...
Probable Cause and Package Plea Agreements in UNITED STATES v. Martinez-Molina et al.

Probable Cause and Package Plea Agreements in UNITED STATES v. Martinez-Molina et al.

Date: Aug 31, 1995
Probable Cause and Package Plea Agreements in UNITED STATES v. Martinez-Molina et al. Introduction In the case of UNITED STATES v. Carlos Martinez-Molina, et al. (64 F.3d 719), the United States...
ERISA Safe Harbor Regulation Clarified: Employer Neutrality in Group Insurance Programs

ERISA Safe Harbor Regulation Clarified: Employer Neutrality in Group Insurance Programs

Date: Aug 24, 1995
ERISA Safe Harbor Regulation Clarified: Employer Neutrality in Group Insurance Programs Introduction The case of James Johnson v. Watts Regulator Company presents a pivotal examination of the...
Ensuring Informed Pleas: Insights from United States v. Roy Gray on Rule 11

Ensuring Informed Pleas: Insights from United States v. Roy Gray on Rule 11

Date: Aug 17, 1995
Ensuring Informed Pleas: Insights from United States v. Roy Gray on Rule 11 Introduction United States v. Roy Gray, 63 F.3d 57 (1st Cir. 1995), is a pivotal case that underscores the importance of...
Exclusivity of Administrative Review Under the OSH Act: NEA v. Secretary of Labor

Exclusivity of Administrative Review Under the OSH Act: NEA v. Secretary of Labor

Date: Aug 16, 1995
Exclusivity of Administrative Review Under the OSH Act: Northeast Erectors Association v. Secretary of Labor 1. Introduction The case of Northeast Erectors Association of the BTEA v. Secretary of...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ERISA Section 510 Case: Barbour v. Dynamics Research Corporation

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ERISA Section 510 Case: Barbour v. Dynamics Research Corporation

Date: Aug 16, 1995
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in ERISA Section 510 Case: Barbour v. Dynamics Research Corporation Introduction The case of Theodore M. Barbour v. Dynamics Research Corporation (DRC), adjudicated by...
Selective Enforcement and Retaliation in Civil Rights: Analysis of Rubinovitz v. Rogato

Selective Enforcement and Retaliation in Civil Rights: Analysis of Rubinovitz v. Rogato

Date: Aug 2, 1995
Selective Enforcement and Retaliation in Civil Rights: Analysis of Rubinovitz v. Rogato Introduction Rubinovitz v. Rogato, 60 F.3d 906 (1st Cir. 1995), is a significant appellate case that examines...
Reinstatement of Tax Evasion Convictions: Upholding the Viewpoint Principle in Evidentiary Sufficiency

Reinstatement of Tax Evasion Convictions: Upholding the Viewpoint Principle in Evidentiary Sufficiency

Date: Jul 27, 1995
Reinstatement of Tax Evasion Convictions: Upholding the Viewpoint Principle in Evidentiary Sufficiency Introduction The case of United States of America v. Anthony G. Olbres and Shirley A. Olbres,...
Procedural Framework for Rule 33 Motions During Direct Appeal: Insights from United States v. Graciani

Procedural Framework for Rule 33 Motions During Direct Appeal: Insights from United States v. Graciani

Date: Jul 25, 1995
Procedural Framework for Rule 33 Motions During Direct Appeal: Insights from United States v. Graciani Introduction The case of United States of America v. Edgar Graciani (61 F.3d 70, First Circuit,...
Affirmation of RICO Conspiracy and Vicarious Liability in United States v. Saccoccia et al.

Affirmation of RICO Conspiracy and Vicarious Liability in United States v. Saccoccia et al.

Date: Jul 25, 1995
Affirmation of RICO Conspiracy and Vicarious Liability in United States v. Saccoccia et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Saccoccia et al. involves a complex web of legal...
Withdrawal of Guilty Plea Post-Sentencing Requires Demonstrating a Fundamental Defect: United States v. Ferguson

Withdrawal of Guilty Plea Post-Sentencing Requires Demonstrating a Fundamental Defect: United States v. Ferguson

Date: Jul 21, 1995
Withdrawal of Guilty Plea Post-Sentencing Requires Demonstrating a Fundamental Defect: United States v. Ferguson Introduction Case: United States of America v. Mark A. Ferguson Court: United States...
First Circuit Establishes Due Process and NEPA Compliance in NRC Decommissioning Policies

First Circuit Establishes Due Process and NEPA Compliance in NRC Decommissioning Policies

Date: Jul 21, 1995
First Circuit Establishes Due Process and NEPA Compliance in NRC Decommissioning Policies Introduction In the landmark case of Citizens Awareness Network, Inc. v. United States Nuclear Regulatory...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert