Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Vacating a Guilty Plea Due to Misapplication of Safety Valve Provision: Insights from United States v. Hernandez-Wilson

Vacating a Guilty Plea Due to Misapplication of Safety Valve Provision: Insights from United States v. Hernandez-Wilson

Date: Jul 24, 1999
Vacating a Guilty Plea Due to Misapplication of Safety Valve Provision: Insights from United States v. Hernandez-Wilson Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Robert Ali...
Reaffirming BAKER v. McCOLLAN: Police Officers Shielded from §1983 Liability in Valid Warrant Arrests – Brady v. Dill

Reaffirming BAKER v. McCOLLAN: Police Officers Shielded from §1983 Liability in Valid Warrant Arrests – Brady v. Dill

Date: Jul 23, 1999
Reaffirming BAKER v. McCOLLAN: Police Officers Shielded from §1983 Liability in Valid Warrant Arrests – Brady v. Dill Introduction The case of Brady v. Dill, 187 F.3d 104 (1st Cir. 1999), addressed a...
Burden of Proof Allocation in Crashworthiness Cases: Insights from Trull v. Volkswagen

Burden of Proof Allocation in Crashworthiness Cases: Insights from Trull v. Volkswagen

Date: Jul 23, 1999
Burden of Proof Allocation in Crashworthiness Cases: Insights from Trull v. Volkswagen Introduction The case of Trull v. Volkswagen of America, Inc. (187 F.3d 88) adjudicated by the United States...
Objective Falsity as Preclusive on Defamation Claims: Insights from Faigin v. Kelly

Objective Falsity as Preclusive on Defamation Claims: Insights from Faigin v. Kelly

Date: Jul 20, 1999
Objective Falsity as Preclusive on Defamation Claims: Insights from Faigin v. Kelly Introduction A.J. Faigin v. James E. Kelly and Vic Carucci is a landmark defamation case adjudicated by the United...
Vieux v. Pepe: Clarifying the "Ordinary Course of Business" Exception in Federal Wiretapping Law

Vieux v. Pepe: Clarifying the "Ordinary Course of Business" Exception in Federal Wiretapping Law

Date: Jul 20, 1999
Vieux v. Pepe: Clarifying the "Ordinary Course of Business" Exception in Federal Wiretapping Law Introduction In the landmark case of Charles Vieux v. Peter A. Pepe, Jr., et al., the United States...
Notice Standard for Title VII Claims Established in Thomas v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Notice Standard for Title VII Claims Established in Thomas v. Eastman Kodak Co.

Date: Jul 16, 1999
Notice Standard for Title VII Claims Established in Thomas v. Eastman Kodak Co. Introduction In the landmark case Myrtle Thomas v. Eastman Kodak Company, the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Comprehensive Commentary on Wills v. Brown University: Hostile Environment under Title IX

Comprehensive Commentary on Wills v. Brown University: Hostile Environment under Title IX

Date: Jul 16, 1999
Comprehensive Commentary on Wills v. Brown University: Hostile Environment under Title IX Introduction Marketa Wills v. Brown University (184 F.3d 20) is a significant appellate case adjudicated by...
Affirming Insurer's Duty to Defend in the Absence of Employee Status: Franco v. Selective Insurance Company

Affirming Insurer's Duty to Defend in the Absence of Employee Status: Franco v. Selective Insurance Company

Date: Jul 15, 1999
Affirming Insurer's Duty to Defend in the Absence of Employee Status Introduction The case Michael Franco v. Selective Insurance Company (184 F.3d 4), decided by the United States Court of Appeals,...
Establishing Probable Cause in Residence Searches for Drug Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Feliz

Establishing Probable Cause in Residence Searches for Drug Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Feliz

Date: Jul 8, 1999
Establishing Probable Cause in Residence Searches for Drug Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Feliz Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Yanokura Feliz, the United States...
Affirmation of Racketeering Convictions Amidst Challenges to Jury Selection and Evidence Admissibility

Affirmation of Racketeering Convictions Amidst Challenges to Jury Selection and Evidence Admissibility

Date: Jul 1, 1999
Affirmation of Racketeering Convictions Amidst Challenges to Jury Selection and Evidence Admissibility Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Giovanni Lara et al. (181 F.3d...
Retaliation and Qualified Immunity in Prisoner Grievance Cases: Shabazz v. Cole and Matesanz

Retaliation and Qualified Immunity in Prisoner Grievance Cases: Shabazz v. Cole and Matesanz

Date: Jun 26, 1999
Retaliation and Qualified Immunity in Prisoner Grievance Cases: Shabazz v. Cole and Matesanz Introduction Ramadan Shabazz, an African-American inmate at the Bay State Correctional Center (BSCC) in...
Preemption of State Foreign Trade Regulations: Analysis of National Foreign Trade Council v. Natsios

Preemption of State Foreign Trade Regulations: Analysis of National Foreign Trade Council v. Natsios

Date: Jun 23, 1999
Preemption of State Foreign Trade Regulations: Analysis of National Foreign Trade Council v. Natsios Introduction The case of National Foreign Trade Council (NFTC) v. Andrew S. Natsios addresses the...
Koster v. Trans World Airlines: Refining Age Discrimination Remedies under Massachusetts Law

Koster v. Trans World Airlines: Refining Age Discrimination Remedies under Massachusetts Law

Date: Jun 22, 1999
Koster v. Trans World Airlines: Refining Age Discrimination Remedies under Massachusetts Law Introduction Koster v. Trans World Airlines, Inc., 181 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case in the...
Affirmation of AEDPA's One-Year Limitation Period for §2255 Motions in Rogers v. United States

Affirmation of AEDPA's One-Year Limitation Period for §2255 Motions in Rogers v. United States

Date: Jun 18, 1999
Affirmation of AEDPA's One-Year Limitation Period for §2255 Motions in Rogers v. United States Introduction Rogers v. United States is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Rodriguez-Cuervos v. Wal-Mart Initiates Critical Precedent on Burden-Shifting Framework in Discrimination Cases

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Rodriguez-Cuervos v. Wal-Mart Initiates Critical Precedent on Burden-Shifting Framework in Discrimination Cases

Date: Jun 12, 1999
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Rodriguez-Cuervos v. Wal-Mart Initiates Critical Precedent on Burden-Shifting Framework in Discrimination Cases Introduction The case of Jorge Rodriguez-Cuervos v....
Jurisdictional Bar Applied in Deportation Case: Maghsoudi v. INS

Jurisdictional Bar Applied in Deportation Case: Maghsoudi v. INS

Date: Jun 11, 1999
Jurisdictional Bar Applied in Deportation Case: Maghsoudi v. INS Introduction The case of Sasan Maghsoudi v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS) addresses the intricate intersection of...
Barrett v. United States: Reinforcing AEDPA Restrictions on Successive Post-Conviction Petitions

Barrett v. United States: Reinforcing AEDPA Restrictions on Successive Post-Conviction Petitions

Date: May 28, 1999
Barrett v. United States: Reinforcing AEDPA Restrictions on Successive Post-Conviction Petitions Introduction Barrett v. United States, 178 F.3d 34 (1st Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case that delves into...
Reaffirming the 'Deliberate Indifference' Standard in Eighth Amendment Prisoner Safety Claims

Reaffirming the 'Deliberate Indifference' Standard in Eighth Amendment Prisoner Safety Claims

Date: May 25, 1999
Reaffirming the 'Deliberate Indifference' Standard in Eighth Amendment Prisoner Safety Claims Introduction The case of Shawn Giroux v. Somerset County, Fred Hartley, and Barry DeLong (178 F.3d 28)...
Libby v. Magnusson: Clarifying AEDPA's Constraints on Successive Habeas Petitions

Libby v. Magnusson: Clarifying AEDPA's Constraints on Successive Habeas Petitions

Date: May 25, 1999
Libby v. Magnusson: Clarifying AEDPA's Constraints on Successive Habeas Petitions Introduction Libby v. Magnusson, 177 F.3d 43 (1st Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case addressing the stringent requirements...
Remittitur of Non-Economic Damages: An In-Depth Analysis of Smith v. Kmart Corporation

Remittitur of Non-Economic Damages: An In-Depth Analysis of Smith v. Kmart Corporation

Date: May 21, 1999
Remittitur of Non-Economic Damages: An In-Depth Analysis of Smith v. Kmart Corporation Introduction Smith v. Kmart Corporation is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert