Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Advancing Employment Discrimination Law: Circumstantial Evidence and Contractual Interpretation in Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R. Wireless Corp.

Advancing Employment Discrimination Law: Circumstantial Evidence and Contractual Interpretation in Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R. Wireless Corp.

Date: Jul 7, 2000
Advancing Employment Discrimination Law: Circumstantial Evidence and Contractual Interpretation in Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R. Wireless Corp. Introduction Santiago-Ramos v. Centennial P.R....
Federal Courts to Abstain from Pretrial Habeas Corpus Petitions Interfering with State Criminal Proceedings

Federal Courts to Abstain from Pretrial Habeas Corpus Petitions Interfering with State Criminal Proceedings

Date: Jul 4, 2000
Federal Courts to Abstain from Pretrial Habeas Corpus Petitions Interfering with State Criminal Proceedings Introduction The case In re: Justices of the Superior Court Department of the Massachusetts...
Expanding Privity in Rule 41(a)(2) Dismissals: Insights from John Doe v. Urohealth Systems, Inc.

Expanding Privity in Rule 41(a)(2) Dismissals: Insights from John Doe v. Urohealth Systems, Inc.

Date: Jun 27, 2000
Expanding Privity in Rule 41(a)(2) Dismissals: Insights from John Doe v. Urohealth Systems, Inc. Introduction John Doe v. Urohealth Systems, Inc. (216 F.3d 157, 2000) is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Jurisdictional Clarity in ICCTA Claims: Pejepscot Industrial Park v. Maine Central Railroad

Jurisdictional Clarity in ICCTA Claims: Pejepscot Industrial Park v. Maine Central Railroad

Date: Jun 24, 2000
Jurisdictional Clarity in ICCTA Claims: Pejepscot Industrial Park v. Maine Central Railroad 215 F.3d 195, United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit, June 23, 2000 Introduction The case of...
ERISA Preemption Revisited: First Circuit Abrogates Prior Holding in Carpenters Local Union No. 26 v. US Fidelity Guaranty Co.

ERISA Preemption Revisited: First Circuit Abrogates Prior Holding in Carpenters Local Union No. 26 v. US Fidelity Guaranty Co.

Date: Jun 17, 2000
ERISA Preemption Revisited: First Circuit Abrogates Prior Holding in Carpenters Local Union No. 26 v. US Fidelity Guaranty Co. Introduction The case of Carpenters Local Union No. 26, United...
First Circuit Upholds Conspiracy Conviction and Validates Inmate Call Recording under Title III

First Circuit Upholds Conspiracy Conviction and Validates Inmate Call Recording under Title III

Date: Jun 17, 2000
First Circuit Upholds Conspiracy Conviction and Validates Inmate Call Recording under Title III Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Troy Footman, the United States Court of...
Remand for Discovery Completion in Carmona v. Toledo Establishes Judicial Scrutiny on Summary Judgment Motions

Remand for Discovery Completion in Carmona v. Toledo Establishes Judicial Scrutiny on Summary Judgment Motions

Date: Jun 17, 2000
Remand for Discovery Completion in Carmona v. Toledo Establishes Judicial Scrutiny on Summary Judgment Motions Introduction Carmona Carmona, Etc., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Pedro A. Toledo, Etc.,...
Clarifying Direct Evidence and Mixed-Motive Jury Instructions in ADEA Cases: Analysis of Clemente Febres v. Challenger Caribbean Corp.

Clarifying Direct Evidence and Mixed-Motive Jury Instructions in ADEA Cases: Analysis of Clemente Febres v. Challenger Caribbean Corp.

Date: Jun 9, 2000
Clarifying Direct Evidence and Mixed-Motive Jury Instructions in ADEA Cases: Analysis of Clemente Febres v. Challenger Caribbean Corp. 1. Introduction Clemente Febres, A/K/A Clemente Febres-Morales,...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under IDEA: Affirmation in Rose v. Yeaw

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under IDEA: Affirmation in Rose v. Yeaw

Date: Jun 8, 2000
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under IDEA: Affirmation in Rose v. Yeaw Introduction The case of Wayne Rose and Donna Rose, individually and as parents and natural guardians of Wayne Rose, Jr.,...
Contingent Employment Offers and Contract Formation: Insights from Sands v. Ridefilm Corporation

Contingent Employment Offers and Contract Formation: Insights from Sands v. Ridefilm Corporation

Date: May 19, 2000
Contingent Employment Offers and Contract Formation: Insights from Sands v. Ridefilm Corporation Introduction In the landmark case of Howard Sands v. Ridefilm Corporation and Bernard Plishtin,...
Establishing Reasonableness in ADA Accommodations: Insights from Garcia-Ayala v. Lederle Parenterals, Inc.

Establishing Reasonableness in ADA Accommodations: Insights from Garcia-Ayala v. Lederle Parenterals, Inc.

Date: May 19, 2000
Establishing Reasonableness in ADA Accommodations: Insights from Garcia-Ayala v. Lederle Parenterals, Inc. Introduction Garcia-Ayala v. Lederle Parenterals, Inc., 212 F.3d 638 (1st Cir. 2000),...
Enhancing Protection Against Political Discrimination Within Political Factions: Padilla-García v. Rodríguez

Enhancing Protection Against Political Discrimination Within Political Factions: Padilla-García v. Rodríguez

Date: May 16, 2000
Enhancing Protection Against Political Discrimination Within Political Factions: Padilla-García v. Rodríguez Introduction The case of Santa Padilla-García v. José Guillermo Rodríguez, adjudicated by...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under IDEA Essential for Section 504 Retaliation Claims: Weber v. Cranston School Committee

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under IDEA Essential for Section 504 Retaliation Claims: Weber v. Cranston School Committee

Date: May 9, 2000
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under IDEA Essential for Section 504 Retaliation Claims: Weber v. Cranston School Committee Introduction The case of Melissa F. Weber versus Cranston School...
Finality and Appealability of "Without Prejudice" Dismissals: Mirpuri v. ACT Manufacturing

Finality and Appealability of "Without Prejudice" Dismissals: Mirpuri v. ACT Manufacturing

Date: May 6, 2000
Finality and Appealability of "Without Prejudice" Dismissals: Mirpuri v. ACT Manufacturing Introduction In the landmark case Mirpuri v. ACT Manufacturing, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for...
Limits on Warrantless Entries under the Fourth Amendment: Bilida v. McCleod Analysis

Limits on Warrantless Entries under the Fourth Amendment: Bilida v. McCleod Analysis

Date: May 6, 2000
Limits on Warrantless Entries under the Fourth Amendment: Bilida v. McCleod Analysis Introduction Bilida v. McCleod is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the First...
Application of the Windfall Elimination Provision in Clifford Ward v. Commissioner of Social Security

Application of the Windfall Elimination Provision in Clifford Ward v. Commissioner of Social Security

Date: May 3, 2000
Application of the Windfall Elimination Provision in Clifford Ward v. Commissioner of Social Security 1. Introduction Clifford Ward v. Commissioner of Social Security is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Affirmation of the "Shock the Conscience" Standard in Substantive Due Process Claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Cruz-Erazo v. Rivera-Montañez

Affirmation of the "Shock the Conscience" Standard in Substantive Due Process Claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Cruz-Erazo v. Rivera-Montañez

Date: May 3, 2000
Affirmation of the "Shock the Conscience" Standard in Substantive Due Process Claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Cruz-Erazo v. Rivera-Montañez Introduction The case of Maritza Cruz-Erazo et al. v. Carlos...
Res Judicata Reinforced in Employment Discrimination Cases: Boateng v. InterAmerican University

Res Judicata Reinforced in Employment Discrimination Cases: Boateng v. InterAmerican University

Date: Apr 19, 2000
Res Judicata Reinforced in Employment Discrimination Cases: Boateng v. InterAmerican University 1. Introduction The legal landscape of employment discrimination and contract disputes was...
Limitation of Bivens Actions Against Federal Agencies: Analysis of Ruiz Rivera v. Riley

Limitation of Bivens Actions Against Federal Agencies: Analysis of Ruiz Rivera v. Riley

Date: Apr 13, 2000
Limitation of Bivens Actions Against Federal Agencies: Analysis of Ruiz Rivera v. Riley Introduction Ruiz Rivera et al. v. Riley, 209 F.3d 24 (1st Cir. 2000), is a pivotal case that explores the...
Instituto de Educacion Universal v. U.S. Department of Education: Enhancing Corporate Access to Judicial Review and Liberal Pleading Interpretation

Instituto de Educacion Universal v. U.S. Department of Education: Enhancing Corporate Access to Judicial Review and Liberal Pleading Interpretation

Date: Apr 13, 2000
Instituto de Educacion Universal v. U.S. Department of Education: Enhancing Corporate Access to Judicial Review and Liberal Pleading Interpretation Introduction The case of Instituto de Educacion...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert