Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

First Circuit Reaffirms Due Process in Administrative Forfeiture: Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. United States

First Circuit Reaffirms Due Process in Administrative Forfeiture: Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. United States

Date: Jul 24, 2001
First Circuit Reaffirms Due Process in Administrative Forfeiture: Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. United States Introduction Manuel Gonzalez-Gonzalez v. United States is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
United States v. Brunette: Redefining Probable Cause and Good Faith in Child Pornography Investigations

United States v. Brunette: Redefining Probable Cause and Good Faith in Child Pornography Investigations

Date: Jul 13, 2001
United States v. Brunette: Redefining Probable Cause and Good Faith in Child Pornography Investigations Introduction The case of United States v. Brunette addresses critical issues surrounding the...
Reaffirming the Clear Error Standard in Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: The Valentin v. Hospital Bella Vista Decision

Reaffirming the Clear Error Standard in Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: The Valentin v. Hospital Bella Vista Decision

Date: Jun 28, 2001
Reaffirming the Clear Error Standard in Subject-Matter Jurisdiction: The Valentin v. Hospital Bella Vista Decision Introduction The case of Helga E. Valentin v. Hospital Bella Vista, decided by the...
Mootness in Class Action Litigation: Insights from Cruz v. Farquharson

Mootness in Class Action Litigation: Insights from Cruz v. Farquharson

Date: Jun 13, 2001
Mootness in Class Action Litigation: Insights from Cruz v. Farquharson Introduction The landmark case of Maria Antonia Cruz, et al. v. Steven J. Farquharson, decided by the United States Court of...
Essential Job Functions and Reasonable Accommodations under the ADA: A Comprehensive Commentary on Phelps v. Optima Health, Inc.

Essential Job Functions and Reasonable Accommodations under the ADA: A Comprehensive Commentary on Phelps v. Optima Health, Inc.

Date: May 31, 2001
Essential Job Functions and Reasonable Accommodations under the ADA: A Comprehensive Commentary on Phelps v. Optima Health, Inc. Introduction In the case of Simonne Phelps, Plaintiff, Appellant v....
Enforcement of Amount in Controversy Requirement in Class Actions under 28 U.S.C. §1332: Spielman v. Genzyme

Enforcement of Amount in Controversy Requirement in Class Actions under 28 U.S.C. §1332: Spielman v. Genzyme

Date: May 25, 2001
Enforcement of Amount in Controversy Requirement in Class Actions under 28 U.S.C. §1332: Spielman v. Genzyme Introduction Spielman v. Genzyme Corp. is a landmark decision by the United States Court...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Straughn v. Delta Air Lines: No Discrimination Found in Employment Termination

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Straughn v. Delta Air Lines: No Discrimination Found in Employment Termination

Date: May 18, 2001
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Straughn v. Delta Air Lines: No Discrimination Found in Employment Termination Introduction Case: Claire A. Straughn v. Delta Air Lines, Inc. Court: United States...
Wilson v. Union Underwear Company: Establishing Limits on Failure to Warn Claims Under the Flammable Fabrics Act

Wilson v. Union Underwear Company: Establishing Limits on Failure to Warn Claims Under the Flammable Fabrics Act

Date: May 18, 2001
Wilson v. Union Underwear Company: Establishing Limits on Failure to Warn Claims Under the Flammable Fabrics Act Introduction In Wilson v. Union Underwear Company, Inc., the United States Court of...
First Circuit Upholds Maine Rx Program: Implications for Preemption and Dormant Commerce Clause

First Circuit Upholds Maine Rx Program: Implications for Preemption and Dormant Commerce Clause

Date: May 17, 2001
First Circuit Upholds Maine Rx Program: Implications for Preemption and Dormant Commerce Clause Introduction The case of Pharmaceutical Research and Manufacturers of America (PhRMA) v. Ke (249 F.3d...
Cody v. United States: Standards for Ineffective Assistance and Plea Voluntariness

Cody v. United States: Standards for Ineffective Assistance and Plea Voluntariness

Date: May 12, 2001
Cody v. United States: Standards for Ineffective Assistance and Plea Voluntariness Introduction The case of Michael Cody v. United States of America (249 F.3d 47) adjudicated by the United States...
Geffon v. Micrion Corp. (1st Cir.): Establishing the Necessity of Demonstrating Scienter in Securities Fraud Litigation

Geffon v. Micrion Corp. (1st Cir.): Establishing the Necessity of Demonstrating Scienter in Securities Fraud Litigation

Date: May 11, 2001
Geffon v. Micrion Corp. (1st Cir.): Establishing the Necessity of Demonstrating Scienter in Securities Fraud Litigation Introduction Geffon v. Micrion Corp. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Strict Enforcement of Mandatory Expert Disclosures: Ortiz-Lopez v. Sociedad Española de Auxilio Mutuo

Strict Enforcement of Mandatory Expert Disclosures: Ortiz-Lopez v. Sociedad Española de Auxilio Mutuo

Date: May 4, 2001
Strict Enforcement of Mandatory Expert Disclosures: Ortiz-Lopez v. Sociedad Española de Auxilio Mutuo Introduction The case of Jose Antonio Ortiz-Lopez, et al. v. Sociedad Española de Auxilio Mutuo y...
Affirmation of Employer's Right to Enforce Strict Personnel Policies in Wrongful Termination Cases

Affirmation of Employer's Right to Enforce Strict Personnel Policies in Wrongful Termination Cases

Date: May 4, 2001
Affirmation of Employer's Right to Enforce Strict Personnel Policies in Wrongful Termination Cases 1. Introduction The case of Francisco Corrada Betances v. Sea-Land Service, Inc. (248 F.3d 40)...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in RICO Claims Against Manufacturers Due to Insufficient Evidence of Complicity: Perez v. Volvo

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in RICO Claims Against Manufacturers Due to Insufficient Evidence of Complicity: Perez v. Volvo

Date: May 3, 2001
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in RICO Claims Against Manufacturers Due to Insufficient Evidence of Complicity: Perez v. Volvo Introduction In Alma I. Perez et al. v. Volvo Car Corporation, 247 F.3d...
Establishing Prevailing Party Status and Fee Calculation under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Insights from Gay Officers Action League v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

Establishing Prevailing Party Status and Fee Calculation under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Insights from Gay Officers Action League v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico

Date: Apr 24, 2001
Establishing Prevailing Party Status and Fee Calculation under 42 U.S.C. § 1988: Insights from Gay Officers Action League v. Commonwealth of Puerto Rico Introduction Gay Officers Action League, et...
Guilty Plea and Drug Quantity Admission Circumvent Apprendi Error: United States v. Duarte, Jr.

Guilty Plea and Drug Quantity Admission Circumvent Apprendi Error: United States v. Duarte, Jr.

Date: Apr 18, 2001
Guilty Plea and Drug Quantity Admission Circumvent Apprendi Error: United States v. Duarte, Jr. Introduction United States v. Duarte, Jr. is a pivotal appellate decision by the United States Court of...
Enforcing Local Rule 311.12 in Summary Judgment: Comprehensive Commentary on Morales v. Orssleff's EFTF

Enforcing Local Rule 311.12 in Summary Judgment: Comprehensive Commentary on Morales v. Orssleff's EFTF

Date: Apr 12, 2001
Enforcing Local Rule 311.12 in Summary Judgment: Comprehensive Commentary on Morales v. Orssleff's EFTF 1. Introduction Morales v. Orssleff's EFTF, 246 F.3d 32 (1st Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case that...
COLLINS v. BOARD OF ALDERMEN: Upholding Strict Criteria for §1983 Claims and Defamation Limitations

COLLINS v. BOARD OF ALDERMEN: Upholding Strict Criteria for §1983 Claims and Defamation Limitations

Date: Apr 6, 2001
COLLINS v. BOARD OF ALDERMEN: Upholding Strict Criteria for §1983 Claims and Defamation Limitations Introduction In COLLINS v. BOARD OF ALDERMEN, Gary J. Collins, operating as Car Place Wholesalers,...
Reed v. LePage Bakeries: Clarifying the Burden of Proof in ADA Reasonable Accommodation Litigation

Reed v. LePage Bakeries: Clarifying the Burden of Proof in ADA Reasonable Accommodation Litigation

Date: Apr 6, 2001
Reed v. LePage Bakeries: Clarifying the Burden of Proof in ADA Reasonable Accommodation Litigation Introduction Reed v. LePage Bakeries, Inc., 244 F.3d 254 (1st Cir. 2001), presents a significant...
First Circuit Upholds 'No Property Interest' in Discretionary Tax Credits and Enforces Strict 'Similarly Situated' Standard in Equal Protection Challenges

First Circuit Upholds 'No Property Interest' in Discretionary Tax Credits and Enforces Strict 'Similarly Situated' Standard in Equal Protection Challenges

Date: Apr 6, 2001
First Circuit Upholds 'No Property Interest' in Discretionary Tax Credits and Enforces Strict 'Similarly Situated' Standard in Equal Protection Challenges Introduction Barrington Cove Limited...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert