Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Reaffirming Standards for Franks Motions, Jury Instructions, and Loss Calculations in Mail and Wire Fraud Cases: United States v. Ranney & Cioffi

Reaffirming Standards for Franks Motions, Jury Instructions, and Loss Calculations in Mail and Wire Fraud Cases: United States v. Ranney & Cioffi

Date: Aug 2, 2002
Reaffirming Standards for Franks Motions, Jury Instructions, and Loss Calculations in Mail and Wire Fraud Cases: United States v. Ranney & Cioffi Introduction In the landmark case of United States of...
First Circuit Clarifies FOIA Exemptions: Rejecting 'Primarily for Litigation' Standard in Work-Product Claims

First Circuit Clarifies FOIA Exemptions: Rejecting 'Primarily for Litigation' Standard in Work-Product Claims

Date: Jul 31, 2002
First Circuit Clarifies FOIA Exemptions: Rejecting 'Primarily for Litigation' Standard in Work-Product Claims Introduction The case of State of Maine v. United States Department of the Interior,...
Piper v. United States: Reevaluation of Coconspirator Hearsay Exceptions

Piper v. United States: Reevaluation of Coconspirator Hearsay Exceptions

Date: Jul 27, 2002
Piper v. United States: Reevaluation of Coconspirator Hearsay Exceptions Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Stanley M. Piper, 298 F.3d 47 (1st Cir. 2002), the United States Court...
Defining Finality and Procedural Default Post-Apprendi: Commentary on Derman v. United States

Defining Finality and Procedural Default Post-Apprendi: Commentary on Derman v. United States

Date: Jul 26, 2002
Defining Finality and Procedural Default Post-Apprendi: Commentary on Derman v. United States Introduction Derman v. United States, 298 F.3d 34 (1st Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case that delves into the...
Strict Enforcement of Scheduling Orders in Civil Litigation: Insights from Tower Ventures, Inc. v. City of Westfield

Strict Enforcement of Scheduling Orders in Civil Litigation: Insights from Tower Ventures, Inc. v. City of Westfield

Date: Jul 24, 2002
Strict Enforcement of Scheduling Orders in Civil Litigation: Insights from Tower Ventures, Inc. v. City of Westfield Introduction The case of Tower Ventures, Inc. v. City of Westfield, adjudicated by...
Effective Prohibition of Wireless Services: Insights from National Tower, LLC v. Plainville Zoning Board of Appeals

Effective Prohibition of Wireless Services: Insights from National Tower, LLC v. Plainville Zoning Board of Appeals

Date: Jul 19, 2002
Effective Prohibition of Wireless Services: Insights from National Tower, LLC v. Plainville Zoning Board of Appeals Introduction The case of National Tower, LLC; Omnipoint Communications, Inc. v....
Limiting the Scope of Section 1981 in Retail Discrimination Claims: Garrett v. Tandy Corporation

Limiting the Scope of Section 1981 in Retail Discrimination Claims: Garrett v. Tandy Corporation

Date: Jul 10, 2002
Limiting the Scope of Section 1981 in Retail Discrimination Claims: Garrett v. Tandy Corporation Introduction In Garrett v. Tandy Corporation d/b/a Radio Shack (295 F.3d 94, 2002), the United States...
Affirming the Threshold of Disability in ADA Claims: Carroll v. Xerox Corporation

Affirming the Threshold of Disability in ADA Claims: Carroll v. Xerox Corporation

Date: Jun 29, 2002
Affirming the Threshold of Disability in ADA Claims: Carroll v. Xerox Corporation Introduction Carroll v. Xerox Corporation, 294 F.3d 231 (1st Cir. 2002), is a significant appellate decision that...
Strategic Litigation Choices Bound Appellate Review in Excessive Force Claims: Wilson v. Town of Mendon

Strategic Litigation Choices Bound Appellate Review in Excessive Force Claims: Wilson v. Town of Mendon

Date: Jun 18, 2002
Strategic Litigation Choices Bound Appellate Review in Excessive Force Claims: Wilson v. Town of Mendon Introduction In Richard E. Wilson v. Town of Mendon, James Crosby, and Dennis Grady, 294 F.3d 1...
Effective Assistance of Counsel: Broken Promise in OUBER v. GUARINO Establishes New Standards

Effective Assistance of Counsel: Broken Promise in OUBER v. GUARINO Establishes New Standards

Date: Jun 18, 2002
Effective Assistance of Counsel: Broken Promise in OUBER v. GUARINO Establishes New Standards Introduction The case of Barbara Ouber, Petitioner, Appellee v. Barbara Guarino, Respondent, Appellant,...
Overturning Blanket Nonfiling Policies: Enhancing Public Access Rights Under the First Amendment

Overturning Blanket Nonfiling Policies: Enhancing Public Access Rights Under the First Amendment

Date: Jun 13, 2002
Overturning Blanket Nonfiling Policies: Enhancing Public Access Rights Under the First Amendment Introduction The case of In Re Providence Journal Company, Inc. (293 F.3d 1) presents a significant...
Jurisdictional Abstention in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In re Middlesex Power Equipment Marine, Inc.

Jurisdictional Abstention in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In re Middlesex Power Equipment Marine, Inc.

Date: Jun 12, 2002
Jurisdictional Abstention in Bankruptcy Proceedings: Insights from In re Middlesex Power Equipment Marine, Inc. Introduction The case of In re Middlesex Power Equipment Marine, Inc., Debtor examines...
Rescission Under TILA Does Not Void Arbitration Clauses: First Circuit Upholds Mandatory Arbitration

Rescission Under TILA Does Not Void Arbitration Clauses: First Circuit Upholds Mandatory Arbitration

Date: Jun 7, 2002
Rescission Under TILA Does Not Void Arbitration Clauses: First Circuit Upholds Mandatory Arbitration Introduction The case of William E. Large and Diane A. Large v. Conseco Finance Servicing...
Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under PLRA: A Comprehensive Analysis of Medina-Claudio v. Rodríguez-Mateo

Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under PLRA: A Comprehensive Analysis of Medina-Claudio v. Rodríguez-Mateo

Date: Jun 5, 2002
Mandatory Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under PLRA: A Comprehensive Analysis of Medina-Claudio v. Rodríguez-Mateo Introduction Medina-Claudio v. Rodríguez-Mateo, 292 F.3d 31 (1st Cir. 2002),...
Constructive Obligations in Hostile Work Environment Claims: Insights from Gorski v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections

Constructive Obligations in Hostile Work Environment Claims: Insights from Gorski v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections

Date: May 25, 2002
Constructive Obligations in Hostile Work Environment Claims: Insights from Gorski v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections Introduction In Tara Gorski v. New Hampshire Department of Corrections,...
Tse v. United States: Establishing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Plea Negotiations

Tse v. United States: Establishing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Plea Negotiations

Date: May 18, 2002
Tse v. United States: Establishing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Plea Negotiations Introduction In Stephen Tse v. United States (290 F.3d 462), the United States Court of Appeals...
Randall J. Cofske v. United States: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Prior Convictions under U.S.S.G § 2K2.1

Randall J. Cofske v. United States: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Prior Convictions under U.S.S.G § 2K2.1

Date: May 14, 2002
Randall J. Cofske v. United States: Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Prior Convictions under U.S.S.G § 2K2.1 Introduction Randall J. Cofske v. United States is a pivotal appellate decision...
Imputation of Contacts in Personal Jurisdiction: Daynard v. Scruggs Defendants

Imputation of Contacts in Personal Jurisdiction: Daynard v. Scruggs Defendants

Date: May 11, 2002
Imputation of Contacts in Personal Jurisdiction: Daynard v. Scruggs Defendants Introduction Daynard v. Scruggs Defendants is a significant case from the United States Court of Appeals for the First...
Karak v. Bursaw Oil Corp.: Affirmation of Rule 60(b) Restrictions

Karak v. Bursaw Oil Corp.: Affirmation of Rule 60(b) Restrictions

Date: May 3, 2002
Karak v. Bursaw Oil Corp.: Affirmation of Rule 60(b) Restrictions Introduction Karak v. Bursaw Oil Corp., 288 F.3d 15 (1st Cir. 2002), is a pivotal appellate decision that underscores the stringent...
The Impact of Procedural Default in Felony Murder Cases: An Analysis of Gunter v. Maloney

The Impact of Procedural Default in Felony Murder Cases: An Analysis of Gunter v. Maloney

Date: Apr 30, 2002
The Impact of Procedural Default in Felony Murder Cases: An Analysis of Gunter v. Maloney Introduction Paul Gunter, the petitioner, was convicted in 1996 of felony murder and other charges in...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert