Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Mandated Detention Interpretations under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c): Insights from Houng Saysana v. Brian H. Gillen

Mandated Detention Interpretations under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c): Insights from Houng Saysana v. Brian H. Gillen

Date: Dec 23, 2009
Mandated Detention Interpretations under 8 U.S.C. § 1226(c): Insights from Houng Saysana v. Brian H. Gillen Introduction Houng Saysana v. Brian H. Gillen is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Reclassification of ADA Employment Discrimination Claims under the Bankruptcy Code: Rederford v. US Airways

Reclassification of ADA Employment Discrimination Claims under the Bankruptcy Code: Rederford v. US Airways

Date: Dec 15, 2009
Reclassification of ADA Employment Discrimination Claims under the Bankruptcy Code: Rederford v. US Airways Introduction Rederford v. US Airways, Inc., 589 F.3d 30 (1st Cir. 2009), is a pivotal case...
Affirming Sentencing Discretion and Waiver of Appeal in Federal Conspiracy Cases: USA v. Carrasco-de-Jesús

Affirming Sentencing Discretion and Waiver of Appeal in Federal Conspiracy Cases: USA v. Carrasco-de-Jesús

Date: Dec 12, 2009
Affirming Sentencing Discretion and Waiver of Appeal in Federal Conspiracy Cases: USA v. Carrasco-de-Jesús Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Oneida Carrasco-de-Jesús,...
Affirmation of Preliminary Injunction in Milk Industry Regulation: Establishing Due Process and Equal Protection Standards

Affirmation of Preliminary Injunction in Milk Industry Regulation: Establishing Due Process and Equal Protection Standards

Date: Nov 24, 2009
Affirmation of Preliminary Injunction in Milk Industry Regulation: Establishing Due Process and Equal Protection Standards Introduction The case of Vaquería Tres Monjitas, Inc.; Suiza Dairy, Inc. v....
Affirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard in Granting Motions for New Trial: JENNINGS v. JONES

Affirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard in Granting Motions for New Trial: JENNINGS v. JONES

Date: Nov 20, 2009
Affirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard in Granting Motions for New Trial: JENNINGS v. JONES Introduction JENNINGS v. JONES, 587 F.3d 430 (1st Cir. 2009), is a pivotal case in the realm of civil...
Affirmation of Cy Pres Distribution in Class Action Settlement: IN RE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE Price Litigation

Affirmation of Cy Pres Distribution in Class Action Settlement: IN RE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE Price Litigation

Date: Nov 20, 2009
Affirmation of Cy Pres Distribution in Class Action Settlement: IN RE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE Price Litigation Introduction The case of IN RE PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE...
Administrative Exhaustion Limits in ADA Disability Discrimination: Insights from Thornton v. UPS

Administrative Exhaustion Limits in ADA Disability Discrimination: Insights from Thornton v. UPS

Date: Nov 13, 2009
Administrative Exhaustion Limits in ADA Disability Discrimination: Insights from Thornton v. UPS Introduction The case of Charles Thornton v. United Parcel Service, Inc. (587 F.3d 27) addresses...
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Affirmed in Parental Rights Termination Case

Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Affirmed in Parental Rights Termination Case

Date: Nov 5, 2009
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Affirmed in Parental Rights Termination Case Introduction The case of Janeen Miller and James Mahood v. Kristen Nichols and Brenda Harvey [586 F.3d 53] presents a significant...
Affirmation of Political Discrimination and Retaliation Claims under §1983: Limitations on Abstention Doctrines and Immunity Defenses

Affirmation of Political Discrimination and Retaliation Claims under §1983: Limitations on Abstention Doctrines and Immunity Defenses

Date: Oct 30, 2009
Affirmation of Political Discrimination and Retaliation Claims under §1983: Limitations on Abstention Doctrines and Immunity Defenses Introduction In the case of Andrés Guillemard-Ginorio et al. v....
Federal Preemption of State Coastal Regulations in LNG Terminal Development: Weaver's Cove Energy v. CRMC

Federal Preemption of State Coastal Regulations in LNG Terminal Development: Weaver's Cove Energy v. CRMC

Date: Oct 27, 2009
Federal Preemption of State Coastal Regulations in LNG Terminal Development: Weaver's Cove Energy v. CRMC Introduction The case of Weaver's Cove Energy, LLC v. Rhode Island Coastal Resources...
Affirmation of Personal Jurisdiction and Enforceability of Non-Competition Clauses in ASTRO-MED v. NIHON KOHDEN AMERICA

Affirmation of Personal Jurisdiction and Enforceability of Non-Competition Clauses in ASTRO-MED v. NIHON KOHDEN AMERICA

Date: Oct 23, 2009
Affirmation of Personal Jurisdiction and Enforceability of Non-Competition Clauses in ASTRO-MED, INC. v. NIHON KOHDEN AMERICA, INC. Introduction The case of ASTRO-MED, INC. v. NIHON KOHDEN AMERICA,...
First Circuit Vacates Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Emphasizing Pretext and Disparate Treatment under ADEA

First Circuit Vacates Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Emphasizing Pretext and Disparate Treatment under ADEA

Date: Oct 17, 2009
First Circuit Vacates Summary Judgment in Age Discrimination Case: Emphasizing Pretext and Disparate Treatment under ADEA Introduction In the case of José Vélez v. Thermo King de Puerto Rico, Inc.,...
Affirmation of Liability for AWP Inflation as Unfair and Deceptive under Chapter 93A

Affirmation of Liability for AWP Inflation as Unfair and Deceptive under Chapter 93A

Date: Sep 24, 2009
Affirmation of Liability for AWP Inflation as Unfair and Deceptive under Chapter 93A Introduction The case of Blue Cross Blue Shield of Massachusetts, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellees, v. AstraZeneca...
First Circuit Affirms Government Speech Doctrine in Epping Residents for Principled Government v. Epping School District

First Circuit Affirms Government Speech Doctrine in Epping Residents for Principled Government v. Epping School District

Date: Sep 18, 2009
First Circuit Affirms Government Speech Doctrine in Epping Residents for Principled Government v. Epping School District Introduction In the landmark decision of Thomas Sutliffe et al. v. Epping...
Interpreting EMTALA's Stabilization Duty: Insights from Pro v. Alvarez-Torres et al.

Interpreting EMTALA's Stabilization Duty: Insights from Pro v. Alvarez-Torres et al.

Date: Sep 5, 2009
Interpreting EMTALA's Stabilization Duty: Insights from Pro v. Alvarez-Torres et al. Introduction Pro v. Alvarez-Torres et al., 582 F.3d 47 (1st Cir. 2009), is a pivotal case addressing the...
Reaffirmation of Juvenile Handgun Possession Restrictions Under the Second Amendment

Reaffirmation of Juvenile Handgun Possession Restrictions Under the Second Amendment

Date: Sep 1, 2009
Reaffirmation of Juvenile Handgun Possession Restrictions Under the Second Amendment Introduction The case of United States of America v. Rene E., Ju, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Limone v. United States: Affirming FTCA Liability for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Limone v. United States: Affirming FTCA Liability for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress

Date: Aug 28, 2009
Limone v. United States: Affirming FTCA Liability for Intentional Infliction of Emotional Distress Introduction Limone v. United States, 579 F.3d 79 (1st Cir. 2009), is a landmark case adjudicated by...
Statute of Limitations and Extrajudicial Claims under §1983: Insights from Santana-Castro v. Toledo-Dávila

Statute of Limitations and Extrajudicial Claims under §1983: Insights from Santana-Castro v. Toledo-Dávila

Date: Aug 28, 2009
Statute of Limitations and Extrajudicial Claims under §1983: Insights from Santana-Castro v. Toledo-Dávila Introduction The case Charles Santana-Castro et al. v. Pedro Toledo-Dávila et al....
Defining 'Newly Discovered Evidence' under Federal Rule 33: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Lenz

Defining 'Newly Discovered Evidence' under Federal Rule 33: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Lenz

Date: Aug 15, 2009
Defining 'Newly Discovered Evidence' under Federal Rule 33: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Lenz Introduction The case of United States of America v. Daniel Moses Lenz (577 F.3d 377)...
Clarifying the 'Original Source' Exception under the False Claims Act: First Circuit's Interpretation in Duxbury v. Ortho Biotech Products

Clarifying the 'Original Source' Exception under the False Claims Act: First Circuit's Interpretation in Duxbury v. Ortho Biotech Products

Date: Aug 13, 2009
Clarifying the 'Original Source' Exception under the False Claims Act: First Circuit's Interpretation in Duxbury v. Ortho Biotech Products Introduction In United States ex rel. Mark Eugene Duxbury...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert