Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Upholding First Amendment Protections in Public Employee Retaliation: Brasslett v. Cota

Upholding First Amendment Protections in Public Employee Retaliation: Brasslett v. Cota

Date: May 17, 1985
Upholding First Amendment Protections in Public Employee Retaliation: Brasslett v. Cota Introduction In the landmark case of Brasslett v. Cota, the United States Court of Appeals for the First...
Enhancing Miranda Protections: The Porter Decision

Enhancing Miranda Protections: The Porter Decision

Date: May 15, 1985
Enhancing Miranda Protections: The Porter Decision Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Porter, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the First Circuit in 1985,...
Affirmation of Residual Functional Capacity Assessment and Consideration of Past Work in Disability Claims: Gray v. Heckler

Affirmation of Residual Functional Capacity Assessment and Consideration of Past Work in Disability Claims: Gray v. Heckler

Date: May 1, 1985
Affirmation of Residual Functional Capacity Assessment and Consideration of Past Work in Disability Claims: Gray v. Heckler Introduction The case of Elaine Gray v. Margaret Heckler, Secretary of...
BARBER v. PONTE: Redefining Cognizable Groups in Jury Selection

BARBER v. PONTE: Redefining Cognizable Groups in Jury Selection

Date: Apr 5, 1985
BARBER v. PONTE: Redefining Cognizable Groups in Jury Selection Introduction BARBER v. PONTE, 772 F.2d 982, is a landmark case decided by the United States Court of Appeals, First Circuit in 1985....
Finality in Bankruptcy Appeals: Jurisdictional Limits Established by In Re American Colonial Broadcasting Corp.

Finality in Bankruptcy Appeals: Jurisdictional Limits Established by In Re American Colonial Broadcasting Corp.

Date: Apr 4, 1985
Finality in Bankruptcy Appeals: Jurisdictional Limits Established by In Re American Colonial Broadcasting Corp. Introduction The case of In Re American Colonial Broadcasting Corp., Debtor, decided by...
Voutour v. Vitale et al.: Establishing Standards for Section 1983 Claims in Police Conduct Cases

Voutour v. Vitale et al.: Establishing Standards for Section 1983 Claims in Police Conduct Cases

Date: Mar 30, 1985
Voutour v. Vitale et al.: Establishing Standards for Section 1983 Claims in Police Conduct Cases Introduction The case of James T. Voutour v. Harold Vitale et al., decided by the United States Court...
Establishing 'Severe Impairment' in Disability Claims: Analysis of Carrillo Marin v. HHS

Establishing 'Severe Impairment' in Disability Claims: Analysis of Carrillo Marin v. HHS

Date: Mar 29, 1985
Establishing 'Severe Impairment' in Disability Claims: Analysis of Carrillo Marin v. HHS Introduction In Carrillo Marin v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 758 F.2d 14 (1st Cir. 1985), the...
Negligence and Civil Penalties under 19 U.S.C. § 1592: An Analysis of UNITED STATES v. VEN-FUEL, INC.

Negligence and Civil Penalties under 19 U.S.C. § 1592: An Analysis of UNITED STATES v. VEN-FUEL, INC.

Date: Mar 22, 1985
Negligence and Civil Penalties under 19 U.S.C. § 1592: An Analysis of UNITED STATES v. VEN-FUEL, INC. Introduction UNITED STATES v. VEN-FUEL, INC. is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court...
Rose Dionne v. Gerard Bouley: Establishing Due Process Protections in Post-Judgment Garnishment Procedures

Rose Dionne v. Gerard Bouley: Establishing Due Process Protections in Post-Judgment Garnishment Procedures

Date: Mar 20, 1985
Rose Dionne v. Gerard Bouley: Establishing Due Process Protections in Post-Judgment Garnishment Procedures Introduction Rose Dionne v. Gerard Bouley is a landmark case decided by the United States...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Federal Employment Discrimination Claims: Castro v. United States

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Federal Employment Discrimination Claims: Castro v. United States

Date: Mar 15, 1985
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Federal Employment Discrimination Claims: Castro v. United States Introduction Castro v. United States of America, et al., 775 F.2d 399 (1st Cir. 1985), is a...
Hearsay Evidence in Pretrial Detention: Insights from United States v. Acevedo-Ramos

Hearsay Evidence in Pretrial Detention: Insights from United States v. Acevedo-Ramos

Date: Feb 26, 1985
Hearsay Evidence in Pretrial Detention: Insights from United States v. Acevedo-Ramos Introduction United States of America v. Hector Acevedo-Ramos, 755 F.2d 203 (1st Cir. 1985), is a pivotal...
Established Rebuttable Presumptions for Flight Risk in Bail Reform Act of 1984: United States v. Jessup

Established Rebuttable Presumptions for Flight Risk in Bail Reform Act of 1984: United States v. Jessup

Date: Feb 26, 1985
Validation of Rebuttable Presumptions in Bail Decisions: United States v. Jessup Introduction The case of United States of America v. Mark Jessup, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Private Enforcement of Antitrust Laws: Expanding Injunctive Remedies through §16 of the Clayton Act

Private Enforcement of Antitrust Laws: Expanding Injunctive Remedies through §16 of the Clayton Act

Date: Feb 7, 1985
Private Enforcement of Antitrust Laws: Expanding Injunctive Remedies through §16 of the Clayton Act Introduction In the landmark case CIA. Petrolera Caribe, Inc. v. Arco Caribbean, Inc., et al., 754...
Piercing the Corporate Veil and Enforcing Unfair Trade Practices: A Comprehensive Commentary on Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co. v. Checkers, Inc.

Piercing the Corporate Veil and Enforcing Unfair Trade Practices: A Comprehensive Commentary on Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co. v. Checkers, Inc.

Date: Jan 29, 1985
Piercing the Corporate Veil and Enforcing Unfair Trade Practices: A Comprehensive Commentary on Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan Bottling Co. v. Checkers, Inc. Introduction The case of Pepsi-Cola Metropolitan...
Grendel's Den, Inc. v. Larkin: Defining Reasonableness in Attorney's Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Grendel's Den, Inc. v. Larkin: Defining Reasonableness in Attorney's Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Date: Dec 6, 1984
Grendel's Den, Inc. v. Larkin: Defining Reasonableness in Attorney's Fees Under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 1. Introduction The case of Grendel's Den, Inc. v. John P. Larkin et al., adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions in United States v. Drougas et al.

Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions in United States v. Drougas et al.

Date: Nov 8, 1984
Affirmation of Conspiracy Convictions in United States v. Drougas et al. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Aristedes Drougas, Michael Aristotle Karahalis, Arnold W. Ellis, Jr.,...
Assessing Disability: The Impact of Lopez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services on Residual Functional Capacity Determinations

Assessing Disability: The Impact of Lopez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services on Residual Functional Capacity Determinations

Date: Oct 31, 1984
Assessing Disability: The Impact of Lopez v. Secretary of Health and Human Services on Residual Functional Capacity Determinations Introduction In the landmark case of Gladys Burgos Lopez v....
Defining 'Doing Business' for Federal Venue: Insights from Johnson Creative Arts, Inc. v. Wool Masters, Inc.

Defining 'Doing Business' for Federal Venue: Insights from Johnson Creative Arts, Inc. v. Wool Masters, Inc.

Date: Sep 7, 1984
Defining 'Doing Business' for Federal Venue: Insights from Johnson Creative Arts, Inc. v. Wool Masters, Inc. Introduction The case of Johnson Creative Arts, Inc., Plaintiff, Appellant, versus Wool...
Enhancing Particularity in Fraud Allegations: Insights from Wayne Investment v. Gulf Oil

Enhancing Particularity in Fraud Allegations: Insights from Wayne Investment v. Gulf Oil

Date: Jul 19, 1984
Enhancing Particularity in Fraud Allegations: Insights from Wayne Investment, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corporation Introduction The case of Wayne Investment, Inc. v. Gulf Oil Corporation, decided by the...
Establishing Limits of General Jurisdiction: Insights from GLATER v. ELI LILLY CO.

Establishing Limits of General Jurisdiction: Insights from GLATER v. ELI LILLY CO.

Date: Jul 13, 1984
Establishing Limits of General Jurisdiction: Insights from GLATER v. ELI LILLY CO. Introduction The case of Cathy Ann GLATER v. ELI LILLY CO. (744 F.2d 213, 1st Cir. 1984) presents a pivotal...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert