Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Limitations on Remand for New Evidence under 42 U.S.C. §405(g): First Circuit Affirmation

Limitations on Remand for New Evidence under 42 U.S.C. §405(g): First Circuit Affirmation

Date: Aug 12, 1987
Limitations on Remand for New Evidence under 42 U.S.C. §405(g): First Circuit Affirmation Introduction In Samuel C. Evangelista v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, 826 F.2d 136 (1st Cir....
Establishing Front Pay as a Remedy in Employment Discrimination Cases: Conway v. Electro Switch Corp.

Establishing Front Pay as a Remedy in Employment Discrimination Cases: Conway v. Electro Switch Corp.

Date: Aug 7, 1987
Establishing Front Pay as a Remedy in Employment Discrimination Cases: Conway v. Electro Switch Corp. Introduction The case of Sandra Conway v. Electro Switch Corp. addresses significant issues...
United States v. Gonzalez-Sanchez: Enforcement of Plea Agreements and Admissibility of Prior Crimes Evidence

United States v. Gonzalez-Sanchez: Enforcement of Plea Agreements and Admissibility of Prior Crimes Evidence

Date: Aug 1, 1987
United States v. Gonzalez-Sanchez: Enforcement of Plea Agreements and Admissibility of Prior Crimes Evidence Introduction The case of United States of America v. Pedro M. Gonzalez-Sanchez and...
Admissibility of Contingently Compensated Informants Affirmed in U.S. v. Cresta et al.

Admissibility of Contingently Compensated Informants Affirmed in U.S. v. Cresta et al.

Date: Jul 24, 1987
Admissibility of Contingently Compensated Informants Affirmed in United States v. Cresta et al. Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Cresta, Defendant Appellant (827 F.2d...
Credibility Assessment and Objective Evidence in Supplemental Security Income: Frustaglia v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Credibility Assessment and Objective Evidence in Supplemental Security Income: Frustaglia v. Secretary of Health and Human Services

Date: Jul 18, 1987
Credibility Assessment and Objective Evidence in Supplemental Security Income: Frustaglia v. Secretary of Health and Human Services Introduction The case of Joseph T. Frustaglia v. Secretary of...
Establishing Causation Under FELA: Analysis of Moody v. Maine Central Railroad Co.

Establishing Causation Under FELA: Analysis of Moody v. Maine Central Railroad Co.

Date: Jul 16, 1987
Establishing Causation Under FELA: Analysis of Moody v. Maine Central Railroad Co. Introduction Donald Moody v. Maine Central Railroad Company, 823 F.2d 693 (1st Cir. 1987), is a pivotal case in the...
Affirming Statutory Limitations in Jones Act Claims and Strict Standards for Unseaworthiness – Clauson v. Smith

Affirming Statutory Limitations in Jones Act Claims and Strict Standards for Unseaworthiness – Clauson v. Smith

Date: Jul 8, 1987
Affirming Statutory Limitations in Jones Act Claims and Strict Standards for Unseaworthiness – Clauson v. Smith Introduction In the case of Charles Clauson v. Robert D. Smith, 823 F.2d 660 (1st Cir....
Reaffirmation of Discretionary Standards in Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) Motions: U.S. v. DeCologero

Reaffirmation of Discretionary Standards in Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) Motions: U.S. v. DeCologero

Date: Jun 20, 1987
Reaffirmation of Discretionary Standards in Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b) Motions: U.S. v. DeCologero Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Anthony DeCologero, the United States...
Proximate Causation in Racial Discrimination: Springer v. Seamen et al.

Proximate Causation in Racial Discrimination: Springer v. Seamen et al.

Date: Jun 17, 1987
Proximate Causation in Racial Discrimination: Springer v. Seamen et al. Introduction In Beresford N. Springer v. Gretchen Seamen, et al., 821 F.2d 871 (1st Cir. 1987), the United States Court of...
Defining Reportable Transactions Under the Bank Secrecy Act: Insights from United States v. Bank of New England

Defining Reportable Transactions Under the Bank Secrecy Act: Insights from United States v. Bank of New England

Date: Jun 11, 1987
Defining Reportable Transactions Under the Bank Secrecy Act: Insights from United States v. Bank of New England Introduction The case of United States of America v. Bank of New England, N.A. (821...
Establishing Independent Analysis and Inflation Adjustments under the Equal Access to Justice Act: Insights from Sierra Club v. Secretary of the Army

Establishing Independent Analysis and Inflation Adjustments under the Equal Access to Justice Act: Insights from Sierra Club v. Secretary of the Army

Date: Jun 4, 1987
Establishing Independent Analysis and Inflation Adjustments under the Equal Access to Justice Act: Insights from Sierra Club v. Secretary of the Army Introduction In Sierra Club v. Secretary of the...
Assessing Eleventh Amendment Immunity: Insights from Ainsworth v. Puerto Rico Tourism Company

Assessing Eleventh Amendment Immunity: Insights from Ainsworth v. Puerto Rico Tourism Company

Date: May 19, 1987
Assessing Eleventh Amendment Immunity: Insights from Ainsworth v. Puerto Rico Tourism Company Introduction The case of AINSWORTH ARISTOCRAT INTERNATIONAL PTY. LIMITED v. TOURISM COMPANY OF THE...
Enhanced Probable Cause Standards in Counterfeiting Cases: Figueroa v. United States of America

Enhanced Probable Cause Standards in Counterfeiting Cases: Figueroa v. United States of America

Date: May 16, 1987
Enhanced Probable Cause Standards in Counterfeiting Cases: Figueroa v. United States of America Introduction Figueroa v. United States of America, 818 F.2d 1020 (1st Cir. 1987), is a notable case...
Affirmation of Chain Conspiracy Liability in Drug Importation: Giry v. United States

Affirmation of Chain Conspiracy Liability in Drug Importation: Giry v. United States

Date: May 14, 1987
Affirmation of Chain Conspiracy Liability in Drug Importation: Giry v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Pierre Michel Henri Giry and Steven Seward (818...
Enforceability of Waivers in Civil Rights Cases: Implications of Bancroft Hall v. Och’s Decision

Enforceability of Waivers in Civil Rights Cases: Implications of Bancroft Hall v. Och’s Decision

Date: May 6, 1987
Enforceability of Waivers in Civil Rights Cases: Implications of Bancroft Hall v. Och’s Decision Introduction The case of Bancroft Dudley Hall, et al. v. Frederick J. Ochs, et al. adjudicated by the...
Reinforcing the Integrity of Bankruptcy Filings: In Re John E. Tully, Debtor

Reinforcing the Integrity of Bankruptcy Filings: In Re John E. Tully, Debtor

Date: May 5, 1987
Reinforcing the Integrity of Bankruptcy Filings: In Re John E. Tully, Debtor Introduction The case of In Re John E. Tully, Debtor, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the First...
Attorney Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice: Precedent in United States v. Cintolo

Attorney Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice: Precedent in United States v. Cintolo

Date: May 2, 1987
Attorney Conspiracy to Obstruct Justice: Precedent in United States v. Cintolo Introduction United States of America v. William J. Cintolo (818 F.2d 980) is a landmark case decided by the United...
Preservation of Errors and Rule 403 Balancing: Insights from United States v. Griffin

Preservation of Errors and Rule 403 Balancing: Insights from United States v. Griffin

Date: Apr 24, 1987
Preservation of Errors and Rule 403 Balancing: Insights from United States v. Griffin Introduction In United States of America, Appellee, v. Barry J. Griffin, Defendant, Appellant (818 F.2d 97), the...
Admissibility of Pre-Joining Conspiracy Statements Under Rule 801(d)(2)(E): United States v. Masse

Admissibility of Pre-Joining Conspiracy Statements Under Rule 801(d)(2)(E): United States v. Masse

Date: Apr 22, 1987
Admissibility of Pre-Joining Conspiracy Statements Under Rule 801(d)(2)(E): United States v. Masse Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Masse, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Security Interests of Bankruptcy Attorneys: Insights from In Re Larry T. Cynthia J. Martin Decision

Security Interests of Bankruptcy Attorneys: Insights from In Re Larry T. Cynthia J. Martin Decision

Date: Apr 18, 1987
Security Interests of Bankruptcy Attorneys: Insights from In Re Larry T. Cynthia J. Martin Decision Introduction The case of In Re Larry T. Cynthia J. Martin D/B/A A W Drive-In Restaurant Martin's...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert