Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

1st Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Younger Abstention and Absolute Immunity in Medical Licensing Proceedings

Affirmation of Younger Abstention and Absolute Immunity in Medical Licensing Proceedings

Date: Jun 1, 1990
Affirmation of Younger Abstention and Absolute Immunity in Medical Licensing Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of PAUL E. BETTENCOURT, M.D., PLAINTIFF, APPELLANT, v. BOARD OF REGISTRATION...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Due Process Claim: A Comprehensive Analysis of Amsden v. Moran

Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Due Process Claim: A Comprehensive Analysis of Amsden v. Moran

Date: May 30, 1990
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Due Process Claim: A Comprehensive Analysis of Amsden v. Moran Introduction The case of Henry H. Amsden, et al., Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. Thomas F. Moran, etc.,...
Limitations on Insurer Subrogation Against Its Own Insured: A Comprehensive Analysis of Farr Man Co. v. M/V Rozita

Limitations on Insurer Subrogation Against Its Own Insured: A Comprehensive Analysis of Farr Man Co. v. M/V Rozita

Date: May 23, 1990
Limitations on Insurer Subrogation Against Its Own Insured: A Comprehensive Analysis of Farr Man Co. v. M/V Rozita Introduction The case of Farr Man Co., Inc., et al., v. M/V Rozita, etc., et al....
Voluntary Dismissal and General Personal Jurisdiction: Comprehensive Analysis of Sandstrom v. ChemLawn

Voluntary Dismissal and General Personal Jurisdiction: Comprehensive Analysis of Sandstrom v. ChemLawn

Date: May 18, 1990
Voluntary Dismissal and General Personal Jurisdiction: Comprehensive Analysis of Sandstrom v. ChemLawn Introduction In the realm of civil litigation, understanding the nuances of personal...
Ripeness of RICO Claims: Lincoln House, Inc. v. Paul W. Dupre

Ripeness of RICO Claims: Lincoln House, Inc. v. Paul W. Dupre

Date: May 17, 1990
Ripeness of RICO Claims: Lincoln House, Inc. v. Paul W. Dupre Introduction Lincoln House, Inc., Plaintiff and Appellant, filed a lawsuit against Paul W. Dupre and Lauren L. Dupre, Defendants and...
Wilma Cumpiano Sanchez v. Banco Santander Puerto Rico: A Landmark on Pregnancy Discrimination under Title VII

Wilma Cumpiano Sanchez v. Banco Santander Puerto Rico: A Landmark on Pregnancy Discrimination under Title VII

Date: May 5, 1990
Wilma Cumpiano Sanchez v. Banco Santander Puerto Rico: A Landmark on Pregnancy Discrimination under Title VII Introduction Wilma Cumpiano Sanchez (hereinafter “Cumpiano”), an employee of Banco...
Reaffirming Limited Due Process Protections for Trust Employees in Puerto Rico’s Judicial Branch

Reaffirming Limited Due Process Protections for Trust Employees in Puerto Rico’s Judicial Branch

Date: May 1, 1990
Reaffirming Limited Due Process Protections for Trust Employees in Puerto Rico’s Judicial Branch Introduction In the case of Correa-Martinez v. Arrillaga-Belendez, the United States Court of Appeals...
Summary Judgment and Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Suits: Insights from Rogers v. Fair

Summary Judgment and Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Suits: Insights from Rogers v. Fair

Date: May 1, 1990
Summary Judgment and Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Suits: Insights from Rogers v. Fair Introduction Ralph Rogers v. Michael Fair, 902 F.2d 140 (1st Cir. 1990), is a pivotal case in the realm of civil...
Affirmation of Forfeiture Under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6): United States v. Parcels of Land

Affirmation of Forfeiture Under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6): United States v. Parcels of Land

Date: May 1, 1990
Affirmation of Forfeiture Under 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6): United States v. Parcels of Land Introduction In the case of United States v. Parcels of Land, etc., Costa. Apellants, the United States Court...
Limiting Downward Departures for Substantial Assistance: Upholding 18 U.S.C. §3553(e) and U.S.S.G. §5K1.1

Limiting Downward Departures for Substantial Assistance: Upholding 18 U.S.C. §3553(e) and U.S.S.G. §5K1.1

Date: Apr 26, 1990
Limiting Downward Departures for Substantial Assistance: Upholding 18 U.S.C. §3553(e) and U.S.S.G. §5K1.1 Introduction The case of United States of America v. Julio La Guardia and Eredia Josefa...
Morgan v. Massachusetts General Hospital: Strengthening Summary Judgment Standards in Workplace Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Claims

Morgan v. Massachusetts General Hospital: Strengthening Summary Judgment Standards in Workplace Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Claims

Date: Apr 21, 1990
Morgan v. Massachusetts General Hospital: Strengthening Summary Judgment Standards in Workplace Discrimination and Sexual Harassment Claims Introduction John E. Morgan v. Massachusetts General...
Strict Enforcement of Filing Deadlines Affirmed in Mendez v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

Strict Enforcement of Filing Deadlines Affirmed in Mendez v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico

Date: Apr 7, 1990
Strict Enforcement of Filing Deadlines Affirmed in Mendez v. Banco Popular de Puerto Rico Introduction In the appellate decision Julio Mendez a/k/a Julio Mendez Rodriguez, et al. v. Banco Popular de...
Implied Contract Reversed in National Metal Finishing v. BarclaysAmerican/Commercial

Implied Contract Reversed in National Metal Finishing v. BarclaysAmerican/Commercial

Date: Mar 30, 1990
Implied Contract Reversed in National Metal Finishing v. BarclaysAmerican/Commercial Introduction In the landmark case of National Metal Finishing Company, Inc. v. BarclaysAmerican/Commercial, Inc.,...
Affirmation of Sanctions and Appellate Deference in Discovery Misconduct under Federal Civil Rules

Affirmation of Sanctions and Appellate Deference in Discovery Misconduct under Federal Civil Rules

Date: Mar 27, 1990
Affirmation of Sanctions and Appellate Deference in Discovery Misconduct under Federal Civil Rules Introduction The case of Anne Anderson, et al. v. Beatrice Foods Co., adjudicated in the United...
Affirming Agency Discretion in CERCLA Consent Decrees: Cannons Engineering Corp. v. United States

Affirming Agency Discretion in CERCLA Consent Decrees: Cannons Engineering Corp. v. United States

Date: Mar 21, 1990
Affirming Agency Discretion in CERCLA Consent Decrees: Cannons Engineering Corp. v. United States Introduction The case of Cannons Engineering Corp., et al. v. United States addresses critical issues...
Interpretation of Pollution Exclusion Clauses in Liability Insurance Policies: Titan Holdings Syndicate v. City of Keene

Interpretation of Pollution Exclusion Clauses in Liability Insurance Policies: Titan Holdings Syndicate v. City of Keene

Date: Mar 16, 1990
Interpretation of Pollution Exclusion Clauses in Liability Insurance Policies: Titan Holdings Syndicate v. City of Keene Introduction In the landmark case of Titan Holdings Syndicate, Inc., et al. v....
Affirmation of RICO Conspiracy in Police Corruption: Comprehensive Review of Joinder, Pattern, and Jury Instructions in United States v. Boylan and Co.

Affirmation of RICO Conspiracy in Police Corruption: Comprehensive Review of Joinder, Pattern, and Jury Instructions in United States v. Boylan and Co.

Date: Mar 15, 1990
Affirmation of RICO Conspiracy in Police Corruption: Comprehensive Review of Joinder, Pattern, and Jury Instructions in United States v. Boylan and Co. Introduction In the landmark case of United...
Conversion of Security Interests under UCC Article 9: Insights from Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Bank of New England

Conversion of Security Interests under UCC Article 9: Insights from Harley-Davidson Motor Co. v. Bank of New England

Date: Mar 7, 1990
Conversion of Security Interests under UCC Article 9: Insights from Harley-Davidson Motor Co., Inc. v. Bank of New England Introduction The case of Harley-Davidson Motor Co., Inc., and ITT Commercial...
Clarification of RICO’s Pattern Requirement in Organized Crime Context: United States v. Angiulo

Clarification of RICO’s Pattern Requirement in Organized Crime Context: United States v. Angiulo

Date: Mar 6, 1990
Clarification of RICO’s Pattern Requirement in Organized Crime Context: United States v. Angiulo, 897 F.2d 1169 (1st Cir. 1990) Introduction The case of United States v. Angiulo involves the appeal...
Dismissal with Prejudice Under Rule 41(b): A Comprehensive Analysis of Figueroa Ruiz v. Alegria

Dismissal with Prejudice Under Rule 41(b): A Comprehensive Analysis of Figueroa Ruiz v. Alegria

Date: Feb 24, 1990
Dismissal with Prejudice Under Rule 41(b): A Comprehensive Analysis of Figueroa Ruiz v. Alegria Introduction The case of Rafael Figueroa Ruiz, et al. v. Jose E. Alegria, et al., adjudicated by the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert