Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Non-Retroactive Amendment 709 Cannot Be Used to Achieve “Zero-Point Offender” Relief Under Retroactive Amendment 821

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Non-Retroactive Amendment 709 Cannot Be Used to Achieve “Zero-Point Offender” Relief Under Retroactive Amendment 821

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Non-Retroactive Amendment 709 Cannot Be Used to Achieve “Zero-Point Offender” Relief Under Retroactive Amendment 821 Introduction United States v. Lawrence Lombardi,...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: No Heightened Pleading Standard for Breach-of-Contract Claims under Rule 8(a)

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: No Heightened Pleading Standard for Breach-of-Contract Claims under Rule 8(a)

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies: No Heightened Pleading Standard for Breach-of-Contract Claims under Rule 8(a) Introduction In Caterpillar Financial Services Corp. v. Venequip Machinery Sales Corp., No....
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling:  A Deep Dive into United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling: A Deep Dive into United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling: A Deep Dive into United States v. Mark Gyetvay 1. Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s published opinion in United States v. Mark Gyetvay,...
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific §3292 Tolling Applications: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific §3292 Tolling Applications: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Gyetvay

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Demands Offence-Specific § 3292 Tolling Applications: A Commentary on United States v. Mark Gyetvay Introduction On 7 August 2025 the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ADEA Prima Facie Proof: Replacement by a Younger Employee Is Enough — Commentary on Gallimore v. City of Opa-Locka

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ADEA Prima Facie Proof: Replacement by a Younger Employee Is Enough — Commentary on Gallimore v. City of Opa-Locka

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ADEA Prima Facie Proof: Replacement by a Younger Employee Is Enough In-Depth Commentary on Sharon Gallimore v. City of Opa-Locka, No. 23-12241 (11th Cir. Aug. 6, 2025) 1....
United States v. Petersen (11th Cir. 2025):  A Clearer Timeliness Standard for Successive Coram Nobis Petitions

United States v. Petersen (11th Cir. 2025): A Clearer Timeliness Standard for Successive Coram Nobis Petitions

Date: Aug 13, 2025
United States v. Petersen (11th Cir. 2025): A Clearer Timeliness Standard for Successive Coram Nobis Petitions Introduction In United States v. David Petersen, the Eleventh Circuit again confronted...
“When Futility Trumps the Right to Amend” – Eleventh Circuit Harmonises Rule 15(a)(1) with § 1915(e)(2) Screening in Willy Toussaint v. U.S. Attorney’s Office

“When Futility Trumps the Right to Amend” – Eleventh Circuit Harmonises Rule 15(a)(1) with § 1915(e)(2) Screening in Willy Toussaint v. U.S. Attorney’s Office

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“When Futility Trumps the Right to Amend” – Eleventh Circuit Harmonises Rule 15(a)(1) with § 1915(e)(2) Screening in Willy Toussaint v. U.S. Attorney’s Office 1. Introduction The unpublished decision...
“From Clear Error to Substantial Evidence” – The Eleventh Circuit Sets the Standard for Reviewing Exceptional-and-Extremely-Unusual-Hardship Findings

“From Clear Error to Substantial Evidence” – The Eleventh Circuit Sets the Standard for Reviewing Exceptional-and-Extremely-Unusual-Hardship Findings

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“From Clear Error to Substantial Evidence” – The Eleventh Circuit Sets the Standard for Reviewing Exceptional-and-Extremely-Unusual-Hardship Findings Introduction In Isaac Lopez-Martinez & Martha...
“Substantial Evidence” Takes Centre Stage: Eleventh Circuit Sets the Review Standard for Exceptional-and-Extremely-Unusual-Hardship Determinations

“Substantial Evidence” Takes Centre Stage: Eleventh Circuit Sets the Review Standard for Exceptional-and-Extremely-Unusual-Hardship Determinations

Date: Aug 13, 2025
“Substantial Evidence” Takes Centre Stage: Eleventh Circuit Sets the Review Standard for Exceptional-and-Extremely-Unusual-Hardship Determinations 1. Introduction In Isaac Lopez-Martinez & Martha...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Prisoners Exhaust Remedies When They Properly Mail a BP-11: McGuire-Mollica v. Griffin

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Prisoners Exhaust Remedies When They Properly Mail a BP-11: McGuire-Mollica v. Griffin

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies that Prisoners Exhaust Remedies When They Properly Mail a BP-11 Form: McGuire-Mollica v. Griffin 1. Introduction The United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Eleventh Circuit: Failure to Escalate Known Severe Dental Pain Can Show Deliberate Indifference; Grievance Denial Alone Is Insufficient for §1983 Supervisory Liability

Eleventh Circuit: Failure to Escalate Known Severe Dental Pain Can Show Deliberate Indifference; Grievance Denial Alone Is Insufficient for §1983 Supervisory Liability

Date: Aug 13, 2025
Eleventh Circuit: Failure to Escalate Known Severe Dental Pain Can Show Deliberate Indifference; Grievance Denial Alone Is Insufficient for §1983 Supervisory Liability Introduction In Robert DiPietro...
Higgins v. SSA: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ALJ Discretion in Quantifying Off-Task Limits and Assessing Fibromyalgia Claims Under SSR 12-2p

Higgins v. SSA: Eleventh Circuit Clarifies ALJ Discretion in Quantifying Off-Task Limits and Assessing Fibromyalgia Claims Under SSR 12-2p

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Higgins v. Commissioner of Social Security Eleventh Circuit (2025) Introduction The Eleventh Circuit’s non-published decision in Melanie Higgins v. Commissioner of Social Security ushers in a...
Eleventh Circuit Mandates Strict Particularity in Medicare Appeals Council Requests for Review under 42 C.F.R. § 405.1112(b)

Eleventh Circuit Mandates Strict Particularity in Medicare Appeals Council Requests for Review under 42 C.F.R. § 405.1112(b)

Date: Aug 7, 2025
Eleventh Circuit Mandates Strict Particularity in Medicare Appeals Council Requests for Review under 42 C.F.R. § 405.1112(b) Introduction In Rehabilitation Hospital of Phenix City, LLC v. Secretary,...
The “Jackson Investigation Doctrine” – When an Employer’s Good-Faith, Employee-Requested Investigation Defeats Retaliation Claims

The “Jackson Investigation Doctrine” – When an Employer’s Good-Faith, Employee-Requested Investigation Defeats Retaliation Claims

Date: Aug 7, 2025
The “Jackson Investigation Doctrine” Eleventh Circuit clarifies that discipline flowing from an employee-requested, good-faith investigation constitutes a legitimate, non-retaliatory basis for...
Sterling BV v. Cadillac Products Packaging Co.: Price-Quotes as Offers and the Enforceability of Consequential-Damage Waivers under the California UCC

Sterling BV v. Cadillac Products Packaging Co.: Price-Quotes as Offers and the Enforceability of Consequential-Damage Waivers under the California UCC

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Sterling BV, Inc. v. Cadillac Products Packaging Co. Price-Quotes as Offers and the Enforceability of Consequential-Damage Waivers under the California UCC Introduction What began in 2017 as an...
Intrinsic Evidence & Georgia Cocaine Convictions: United States v. Daise as a Dual-Holding on Rule 404(b) and Career-Offender Predicate Status

Intrinsic Evidence & Georgia Cocaine Convictions: United States v. Daise as a Dual-Holding on Rule 404(b) and Career-Offender Predicate Status

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Intrinsic Evidence & Georgia Cocaine Convictions: United States v. Daise as a Dual-Holding on Rule 404(b) and Career-Offender Predicate Status Introduction United States v. Barry Kiya Daise, No....
“Intent to Confine” Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Holds False-Imprisonment Judgments Are Nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6) Despite Debtor’s Good-Faith Belief

“Intent to Confine” Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Holds False-Imprisonment Judgments Are Nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6) Despite Debtor’s Good-Faith Belief

Date: Aug 6, 2025
“Intent to Confine” Suffices: Eleventh Circuit Holds False-Imprisonment Judgments Are Nondischargeable under § 523(a)(6) Despite Debtor’s Good-Faith Belief 1. Introduction The Court of Appeals for...
When Consumer-Protection Claims “Sound in Fraud”: Eleventh Circuit Requires Rule 9(b) Particularity for FDUTPA Allegations

When Consumer-Protection Claims “Sound in Fraud”: Eleventh Circuit Requires Rule 9(b) Particularity for FDUTPA Allegations

Date: Aug 6, 2025
When Consumer-Protection Claims “Sound in Fraud”: Eleventh Circuit Requires Rule 9(b) Particularity for FDUTPA Allegations 1. Introduction In Alin Pop v. LuliFama.com LLC, No. 24-11048 (11th Cir....
Partial-Withdrawal Credits Must Be Applied at “Step Two” of the MPPAA Formula – 
            Commentary on Perfection Bakeries Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Int’l Union Pension Fund

Partial-Withdrawal Credits Must Be Applied at “Step Two” of the MPPAA Formula – Commentary on Perfection Bakeries Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale & Department Store Int’l Union Pension Fund

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Partial-Withdrawal Credits Must Be Applied at “Step Two” of the MPPAA Formula (Perfection Bakeries Inc. v. Retail, Wholesale & Department Store International Union Pension Fund, 11th Cir., 2025)...
Clarifying Medical-Necessity & Qualified-Immunity Standards in Transgender Inmate Care: Bayse v. Philbin (11th Cir. 2025)

Clarifying Medical-Necessity & Qualified-Immunity Standards in Transgender Inmate Care: Bayse v. Philbin (11th Cir. 2025)

Date: Aug 6, 2025
Clarifying Medical-Necessity & Qualified-Immunity Standards in Transgender Inmate Care: Bayse v. Philbin (11th Cir. 2025) Introduction In Bayse v. Philbin, No. 24-11299 (11th Cir. Aug. 1, 2025), the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert