Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Spring Valley Farms v. Crow: Upholding Due Process in Bankruptcy Discharges

Spring Valley Farms v. Crow: Upholding Due Process in Bankruptcy Discharges

Date: Jan 18, 1989
Spring Valley Farms v. Crow: Upholding Due Process in Bankruptcy Discharges 1. Introduction The case of In re Spring Valley Farms, Inc., Debtor delves into the intricacies of bankruptcy law,...
O'Neal v. Cook: Defining the Limits of Political Patronage in Public Employment

O'Neal v. Cook: Defining the Limits of Political Patronage in Public Employment

Date: Jan 13, 1989
O'Neal v. Cook: Defining the Limits of Political Patronage in Public Employment Introduction The case O'Neal Terry et al. v. A.C. Cook et al., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
PARKER v. AMERSON: Establishing County Liability under Section 1983

PARKER v. AMERSON: Establishing County Liability under Section 1983

Date: Jan 12, 1989
PARKER v. AMERSON: Establishing County Liability under Section 1983 Introduction PARKER v. AMERSON is a seminal case heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit in 1989. The...
Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Relief in Gates v. Zant: Analysis of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Due Process Claims

Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Relief in Gates v. Zant: Analysis of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Due Process Claims

Date: Jan 7, 1989
Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Relief in Gates v. Zant: Analysis of Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and Due Process Claims Introduction The case of Johnny Lee Gates v. Walter Zant, adjudicated by...
Denial of Appointed Counsel in §1983 Actions Not Immediately Appealable under 28 U.S.C. §1291: Holt v. Ford

Denial of Appointed Counsel in §1983 Actions Not Immediately Appealable under 28 U.S.C. §1291: Holt v. Ford

Date: Jan 5, 1989
Denial of Appointed Counsel in §1983 Actions Not Immediately Appealable under 28 U.S.C. §1291: Holt v. Ford Introduction Robert Holt, the plaintiff-appellant, challenged the denial of appointed...
Reflectone, Inc. v. Farrand Industries: Clarifying the Standards for Piercing the Corporate Veil under Florida Law

Reflectone, Inc. v. Farrand Industries: Clarifying the Standards for Piercing the Corporate Veil under Florida Law

Date: Jan 4, 1989
Reflectone, Inc. v. Farrand Industries: Clarifying the Standards for Piercing the Corporate Veil under Florida Law Introduction In Reflectone, Inc. v. Farrand Optical Company, Inc., Farrand...
Recalibration of Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act: Comprehensive Commentary on JEAN v. NELSON

Recalibration of Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act: Comprehensive Commentary on JEAN v. NELSON

Date: Dec 28, 1988
Recalibration of Attorney's Fees Under the Equal Access to Justice Act: Comprehensive Commentary on JEAN v. NELSON Introduction The case of Marie Lucie Jean, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees, v. Alan C....
Federal Jurisdiction Over Ancillary Claims and Indemnity Rights: Maseda v. Honda Motor Co. Implications

Federal Jurisdiction Over Ancillary Claims and Indemnity Rights: Maseda v. Honda Motor Co. Implications

Date: Dec 20, 1988
Federal Jurisdiction Over Ancillary Claims and Indemnity Rights: Maseda v. Honda Motor Co. Implications Introduction The case of Maseda v. Honda Motor Company, Ltd., adjudicated by the United States...
Establishing Standards for Missing Witness Inference and Indemnity in Negligence Cases: CARRIE V. JONES v. OTIS Elevator Co.

Establishing Standards for Missing Witness Inference and Indemnity in Negligence Cases: CARRIE V. JONES v. OTIS Elevator Co.

Date: Dec 9, 1988
Establishing Standards for Missing Witness Inference and Indemnity in Negligence Cases: CARRIE V. JONES v. OTIS Elevator Company Introduction The case of CARRIE V. JONES v. OTIS Elevator Company...
State Action Doctrine Clarified: Private Union Exclusion of Media Not Considered State Action in NBC v. CWA

State Action Doctrine Clarified: Private Union Exclusion of Media Not Considered State Action in NBC v. CWA

Date: Nov 29, 1988
State Action Doctrine Clarified: Private Union Exclusion of Media Not Considered State Action in NBC v. CWA Introduction The case of National Broadcasting Company, Inc. (NBC) v. Communications...
Reversing Eleventh Amendment Immunity: Enhancing Indigent Defense Rights in Georgia

Reversing Eleventh Amendment Immunity: Enhancing Indigent Defense Rights in Georgia

Date: Nov 24, 1988
Reversing Eleventh Amendment Immunity: Enhancing Indigent Defense Rights in Georgia Introduction In the landmark case of Horace Luckey, III, et al. v. Joe Frank Harris, Governor, et al., the United...
Ensuring Adequate Discovery Before Summary Judgment: Insights from Snook v. Trust Company

Ensuring Adequate Discovery Before Summary Judgment: Insights from Snook v. Trust Company

Date: Nov 8, 1988
Ensuring Adequate Discovery Before Summary Judgment: Insights from Snook v. Trust Company Introduction The case of Snook, Hinson, and Prevatt v. Trust Company of Georgia Bank of Savannah, 859 F.2d...
Affirmed Reasonable Suspicion in Traffic Stops for Narcotics Investigation: United States v. Hardy & Huffman

Affirmed Reasonable Suspicion in Traffic Stops for Narcotics Investigation: United States v. Hardy & Huffman

Date: Nov 5, 1988
Affirmed Reasonable Suspicion in Traffic Stops for Narcotics Investigation: United States v. Hardy & Huffman Introduction The case of United States of America v. Charles Gilbert Hardy and Buddy...
Enhanced Legal Standards for Disability Determinations under the Social Security Act: Insights from Cannon v. Bowen

Enhanced Legal Standards for Disability Determinations under the Social Security Act: Insights from Cannon v. Bowen

Date: Nov 3, 1988
Enhanced Legal Standards for Disability Determinations under the Social Security Act: Insights from Cannon v. Bowen Introduction Cannon v. Bowen, 858 F.2d 1541 (11th Cir. 1988), serves as a pivotal...
Enhancing Compliance with Court Orders: Insights from United States v. John W. Roberts

Enhancing Compliance with Court Orders: Insights from United States v. John W. Roberts

Date: Oct 26, 1988
Enhancing Compliance with Court Orders: Insights from United States v. John W. Roberts Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. John W. Roberts, 858 F.2d 698 (11th Cir. 1988),...
Limits of Debtor’s Authority in Settlements Under Bankruptcy Code: Jones v. Harrell

Limits of Debtor’s Authority in Settlements Under Bankruptcy Code: Jones v. Harrell

Date: Oct 25, 1988
Limits of Debtor’s Authority in Settlements Under Bankruptcy Code: Jones v. Harrell Introduction Howard W. Jones, Trustee in Bankruptcy for James Steven Boyd and Teresa Irene Boyd v. Kelly Harrell...
Affirmation of Arbitration Award Standards: O.R. Securities, Inc. v. Professional Planning Associates, Inc.

Affirmation of Arbitration Award Standards: O.R. Securities, Inc. v. Professional Planning Associates, Inc.

Date: Oct 13, 1988
Affirmation of Arbitration Award Standards: O.R. Securities, Inc. v. Professional Planning Associates, Inc. Introduction The case of O.R. Securities, Inc. v. Professional Planning Associates, Inc....
Extension of Absolute Immunity to Grand Jury Testimony: Strength v. Hubert and Carroll

Extension of Absolute Immunity to Grand Jury Testimony: Strength v. Hubert and Carroll

Date: Oct 7, 1988
Extension of Absolute Immunity to Grand Jury Testimony: Strength v. Hubert and Carroll Introduction In Strength v. Hubert and Carroll, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit...
Preemption of State Fraud Claims under the National Labor Relations Act: Analysis of Parker v. Connors Steel Company

Preemption of State Fraud Claims under the National Labor Relations Act: Analysis of Parker v. Connors Steel Company

Date: Sep 30, 1988
Preemption of State Fraud Claims under the National Labor Relations Act: Analysis of Parker v. Connors Steel Company Introduction Parker v. Connors Steel Company, 855 F.2d 1510 (11th Cir. 1988), is a...
Balancing Protected Speech and Employment Decisions: Kurtz v. Vickrey Appellate Analysis

Balancing Protected Speech and Employment Decisions: Kurtz v. Vickrey Appellate Analysis

Date: Sep 20, 1988
Balancing Protected Speech and Employment Decisions: Kurtz v. Vickrey Appellate Analysis Introduction In Kurtz v. Vickrey, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit addressed...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert