Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Ikner v. Lee: Clarifying the Standards for 'Willful and Malicious Injury' in Bankruptcy Dischargeability

Ikner v. Lee: Clarifying the Standards for 'Willful and Malicious Injury' in Bankruptcy Dischargeability

Date: Sep 16, 1989
Ikner v. Lee: Clarifying the Standards for 'Willful and Malicious Injury' in Bankruptcy Dischargeability Introduction The case of In re Clinton Melvin Ikner, Jr., Debtor v. Linda L. Lee (F/K/A Linda...
Eleventh Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment, Affirming Liberty Interests of Youthful Offenders Under §1983

Eleventh Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment, Affirming Liberty Interests of Youthful Offenders Under §1983

Date: Sep 16, 1989
Eleventh Circuit Reverses Summary Judgment, Affirming Liberty Interests of Youthful Offenders Under §1983 Introduction In the landmark case of Michael A. Barfield v. David Brierton et al., the United...
Eleventh Circuit Asserts Pursuit of Insurer Liability Post-Bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 524(e)

Eleventh Circuit Asserts Pursuit of Insurer Liability Post-Bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 524(e)

Date: Sep 16, 1989
Eleventh Circuit Asserts Pursuit of Insurer Liability Post-Bankruptcy under 11 U.S.C. § 524(e) Introduction The case of In Re Jet Florida Systems, Inc. f/k/a Air Florida Systems, Inc. and Airport...
Substantive Due Process in Zoning: Insights from Greenbriar v. City of Alabaster

Substantive Due Process in Zoning: Insights from Greenbriar v. City of Alabaster

Date: Sep 2, 1989
Substantive Due Process in Zoning: Insights from Greenbriar v. City of Alabaster Introduction Greenbriar, Ltd. and Mary Roensch v. City of Alabaster, 881 F.2d 1570 (11th Cir. 1989), stands as a...
Establishing Probable Cause and Upholding Conspiracy Convictions in Drug Enforcement: United States v. Hastamorir et al.

Establishing Probable Cause and Upholding Conspiracy Convictions in Drug Enforcement: United States v. Hastamorir et al.

Date: Sep 2, 1989
Establishing Probable Cause and Upholding Conspiracy Convictions in Drug Enforcement: United States v. Hastamorir et al. Case Information Case Title: UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v....
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Comprehensive Analysis of BERTOLOTTI v. DUGGER

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Comprehensive Analysis of BERTOLOTTI v. DUGGER

Date: Sep 1, 1989
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Comprehensive Analysis of BERTOLOTTI v. DUGGER Introduction In Anthony Bertolotti v. Richard Dugger, 883 F.2d 1503 (11th Cir. 1989), the United States Court of...
Affirming Age Discrimination Claims under ADEA: Willful Discrimination Upholding Liquidated Damages in Verbraeken v. Westinghouse

Affirming Age Discrimination Claims under ADEA: Willful Discrimination Upholding Liquidated Damages in Verbraeken v. Westinghouse

Date: Aug 30, 1989
Affirming Age Discrimination Claims under ADEA: Willful Discrimination Upholding Liquidated Damages in Verbraeken v. Westinghouse Introduction In the landmark case of Marcel Verbraeken v....
EEOC v. White and Son Enterprises: Strengthening Protections Against Wage Discrimination and Retaliatory Practices under EPA and Title VII

EEOC v. White and Son Enterprises: Strengthening Protections Against Wage Discrimination and Retaliatory Practices under EPA and Title VII

Date: Aug 25, 1989
EEOC v. White and Son Enterprises: Strengthening Protections Against Wage Discrimination and Retaliatory Practices under EPA and Title VII Introduction The case of Equal Employment Opportunity...
Rethinking Rule 11 Sanctions: The Eleventh Circuit's Decision in Thomas v. Evans Establishes New Standards for Pro Se Prisoners

Rethinking Rule 11 Sanctions: The Eleventh Circuit's Decision in Thomas v. Evans Establishes New Standards for Pro Se Prisoners

Date: Aug 22, 1989
Rethinking Rule 11 Sanctions: The Eleventh Circuit's Decision in Thomas v. Evans Establishes New Standards for Pro Se Prisoners Introduction Albert Thomas, an inmate at Georgia State Prison, engaged...
Enhancement of Federal Sentences: Sixth Amendment Protections Affirmed in Greene v. United States

Enhancement of Federal Sentences: Sixth Amendment Protections Affirmed in Greene v. United States

Date: Aug 22, 1989
Enhancement of Federal Sentences: Sixth Amendment Protections Affirmed in Greene v. United States Introduction James Alfonso Greene appeals his conviction and sentence under 18 U.S.C. § 1202(a),...
Limiting Rule 33 and Expanding Section 2255: U.S. v. DiBernardo & Rothstein Establishes Boundaries for Motions for New Trials

Limiting Rule 33 and Expanding Section 2255: U.S. v. DiBernardo & Rothstein Establishes Boundaries for Motions for New Trials

Date: Aug 22, 1989
Limiting Rule 33 and Expanding Section 2255: U.S. v. DiBernardo & Rothstein Establishes Boundaries for Motions for New Trials Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Robert DiBernardo...
Burden-Shifting Jury Instructions and Harmless Error: Insights from LANCASTER v. NEWSOME

Burden-Shifting Jury Instructions and Harmless Error: Insights from LANCASTER v. NEWSOME

Date: Aug 11, 1989
Burden-Shifting Jury Instructions and Harmless Error: Insights from LANCASTER v. NEWSOME Introduction Bob Edward Lancaster appealed the denial of his habeas corpus petition following his conviction...
Dieter v. B H Industries: Incontestable Trademark Status Influences Likelihood of Confusion Analysis

Dieter v. B H Industries: Incontestable Trademark Status Influences Likelihood of Confusion Analysis

Date: Aug 11, 1989
Dieter v. B H Industries: Incontestable Trademark Status Influences Likelihood of Confusion Analysis Introduction Dieter v. B H Industries of Southwest Florida, Inc., 880 F.2d 322 (11th Cir. 1989),...
Reaffirming Student Constitutional Rights in School Counseling: Eleventh Circuit's Decision on Section 1983 Claims

Reaffirming Student Constitutional Rights in School Counseling: Eleventh Circuit's Decision on Section 1983 Claims

Date: Aug 11, 1989
Reaffirming Student Constitutional Rights in School Counseling: Eleventh Circuit's Decision on Section 1983 Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Helen H. Arnold et al. v. Board of Education of...
Establishing Constructive Possession and Firearm Use in Drug Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Poole

Establishing Constructive Possession and Firearm Use in Drug Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Poole

Date: Aug 5, 1989
Establishing Constructive Possession and Firearm Use in Drug Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Poole Introduction United States v. Poole (878 F.2d 1389, 11th Cir. 1989) is a pivotal case...
Harduvel v. General Dynamics: Affirming the Government Contractor Defense under Boyle

Harduvel v. General Dynamics: Affirming the Government Contractor Defense under Boyle

Date: Aug 1, 1989
Harduvel v. General Dynamics: Affirming the Government Contractor Defense under Boyle Introduction Harduvel v. General Dynamics Corporation, 878 F.2d 1311 (11th Cir. 1989), is a pivotal appellate...
Affirmation of Guideline-Based Sentencing: Aggregation of Related Offenses in U.S. v. Scroggins

Affirmation of Guideline-Based Sentencing: Aggregation of Related Offenses in U.S. v. Scroggins

Date: Aug 1, 1989
Affirmation of Guideline-Based Sentencing: Aggregation of Related Offenses in U.S. v. Scroggins Introduction The case of United States of America v. Samuel Scroggins, adjudicated by the United States...
Owens v. Fulton County: Defining Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Owens v. Fulton County: Defining Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983

Date: Jul 21, 1989
Owens v. Fulton County: Defining Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Introduction Owens v. Fulton County is a significant appellate decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Vehicle Stops in Narcotics Conspiracy Cases

Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Vehicle Stops in Narcotics Conspiracy Cases

Date: Jul 13, 1989
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion Standards for Vehicle Stops in Narcotics Conspiracy Cases Introduction The case of United States of America v. Tommy Lee Williams, Leonard Williams (876 F.2d 1521,...
Impact of Ineffective Counsel in CCE Sentencing: Holmes v. United States

Impact of Ineffective Counsel in CCE Sentencing: Holmes v. United States

Date: Jul 13, 1989
Impact of Ineffective Counsel in CCE Sentencing: Holmes v. United States Introduction Holmes v. United States (876 F.2d 1545, 1989) is a significant appellate case from the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert