Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Comprehensive Commentary on EEOC v. Mike Smith Pontiac GMC, Inc. - Damages Calculation and Default Judgment Standards

Comprehensive Commentary on EEOC v. Mike Smith Pontiac GMC, Inc. - Damages Calculation and Default Judgment Standards

Date: Mar 15, 1990
Damages Calculation and Default Judgment Standards in Employment Discrimination: A Commentary on Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Mike Smith Pontiac GMC, Inc. (896 F.2d 524) Introduction...
Clarifying §506(b): Post-Petition Interest on Oversecured Claims in In Re Robert L. Sublett and Lenora A. Sublett

Clarifying §506(b): Post-Petition Interest on Oversecured Claims in In Re Robert L. Sublett and Lenora A. Sublett

Date: Mar 9, 1990
Clarifying §506(b): Post-Petition Interest on Oversecured Claims in In Re Robert L. Sublett and Lenora A. Sublett Introduction The case of In Re Robert L. Sublett and Lenora A. Sublett involves a...
Eleventh Circuit Reinforces Sentencing Guidelines on Drug Conspiracy Quantities and Upholds Batson Standards in Jury Selection

Eleventh Circuit Reinforces Sentencing Guidelines on Drug Conspiracy Quantities and Upholds Batson Standards in Jury Selection

Date: Mar 9, 1990
Eleventh Circuit Reinforces Sentencing Guidelines on Drug Conspiracy Quantities and Upholds Batson Standards in Jury Selection Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Thurnell Alston...
Establishing the Necessity of Irreparable Injury for Preliminary Injunctions in Equal Protection Cases: N.E. Florida Contractors v. Jacksonville

Establishing the Necessity of Irreparable Injury for Preliminary Injunctions in Equal Protection Cases: N.E. Florida Contractors v. Jacksonville

Date: Mar 3, 1990
Establishing the Necessity of Irreparable Injury for Preliminary Injunctions in Equal Protection Cases: N.E. Florida Contractors v. Jacksonville Introduction The case of Northeastern Florida Chapter...
Establishing Standards for Voidable Transfers in Bankruptcy: Insights from In Re Domino Investments

Establishing Standards for Voidable Transfers in Bankruptcy: Insights from In Re Domino Investments

Date: Mar 2, 1990
Establishing Standards for Voidable Transfers in Bankruptcy: Insights from In Re Domino Investments Introduction The case of In Re Alberto Duque Rodriguez and Domino Investments, Inc., Debtors versus...
Veil-Piercing Standards for Fictitious Family Salary Arrangements in Social Security Benefits Claims

Veil-Piercing Standards for Fictitious Family Salary Arrangements in Social Security Benefits Claims

Date: Mar 2, 1990
Veil-Piercing Standards for Fictitious Family Salary Arrangements in Social Security Benefits Claims Introduction The case of Ted Martin v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of the Department of Health...
Defining Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: An Analysis of Brown v. Hughes

Defining Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: An Analysis of Brown v. Hughes

Date: Mar 2, 1990
Defining Deliberate Indifference in Prison Medical Care: An Analysis of Brown v. Hughes Introduction Brown v. Hughes is a landmark case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Agency and Coverage Eligibility in Group Insurance: United of Omaha Life Ins. Co. v. Sun Life Ins. Co. of America

Agency and Coverage Eligibility in Group Insurance: United of Omaha Life Ins. Co. v. Sun Life Ins. Co. of America

Date: Mar 2, 1990
Agency and Coverage Eligibility in Group Insurance: United of Omaha Life Ins. Co. v. Sun Life Ins. Co. of America Introduction The case United of Omaha Life Insurance Company v. Sun Life Insurance...
Juror Dismissal Standards under Fed. R. Crim. P. 23(b): A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Wilson et al.

Juror Dismissal Standards under Fed. R. Crim. P. 23(b): A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Wilson et al.

Date: Feb 21, 1990
Juror Dismissal Standards under Fed. R. Crim. P. 23(b): A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Wilson et al. Introduction United States v. Wilson et al. is a landmark decision by the United...
Affirmation of Procedural Default Based on Clear State Grounds in Harmon v. Barton & Butterworth

Affirmation of Procedural Default Based on Clear State Grounds in Harmon v. Barton & Butterworth

Date: Feb 21, 1990
Affirmation of Procedural Default Based on Clear State Grounds in Harmon v. Barton & Butterworth Introduction Harmon v. Barton & Butterworth is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
No Constitutional Right to Co-Counsel and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Cross v. United States

No Constitutional Right to Co-Counsel and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Cross v. United States

Date: Feb 13, 1990
No Constitutional Right to Co-Counsel and Effective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from Cross v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of William Howard Cross, Sr. v. United States of...
Affirming Manufacturer Liability Under CERCLA for Arranging Hazardous Waste Disposal: Analysis of FPL v. Allis Chalmers

Affirming Manufacturer Liability Under CERCLA for Arranging Hazardous Waste Disposal: Analysis of FPL v. Allis Chalmers

Date: Feb 10, 1990
Affirming Manufacturer Liability Under CERCLA for Arranging Hazardous Waste Disposal: Analysis of FPL v. Allis Chalmers Introduction The case of Florida Power Light Company (FPL) v. Allis Chalmers...
Estoppel in ERISA: Eleventh Circuit Permits Equitable Estoppel for Oral Plan Interpretations

Estoppel in ERISA: Eleventh Circuit Permits Equitable Estoppel for Oral Plan Interpretations

Date: Feb 8, 1990
Estoppel in ERISA: Eleventh Circuit Permits Equitable Estoppel for Oral Plan Interpretations Introduction The case Kenneth Kane v. Aetna Life Insurance and Southern Bell Telephone Telegraph (893 F.2d...
Application of Lanham Act Remedies in Civil Contempt Sanctions: Howard Johnson Co., Inc. v. Khimani

Application of Lanham Act Remedies in Civil Contempt Sanctions: Howard Johnson Co., Inc. v. Khimani

Date: Jan 30, 1990
Application of Lanham Act Remedies in Civil Contempt Sanctions: Howard Johnson Co., Inc. v. Khimani Introduction The case of Howard Johnson Company, Inc., Howard Johnson Franchise Systems, Inc.,...
Precedent on Common Law Trademark Rights and Geographic Limitations: Tally-Ho, Inc. v. Coast Community College District

Precedent on Common Law Trademark Rights and Geographic Limitations: Tally-Ho, Inc. v. Coast Community College District

Date: Jan 20, 1990
Precedent on Common Law Trademark Rights and Geographic Limitations: Tally-Ho, Inc. v. Coast Community College District Introduction In the landmark case Tally-Ho, Inc. v. Coast Community College...
Limiting Retaliation Claims Under Title VII and Section 1981: Sherman v. Burke Contracting

Limiting Retaliation Claims Under Title VII and Section 1981: Sherman v. Burke Contracting

Date: Jan 17, 1990
Limiting Retaliation Claims Under Title VII and Section 1981: Sherman v. Burke Contracting Introduction In WILLIE LEWIS SHERMAN, PLAINTIFF-APPELLEE, v. BURKE CONTRACTING, INC., AND WILLIAM E. BURKE,...
Res Judicata Reinforces Summary Judgment in NAACP v. Alabama State Defendants

Res Judicata Reinforces Summary Judgment in NAACP v. Alabama State Defendants

Date: Jan 17, 1990
Res Judicata Reinforces Summary Judgment in NAACP v. Alabama State Defendants Introduction In the landmark case NATIONAL ASSOCIATION FOR THE ADVANCEMENT OF COLORED PEOPLE (NAACP) v. Alabama State...
Balancing Free Speech and Departmental Efficiency: Insights from Bryson v. City of Waycross

Balancing Free Speech and Departmental Efficiency: Insights from Bryson v. City of Waycross

Date: Jan 12, 1990
Balancing Free Speech and Departmental Efficiency: Insights from Bryson v. City of Waycross Introduction The case of J.R. Bryson v. City of Waycross (888 F.2d 1562) adjudicated by the United States...
Deliberate Indifference to Inmate Mental Health Needs under the Eighth Amendment: Greason v. Kemp and the Evolution of Qualified Immunity

Deliberate Indifference to Inmate Mental Health Needs under the Eighth Amendment: Greason v. Kemp and the Evolution of Qualified Immunity

Date: Jan 10, 1990
Deliberate Indifference to Inmate Mental Health Needs under the Eighth Amendment: Greason v. Kemp and the Evolution of Qualified Immunity Introduction Marilyn Greason, et al., Plaintiffs-Appellees,...
Affirming ERISA Civil Penalties Without Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies: Curry v. Contract Fabricators Inc.

Affirming ERISA Civil Penalties Without Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies: Curry v. Contract Fabricators Inc.

Date: Jan 10, 1990
Affirming ERISA Civil Penalties Without Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies: Curry v. Contract Fabricators Inc. Introduction Alexander Curry worked for approximately thirteen years at Contract...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert