Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Joint Trial Severance and Co-Conspirator Hearsay: Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Cross and Lodge

Joint Trial Severance and Co-Conspirator Hearsay: Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Cross and Lodge

Date: Apr 17, 1991
Joint Trial Severance and Co-Conspirator Hearsay: Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Cross and Lodge Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Mervyn Harold Cross A/K/A Eric...
Extending ERISA to Individually Tailored Retirement Benefits: Williams v. Wright

Extending ERISA to Individually Tailored Retirement Benefits: Williams v. Wright

Date: Apr 12, 1991
Extending ERISA to Individually Tailored Retirement Benefits: Williams v. Wright Introduction The case of James T. Williams v. Fred P. Wright, Jr., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Defining "Past Relevant Work" in Social Security Disability Claims: Barnes v. Sullivan

Defining "Past Relevant Work" in Social Security Disability Claims: Barnes v. Sullivan

Date: Apr 3, 1991
Defining "Past Relevant Work" in Social Security Disability Claims: Barnes v. Sullivan Introduction The case of Maxine Barnes v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services (932 F.2d...
Restricting Subpoenas of Government Employees in Private Litigation: Moore v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co.

Restricting Subpoenas of Government Employees in Private Litigation: Moore v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co.

Date: Apr 3, 1991
Restricting Subpoenas of Government Employees in Private Litigation: Moore v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co. Introduction The case of Moore et al. v. Armour Pharmaceutical Co. involves a pivotal legal...
Cunningham v. Warden: Establishing Standards for Sentencing Phase Jury Instructions

Cunningham v. Warden: Establishing Standards for Sentencing Phase Jury Instructions

Date: Mar 28, 1991
Cunningham v. Warden: Establishing Standards for Sentencing Phase Jury Instructions Introduction James Cunningham, Jr., the plaintiff-appellee and cross-appellant, challenged his death sentence...
Article III Limits on Bankruptcy Courts: In Re Parklane Hosiery Company, Inc. v. Silvers

Article III Limits on Bankruptcy Courts: In Re Parklane Hosiery Company, Inc. v. Silvers

Date: Mar 20, 1991
Article III Limits on Bankruptcy Courts: In Re Parklane Hosiery Company, Inc. v. Silvers Introduction The case of In Re Parklane/Atlanta Joint Venture, Debtor. Parklane Hosiery Company, Inc.,...
Chandler v. Baird: Eighth Amendment Protections in Administrative Confinement

Chandler v. Baird: Eighth Amendment Protections in Administrative Confinement

Date: Mar 16, 1991
Chandler v. Baird: Eighth Amendment Protections in Administrative Confinement Introduction Chandler v. Baird, 926 F.2d 1057 (11th Cir. 1991), is a significant case adjudicated by the United States...
Ansley v. Heinrich: Establishing Boundaries on Qualified Immunity in Use-of-Force Cases

Ansley v. Heinrich: Establishing Boundaries on Qualified Immunity in Use-of-Force Cases

Date: Mar 12, 1991
Ansley v. Heinrich: Establishing Boundaries on Qualified Immunity in Use-of-Force Cases Introduction The case of Kevin H. Ansley v. Walter C. Heinrich and others, adjudicated by the United States...
Affirming Warrantless Searches under Exigent Circumstances in Ackerson v. United States

Affirming Warrantless Searches under Exigent Circumstances in Ackerson v. United States

Date: Feb 22, 1991
Affirming Warrantless Searches under Exigent Circumstances in Ackerson v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Ronald Tobin, Clifford Roger Ackerson, 923 F.2d 1506 (11th Cir. 1991),...
Qualified Immunity and Municipal Liability in Racial Discrimination Cases: Insights from Brown v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Qualified Immunity and Municipal Liability in Racial Discrimination Cases: Insights from Brown v. City of Fort Lauderdale

Date: Feb 20, 1991
Qualified Immunity and Municipal Liability in Racial Discrimination Cases: Insights from Brown v. City of Fort Lauderdale Introduction The case of Mathas Brown v. City of Fort Lauderdale (923 F.2d...
Equal Protection Upholds Social Security's Exclusion of Familial Domestic Employment

Equal Protection Upholds Social Security's Exclusion of Familial Domestic Employment

Date: Feb 20, 1991
Equal Protection Upholds Social Security's Exclusion of Familial Domestic Employment Introduction Gladyce V. Cornelius, a grandmother employed by her married daughter to provide childcare services,...
Equal Protection in Social Security: Insights from Gladyce v. Cornelius

Equal Protection in Social Security: Insights from Gladyce v. Cornelius

Date: Feb 20, 1991
Equal Protection in Social Security: Insights from Gladyce v. Cornelius Introduction The case of Gladyce V. Cornelius versus Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human Services (936 F.2d...
Ripeness and Equal Protection in Zoning Disputes: Analysis of Executive 100, Inc. v. Martin County (11th Cir. 1991)

Ripeness and Equal Protection in Zoning Disputes: Analysis of Executive 100, Inc. v. Martin County (11th Cir. 1991)

Date: Feb 8, 1991
Ripeness and Equal Protection in Zoning Disputes: Analysis of Executive 100, Inc. v. Martin County (11th Cir. 1991) Introduction Executive 100, Inc. and Kings Ridge 239, Inc. v. Martin County is a...
Affirmation of Title VII Protections and Reassessment of §1981 in Employment Discrimination: Weaver v. Casa Gallardo

Affirmation of Title VII Protections and Reassessment of §1981 in Employment Discrimination: Weaver v. Casa Gallardo

Date: Feb 2, 1991
Affirmation of Title VII Protections and Reassessment of §1981 in Employment Discrimination: Weaver v. Casa Gallardo Introduction In the landmark case of Ronald R. Weaver v. Casa Gallardo, Inc., the...
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Retroactive Application of Georgia's Partial Restraint of Trade Statute

Eleventh Circuit Affirms Retroactive Application of Georgia's Partial Restraint of Trade Statute

Date: Feb 2, 1991
Eleventh Circuit Affirms Retroactive Application of Georgia's Partial Restraint of Trade Statute Introduction In the landmark case of Terrence Lee Ferrero v. Associated Materials Incorporated, 923...
Establishing the Limits of Disparate Impact in ADEA Claims: Analysis of MacPherson and Narz v. University of Montevallo

Establishing the Limits of Disparate Impact in ADEA Claims: Analysis of MacPherson and Narz v. University of Montevallo

Date: Jan 31, 1991
Establishing the Limits of Disparate Impact in ADEA Claims: Analysis of MacPherson and Narz v. University of Montevallo Introduction In the landmark case of Roderick MacPherson and Marvin Narz v....
Justiciability of Facial Challenges to Public Employee Policies: Hallandale Fire Fighters Case Established

Justiciability of Facial Challenges to Public Employee Policies: Hallandale Fire Fighters Case Established

Date: Jan 31, 1991
Justiciability of Facial Challenges to Public Employee Policies: Hallandale Prof Fire Fighters Local 2238 v. City of Hallandale Introduction The case of Hallandale Professional Fire Fighters Local...
Affirmation of Complex Drug Conspiracy Convictions and Upholding Trial Court Discretion

Affirmation of Complex Drug Conspiracy Convictions and Upholding Trial Court Discretion

Date: Jan 31, 1991
Affirmation of Complex Drug Conspiracy Convictions and Upholding Trial Court Discretion Introduction The case of United States of America v. Sandra Hernandez, Ronnie Lee Tape, Karen McCalvin, Rodney...
Establishing Precedent on RICO Conspiracy and Double Jeopardy: Analysis of United States v. Gonzalez et al.

Establishing Precedent on RICO Conspiracy and Double Jeopardy: Analysis of United States v. Gonzalez et al.

Date: Jan 31, 1991
Establishing Precedent on RICO Conspiracy and Double Jeopardy: Analysis of United States v. Gonzalez et al. Introduction In the case titled United States of America v. Jorge Enrique Gonzalez, a/k/a...
Strengthening Rule 11 Enforcement: Sanctions for Frivolous Litigation in Pelletier v. Zweifel

Strengthening Rule 11 Enforcement: Sanctions for Frivolous Litigation in Pelletier v. Zweifel

Date: Jan 30, 1991
Strengthening Rule 11 Enforcement: Sanctions for Frivolous Litigation in Pelletier v. Zweifel Introduction The case of Ronald O. Pelletier, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Gary D. Zweifel,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert