Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit Reinforces Intentional Discrimination Standard for Compensation under Section 504: Wood v. Spring Hill College

Eleventh Circuit Reinforces Intentional Discrimination Standard for Compensation under Section 504: Wood v. Spring Hill College

Date: Dec 10, 1992
Eleventh Circuit Reinforces Intentional Discrimination Standard for Compensation under Section 504: Wood v. Spring Hill College Introduction In the landmark case Jennifer Wood, Carol Wood, W.B. Wood...
Exhaustion of State Remedies in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Footman v. Singletary

Exhaustion of State Remedies in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Footman v. Singletary

Date: Dec 8, 1992
Exhaustion of State Remedies in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Footman v. Singletary Introduction Footman v. Singletary, 978 F.2d 1207 (11th Cir. 1992), is a pivotal case addressing the...
Extending COGSA to On-Deck Carriage via Bill of Lading Clauses: Z.K. Marine v. M/V Archigetis

Extending COGSA to On-Deck Carriage via Bill of Lading Clauses: Z.K. Marine v. M/V Archigetis

Date: Dec 4, 1992
Extending COGSA to On-Deck Carriage via Bill of Lading Clauses: Z.K. Marine v. M/V Archigetis Introduction In the case of Z.K. Marine, Inc. and Southern Offshore Yachts, Inc. v. M/V Archigetis,...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Qualified Immunity Limits for Public and Private Defendants under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3): Burrell v. Board of Trustees of GA Military College

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Qualified Immunity Limits for Public and Private Defendants under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3): Burrell v. Board of Trustees of GA Military College

Date: Oct 30, 1992
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Qualified Immunity Limits for Public and Private Defendants under 42 U.S.C. §§ 1983 and 1985(3) Introduction In Melba J. Burrell v. The Board of Trustees of GA Military...
Broadening Gender-Based Wage Discrimination Protections: Miranda v. B B Cash Grocery Store, Inc.

Broadening Gender-Based Wage Discrimination Protections: Miranda v. B B Cash Grocery Store, Inc.

Date: Oct 29, 1992
Broadening Gender-Based Wage Discrimination Protections: Miranda v. B B Cash Grocery Store, Inc. Introduction Miranda v. B B Cash Grocery Store, Inc. is a landmark case adjudicated by the United...
Continuing Violation Doctrine Affirmed in BEAVERS v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE CO.

Continuing Violation Doctrine Affirmed in BEAVERS v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE CO.

Date: Oct 20, 1992
Continuing Violation Doctrine Affirmed in BEAVERS v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE CO. Introduction In BEAVERS v. AMERICAN CAST IRON PIPE CO., 975 F.2d 792 (11th Cir. 1992), the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Miranda Rights and the Necessity for Conflict-Free Counsel: J.B. Parker v. Singletary

Affirmation of Miranda Rights and the Necessity for Conflict-Free Counsel: J.B. Parker v. Singletary

Date: Oct 7, 1992
Affirmation of Miranda Rights and the Necessity for Conflict-Free Counsel: J.B. Parker v. Singletary Introduction The case of J.B. Parker, Petitioner-Appellant v. Harry K. Singletary, Secretary,...
Affirmation of Reasonable Force Standard Under 18 U.S.C. §242 in Civil Rights Violation Cases

Affirmation of Reasonable Force Standard Under 18 U.S.C. §242 in Civil Rights Violation Cases

Date: Sep 26, 1992
Affirmation of Reasonable Force Standard Under 18 U.S.C. §242 in Civil Rights Violation Cases Introduction The case of United States of America v. Carl Harold Myers (972 F.2d 1566) represents a...
Qualified Immunity in Public Employee First Amendment Claims: Insights from Sims v. Metropolitan Dade County

Qualified Immunity in Public Employee First Amendment Claims: Insights from Sims v. Metropolitan Dade County

Date: Sep 19, 1992
Qualified Immunity in Public Employee First Amendment Claims: Insights from Sims v. Metropolitan Dade County Introduction Sims v. Metropolitan Dade County, decided by the United States Court of...
Expanding Municipal Liability: Final Policymaking Authority in Martinez v. City of Opa-Locka

Expanding Municipal Liability: Final Policymaking Authority in Martinez v. City of Opa-Locka

Date: Sep 11, 1992
Expanding Municipal Liability: Final Policymaking Authority in Martinez v. City of Opa-Locka Introduction The case of Martinez v. City of Opa-Locka presents a significant judicial exploration into...
A Comprehensive Commentary on Tipton v. Bergrohr GmbH-Siegen et al. (1992)

A Comprehensive Commentary on Tipton v. Bergrohr GmbH-Siegen et al. (1992)

Date: Sep 5, 1992
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Tipton v. Bergrohr GmbH-Siegen et al. (1992) Introduction The case of Donald Lee Tipton, Linda Tipton, His Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants v. Bergrohr GMBH-Siegen, a...
Strickland Standards in Capital Cases: An Analysis of White v. Singletary

Strickland Standards in Capital Cases: An Analysis of White v. Singletary

Date: Sep 4, 1992
Strickland Standards in Capital Cases: An Analysis of White v. Singletary Introduction White v. Singletary, 972 F.2d 1218 (11th Cir. 1992), is a pivotal case that delves into the standards for...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies 7(k) Exemption and On-Call Compensation under FLSA in Gadsden Police Case

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies 7(k) Exemption and On-Call Compensation under FLSA in Gadsden Police Case

Date: Sep 3, 1992
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies 7(k) Exemption and On-Call Compensation under FLSA in Gadsden Police Case Introduction The case of Birbirdwell et al. v. City of Gadsden, Alabama (970 F.2d 802, 1992)...
Cave v. Singletary: Establishing Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel During Sentencing Phase in Capital Cases

Cave v. Singletary: Establishing Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel During Sentencing Phase in Capital Cases

Date: Aug 27, 1992
Cave v. Singletary: Establishing Prejudice in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel During Sentencing Phase in Capital Cases Introduction Cave v. Singletary, 971 F.2d 1513 (11th Cir. 1992), is a pivotal...
Reasonableness of Probable Cause Determinations in Gonzalez v. United States

Reasonableness of Probable Cause Determinations in Gonzalez v. United States

Date: Aug 22, 1992
Reasonableness of Probable Cause Determinations in Gonzalez v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Alfredo F. Gonzalez, 969 F.2d 999 (11th Cir. 1992), addresses critical issues...
Attorney-Client Privilege and the "Last Link" Doctrine: Insights from In Re Grand Jury Matter No. 91-01386

Attorney-Client Privilege and the "Last Link" Doctrine: Insights from In Re Grand Jury Matter No. 91-01386

Date: Aug 21, 1992
Attorney-Client Privilege and the "Last Link" Doctrine: Insights from In Re Grand Jury Matter No. 91-01386 Introduction In Re Grand Jury Matter No. 91-01386 serves as a pivotal case in the realm of...
Court's Authority to Modify Rescission Conditions under TILA Affirmed

Court's Authority to Modify Rescission Conditions under TILA Affirmed

Date: Aug 15, 1992
Court's Authority to Modify Rescission Conditions under TILA Affirmed Introduction The case of Annie Mae Williams v. Homestake Mortgage Co., Ignacio Goldemberg and Adriana Goldemberg, reported as 968...
Intentional Vehicle Force as Unreasonable Seizure under the Fourth Amendment: Adams v. St. Lucie County Sheriff's Department

Intentional Vehicle Force as Unreasonable Seizure under the Fourth Amendment: Adams v. St. Lucie County Sheriff's Department

Date: Aug 13, 1992
Intentional Vehicle Force as Unreasonable Seizure under the Fourth Amendment: Adams v. St. Lucie County Sheriff's Department Introduction In Adams v. St. Lucie County Sheriff's Department, 962 F.2d...
Remand and Qualified Immunity in Inventory Search and Forfeiture Claims: Sammons v. Taylor et al.

Remand and Qualified Immunity in Inventory Search and Forfeiture Claims: Sammons v. Taylor et al.

Date: Aug 11, 1992
Remand and Qualified Immunity in Inventory Search and Forfeiture Claims: Sammons v. Taylor et al. Introduction The case of Michael Lee Sammons v. Maury Taylor and Six Unidentified FBI Agents...
Affirmation of Juvenile Conviction Enhancements in Adult Sentencing: McCullough v. Singletary

Affirmation of Juvenile Conviction Enhancements in Adult Sentencing: McCullough v. Singletary

Date: Aug 4, 1992
Affirmation of Juvenile Conviction Enhancements in Adult Sentencing: McCullough v. Singletary Introduction Alonzo McCullough appealed his life without parole sentence imposed by the Sixth Judicial...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert