Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Restricting Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions under AEDPA: An Analysis of Felker v. Turpin

Restricting Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions under AEDPA: An Analysis of Felker v. Turpin

Date: May 3, 1996
Restricting Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions under AEDPA: An Analysis of Felker v. Turpin Introduction Felker v. Turpin, 83 F.3d 1303 (11th Cir. 1996), is a pivotal case that underscores the...
Inclusion of Unsigned Nolo Contendere Pleas in Federal Criminal History: Insights from United States v. Tamayo (11th Cir. 1996)

Inclusion of Unsigned Nolo Contendere Pleas in Federal Criminal History: Insights from United States v. Tamayo (11th Cir. 1996)

Date: Apr 20, 1996
Inclusion of Unsigned Nolo Contendere Pleas in Federal Criminal History: Insights from United States v. Tamayo (11th Cir. 1996) Introduction United States v. Gonzalo De Jesus Tamayo is a landmark...
Qualified Immunity and the Public Duty Doctrine: Insights from Hamilton v. Cannon

Qualified Immunity and the Public Duty Doctrine: Insights from Hamilton v. Cannon

Date: Apr 20, 1996
Qualified Immunity and the Public Duty Doctrine: Insights from Hamilton v. Cannon, 80 F.3d 1525 (11th Cir. 1996) Introduction The case of Mathew Hamilton v. Charles Cannon addresses significant...
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Upholds Federal Jurisdiction Limits in FSPA Challenge

Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Upholds Federal Jurisdiction Limits in FSPA Challenge

Date: Apr 16, 1996
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Upholds Federal Jurisdiction Limits in FSPA Challenge Introduction The appellate case Eugene E. Powell v. Joyce Marie Powell; John Dalton, Secretary of the Navy, adjudicated...
Imputing Disability Knowledge in ADA Discrimination Cases: Insights from Morisky v. Broward County

Imputing Disability Knowledge in ADA Discrimination Cases: Insights from Morisky v. Broward County

Date: Apr 12, 1996
Imputing Disability Knowledge in ADA Discrimination Cases: Insights from Morisky v. Broward County Introduction Morisky v. Broward County is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Strengthening Whistleblower Protections: Retaliatory Dismissal under First Amendment Rights

Strengthening Whistleblower Protections: Retaliatory Dismissal under First Amendment Rights

Date: Apr 10, 1996
Strengthening Whistleblower Protections: Retaliatory Dismissal under First Amendment Rights Introduction The case of James Larry Fikes v. City of Daphne revolves around the lawful termination of a...
Procedural Default and the Limitations of Ineffective Assistance Claims: An Analysis of Alabama v. Hill

Procedural Default and the Limitations of Ineffective Assistance Claims: An Analysis of Alabama v. Hill

Date: Apr 10, 1996
Procedural Default and the Limitations of Ineffective Assistance Claims: An Analysis of Alabama v. Hill Introduction Alabama v. Hill is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Enhancing ADEA Class Action Procedures: Opt-In Joinder and Statute of Limitations in Grayson v. K Mart Corporation

Enhancing ADEA Class Action Procedures: Opt-In Joinder and Statute of Limitations in Grayson v. K Mart Corporation

Date: Apr 10, 1996
Enhancing ADEA Class Action Procedures: Opt-In Joinder and Statute of Limitations in Grayson v. K Mart Corporation Introduction Grayson v. K Mart Corporation is a landmark case adjudicated by the...
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Limitations on CWA's 'Zero Discharge' Standard and Enforces Injunctive Specificity

Eleventh Circuit Establishes Limitations on CWA's 'Zero Discharge' Standard and Enforces Injunctive Specificity

Date: Apr 2, 1996
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Limitations on CWA's 'Zero Discharge' Standard and Enforces Injunctive Specificity Introduction In the case of Terence D. Hughey v. JMS Development Corporation (78 F.3d...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison Methodology and Interface Specification Protection in Software Copyright Infringement

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison Methodology and Interface Specification Protection in Software Copyright Infringement

Date: Mar 23, 1996
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Abstraction-Filtration-Comparison Methodology and Interface Specification Protection in Software Copyright Infringement Introduction In the case of Brian E. Bateman &...
Aggregating Punitive Damages in Class Actions Meets Diversity Jurisdiction: Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp.

Aggregating Punitive Damages in Class Actions Meets Diversity Jurisdiction: Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp.

Date: Mar 21, 1996
Aggregating Punitive Damages in Class Actions Meets Diversity Jurisdiction: Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp. Introduction In the landmark case Tapscott v. MS Dealer Service Corp., the United...
SunAmerica Corp. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada: Establishing the Principle of Reviving Estopped Trademark Claims Through Inevitable Confusion

SunAmerica Corp. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada: Establishing the Principle of Reviving Estopped Trademark Claims Through Inevitable Confusion

Date: Mar 20, 1996
SunAmerica Corp. v. Sun Life Assurance Co. of Canada: Establishing the Principle of Reviving Estopped Trademark Claims Through Inevitable Confusion Introduction The legal landscape of trademark...
Pioneer Standard Applied to Excusable Neglect Under FRAP 4(a)(5): Advanced Estimating Systems v. Timothy J. Riney

Pioneer Standard Applied to Excusable Neglect Under FRAP 4(a)(5): Advanced Estimating Systems v. Timothy J. Riney

Date: Mar 20, 1996
Pioneer Standard Applied to Excusable Neglect Under FRAP 4(a)(5): Advanced Estimating Systems v. Timothy J. Riney Introduction The case of Advanced Estimating Systems, Inc. v. Timothy J. Riney is a...
Establishing Private Entities' Liability under Section 1983 for Public Functions: Blumel v. Mylander

Establishing Private Entities' Liability under Section 1983 for Public Functions: Blumel v. Mylander

Date: Mar 13, 1996
Establishing Private Entities' Liability under Section 1983 for Public Functions: Blumel v. Mylander Introduction The case of Thomas B. Blumel, Sr. v. Thomas A. Mylander, decided on March 12, 1996,...
Mallory v. Harkness: Defining Attorney's Fees and Apportionment under 42 U.S.C. §1988

Mallory v. Harkness: Defining Attorney's Fees and Apportionment under 42 U.S.C. §1988

Date: Mar 13, 1996
Mallory v. Harkness: Defining Attorney's Fees and Apportionment under 42 U.S.C. §1988 Introduction In the seminal case of Mallory v. Harkness, the United States District Court for the Southern...
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Precedent on Sovereign Immunity and Procedural Due Process in Eviction Proceedings

Eleventh Circuit Establishes Precedent on Sovereign Immunity and Procedural Due Process in Eviction Proceedings

Date: Mar 9, 1996
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Precedent on Sovereign Immunity and Procedural Due Process in Eviction Proceedings Introduction In the landmark case of Joel Tinney and Lisa Tinney v. Edith Shores et...
Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Under Commerce Clause: United States v. McAllister

Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Under Commerce Clause: United States v. McAllister

Date: Mar 9, 1996
Affirmation of 18 U.S.C. § 922(g)(1) Under Commerce Clause: United States v. McAllister Introduction The case of United States of America v. Eugene Kenny McAllister (77 F.3d 387, 1996) presents a...
Enhanced Burden of Proof in Bankruptcy Fraud Claims: Insights from Fuller v. Johannessen

Enhanced Burden of Proof in Bankruptcy Fraud Claims: Insights from Fuller v. Johannessen

Date: Feb 29, 1996
Enhanced Burden of Proof in Bankruptcy Fraud Claims: Insights from Fuller v. Johannessen Introduction The case of Fuller v. Johannessen ([76 F.3d...
Inferring Discrimination in Reduction-in-Force Cases: The Jameson v. Arrow Decision

Inferring Discrimination in Reduction-in-Force Cases: The Jameson v. Arrow Decision

Date: Feb 29, 1996
Inferring Discrimination in Reduction-in-Force Cases: The Jameson v. Arrow Decision Introduction The case of Ann C. Jameson v. The Arrow Company, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Clarifying Pleading Standards and Immunity in Civil Rights Litigation: Anderson v. District Board of Trustees

Clarifying Pleading Standards and Immunity in Civil Rights Litigation: Anderson v. District Board of Trustees

Date: Feb 21, 1996
Clarifying Pleading Standards and Immunity in Civil Rights Litigation: Anderson v. District Board of Trustees Introduction In Anderson v. District Board of Trustees of Central Florida Community...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert