Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

United States v. Chavez: Classification of Assault under 18 U.S.C. §113(a)(4) as a Petty Offense and Implications for Jury Trial Rights

United States v. Chavez: Classification of Assault under 18 U.S.C. §113(a)(4) as a Petty Offense and Implications for Jury Trial Rights

Date: Mar 1, 2000
United States v. Chavez: Classification of Assault under 18 U.S.C. §113(a)(4) as a Petty Offense and Implications for Jury Trial Rights Introduction In the landmark case, United States of America v....
Strict Enforcement of AEDPA’s One-Year Limitation on §2255 Motions Affirmed in Akins v. United States

Strict Enforcement of AEDPA’s One-Year Limitation on §2255 Motions Affirmed in Akins v. United States

Date: Feb 25, 2000
Strict Enforcement of AEDPA’s One-Year Limitation on §2255 Motions Affirmed in Akins v. United States Introduction Akins v. United States, 204 F.3d 1086 (11th Cir. 2000), is a pivotal case that...
Reaffirming Lindsey: Limits on Aggregating Punitive Damages and Attorney Fees in Class Actions for Diversity Jurisdiction

Reaffirming Lindsey: Limits on Aggregating Punitive Damages and Attorney Fees in Class Actions for Diversity Jurisdiction

Date: Feb 25, 2000
Reaffirming Lindsey: Limits on Aggregating Punitive Damages and Attorney Fees in Class Actions for Diversity Jurisdiction Introduction Cohen v. Office Depot Inc., 204 F.3d 1069 (11th Cir. 2000), is a...
Standing and Expectation of Privacy in Unregistered Hotel Rooms: UNITED STATES v. COOPER and Urbina

Standing and Expectation of Privacy in Unregistered Hotel Rooms: UNITED STATES v. COOPER and Urbina

Date: Feb 15, 2000
Standing and Expectation of Privacy in Unregistered Hotel Rooms: UNITED STATES v. COOPER and Urbina Introduction In UNITED STATES v. COOPER and Urbina, 203 F.3d 1279 (11th Cir. 2000), the United...
Limitation of Discretion in Sentence Reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2): UNITED STATES v. Bravo

Limitation of Discretion in Sentence Reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2): UNITED STATES v. Bravo

Date: Feb 12, 2000
Limitation of Discretion in Sentence Reduction under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2): UNITED STATES v. Bravo Introduction UNITED STATES of America v. Juan Camilo Bravo is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Requirement of Post-Loss Obligations Before Appraisal in Homeowner’s Insurance Claims: Analysis of Galindo v. ARI Mutual Insurance Company

Requirement of Post-Loss Obligations Before Appraisal in Homeowner’s Insurance Claims: Analysis of Galindo v. ARI Mutual Insurance Company

Date: Feb 8, 2000
Requirement of Post-Loss Obligations Before Appraisal in Homeowner’s Insurance Claims: Analysis of Galindo v. ARI Mutual Insurance Company 1. Introduction The case Galindo v. ARI Mutual Insurance...
Establishing State Action in §1983 Claims: Insights from Patrick v. Floyd Medical Center

Establishing State Action in §1983 Claims: Insights from Patrick v. Floyd Medical Center

Date: Jan 27, 2000
Establishing State Action in §1983 Claims: Insights from Patrick v. Floyd Medical Center Introduction In the landmark case Ronald D. Patrick, M.D., FACS v. Floyd Medical Center et al., decided by the...
FMLA Protection Limits in Employment Terminations Amid Reduction in Force: O'Connor v. PCA Family Health Plan Inc.

FMLA Protection Limits in Employment Terminations Amid Reduction in Force: O'Connor v. PCA Family Health Plan Inc.

Date: Jan 19, 2000
FMLA Protection Limits in Employment Terminations Amid Reduction in Force: O'Connor v. PCA Family Health Plan Inc. Introduction The case of Debra Lee O'Connor v. PCA Family Health Plan Inc., decided...
Wolf v. Coca-Cola: Defining ERISA Participant Eligibility and the Scope of Retaliation Claims

Wolf v. Coca-Cola: Defining ERISA Participant Eligibility and the Scope of Retaliation Claims

Date: Jan 19, 2000
Wolf v. Coca-Cola: Defining ERISA Participant Eligibility and the Scope of Retaliation Claims Introduction In the landmark case Sheila Wolf v. Coca-Cola Company, decided by the United States Court of...
Reinforcement of the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine in §1985(3) Claims: Analysis of Dickerson v. Alachua County Commission

Reinforcement of the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine in §1985(3) Claims: Analysis of Dickerson v. Alachua County Commission

Date: Jan 15, 2000
Reinforcement of the Intracorporate Conspiracy Doctrine in §1985(3) Claims: Analysis of Dickerson v. Alachua County Commission Introduction In Dickerson v. Alachua County Commission, the United...
Limits on District Courts Withdraw References in Bankruptcy Cases: Insights from In Re Ruby Mae Simmons

Limits on District Courts Withdraw References in Bankruptcy Cases: Insights from In Re Ruby Mae Simmons

Date: Jan 12, 2000
Limits on District Courts Withdraw References in Bankruptcy Cases: Insights from In Re Ruby Mae Simmons Introduction The case of In Re Ruby Mae Simmons, Debtor explores the boundaries of judicial...
Tolling Limitations in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Webster v. Moore

Tolling Limitations in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Webster v. Moore

Date: Jan 5, 2000
Tolling Limitations in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Webster v. Moore Introduction Webster v. Moore, 199 F.3d 1256 (11th Cir. 2000), is a pivotal case addressing the application of statutory...
Strict Interpretation of Federal Sentencing Guideline §2D1.1(b)(2) in Drug Conspiracy Cases

Strict Interpretation of Federal Sentencing Guideline §2D1.1(b)(2) in Drug Conspiracy Cases

Date: Dec 31, 1999
Strict Interpretation of Federal Sentencing Guideline §2D1.1(b)(2) in Drug Conspiracy Cases Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. James Glenn Chastain et al., decided on...
Enforcing "Follow the Fortunes" in Reinsurance Contracts: American Bankers v. Northwestern

Enforcing "Follow the Fortunes" in Reinsurance Contracts: American Bankers v. Northwestern

Date: Dec 31, 1999
Enforcing "Follow the Fortunes" in Reinsurance Contracts: American Bankers v. Northwestern Introduction The legal landscape of reinsurance contracts is intricate, involving sophisticated agreements...
Honest Services Fraud in the Private Sector: United States v. DeVegter and Poirier

Honest Services Fraud in the Private Sector: United States v. DeVegter and Poirier

Date: Dec 30, 1999
Honest Services Fraud in the Private Sector: United States v. DeVegter and Poirier Introduction The case of United States of America v. Michael DeVegter and Richard Poirier Jr., adjudicated by the...
Hyde Amendment Interpretation in UNITED STATES v. GILBERT: Criteria for Attorney Fee Awards

Hyde Amendment Interpretation in UNITED STATES v. GILBERT: Criteria for Attorney Fee Awards

Date: Dec 29, 1999
Hyde Amendment Interpretation in UNITED STATES v. GILBERT: Criteria for Attorney Fee Awards Introduction United States of America v. Richard L. Gilbert is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of Preponderance Standard for Forfeiture of Medical Licenses under 21 U.S.C. § 853(a)(2) in United States v. Dicter

Affirmation of Preponderance Standard for Forfeiture of Medical Licenses under 21 U.S.C. § 853(a)(2) in United States v. Dicter

Date: Dec 24, 1999
Affirmation of Preponderance Standard for Forfeiture of Medical Licenses under 21 U.S.C. § 853(a)(2) in United States v. Dicter Introduction In United States v. Dicter, the United States Court of...
Continuous Violations and Equitable Tolling in Antitrust Litigation: Insights from Morton’s Market v. Gustafson’s Dairy

Continuous Violations and Equitable Tolling in Antitrust Litigation: Insights from Morton’s Market v. Gustafson’s Dairy

Date: Dec 21, 1999
Continuous Violations and Equitable Tolling in Antitrust Litigation: Insights from Morton’s Market, Inc. v. Gustafson's Dairy Inc. Introduction The appellate decision in Morton’s Market, Inc.; J J...
Ambiguity in Franchise Agreements: Establishing Precedent on Right of First Refusal in St. Charles Foods v. America's Favorite Chicken Company

Ambiguity in Franchise Agreements: Establishing Precedent on Right of First Refusal in St. Charles Foods v. America's Favorite Chicken Company

Date: Dec 21, 1999
Ambiguity in Franchise Agreements: Establishing Precedent on Right of First Refusal in St. Charles Foods, Inc. v. America's Favorite Chicken Company Introduction St. Charles Foods, Inc. (SCF) versus...
Reopening Federal ACCA Sentences via Habeas Corpus Following State Conviction Vacatur

Reopening Federal ACCA Sentences via Habeas Corpus Following State Conviction Vacatur

Date: Dec 18, 1999
Reopening Federal ACCA Sentences via Habeas Corpus Following State Conviction Vacatur Introduction The case of United States of America v. Zachery Walker, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert