Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Eleventh Circuit Establishes Strong Precedent Against Race-Based Employment Discrimination in Public Institutions

Eleventh Circuit Establishes Strong Precedent Against Race-Based Employment Discrimination in Public Institutions

Date: Jun 7, 2003
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Strong Precedent Against Race-Based Employment Discrimination in Public Institutions Introduction In the landmark case of Janet Bogle, Sherri Bowers, et al. v. William...
Limitations on Entry Exceptions for Legalization Applicants: Assa'ad v. U.S. Attorney General

Limitations on Entry Exceptions for Legalization Applicants: Assa'ad v. U.S. Attorney General

Date: Jun 6, 2003
Limitations on Entry Exceptions for Legalization Applicants: Assa'ad v. U.S. Attorney General Introduction Assa'ad v. United States Attorney General is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
Amendment 599: Prohibiting Double Counting in Firearm-Related Sentencing Enhancements

Amendment 599: Prohibiting Double Counting in Firearm-Related Sentencing Enhancements

Date: Jun 6, 2003
Amendment 599: Prohibiting Double Counting in Firearm-Related Sentencing Enhancements Introduction In the appellate case of United States v. Don Newcombe Brown, 332 F.3d 1341 (11th Cir. 2003), the...
Affirmation of Guilty Plea Procedures and Sentencing Enhancements in Conspiracy Cases: United States v. Freixas

Affirmation of Guilty Plea Procedures and Sentencing Enhancements in Conspiracy Cases: United States v. Freixas

Date: Jun 4, 2003
Affirmation of Guilty Plea Procedures and Sentencing Enhancements in Conspiracy Cases: United States v. Freixas Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Dolores Freixas, the...
Reversing District Court's Rule 11 Sanctions: Insights from Kaplan v. DaimlerChrysler

Reversing District Court's Rule 11 Sanctions: Insights from Kaplan v. DaimlerChrysler

Date: May 31, 2003
Reversing District Court's Rule 11 Sanctions: Insights from Kaplan v. DaimlerChrysler Introduction The case of Elwood I. Kaplan, Norma Kaplan, Plaintiffs-Appellees v. DaimlerChrysler, A.G. and...
Severability and Amending Ordinances: Upholding Warner Robins' Regulations on Adult Entertainment and Alcohol Sales

Severability and Amending Ordinances: Upholding Warner Robins' Regulations on Adult Entertainment and Alcohol Sales

Date: May 29, 2003
Severability and Amending Ordinances: Upholding Warner Robins' Regulations on Adult Entertainment and Alcohol Sales Introduction The case of Artistic Entertainment, Inc. v. City of Warner Robins...
Restricting Case Removal Under FSHCAA: Allen v. Christenberry and Godfree

Restricting Case Removal Under FSHCAA: Allen v. Christenberry and Godfree

Date: May 29, 2003
Restricting Case Removal Under FSHCAA: Allen v. Christenberry and Godfree Introduction In Allen v. Christenberry and Godfree, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit addressed the...
Eleventh Circuit Affirming Retroactive Application of ATKINS v. VIRGINIA for Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions

Eleventh Circuit Affirming Retroactive Application of ATKINS v. VIRGINIA for Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: May 27, 2003
Eleventh Circuit Affirming Retroactive Application of ATKINS v. VIRGINIA for Successive Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction The case of In Re: Glenn Holladay, Petitioner (331 F.3d 1169) addressed a...
Standing in Federal Court: The Affirmation of Thomas J. Kelly v. Katherine Harris

Standing in Federal Court: The Affirmation of Thomas J. Kelly v. Katherine Harris

Date: May 23, 2003
Standing in Federal Court: The Affirmation of Thomas J. Kelly v. Katherine Harris Introduction In the landmark case Thomas J. Kelly v. Katherine Harris, decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Res Judicata on Confirmed Chapter 13 Plans and Secured Mortgage Claims: Uni American Mortgage Co. v. Bateman

Res Judicata on Confirmed Chapter 13 Plans and Secured Mortgage Claims: Uni American Mortgage Co. v. Bateman

Date: May 23, 2003
Res Judicata on Confirmed Chapter 13 Plans and Secured Mortgage Claims: Uni American Mortgage Co. v. Bateman Introduction In the appellate case Universal American Mortgage Company v. Carmen Bateman,...
Restricting Successive §2255 Motions under AEDPA: Insights from Farris v. United States

Restricting Successive §2255 Motions under AEDPA: Insights from Farris v. United States

Date: May 22, 2003
Restricting Successive §2255 Motions under AEDPA: Insights from Farris v. United States Introduction In J.B. Farris v. United States, 333 F.3d 1211 (11th Cir. 2003), the United States Court of...
Felony Murder Instruction Omission Deemed Harmless and Counsel's Effectiveness Affirmed in Norman Parker's Habeas Petition

Felony Murder Instruction Omission Deemed Harmless and Counsel's Effectiveness Affirmed in Norman Parker's Habeas Petition

Date: May 21, 2003
Felony Murder Instruction Omission Deemed Harmless and Counsel's Effectiveness Affirmed in Norman Parker's Habeas Petition Introduction The case of Norman Parker v. Secretary for the Department of...
Quinn v. Monroe County: Clarifying 'Decisionmaker' and Collateral Estoppel in §1983 First Amendment Retaliation Claims

Quinn v. Monroe County: Clarifying 'Decisionmaker' and Collateral Estoppel in §1983 First Amendment Retaliation Claims

Date: May 20, 2003
Quinn v. Monroe County: Clarifying 'Decisionmaker' and Collateral Estoppel in §1983 First Amendment Retaliation Claims Introduction Mary Quinn, the Plaintiff-Appellant, brought forth a lawsuit...
Affirmation of Prima Facie Standards in Title VII Racial Discrimination Claims: Knight v. Baptist Hospital

Affirmation of Prima Facie Standards in Title VII Racial Discrimination Claims: Knight v. Baptist Hospital

Date: May 15, 2003
Affirmation of Prima Facie Standards in Title VII Racial Discrimination Claims: Knight v. Baptist Hospital Introduction The case of Alma Knight v. Baptist Hospital of Miami, Inc. ([330 F.3d...
Reversal of Disability Benefits Denial in Coleman v. Barnhart Establishes Critical Precedents in Residual Functional Capacity Assessments

Reversal of Disability Benefits Denial in Coleman v. Barnhart Establishes Critical Precedents in Residual Functional Capacity Assessments

Date: May 10, 2003
Reversal of Disability Benefits Denial in Coleman v. Barnhart Establishes Critical Precedents in Residual Functional Capacity Assessments Introduction In the landmark case of Andretta White Coleman...
Automobile Exception Clarified: Mobility and Probable Cause Sufficient for Warrantless Searches

Automobile Exception Clarified: Mobility and Probable Cause Sufficient for Warrantless Searches

Date: May 9, 2003
Automobile Exception Clarified: Mobility and Probable Cause Sufficient for Warrantless Searches Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Steven Watts, reported as 329 F.3d 1282, the...
Comprehensive Commentary on 31 Foster Children v. S and All Other Children in Florida Foster Care

Comprehensive Commentary on 31 Foster Children v. S and All Other Children in Florida Foster Care

Date: May 9, 2003
Impact of Standing and Younger Abstention in Foster Care Litigation: Analysis of 31 Foster Children v. S and All Other Children in Florida Foster Care Introduction The case of 31 Foster Children v. S...
Strict Standards for Substantive Due Process Violations in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Waddell v. Hendry County Sheriff’s Office

Strict Standards for Substantive Due Process Violations in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Waddell v. Hendry County Sheriff’s Office

Date: May 9, 2003
Strict Standards for Substantive Due Process Violations in §1983 Claims: Analysis of Waddell v. Hendry County Sheriff's Office Introduction The case of Larry Norman Waddell, as Personal...
Amount in Controversy Requirement for Declaratory Judgment Actions: Insights from Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. McKinnon Motors, LLC

Amount in Controversy Requirement for Declaratory Judgment Actions: Insights from Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. McKinnon Motors, LLC

Date: Apr 29, 2003
Amount in Controversy Requirement for Declaratory Judgment Actions: Insights from Federated Mutual Insurance Co. v. McKinnon Motors, LLC Introduction The case of Federated Mutual Insurance Company v....
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Habeas Corpus: Eleventh Circuit's Decision in Sundar v. INS

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Habeas Corpus: Eleventh Circuit's Decision in Sundar v. INS

Date: Apr 26, 2003
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Habeas Corpus: Eleventh Circuit's Decision in Sundar v. INS Introduction The case of Harpersad Sundar v. Immigration and Naturalization Service (INS),...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert