Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Post-Deprivation Notice in Emergency Evictions: Grayden v. Rhodes Establishes Contemporaneous Notice Requirement

Post-Deprivation Notice in Emergency Evictions: Grayden v. Rhodes Establishes Contemporaneous Notice Requirement

Date: Sep 18, 2003
Post-Deprivation Notice in Emergency Evictions: Grayden v. Rhodes Establishes Contemporaneous Notice Requirement Introduction Grayden v. Rhodes, 345 F.3d 1225 (11th Cir. 2003), is a landmark decision...
Clarifying Medicare Secondary Payer Obligations: United States v. Baxter International

Clarifying Medicare Secondary Payer Obligations: United States v. Baxter International

Date: Sep 16, 2003
Clarifying Medicare Secondary Payer Obligations: United States v. Baxter International Introduction In United States v. Baxter International, Incorporated, 345 F.3d 866 (11th Cir. 2003), the United...
Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Analysis of GARRETT v. UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA at Birmingham Trustees

Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Analysis of GARRETT v. UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA at Birmingham Trustees

Date: Sep 12, 2003
Waiver of Eleventh Amendment Immunity Under Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act: Analysis of GARRETT v. UNIVERSITY OF ALABAMA at Birmingham Trustees Introduction The case of Patricia Garrett, et...
Eleventh Circuit Establishes State Action Standards in § 1983 Claims in Focus on the Family v. PSTA

Eleventh Circuit Establishes State Action Standards in § 1983 Claims in Focus on the Family v. PSTA

Date: Sep 10, 2003
Eleventh Circuit Establishes State Action Standards in § 1983 Claims in Focus on the Family v. PSTA Introduction Focus on the Family, an evangelical organization, brought a lawsuit against the...
Establishing Administrative Finality: Coleman v. Director, OWCP

Establishing Administrative Finality: Coleman v. Director, OWCP

Date: Sep 10, 2003
Establishing Administrative Finality: Coleman v. Director, OWCP Introduction Annie Coleman v. Director, OWCP, 345 F.3d 861 (11th Cir. 2003), is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Establishing Individual Liability under the ADA's Anti-Retaliation Provision: Shotz v. City of Plantation

Establishing Individual Liability under the ADA's Anti-Retaliation Provision: Shotz v. City of Plantation

Date: Sep 9, 2003
Establishing Individual Liability under the ADA's Anti-Retaliation Provision: Shotz v. City of Plantation Introduction In the landmark case Frederick A. Shotz v. City of Plantation, Florida, 344 F.3d...
Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Seizure Defined in VAUGHAN v. COX

Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Seizure Defined in VAUGHAN v. COX

Date: Aug 30, 2003
Qualified Immunity and Fourth Amendment Seizure Defined in VAUGHAN v. COX Introduction Jerry Charges Vaughan v. Fred Lawrence Cox is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Mistake of Law Invalidates Traffic Stop: United States v. Chanthasouxat

Mistake of Law Invalidates Traffic Stop: United States v. Chanthasouxat

Date: Aug 23, 2003
Mistake of Law Invalidates Traffic Stop: United States v. Chanthasouxat (11th Cir. 2003) Introduction In the case of United States v. Chanthasouxat and Xayasane, the United States Court of Appeals...
Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Title VII Discrimination: Comprehensive Analysis of Maynard v. Board of Regents

Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Title VII Discrimination: Comprehensive Analysis of Maynard v. Board of Regents

Date: Aug 23, 2003
Eleventh Amendment Immunity and Title VII Discrimination: Comprehensive Analysis of Maynard v. Board of Regents Introduction Donald Maynard v. Board of Regents of the Division of Universities of the...
Appellate Jurisdiction Over Magistrate Judge Decisions: Insights from United States v. Brown (11th Cir. 2003)

Appellate Jurisdiction Over Magistrate Judge Decisions: Insights from United States v. Brown (11th Cir. 2003)

Date: Aug 22, 2003
Appellate Jurisdiction Over Magistrate Judge Decisions: Insights from United States v. Brown (11th Cir. 2003) 1. Introduction United States v. Jacqueline Panseta Brown is a pivotal case decided by...
Eleventh Circuit Rules Florida Whistleblower Act Not Pre-empted by Airline Deregulation Act in Branche v. Airtran

Eleventh Circuit Rules Florida Whistleblower Act Not Pre-empted by Airline Deregulation Act in Branche v. Airtran

Date: Aug 22, 2003
Eleventh Circuit Rules Florida Whistleblower Act Not Pre-empted by Airline Deregulation Act in Branche v. Airtran Introduction In Branche v. Airtran Airways, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals...
Reinstatement of Fees-Paid RICO Claims and Clarification on §1985 Conspiracy Claims Involving Attorneys: Farese v. Scherer et al.

Reinstatement of Fees-Paid RICO Claims and Clarification on §1985 Conspiracy Claims Involving Attorneys: Farese v. Scherer et al.

Date: Aug 20, 2003
Reinstatement of Fees-Paid RICO Claims and Clarification on §1985 Conspiracy Claims Involving Attorneys: Farese v. Scherer et al. Introduction The case of Thomas R. Farese v. Kenneth J. Scherer,...
Reaffirming Absolute Immunity for Litigation Conduct in Civil Fraud and RICO Claims: Green Leaf Nursery v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company

Reaffirming Absolute Immunity for Litigation Conduct in Civil Fraud and RICO Claims: Green Leaf Nursery v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company

Date: Aug 16, 2003
Reaffirming Absolute Immunity for Litigation Conduct in Civil Fraud and RICO Claims: Green Leaf Nursery v. E.I. DuPont de Nemours and Company Introduction The case of Green Leaf Nursery, Inc., Gus...
EAGLE v. LINAHAN: Redefining Prejudice Analysis in Batson Preservation for Appellate Review

EAGLE v. LINAHAN: Redefining Prejudice Analysis in Batson Preservation for Appellate Review

Date: Aug 16, 2003
EAGLE v. LINAHAN: Redefining Prejudice Analysis in Batson Preservation for Appellate Review Introduction The case of Joseph H. Davis, Jr. v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections, James Crosby...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Admissibility of Prior Firearm Convictions Under Federal Evidence Rules in Felon in Possession Cases

Eleventh Circuit Upholds Admissibility of Prior Firearm Convictions Under Federal Evidence Rules in Felon in Possession Cases

Date: Aug 16, 2003
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Admissibility of Prior Firearm Convictions Under Federal Evidence Rules in Felon in Possession Cases Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Randy Jernigan...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Employment Discrimination Case

Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Employment Discrimination Case

Date: Aug 15, 2003
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Employment Discrimination Case Introduction The case of George A. Williams, Michael A. Perryman, et al. v. Consolidated City of Jacksonville, Rayfield Alfred, Fire...
Exum Walker v. Crosby: Unified Statute of Limitations for Habeas Applications Under AEDPA

Exum Walker v. Crosby: Unified Statute of Limitations for Habeas Applications Under AEDPA

Date: Aug 14, 2003
Exum Walker v. Crosby: Unified Statute of Limitations for Habeas Applications Under AEDPA Introduction Exum Walker, the petitioner-appellant, challenged the dismissal of his habeas corpus application...
Sanctions for Fraudulent Claims: Reasonable Reliance on International Counsel Established

Sanctions for Fraudulent Claims: Reasonable Reliance on International Counsel Established

Date: Aug 13, 2003
Sanctions for Fraudulent Claims: Reasonable Reliance on International Counsel Established Introduction The case of Schwartz, Sr. and Musslewhite v. Millon Air, Inc. (341 F.3d 1220) presents a...
No Access to the Courts: Shelton Chapell v. Rich Establishes Strict Limitations on §1983 and §1985 Claims

No Access to the Courts: Shelton Chapell v. Rich Establishes Strict Limitations on §1983 and §1985 Claims

Date: Aug 12, 2003
No Access to the Courts: Shelton Chapell v. Rich Establishes Strict Limitations on §1983 and §1985 Claims Introduction In Shelton Chapell, Martha Bolden, Ruthie Montero, Jackie Williams, Paula Burns,...
Adequate Representation in Class Actions: Insights from London v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Adequate Representation in Class Actions: Insights from London v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Date: Aug 8, 2003
Adequate Representation in Class Actions: Insights from London v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Introduction Roger London v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert