Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Strict Adherence to Procedural Deadlines: Implications from Young v. City of Palm Bay

Strict Adherence to Procedural Deadlines: Implications from Young v. City of Palm Bay

Date: Feb 3, 2004
Strict Adherence to Procedural Deadlines: Implications from Young v. City of Palm Bay Introduction The case of William Dwayne Young et al. v. City of Palm Bay, Florida addresses the critical issue of...
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Inquiry Notice Standard in Securities Fraud Claims: La Grasta v. First Union Securities

Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Inquiry Notice Standard in Securities Fraud Claims: La Grasta v. First Union Securities

Date: Jan 31, 2004
Eleventh Circuit Clarifies Inquiry Notice Standard in Securities Fraud Claims: La Grasta v. First Union Securities Introduction The case of Nicholas La Grasta, Domenico La Grasta, and Mauro La Grasta...
Affirmation of Florida’s Ban on Homosexual Adoption Under Equal Protection and Due Process

Affirmation of Florida’s Ban on Homosexual Adoption Under Equal Protection and Due Process

Date: Jan 29, 2004
Affirmation of Florida’s Ban on Homosexual Adoption Under Equal Protection and Due Process Introduction In the landmark case Ste v. n Lofton et al., decided on January 28, 2004, the United States...
Enhancing False Advertising Claims under the Lanham Act: Insights from Hickson Corp. v. Northern Crossarm Co.

Enhancing False Advertising Claims under the Lanham Act: Insights from Hickson Corp. v. Northern Crossarm Co.

Date: Jan 27, 2004
Enhancing False Advertising Claims under the Lanham Act: Insights from Hickson Corp. v. Northern Crossarm Co. Introduction The case of Hickson Corporation v. Northern Crossarm Co., Inc., Patrick...
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Guidelines for ALJ Use of Medical Vocational Guidelines vs. Vocational Experts in Disability Claims – Phillips v. Barnhart

Eleventh Circuit Establishes Guidelines for ALJ Use of Medical Vocational Guidelines vs. Vocational Experts in Disability Claims – Phillips v. Barnhart

Date: Jan 24, 2004
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Guidelines for ALJ Use of Medical Vocational Guidelines vs. Vocational Experts in Disability Claims – Phillips v. Barnhart Introduction In the case of Renee S. Phillips...
Establishing Standards for Disability Perception under the ADA: Carruthers v. BSA Advertising

Establishing Standards for Disability Perception under the ADA: Carruthers v. BSA Advertising

Date: Jan 22, 2004
Establishing Standards for Disability Perception under the ADA: Carruthers v. BSA Advertising Introduction The case of Jean E. Carruthers v. BSA Advertising, Inc., decided by the United States Court...
Retaliation Claims Under Title VII: Gregory v. Georgia Department of Human Resources

Retaliation Claims Under Title VII: Gregory v. Georgia Department of Human Resources

Date: Jan 8, 2004
Retaliation Claims Under Title VII: Gregory v. Georgia Department of Human Resources Introduction Gladys Gregory v. Georgia Department of Human Resources is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Affirmation of MDLEA Jurisdiction and Upholding Sentencing Enhancements in United States v. Rendon

Affirmation of MDLEA Jurisdiction and Upholding Sentencing Enhancements in United States v. Rendon

Date: Jan 1, 2004
Affirmation of MDLEA Jurisdiction and Upholding Sentencing Enhancements in United States v. Rendon Introduction United States of America v. Geovanni Quintero Rendon is a pivotal case adjudicated by...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Civil Rights Actions: Storck v. City of Coral Springs

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Civil Rights Actions: Storck v. City of Coral Springs

Date: Dec 31, 2003
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Civil Rights Actions: Storck v. City of Coral Springs Introduction Storck v. City of Coral Springs, 354 F.3d 1307 (11th Cir. 2003), is a pivotal case addressing...
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Rule 11 Plea Colloquy Standards: United States v. Monroe

Eleventh Circuit Upholds Rule 11 Plea Colloquy Standards: United States v. Monroe

Date: Dec 25, 2003
Eleventh Circuit Upholds Rule 11 Plea Colloquy Standards: United States v. Monroe Introduction In the landmark decision of United States v. David Wayne Monroe, the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals...
De Novo Review Standard Affirmed in ERISA Disability Benefit Denials

De Novo Review Standard Affirmed in ERISA Disability Benefit Denials

Date: Dec 20, 2003
De Novo Review Standard Affirmed in ERISA Disability Benefit Denials Introduction The case of William M. Shaw versus Connecticut General Life Insurance Company delves into the intricate dynamics of...
Affirmation of Jurisdictional Requirements in Antitrust Actions Against International Organizations

Affirmation of Jurisdictional Requirements in Antitrust Actions Against International Organizations

Date: Dec 19, 2003
Affirmation of Jurisdictional Requirements in Antitrust Actions Against International Organizations Introduction In the landmark case of Prewitt Enterprises, Inc. v. Organization of Petroleum...
Smalbein v. City of Daytona Beach: Establishing Prevailing Party Criteria under 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Smalbein v. City of Daytona Beach: Establishing Prevailing Party Criteria under 42 U.S.C. § 1988

Date: Dec 17, 2003
Smalbein v. City of Daytona Beach: Establishing Prevailing Party Criteria under 42 U.S.C. § 1988 Introduction Smalbein v. City of Daytona Beach is a landmark case decided by the United States Court...
Procedural Default Upholding in Henderson v. Campbell: Implications for Federal Habeas Corpus Relief

Procedural Default Upholding in Henderson v. Campbell: Implications for Federal Habeas Corpus Relief

Date: Dec 17, 2003
Procedural Default Upholding in Henderson v. Campbell: Implications for Federal Habeas Corpus Relief Introduction The case of Jerry Paul Henderson v. Donal Campbell, heard by the United States Court...
Deliberate Indifference Requires Subjective Awareness: Carter v. Galloway

Deliberate Indifference Requires Subjective Awareness: Carter v. Galloway

Date: Dec 16, 2003
Deliberate Indifference Requires Subjective Awareness: Carter v. Galloway Introduction John Carter v. James Galloway is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Standing Limitations under the Overbreadth Doctrine: Insights from Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Clearwater

Standing Limitations under the Overbreadth Doctrine: Insights from Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Clearwater

Date: Nov 29, 2003
Standing Limitations under the Overbreadth Doctrine: Insights from Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v. City of Clearwater Introduction The case of Granite State Outdoor Advertising, Inc. v....
Limits on Prolonging Traffic Stops: Refusal to Consent Cannot Justify Detention Under the Fourth Amendment – United States v. Boyce

Limits on Prolonging Traffic Stops: Refusal to Consent Cannot Justify Detention Under the Fourth Amendment – United States v. Boyce

Date: Nov 29, 2003
Limits on Prolonging Traffic Stops: Refusal to Consent Cannot Justify Detention Under the Fourth Amendment – United States v. Boyce Introduction United States v. Boyce, 351 F.3d 1102 (11th Cir....
Qualified Immunity Upholding Arrest Under Fla. Stat. §316.130 in Durruthy v. Pastor

Qualified Immunity Upholding Arrest Under Fla. Stat. §316.130 in Durruthy v. Pastor

Date: Nov 27, 2003
Qualified Immunity Upholding Arrest Under Fla. Stat. §316.130 in Durruthy v. Pastor Introduction In the case of Albert Durruthy v. Jennifer Pastor, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Reevaluation of Free Speech Protections for Law Enforcement Personnel: Silva v. Bieluch

Reevaluation of Free Speech Protections for Law Enforcement Personnel: Silva v. Bieluch

Date: Nov 26, 2003
Reevaluation of Free Speech Protections for Law Enforcement Personnel: Silva v. Bieluch Introduction In Silva, Ken Thomas, et al. v. Bieluch, 351 F.3d 1045 (11th Cir. 2003), the United States Court...
Application of 28 U.S.C. §§2241 and 2254 in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Medberry v. Crosby

Application of 28 U.S.C. §§2241 and 2254 in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Medberry v. Crosby

Date: Nov 26, 2003
Application of 28 U.S.C. §§2241 and 2254 in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Medberry v. Crosby Introduction Daniel Clark Medberry v. James Crosby, Charlie Crist, Florida Attorney General is a significant...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert