Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Procedural Default in PLRA's Exhaustion Requirement: Da v. Johnson Commentary

Establishing Procedural Default in PLRA's Exhaustion Requirement: Da v. Johnson Commentary

Date: Jul 27, 2005
Establishing Procedural Default in PLRA's Exhaustion Requirement: Da v. Johnson Commentary Introduction In Da v. Johnson, the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit addressed a...
Valderrama v. United States: Upholding CAFRA's Exclusive Remedies in Administrative Forfeiture

Valderrama v. United States: Upholding CAFRA's Exclusive Remedies in Administrative Forfeiture

Date: Jul 23, 2005
Valderrama v. United States: Upholding CAFRA's Exclusive Remedies in Administrative Forfeiture Introduction Valderrama v. United States, 417 F.3d 1189 (11th Cir. 2005), is a pivotal case adjudicated...
Rivers v. United States: Establishing Due Diligence in §2255 Habeas Corpus Petitions Post-State Conviction Vacatur

Rivers v. United States: Establishing Due Diligence in §2255 Habeas Corpus Petitions Post-State Conviction Vacatur

Date: Jul 15, 2005
Rivers v. United States: Establishing Due Diligence in §2255 Habeas Corpus Petitions Post-State Conviction Vacatur Introduction The case of Derrick Rivers v. United States, adjudicated by the United...
Enforcing AEDPA's Exhaustion and Diligence Standards: A Comprehensive Analysis of McNAIR v. CAMPBELL

Enforcing AEDPA's Exhaustion and Diligence Standards: A Comprehensive Analysis of McNAIR v. CAMPBELL

Date: Jul 14, 2005
Enforcing AEDPA's Exhaustion and Diligence Standards: A Comprehensive Analysis of McNAIR v. CAMPBELL Introduction The case of Willie McNair v. Donal Campbell, adjudicated by the United States Court...
United States v. Brown: Upholding the Controlled Substance Analogue Act through Structural and Metabolic Similarity Analysis

United States v. Brown: Upholding the Controlled Substance Analogue Act through Structural and Metabolic Similarity Analysis

Date: Jul 9, 2005
United States v. Brown: Upholding the Controlled Substance Analogue Act through Structural and Metabolic Similarity Analysis Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Ronald...
Aldana v. Fresh Del Monte Produce: Advancements in Torture Claims Under the ATA and TVPA

Aldana v. Fresh Del Monte Produce: Advancements in Torture Claims Under the ATA and TVPA

Date: Jul 9, 2005
Aldana v. Fresh Del Monte Produce: Advancements in Torture Claims Under the ATA and TVPA Introduction Aldana v. Fresh Del Monte Produce, Inc. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Case: Robinson v. Arrugueta

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Case: Robinson v. Arrugueta

Date: Jul 8, 2005
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Case: Robinson v. Arrugueta Introduction The case of Mildred Robinson, Individually, and on behalf of and as next friend to Steven Walters, Jr....
Affirmation of Public Employee Free Speech and Association Rights: Cook v. Gwinnett County School District

Affirmation of Public Employee Free Speech and Association Rights: Cook v. Gwinnett County School District

Date: Jun 30, 2005
Affirmation of Public Employee Free Speech and Association Rights Cook v. Gwinnett County School District, 414 F.3d 1313 (11th Cir. 2005) Introduction Cook v. Gwinnett County School District is a...
Affirming the 'Insured v. Insured' Exclusion in Directors and Officers Liability Policies for Claims by Former Directors under Florida Law – Sphinx International v. National Union Fire Insurance

Affirming the 'Insured v. Insured' Exclusion in Directors and Officers Liability Policies for Claims by Former Directors under Florida Law – Sphinx International v. National Union Fire Insurance

Date: Jun 15, 2005
Affirming the 'Insured v. Insured' Exclusion in Directors and Officers Liability Policies for Claims by Former Directors under Florida Law – Sphinx International, Inc. v. National Union Fire...
Federal Courts and Declaratory Judgment: Analyzing Ameritas v. Roach

Federal Courts and Declaratory Judgment: Analyzing Ameritas v. Roach

Date: Jun 14, 2005
Federal Courts and Declaratory Judgment: Analyzing Ameritas v. Roach Introduction The case of Ameritas Variable Life Insurance Company v. Susan L. Roach, decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirming Complete Diversity Jurisdiction and Requiring Evidentiary Support for Maritime Claims: Insights from Sweet Pea Marine Ltd. v. APJ Marine Inc.

Affirming Complete Diversity Jurisdiction and Requiring Evidentiary Support for Maritime Claims: Insights from Sweet Pea Marine Ltd. v. APJ Marine Inc.

Date: Jun 9, 2005
Affirming Complete Diversity Jurisdiction and Requiring Evidentiary Support for Maritime Claims: Insights from Sweet Pea Marine Ltd. v. APJ Marine Inc. Introduction The case of Sweet Pea Marine Ltd....
Successor in Interest Requires Actual Predecessor-Successor Relationship under USERRA

Successor in Interest Requires Actual Predecessor-Successor Relationship under USERRA

Date: Jun 9, 2005
Successor in Interest Requires Actual Predecessor-Successor Relationship under USERRA Introduction The case of Charles Coffman v. Chugach Support Services, Inc. addresses critical issues surrounding...
Nominal Damages Affirmed in Akouri v. State of Florida Department of Transportation: An In-Depth Analysis

Nominal Damages Affirmed in Akouri v. State of Florida Department of Transportation: An In-Depth Analysis

Date: Jun 8, 2005
Nominal Damages Affirmed in Akouri v. State of Florida Department of Transportation: An In-Depth Analysis Introduction George Akouri v. State of Florida Department of Transportation, 408 F.3d 1338...
Limitations on Aggregation for Diversity Jurisdiction in Class Insurance Claims: Friedman v. New York Life

Limitations on Aggregation for Diversity Jurisdiction in Class Insurance Claims: Friedman v. New York Life

Date: Jun 7, 2005
Limitations on Aggregation for Diversity Jurisdiction in Class Insurance Claims: Friedman v. New York Life Introduction In Susan J. Friedman v. New York Life Insurance Co., the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Florida's Sex Offender Registration and DNA Statute: Comprehensive Analysis of John Doe v. Moore

Affirmation of Florida's Sex Offender Registration and DNA Statute: Comprehensive Analysis of John Doe v. Moore

Date: Jun 7, 2005
Affirmation of Florida's Sex Offender Registration and DNA Statute: Comprehensive Analysis of John Doe v. Moore Introduction In the landmark case of John Doe I, II, III, IV, et al. v. James T. Moore...
Eleventh Circuit Strengthens RLUIPA Protections in Konikov v. Orange County

Eleventh Circuit Strengthens RLUIPA Protections in Konikov v. Orange County

Date: Jun 4, 2005
Eleventh Circuit Strengthens RLUIPA Protections in Konikov v. Orange County Introduction Konikov v. Orange County is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Revival of Time-Barred Securities Fraud Claims Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Insights from Tello v. Dean Witter Reynolds

Revival of Time-Barred Securities Fraud Claims Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Insights from Tello v. Dean Witter Reynolds

Date: Jun 2, 2005
Revival of Time-Barred Securities Fraud Claims Under the Sarbanes-Oxley Act: Insights from Tello v. Dean Witter Reynolds Introduction The case of Mark Tello, on behalf of himself and all others...
Eleventh Circuit Rules Neptune Beach's Sign Code Unconstitutional: Content-Based Discrimination and Unchecked Prior Restraint on Speech

Eleventh Circuit Rules Neptune Beach's Sign Code Unconstitutional: Content-Based Discrimination and Unchecked Prior Restraint on Speech

Date: Jun 1, 2005
Eleventh Circuit Rules Neptune Beach's Sign Code Unconstitutional: Content-Based Discrimination and Unchecked Prior Restraint on Speech Introduction In the landmark case of Solantic, LLC v. City of...
Due Process and Jury Instructions on Principals Doctrine: Analysis of Jamerson v. Department of Corrections

Due Process and Jury Instructions on Principals Doctrine: Analysis of Jamerson v. Department of Corrections

Date: May 28, 2005
Due Process and Jury Instructions on Principals Doctrine: Analysis of Jamerson v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections Introduction Jamerson v. Secretary for the Department of Corrections is a...
Henderson v. United States: Reinforcing Sentencing Guidelines and Evidentiary Standards in Excessive Force Cases

Henderson v. United States: Reinforcing Sentencing Guidelines and Evidentiary Standards in Excessive Force Cases

Date: May 24, 2005
Henderson v. United States: Reinforcing Sentencing Guidelines and Evidentiary Standards in Excessive Force Cases Introduction Henderson v. United States (409 F.3d 1293, 2005) is a pivotal case...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert