Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Supervised Release and Classification of Criminal Contempt: Insights from United States v. Love

Supervised Release and Classification of Criminal Contempt: Insights from United States v. Love

Date: May 19, 2006
Supervised Release and Classification of Criminal Contempt: Insights from United States v. Love Introduction United States v. Christopher Love, 449 F.3d 1154 (11th Cir. 2006), is a pivotal case...
Establishing Burden of Proof for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas Based on Incompetency: United States v. Izquierdo

Establishing Burden of Proof for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas Based on Incompetency: United States v. Izquierdo

Date: May 11, 2006
Establishing Burden of Proof for Withdrawing Guilty Pleas Based on Incompetency: United States v. Izquierdo Introduction United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Javier Izquierdo is a pivotal...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Thorne v. All Restoration Services: Clarifying Individual Coverage Under the FLSA

Affirmation of Dismissal in Thorne v. All Restoration Services: Clarifying Individual Coverage Under the FLSA

Date: May 10, 2006
Affirmation of Dismissal in Thorne v. All Restoration Services: Clarifying Individual Coverage Under the FLSA Introduction In Joseph Thorne v. All Restoration Services, Inc., et al., 448 F.3d 1264...
Enhancing Personal Jurisdiction Through Substantial Activities and Agency Relations: Stubbs v. Wyndham Nassau Resort and WHC Franchise Corporation

Enhancing Personal Jurisdiction Through Substantial Activities and Agency Relations: Stubbs v. Wyndham Nassau Resort and WHC Franchise Corporation

Date: May 6, 2006
Enhancing Personal Jurisdiction Through Substantial Activities and Agency Relations: Stubbs v. Wyndham Nassau Resort and WHC Franchise Corporation Introduction Howard Cameron Stubbs, a resident of...
Clear Link Between Persecution and Protected Grounds: Silva v. U.S. Attorney General

Clear Link Between Persecution and Protected Grounds: Silva v. U.S. Attorney General

Date: May 6, 2006
Clear Link Between Persecution and Protected Grounds: Silva v. U.S. Attorney General Introduction Silva v. U.S. Attorney General, 448 F.3d 1229 (11th Cir. 2006), addresses critical issues in asylum...
Establishing Precedent: Expert Testimony and Reliance on Admitted Declarant Statements under the Sixth Amendment

Establishing Precedent: Expert Testimony and Reliance on Admitted Declarant Statements under the Sixth Amendment

Date: May 4, 2006
Establishing Precedent: Expert Testimony and Reliance on Admitted Declarant Statements under the Sixth Amendment Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Cesar Garcia and Hector Nunez,...
Ensuring Reasoned Decisions in Withholding of Removal: Comprehensive Evaluation of Persecution on Protected Grounds

Ensuring Reasoned Decisions in Withholding of Removal: Comprehensive Evaluation of Persecution on Protected Grounds

Date: May 2, 2006
Ensuring Reasoned Decisions in Withholding of Removal: Comprehensive Evaluation of Persecution on Protected Grounds Introduction The case of Liana Tan and I Gusti Ngurah Nessy Eliarta Suprajapata v....
Application of Booker and Blakely in Sentencing: Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Felix Esteban Thomas

Application of Booker and Blakely in Sentencing: Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Felix Esteban Thomas

Date: Apr 27, 2006
Application of Booker and Blakely in Sentencing: Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Felix Esteban Thomas Introduction In the landmark case United States v. Felix Esteban Thomas, 446 F.3d 1348...
Affirmation of Mandatory Sentencing and Admissibility of Co-Conspirator Statements in United States v. Underwood

Affirmation of Mandatory Sentencing and Admissibility of Co-Conspirator Statements in United States v. Underwood

Date: Apr 26, 2006
Affirmation of Mandatory Sentencing and Admissibility of Co-Conspirator Statements in United States v. Underwood Introduction United States of America v. Darin Underwood, 446 F.3d 1340 (11th Cir....
Affirmation of Non-Abuse of Discretion in Denial of Costs and Attorneys' Fees Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c): Bauknight v. Monroe County

Affirmation of Non-Abuse of Discretion in Denial of Costs and Attorneys' Fees Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c): Bauknight v. Monroe County

Date: Apr 26, 2006
Affirmation of Non-Abuse of Discretion in Denial of Costs and Attorneys' Fees Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c): Bauknight v. Monroe County Introduction Parties Involved: The appellants in this case are...
Enhancing Speedy Trial Protections: Ingram v. United States Establishes Precedent on Indictment Delays

Enhancing Speedy Trial Protections: Ingram v. United States Establishes Precedent on Indictment Delays

Date: Apr 26, 2006
Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal advice regarding your situation, please consult a qualified attorney. Enhancing...
Vacated Nolo Contendere Pleas and Immigration Convictions: Alim v. Gonzales Establishes Precedent

Vacated Nolo Contendere Pleas and Immigration Convictions: Alim v. Gonzales Establishes Precedent

Date: Apr 25, 2006
Vacated Nolo Contendere Pleas and Immigration Convictions: Alim v. Gonzales Establishes Precedent Introduction Samir M. Alim, a native and citizen of Syria, challenged the decision of the United...
Reliance Requirement for ERISA Claims Precludes Rule 23(b)(2) Class Certification

Reliance Requirement for ERISA Claims Precludes Rule 23(b)(2) Class Certification

Date: Apr 25, 2006
Reliance Requirement for ERISA Claims Precludes Rule 23(b)(2) Class Certification Introduction Robert P. Heffner, Jr., et al. v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield of Alabama, Inc. (443 F.3d 1330) is a...
Noncriminal Informants Excluded as a 'Particular Social Group' Under INA: An Analysis of Castillo-Arias v. U.S. Attorney General

Noncriminal Informants Excluded as a 'Particular Social Group' Under INA: An Analysis of Castillo-Arias v. U.S. Attorney General

Date: Apr 21, 2006
Noncriminal Informants Excluded as a 'Particular Social Group' Under INA: An Analysis of Castillo-Arias v. U.S. Attorney General Introduction Castillo-Arias v. U.S. Attorney General is a significant...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under IDEA in Retaliation Claims: Analysis of M.T.V. v. DeKalb County School District

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under IDEA in Retaliation Claims: Analysis of M.T.V. v. DeKalb County School District

Date: Apr 19, 2006
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies under IDEA in Retaliation Claims: Analysis of M.T.V. v. DeKalb County School District Introduction The case of M.T.V., C.T.V., C.E.V., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v....
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Warrantless In-Home Arrests: Analysis of Bashir v. Rockdale County

Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Warrantless In-Home Arrests: Analysis of Bashir v. Rockdale County

Date: Apr 15, 2006
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Warrantless In-Home Arrests: Analysis of Bashir v. Rockdale County Introduction Saleem Bashir v. Rockdale County, Georgia, 445 F.3d 1323 (11th Cir. 2006), is a...
Clarifying the Application of Concurrent Sentences under the Sentencing Guidelines: Coloma v. Holder

Clarifying the Application of Concurrent Sentences under the Sentencing Guidelines: Coloma v. Holder

Date: Apr 12, 2006
Clarifying the Application of Concurrent Sentences under the Sentencing Guidelines: Coloma v. Holder Introduction In Jose Semane Coloma, Petitioner, v. Carlyle I. Holder, Respondent (445 F.3d 1282),...
Legal Principles on Negligent Misrepresentation and Franchise Agreements in AMERICAN CASUAL DINING v. MOE'S SOUTHWEST GRILL

Legal Principles on Negligent Misrepresentation and Franchise Agreements in AMERICAN CASUAL DINING v. MOE'S SOUTHWEST GRILL

Date: Apr 6, 2006
Legal Principles on Negligent Misrepresentation and Franchise Agreements in AMERICAN CASUAL DINING v. MOE'S SOUTHWEST GRILL Introduction The case of AMERICAN CASUAL DINING, L.P. v. MOE'S SOUTHWEST...
Enhancing Disability Claims: The Tauber v. Barnhart Decision

Enhancing Disability Claims: The Tauber v. Barnhart Decision

Date: Apr 1, 2006
Enhancing Disability Claims: The Tauber v. Barnhart Decision Introduction The case of Patricia M. Tauber v. Jo Anne B. Barnhart, decided on March 31, 2006, by the United States District Court for the...
Burke-Fowler v. Orange County: Reinforcement of 'Nearly Identical' Comparator Standard in Title VII Discrimination Claims

Burke-Fowler v. Orange County: Reinforcement of 'Nearly Identical' Comparator Standard in Title VII Discrimination Claims

Date: Mar 28, 2006
Burke-Fowler v. Orange County: Reinforcement of 'Nearly Identical' Comparator Standard in Title VII Discrimination Claims Introduction Burke-Fowler v. Orange County is a significant case adjudicated...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert