Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

District Court Discretion on New Arguments and Judicial Estoppel Affirmed: Stephens v. Tolbert and Duarte

District Court Discretion on New Arguments and Judicial Estoppel Affirmed: Stephens v. Tolbert and Duarte

Date: Dec 6, 2006
District Court Discretion on New Arguments and Judicial Estoppel Affirmed: Stephens v. Tolbert and Duarte Introduction Gerald Stephens v. Thomas Tolbert and Kenneth E. Duarte (471 F.3d 1173, 11th...
Heightened Particularity Requirements for False Claims Act Qui Tam Actions: Insights from United States ex rel. Atkins v. McInteer

Heightened Particularity Requirements for False Claims Act Qui Tam Actions: Insights from United States ex rel. Atkins v. McInteer

Date: Dec 2, 2006
Heightened Particularity Requirements for False Claims Act Qui Tam Actions: Insights from United States ex rel. Atkins v. McInteer Introduction United States ex rel. Patrick Bruce Atkins, M.D. v....
Affirmation of Conviction and Denial of Safety-Valve Relief in Drug Conspiracy: United States v. Milkintas

Affirmation of Conviction and Denial of Safety-Valve Relief in Drug Conspiracy: United States v. Milkintas

Date: Dec 1, 2006
Affirmation of Conviction and Denial of Safety-Valve Relief in Drug Conspiracy: United States v. Milkintas Introduction United States of America v. Arunas Milkintas, 470 F.3d 1339 (11th Cir. 2006),...
United States v. Keene: Sentencing Affirmed Despite Disputed Threat-of-Death Enhancement

United States v. Keene: Sentencing Affirmed Despite Disputed Threat-of-Death Enhancement

Date: Dec 1, 2006
United States v. Keene: Sentencing Affirmed Despite Disputed Threat-of-Death Enhancement Case: UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Billy Jack KEENE, Defendant-Appellant. Citation: 470...
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Specific Waiver for Fraudulent Inducement in Settlement Agreements

Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Specific Waiver for Fraudulent Inducement in Settlement Agreements

Date: Nov 28, 2006
Delaware Supreme Court Establishes Specific Waiver for Fraudulent Inducement in Settlement Agreements Introduction The case of Florida Evergreen Foliage, Chang, Alpha Botanical, Inc., Richard A....
Enforceability of Exculpatory Clauses in Maritime Shore Excursions: Insights from KIM ISBELL v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION

Enforceability of Exculpatory Clauses in Maritime Shore Excursions: Insights from KIM ISBELL v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION

Date: Nov 21, 2006
Enforceability of Exculpatory Clauses in Maritime Shore Excursions: Insights from KIM ISBELL v. CARNIVAL CORPORATION Introduction The case of Kim Isbell v. Carnival Corporation (462 F. Supp. 2d 1232)...
Clarifying Attorney Fee Awards under ADA Title III: Pre-Suit Notice Not Required

Clarifying Attorney Fee Awards under ADA Title III: Pre-Suit Notice Not Required

Date: Nov 17, 2006
Clarifying Attorney Fee Awards under ADA Title III: Pre-Suit Notice Not Required Introduction The landmark case, Association of Disabled Americans, Michelle Wisniewski, Daniel Ruiz, Archivist v....
Garcetti and the False Claims Act: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in BATTLE v. Board of Regents

Garcetti and the False Claims Act: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in BATTLE v. Board of Regents

Date: Oct 26, 2006
Garcetti and the False Claims Act: Eleventh Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment in BATTLE v. Board of Regents Introduction The case of Lillie R. BATTLE, indi v. dually, United States of America, ex...
Supplemental Jurisdiction Affirmed in Environmental Liability Case: PARKER v. SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS, INC.

Supplemental Jurisdiction Affirmed in Environmental Liability Case: PARKER v. SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS, INC.

Date: Oct 25, 2006
Supplemental Jurisdiction Affirmed in Environmental Liability Case: PARKER v. SCRAP METAL PROCESSORS, INC. Introduction The case of Quebell P. Parker, Sandra Skypek, Charles Parker, individually, as...
Hutcherson v. Riley: Defining the Scope of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Capital Punishment Cases

Hutcherson v. Riley: Defining the Scope of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Capital Punishment Cases

Date: Oct 25, 2006
Hutcherson v. Riley: Defining the Scope of 42 U.S.C. § 1983 in Capital Punishment Cases Introduction Larry Hutcherson, a convicted capital murderer, appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for...
Untimely State Post-Conviction Petitions Do Not Toll Federal Habeas Statute of Limitations Under AEDPA: Sweet v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Untimely State Post-Conviction Petitions Do Not Toll Federal Habeas Statute of Limitations Under AEDPA: Sweet v. Secretary, Department of Corrections

Date: Oct 24, 2006
Untimely State Post-Conviction Petitions Do Not Toll Federal Habeas Statute of Limitations Under AEDPA: Sweet v. Secretary, Department of Corrections Introduction In the landmark case of William Earl...
Curtis Osborne v. William Terry: Establishing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Curtis Osborne v. William Terry: Establishing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims

Date: Oct 17, 2006
Curtis Osborne v. William Terry: Establishing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims Introduction Curtis Osborne v. William Terry, 466 F.3d 1298 (11th Cir. 2006), is a significant...
Strict Pleading Requirements under Rule 9(b) and PSLRA: DeKalb County Pension Plan v. NDC Health Corporation

Strict Pleading Requirements under Rule 9(b) and PSLRA: DeKalb County Pension Plan v. NDC Health Corporation

Date: Oct 13, 2006
Strict Pleading Requirements under Rule 9(b) and PSLRA: DeKalb County Pension Plan v. NDC Health Corporation Introduction The case of Robert GARFIELD, indi v. dually and on behalf of all others...
No Racial Discrimination Found in Zoning Decision: Hallmark Developers v. Fulton County

No Racial Discrimination Found in Zoning Decision: Hallmark Developers v. Fulton County

Date: Oct 13, 2006
No Racial Discrimination Found in Zoning Decision: Hallmark Developers v. Fulton County Introduction Hallmark Developers, Inc. and Charles Garrison (collectively, "Hallmark") appealed a decision by...
Automatic Stay Termination Upon Discharge in Bankruptcy Cases Involving Non-Dischargeable Tax Debts

Automatic Stay Termination Upon Discharge in Bankruptcy Cases Involving Non-Dischargeable Tax Debts

Date: Oct 12, 2006
Automatic Stay Termination Upon Discharge in Bankruptcy Cases Involving Non-Dischargeable Tax Debts Introduction The case of United States of America v. James W. White, 466 F.3d 1241 (11th Cir....
Affirmation of Obscene and Harassing Communications under 47 U.S.C. § 223: United States v. Eckhardt

Affirmation of Obscene and Harassing Communications under 47 U.S.C. § 223: United States v. Eckhardt

Date: Oct 5, 2006
Affirmation of Obscene and Harassing Communications under 47 U.S.C. § 223: United States v. Eckhardt Introduction United States of America v. Robert Eckhardt, 466 F.3d 938 (11th Cir. 2006), is a...
Finality of State Convictions as Limiting Factors for Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Pugh v. Smith

Finality of State Convictions as Limiting Factors for Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Pugh v. Smith

Date: Sep 30, 2006
Finality of State Convictions as Limiting Factors for Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: Pugh v. Smith Introduction Gerard Joseph Pugh filed a federal habeas corpus petition challenging his conviction...
Establishing Corporate Liability under RICO: Insights from Mohawk Industries v. Williams

Establishing Corporate Liability under RICO: Insights from Mohawk Industries v. Williams

Date: Sep 28, 2006
Establishing Corporate Liability under RICO: Insights from Mohawk Industries v. Williams Introduction In the landmark case of MOHAWK INDUSTRIES, INC. v. WILLIAMS, the United States Court of Appeals...
Application of Procedural Default and Actual Innocence Claims in Habeas Corpus: Davis v. Terry

Application of Procedural Default and Actual Innocence Claims in Habeas Corpus: Davis v. Terry

Date: Sep 27, 2006
Application of Procedural Default and Actual Innocence Claims in Habeas Corpus: Davis v. Terry Introduction Troy Anthony Davis v. William Terry, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic Prison, 465 F.3d 1249 (11th...
Enhanced Pleading Requirements for Non-Fraud Securities Claims under Rule 9(b)

Enhanced Pleading Requirements for Non-Fraud Securities Claims under Rule 9(b)

Date: Sep 19, 2006
Enhanced Pleading Requirements for Non-Fraud Securities Claims under Rule 9(b) Introduction In the landmark case of Harry Wagner et al. v. First Horizon Pharmaceutical Corporation et al. (464 F.3d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert