Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

11th Circuit Case Commentaries

Oral Settlement Agreements Prevail Over Subsequent Written Drafts: Clough v. Main Line

Oral Settlement Agreements Prevail Over Subsequent Written Drafts: Clough v. Main Line

Date: Jun 7, 2008
Oral Settlement Agreements Prevail Over Subsequent Written Drafts: Clough v. Main Line Introduction Clough Marketing Services, Inc. ("Clough") initiated a legal action against The Main Line...
Eleventh Circuit Recognizes Landlord Standing for Racial Equal Protection Claims in §1983 Actions

Eleventh Circuit Recognizes Landlord Standing for Racial Equal Protection Claims in §1983 Actions

Date: Jun 6, 2008
Eleventh Circuit Recognizes Landlord Standing for Racial Equal Protection Claims in §1983 Actions Introduction In the landmark case Young Apartments, Inc. v. Town of Jupiter, FL, the United States...
Conviction and Sentencing of Cuban Intelligence Agents Under Conspiracy and Foreign Agent Laws

Conviction and Sentencing of Cuban Intelligence Agents Under Conspiracy and Foreign Agent Laws

Date: Jun 5, 2008
Conviction and Sentencing of Cuban Intelligence Agents Under Conspiracy and Foreign Agent Laws Introduction The case of United States of America v. Ruben Campa et al. involves the convictions of five...
Expansion of Adverse Employment Action in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Crawford v. Carroll and Johnston

Expansion of Adverse Employment Action in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Crawford v. Carroll and Johnston

Date: Jun 4, 2008
Expansion of Adverse Employment Action in Title VII Retaliation Claims: Crawford v. Carroll and Johnston Introduction The case of Jacquelyn R. Crawford v. Barbara Carroll and Katherine Johnston...
Strict Adherence to Statute of Limitations in §1983 Execution Method Challenges: Crowe v. Crow Decision Analysis

Strict Adherence to Statute of Limitations in §1983 Execution Method Challenges: Crowe v. Crow Decision Analysis

Date: May 21, 2008
Strict Adherence to Statute of Limitations in §1983 Execution Method Challenges: Crowe v. Crow Decision Analysis Introduction The case of Samuel Da Crowe v. Commissioner of the Georgia Department of...
New Precedent on Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Adjustments in Wire Fraud: United States v. Alma Williams

New Precedent on Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Adjustments in Wire Fraud: United States v. Alma Williams

Date: May 17, 2008
New Precedent on Double Jeopardy and Sentencing Adjustments in Wire Fraud: United States v. Alma Williams Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Alma Williams (527 F.3d 1235), the...
Affirmation of Dismissal in Hindman v. FBI Agents: Implications for §1983 and Bivens Claims

Affirmation of Dismissal in Hindman v. FBI Agents: Implications for §1983 and Bivens Claims

Date: May 17, 2008
Affirmation of Dismissal in Hindman v. FBI Agents: Implications for §1983 and Bivens Claims Introduction In the case of Jimmy Doyle Hindman v. Paul Healy et al., the United States Court of Appeals...
Excessive Force and Qualified Immunity: Analyzing REESE v. HERBERT

Excessive Force and Qualified Immunity: Analyzing REESE v. HERBERT

Date: May 17, 2008
Excessive Force and Qualified Immunity: Analyzing REESE v. HERBERT Introduction REESE v. HERBERT, 527 F.3d 1253 (11th Cir. 2008), presents a pivotal case addressing the limits of qualified immunity...
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Affirmation in Newland v. Hall

Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Affirmation in Newland v. Hall

Date: May 15, 2008
Effective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases: Affirmation in Newland v. Hall Introduction The case of Robert L. Newland, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Hilton Hall, Warden, Georgia Diagnostic Prison,...
Substantial Similarity and Idea-Expression Dichotomy in Architectural Copyright: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment in Oravec v. Sunny Isles Luxury Ventures

Substantial Similarity and Idea-Expression Dichotomy in Architectural Copyright: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment in Oravec v. Sunny Isles Luxury Ventures

Date: May 15, 2008
Substantial Similarity and Idea-Expression Dichotomy in Architectural Copyright: Eleventh Circuit Upholds Summary Judgment in Oravec v. Sunny Isles Luxury Ventures Introduction The case of Paul...
United States v. Padron: Clarifying Criminal Forfeiture Applicability in Mail Fraud Cases under 28 U.S.C. §2461(c)

United States v. Padron: Clarifying Criminal Forfeiture Applicability in Mail Fraud Cases under 28 U.S.C. §2461(c)

Date: May 14, 2008
United States v. Padron: Clarifying Criminal Forfeiture Applicability in Mail Fraud Cases under 28 U.S.C. §2461(c) Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Alfredo Eduardo Polo Padron,...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Importance of State Trial Records in Habeas Corpus Review of Self-Representation Claims

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Importance of State Trial Records in Habeas Corpus Review of Self-Representation Claims

Date: May 14, 2008
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms Importance of State Trial Records in Habeas Corpus Review of Self-Representation Claims Introduction The case of Drago K. Ferguson, Jr. v. Grant Culliver, Attorney General...
Affirmation of JMOL in Enwonwu v. Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority: A Comprehensive Analysis

Affirmation of JMOL in Enwonwu v. Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: May 13, 2008
Affirmation of JMOL in Enwonwu v. Fulton-DeKalb Hospital Authority: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction Edith N. Enwonwu, a pro se litigant, appealed the United States Court of Appeals for the...
McCann v. Tillman: Reinforcement of 'Nearly Identical' Comparator Requirement in Racial Discrimination Claims

McCann v. Tillman: Reinforcement of 'Nearly Identical' Comparator Requirement in Racial Discrimination Claims

Date: May 10, 2008
McCann v. Tillman: Reinforcement of 'Nearly Identical' Comparator Requirement in Racial Discrimination Claims Introduction In the landmark case Georgia McCann v. Jack Tillman, Michael Haley, David...
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms APA Deference in NEPA and CWA Permit Challenges: Sierra Club v. Rinker Materials

Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms APA Deference in NEPA and CWA Permit Challenges: Sierra Club v. Rinker Materials

Date: May 10, 2008
Eleventh Circuit Reaffirms APA Deference in NEPA and CWA Permit Challenges: Sierra Club v. Rinker Materials Introduction In the landmark case of Sierra Club, Natural Resources Defense Council, Inc.,...
Legitimate Expectation of Privacy in Vehicle Searches: United States v. Harris

Legitimate Expectation of Privacy in Vehicle Searches: United States v. Harris

Date: May 9, 2008
Legitimate Expectation of Privacy in Vehicle Searches: United States v. Harris Introduction In United States v. Harris, 526 F.3d 1334 (11th Cir. 2008), the Eleventh Circuit Court of Appeals addressed...
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Clear Standards for Excessive Force and Qualified Immunity in Police Misconduct Cases

Eleventh Circuit Establishes Clear Standards for Excessive Force and Qualified Immunity in Police Misconduct Cases

Date: May 7, 2008
Eleventh Circuit Establishes Clear Standards for Excessive Force and Qualified Immunity in Police Misconduct Cases Introduction In the landmark case of Michael E. Hadley v. G. Gutierrez, Miami Beach...
Judicial Review and Agency Discretion: Eleventh Circuit's Stance on BIA Sua Sponte Reopenings

Judicial Review and Agency Discretion: Eleventh Circuit's Stance on BIA Sua Sponte Reopenings

Date: May 6, 2008
Judicial Review and Agency Discretion: Eleventh Circuit's Stance on BIA Sua Sponte Reopenings Introduction The case of Clara Ines Lenis et al. v. U.S. Attorney General (525 F.3d 1291) adjudicated by...
EAJA Fees Belong to the Prevailing Party: Insights from Reeves v. Astrue

EAJA Fees Belong to the Prevailing Party: Insights from Reeves v. Astrue

Date: May 6, 2008
EAJA Fees Belong to the Prevailing Party: Insights from Reeves v. Astrue Introduction The case of Maxie D. Reeves v. Michael J. Astrue, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Eleventh...
Clarifying the Scope of 18 U.S.C. §1519: Implications from United States v. Hunt

Clarifying the Scope of 18 U.S.C. §1519: Implications from United States v. Hunt

Date: May 6, 2008
Clarifying the Scope of 18 U.S.C. §1519: Implications from United States v. Hunt Introduction United States of America v. Jason Hardy Hunt is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert