Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Defining Custodial Interrogation in Inmate Informant Conversations: Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent in Cook v. United States

Defining Custodial Interrogation in Inmate Informant Conversations: Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent in Cook v. United States

Date: Apr 6, 2010
Defining Custodial Interrogation in Inmate Informant Conversations: Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent in Cook v. United States Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Glenn Dell...
Substantial Burden on Religious Exercise Under RLUIPA: Insights from Abdulhaseeb v. Calbone

Substantial Burden on Religious Exercise Under RLUIPA: Insights from Abdulhaseeb v. Calbone

Date: Apr 3, 2010
Substantial Burden on Religious Exercise Under RLUIPA: Insights from Abdulhaseeb v. Calbone Introduction Madyun Abdulhaseeb v. Sam Calbone, Warden, et al. is a significant case adjudicated by the...
Protective Orders and Interagency Disclosure: Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent in SEC v. Merrill Scott Associates

Protective Orders and Interagency Disclosure: Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent in SEC v. Merrill Scott Associates

Date: Mar 24, 2010
Protective Orders and Interagency Disclosure: Tenth Circuit Sets Precedent in SEC v. Merrill Scott Associates Introduction The case of SEC v. Merrill Scott Associates, Ltd. is a pivotal decision by...
Distinguishing Puffery from False Advertising and Standing under New Mexico UPA: A Comprehensive Analysis of Guidance Endodontics v. Dentsply International

Distinguishing Puffery from False Advertising and Standing under New Mexico UPA: A Comprehensive Analysis of Guidance Endodontics v. Dentsply International

Date: Mar 24, 2010
Distinguishing Puffery from False Advertising and Standing under New Mexico UPA: A Comprehensive Analysis of Guidance Endodontics v. Dentsply International Introduction The case of Guidance...
Affirmation of State Sovereignty and Limitations on RFRA Standing: Insights from El v. n Ross, Sr. (10th Cir. 2010)

Affirmation of State Sovereignty and Limitations on RFRA Standing: Insights from El v. n Ross, Sr. (10th Cir. 2010)

Date: Mar 24, 2010
Affirmation of State Sovereignty and Limitations on RFRA Standing: Insights from El v. n Ross, Sr. (10th Cir. 2010) Introduction In Elvin ROSS, Sr.; Jerry Ross; Tom Ross; Ken Ross; Cynthia Ross; Greg...
Consent to Search Invalidated by Unlawful Seizure: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Fox

Consent to Search Invalidated by Unlawful Seizure: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Fox

Date: Mar 23, 2010
Consent to Search Invalidated by Unlawful Seizure: A Comprehensive Analysis of United States v. Fox Introduction The case of United States of America v. Lucas Gregory Fox, adjudicated in the United...
Proper Application of Mental Impairment Evaluation in Social Security Disability Claims: Insights from Grotendorst v. Astrue

Proper Application of Mental Impairment Evaluation in Social Security Disability Claims: Insights from Grotendorst v. Astrue

Date: Mar 23, 2010
Proper Application of Mental Impairment Evaluation in Social Security Disability Claims: Insights from Grotendorst v. Astrue Introduction The case of Tatiana Grotendorst v. Michael J. Astrue,...
Affirmation of Excessive Force Claims under the Fourth Amendment: Zia Trust Co. v. Montoya

Affirmation of Excessive Force Claims under the Fourth Amendment: Zia Trust Co. v. Montoya

Date: Mar 10, 2010
Affirmation of Excessive Force Claims under the Fourth Amendment: Zia Trust Co. v. Montoya Introduction The case of Zia Trust Company, as Personal Representative of Dylan Causey, Minor Son of Jodie...
Qualified Immunity and Retaliation Claims in McBeth v. Himes: A Comprehensive Analysis

Qualified Immunity and Retaliation Claims in McBeth v. Himes: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Mar 9, 2010
Qualified Immunity and Retaliation Claims in McBeth v. Himes: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction McBeth v. Himes, 598 F.3d 708 (10th Cir. 2010), addresses the complex interplay between qualified...
Dismissal of Pro Se Prisoners’ Appeals as Frivolous and Moot under 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Dismissal of Pro Se Prisoners’ Appeals as Frivolous and Moot under 28 U.S.C. § 1915

Date: Mar 4, 2010
Dismissal of Pro Se Prisoners’ Appeals as Frivolous and Moot under 28 U.S.C. § 1915 Introduction In the case of Keith V. Menefee and Dustin S. Blevins v. Roger Werholtz et al., the United States...
Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Standards in Conspiracy Withdrawal Defense: UNITED STATES v. GONZALEZ

Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Standards in Conspiracy Withdrawal Defense: UNITED STATES v. GONZALEZ

Date: Mar 3, 2010
Affirmation of Effective Assistance of Counsel Standards in Conspiracy Withdrawal Defense Introduction United States of America v. Dennis Emerson Gonzalez, 596 F.3d 1228 (10th Cir. 2010), presents a...
Thorpe v. Ancell: Reinforcing Standards for Awarding Attorneys' Fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988(b)

Thorpe v. Ancell: Reinforcing Standards for Awarding Attorneys' Fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988(b)

Date: Feb 27, 2010
Thorpe v. Ancell: Reinforcing Standards for Awarding Attorneys' Fees under 42 U.S.C. §1988(b) Introduction In the case of Robert Paul Thorpe; Maria Elizabeth Thorpe v. Stanley Ancell et al., the...
BIXLER et al. v. Foster et al.: Affirmation of RICO Standing and PSLRA Implications

BIXLER et al. v. Foster et al.: Affirmation of RICO Standing and PSLRA Implications

Date: Feb 23, 2010
BIXLER et al. v. Foster et al.: Affirmation of RICO Standing and PSLRA Implications Introduction BIXLER et al. v. Foster et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Confrontation Clause and Hearsay: A Detailed Analysis of United States v. Gerardo Lopez-Medina

Confrontation Clause and Hearsay: A Detailed Analysis of United States v. Gerardo Lopez-Medina

Date: Feb 20, 2010
Confrontation Clause and Hearsay: A Detailed Analysis of United States v. Gerardo Lopez-Medina Introduction The case of United States v. Gerardo Lopez-Medina (596 F.3d 716) presents a significant...
Affirmation of Garcetti/Pickering Framework in Retaliation Claims: Rohrbough v. University of Colorado Hospital

Affirmation of Garcetti/Pickering Framework in Retaliation Claims: Rohrbough v. University of Colorado Hospital

Date: Feb 20, 2010
Affirmation of Garcetti/Pickering Framework in Retaliation Claims: Rohrbough v. University of Colorado Hospital Introduction In Rohrbough v. University of Colorado Hospital Authority, the United...
Extension of Statute of Limitations Upon Federal Removal: Wallace v. Microsoft

Extension of Statute of Limitations Upon Federal Removal: Wallace v. Microsoft

Date: Feb 19, 2010
Extension of Statute of Limitations Upon Federal Removal: Wallace v. Microsoft Introduction The case of Peter M. Wallace v. Microsoft Corporation, heard by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Garza v. Davis Analysis

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Garza v. Davis Analysis

Date: Feb 18, 2010
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Habeas Corpus Petitions: Garza v. Davis Analysis Introduction Garza v. Davis is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Seltzer v. United States: Affirming the Right to a Speedy Trial

Seltzer v. United States: Affirming the Right to a Speedy Trial

Date: Feb 18, 2010
Seltzer v. United States: Affirming the Right to a Speedy Trial 1. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Andy Eugene Seltzer, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Reinhardt v. Albuquerque Public Schools: Expanding Protections for Employee Advocacy under Section 504 and the First Amendment

Reinhardt v. Albuquerque Public Schools: Expanding Protections for Employee Advocacy under Section 504 and the First Amendment

Date: Feb 17, 2010
Reinhardt v. Albuquerque Public Schools: Expanding Protections for Employee Advocacy under Section 504 and the First Amendment Introduction Reinhardt v. Albuquerque Public Schools is a landmark case...
Procedural Default and AKE v. OKLAHOMA Claims: Comprehensive Analysis of Alverson v. Workman (595 F.3d 1142)

Procedural Default and AKE v. OKLAHOMA Claims: Comprehensive Analysis of Alverson v. Workman (595 F.3d 1142)

Date: Feb 17, 2010
Procedural Default and AKE v. OKLAHOMA Claims: Comprehensive Analysis of Alverson v. Workman (595 F.3d 1142) Introduction Alverson v. Workman is a pivotal case heard by the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert