Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

10th Circuit Affirms Mootness in RLUIPA Challenge to Book Limit Policy

10th Circuit Affirms Mootness in RLUIPA Challenge to Book Limit Policy

Date: Sep 12, 2015
10th Circuit Affirms Mootness in RLUIPA Challenge to Book Limit Policy Introduction The case of Jacob IND, Plaintiff–Appellee, v. Colorado Department of Corrections, Defendant–Appellant (801 F.3d...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Supervisory Officials in Eighth Amendment Jail Suicide Claims: Cox v. Glanz

Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Supervisory Officials in Eighth Amendment Jail Suicide Claims: Cox v. Glanz

Date: Sep 9, 2015
Qualified Immunity Affirmed for Supervisory Officials in Eighth Amendment Jail Suicide Claims: Cox v. Glanz Introduction In Carolyn Cox v. Stanley Glanz, 800 F.3d 1231 (10th Cir. 2015), the United...
Procedural Bars in Habeas Corpus Petitions: An Analysis of Windsor v. Patton

Procedural Bars in Habeas Corpus Petitions: An Analysis of Windsor v. Patton

Date: Aug 22, 2015
Procedural Bars in Habeas Corpus Petitions: An Analysis of Windsor v. Patton Introduction Windsor v. Patton is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on...
Hancock v. Trammell: Affirmation of AEDPA Deference in Admissibility of Prior Convictions

Hancock v. Trammell: Affirmation of AEDPA Deference in Admissibility of Prior Convictions

Date: Aug 19, 2015
Hancock v. Trammell: Affirmation of AEDPA Deference in Admissibility of Prior Convictions Introduction Hancock v. Trammell, 798 F.3d 1002 (10th Cir. 2015), addresses complex issues surrounding the...
AEDPA Deference and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Comprehensive Analysis of Hanson v. Sherrod

AEDPA Deference and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Comprehensive Analysis of Hanson v. Sherrod

Date: Aug 14, 2015
AEDPA Deference and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Comprehensive Analysis of Hanson v. Sherrod Introduction In the appellate case of John Fitzgerald Hanson v. William A. Sherrod, decided by the...
Tenth Circuit Establishes Mandatory Standardized Criteria for Community-Caretaking Vehicle Impoundments

Tenth Circuit Establishes Mandatory Standardized Criteria for Community-Caretaking Vehicle Impoundments

Date: Aug 8, 2015
Tenth Circuit Establishes Mandatory Standardized Criteria for Community-Caretaking Vehicle Impoundments Introduction In United States of America v. Sanders, 796 F.3d 1241 (10th Cir. 2015), the United...
Affirmation of Summary Judgments in NMSU Discrimination and Retaliation Cases

Affirmation of Summary Judgments in NMSU Discrimination and Retaliation Cases

Date: Aug 7, 2015
Affirmation of Summary Judgments in NMSU Discrimination and Retaliation Cases Introduction In the appellate case Yelena Bird; Freedom Cheteni; John Moraros; Satya Rao, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and...
Affirmation of Lanham Act Protections: Burden-Shifting in False Advertising and Disgorgement of Profits

Affirmation of Lanham Act Protections: Burden-Shifting in False Advertising and Disgorgement of Profits

Date: Aug 1, 2015
Affirmation of Lanham Act Protections: Burden-Shifting in False Advertising and Disgorgement of Profits Introduction The case of General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC, d/b/a General Steel Corporation v....
Clarifying Rule 11 Sanctions and Jurisdictional Boundaries in Patent Litigation: Insights from Predator International, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc.

Clarifying Rule 11 Sanctions and Jurisdictional Boundaries in Patent Litigation: Insights from Predator International, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc.

Date: Jul 15, 2015
Clarifying Rule 11 Sanctions and Jurisdictional Boundaries in Patent Litigation: Insights from Predator International, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case Predator...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Bennett v. Windstream Communications: Implications for Employment Discrimination Claims

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Bennett v. Windstream Communications: Implications for Employment Discrimination Claims

Date: Jul 10, 2015
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Bennett v. Windstream Communications: Implications for Employment Discrimination Claims Introduction In the case of Susan G. Bennett v. Windstream Communications,...
10th Circuit Upholds USPS Firearms Ban on Postal Property: Implications for Second Amendment Rights

10th Circuit Upholds USPS Firearms Ban on Postal Property: Implications for Second Amendment Rights

Date: Jun 27, 2015
10th Circuit Upholds USPS Firearms Ban on Postal Property: Implications for Second Amendment Rights Introduction The case of Tab Bonidy v. United States Postal Service addresses the intersection of...
Clarifying Restitution Calculations under MVRA: United States v. Alisuretove

Clarifying Restitution Calculations under MVRA: United States v. Alisuretove

Date: Jun 9, 2015
Clarifying Restitution Calculations under MVRA: United States v. Alisuretove Introduction United States v. Elvin Alisuretove is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirmation of Factual Findings and Judicial Impartiality in Negligence Litigation: Mathis v. Huff & Puff Trucking

Affirmation of Factual Findings and Judicial Impartiality in Negligence Litigation: Mathis v. Huff & Puff Trucking

Date: Jun 3, 2015
Affirmation of Factual Findings and Judicial Impartiality in Negligence Litigation: Mathis v. Huff & Puff Trucking Introduction The case of Melvin L. Mathis v. Huff & Puff Trucking, Inc. involved a...
Browder v. City of Albuquerque: Affirming Police Liability for Substantive Due Process Violations under §1983

Browder v. City of Albuquerque: Affirming Police Liability for Substantive Due Process Violations under §1983

Date: Jun 3, 2015
Browder v. City of Albuquerque: Affirming Police Liability for Substantive Due Process Violations under §1983 Introduction In the landmark case of Browder v. City of Albuquerque, the United States...
Affirmation of Receiver's Authority Under UFTA in Ponzi Scheme Recovery

Affirmation of Receiver's Authority Under UFTA in Ponzi Scheme Recovery

Date: May 28, 2015
Affirmation of Receiver's Authority Under UFTA in Ponzi Scheme Recovery Introduction In the appellate case R. Wayne KLEIN, the Court–Appointed Receiver of U.S. Ventures LC, Winsome Investment Trust,...
Prejudicial Spillover in Conspiracy Charges: Analysis of United States v. Dejuan Leshae Hill

Prejudicial Spillover in Conspiracy Charges: Analysis of United States v. Dejuan Leshae Hill

Date: May 23, 2015
Prejudicial Spillover in Conspiracy Charges: Analysis of United States v. Dejuan Leshae Hill Introduction United States v. Dejuan Leshae Hill, 786 F.3d 1254 (10th Cir. 2015), addresses significant...
Application of Garcetti/Pickering Framework in First Amendment Retaliation Claims: Nixon v. City and County of Denver

Application of Garcetti/Pickering Framework in First Amendment Retaliation Claims: Nixon v. City and County of Denver

Date: May 1, 2015
Application of Garcetti/Pickering Framework in First Amendment Retaliation Claims: Nixon v. City and County of Denver Introduction In the case of Ricky Nixon, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. City and County...
Affirmation of Procedural Deference in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: *Fairchild v. Trammell*

Affirmation of Procedural Deference in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: *Fairchild v. Trammell*

Date: Apr 24, 2015
Affirmation of Procedural Deference in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Fairchild v. Trammell Introduction The case of Richard Fairchild v. Anita Trammell, adjudicated by the United States...
FIRREA Preempts Shareholder Derivative Claims in Bank Failure Cases: Barnes v. Harris

FIRREA Preempts Shareholder Derivative Claims in Bank Failure Cases: Barnes v. Harris

Date: Apr 22, 2015
FIRREA Preempts Shareholder Derivative Claims in Bank Failure Cases: Barnes v. Harris 1. Introduction In the landmark case of J. Canute Barnes; W. King Barnes; Robert V. Jones, derivatively on behalf...
Affirmation of Heck Doctrine in Excessive Force Claims: Havens v. Johnson

Affirmation of Heck Doctrine in Excessive Force Claims: Havens v. Johnson

Date: Apr 16, 2015
Affirmation of Heck Doctrine in Excessive Force Claims: Havens v. Johnson Introduction The case of Darrell L. Havens v. William Johnson, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert