Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Impact of Victim-Influenced Sentencing: Dodd v. Trammell Establishes Eighth Amendment Constraints

Impact of Victim-Influenced Sentencing: Dodd v. Trammell Establishes Eighth Amendment Constraints

Date: Oct 17, 2013
Impact of Victim-Influenced Sentencing: Dodd v. Trammell Establishes Eighth Amendment Constraints Introduction The case of Rocky Eugene Dodd v. Anita Trammell (753 F.3d 971, United States Court of...
Affirmation of Reves Family-Resemblance Test in Securities Classification: SEC v. Thompson

Affirmation of Reves Family-Resemblance Test in Securities Classification: SEC v. Thompson

Date: Oct 5, 2013
Affirmation of Reves Family-Resemblance Test in Securities Classification: SEC v. Thompson Introduction The case of SEC v. Ralph W. Thompson, Jr. adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Notice Requirements in Title VII Religious Accommodation Claims: EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.

Notice Requirements in Title VII Religious Accommodation Claims: EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc.

Date: Oct 2, 2013
Notice Requirements in Title VII Religious Accommodation Claims: EEOC v. Abercrombie & Fitch Stores, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case Equal Employment Opportunity Commission (EEOC) v....
Exclusivity of VA Immunity Statute Over Bivens Actions Upheld: Ingram v. Faruque et al.

Exclusivity of VA Immunity Statute Over Bivens Actions Upheld: Ingram v. Faruque et al.

Date: Sep 7, 2013
Exclusivity of VA Immunity Statute Over Bivens Actions Upheld: Ingram v. Faruque et al. Introduction In the case of Delbert Ingram v. Hashib D. Faruque, M.D., Yan Feng, M.D., and others, adjudicated...
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and the Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas: Insights from Da v. d Glen HEARD

Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and the Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas: Insights from Da v. d Glen HEARD

Date: Sep 5, 2013
Ineffective Assistance of Counsel and the Withdrawal of Guilty Pleas: Insights from Da v. d Glen HEARD Introduction In the landmark case of Da v. d Glen HEARD, the United States Court of Appeals for...
Federal Preemption of State Warranty Claims in Generic Drug Litigation: Schrock v. Wyeth

Federal Preemption of State Warranty Claims in Generic Drug Litigation: Schrock v. Wyeth

Date: Aug 29, 2013
Federal Preemption of State Warranty Claims in Generic Drug Litigation: Schrock v. Wyeth Introduction In the landmark case of Susan Schrock; Steve Schrock v. Wyeth, Inc., Schwarz Pharma, Inc., PLIVA...
Appellate Review and Mootness in Religious Accommodation Cases: Warner v. Patterson

Appellate Review and Mootness in Religious Accommodation Cases: Warner v. Patterson

Date: Aug 23, 2013
Appellate Review and Mootness in Religious Accommodation Cases: Warner v. Patterson Introduction Warner v. Patterson is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Enhancing RFC Analysis: Tenth Circuit Sets New Standard for Non-Severe Mental Impairments in SSA Disability Cases

Enhancing RFC Analysis: Tenth Circuit Sets New Standard for Non-Severe Mental Impairments in SSA Disability Cases

Date: Aug 20, 2013
Enhancing RFC Analysis: Tenth Circuit Sets New Standard for Non-Severe Mental Impairments in SSA Disability Cases Introduction The case of Joe Ella Wells v. Carolyn W. Colvin, Acting Commissioner of...
Reaffirmation of Strict Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases

Reaffirmation of Strict Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases

Date: Aug 16, 2013
Reaffirmation of Strict Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Cases Introduction The case of John Marion Grant v. Anita Trammell (727 F.3d 1006) adjudicated by the United States...
Jurisdictional Challenges in Foreclosure Litigation: Dutcher v. Matheson and ReconTrust Company

Jurisdictional Challenges in Foreclosure Litigation: Dutcher v. Matheson and ReconTrust Company

Date: Aug 14, 2013
Jurisdictional Challenges in Foreclosure Litigation: Dutcher v. Matheson and ReconTrust Company Introduction Dutcher et al. v. Matheson et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Water Pik v. Med-Systems: Low Likelihood of Confusion Due to Weak Sinu Cleanse Mark

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Water Pik v. Med-Systems: Low Likelihood of Confusion Due to Weak Sinu Cleanse Mark

Date: Aug 13, 2013
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Water Pik v. Med-Systems: Low Likelihood of Confusion Due to Weak Sinu Cleanse Mark Introduction In the trademark dispute between Water Pik, Inc. and Med-Systems,...
Protected Property Interests in Public Transportation Access: BROWN v. EPPLER

Protected Property Interests in Public Transportation Access: BROWN v. EPPLER

Date: Aug 3, 2013
Protected Property Interests in Public Transportation Access: BROWN v. EPPLER Introduction BROWN v. EPPLER, 725 F.3d 1221 (10th Cir. 2013), addresses the critical issue of whether an individual has a...
Wadas Law Office Not Classified as a "Debt Collector" Under FDCPA: A Comprehensive Analysis

Wadas Law Office Not Classified as a "Debt Collector" Under FDCPA: A Comprehensive Analysis

Date: Aug 1, 2013
Wadas Law Office Not Classified as a "Debt Collector" Under FDCPA: A Comprehensive Analysis Introduction The case of George James v. Cheryl Wadas; Wadas Law Office, Defendants–Appellees, and Abby...
P. Da v. d NEWSOME, Jr. Establishes Personal Jurisdiction over Foreign Individual Defendants in Oklahoma

P. Da v. d NEWSOME, Jr. Establishes Personal Jurisdiction over Foreign Individual Defendants in Oklahoma

Date: Jul 18, 2013
P. Da v. d NEWSOME, Jr. Establishes Personal Jurisdiction over Foreign Individual Defendants in Oklahoma Introduction P. Da v. d NEWSOME, Jr. (722 F.3d 1257) is a landmark decision by the United...
1-800 Contacts v. Lens.com: Tenth Circuit Defines Trademark Infringement in AdWords Context

1-800 Contacts v. Lens.com: Tenth Circuit Defines Trademark Infringement in AdWords Context

Date: Jul 17, 2013
1-800 Contacts v. Lens.com: Tenth Circuit Defines Trademark Infringement in AdWords Context Introduction The case of 1-800 Contacts, Inc. v. Lens.com, Inc. was adjudicated by the United States Court...
Preserving Sufficiency-of-Evidence Challenges Through Rule 59(e) Motions in Absence of Rule 50(b): Elm Ridge Exploration Co. v. Fred Engle

Preserving Sufficiency-of-Evidence Challenges Through Rule 59(e) Motions in Absence of Rule 50(b): Elm Ridge Exploration Co. v. Fred Engle

Date: Jul 10, 2013
Preserving Sufficiency-of-Evidence Challenges Through Rule 59(e) Motions in Absence of Rule 50(b): Elm Ridge Exploration Co. v. Fred Engle Introduction The case of Elm Ridge Exploration Company, LLC...
10th Circuit Establishes Rigorous Standards for Class Certification in Royalty Underpayment Cases

10th Circuit Establishes Rigorous Standards for Class Certification in Royalty Underpayment Cases

Date: Jul 10, 2013
10th Circuit Establishes Rigorous Standards for Class Certification in Royalty Underpayment Cases Introduction The case of Wallace B. Roderick Revocable Living Trust, Trustee Amanda Roderick v. XTO...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity Standards in §1983 Claims: Insights from Rojas v. Anderson

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity Standards in §1983 Claims: Insights from Rojas v. Anderson

Date: Jul 10, 2013
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity Standards in §1983 Claims: Insights from Rojas v. Anderson Introduction Rojas v. Anderson, 727 F.3d 1000 (10th Cir. 2013), is a pivotal case that underscores the...
Reaffirming Totality of Circumstances in Reasonable Suspicion: United States v. Briggs (10th Cir. 2013)

Reaffirming Totality of Circumstances in Reasonable Suspicion: United States v. Briggs (10th Cir. 2013)

Date: Jul 3, 2013
Reaffirming Totality of Circumstances in Reasonable Suspicion: United States v. Briggs (10th Cir. 2013) Introduction United States v. Nathan Andrew Briggs is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Santa Fe Public Schools Pat-Down Search Case

Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Santa Fe Public Schools Pat-Down Search Case

Date: Jun 29, 2013
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Santa Fe Public Schools Pat-Down Search Case Introduction In the landmark case of Candice Herrera, Arianna London, Ashley Hurtado, and T.H. v. Santa Fe Public Schools,...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert