Log In
  • US
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Supreme Court
  • High Courts
    All High Courts
    Allahabad High Court
    Andhra Pradesh High Court
    Bombay High Court
    Calcutta High Court
    Chhattisgarh High Court
    Delhi High Court
    Gauhati High Court
    Gujarat High Court
    Himachal Pradesh High Court
    Jammu and Kashmir High Court
    Jharkhand High Court
    Karnataka High Court
    Kerala High Court
    Madhya Pradesh High Court
    Madras High Court
    Manipur High Court
    Meghalaya High Court
    Orissa High Court
    Patna High Court
    Punjab & Haryana High Court
    Rajasthan High Court
    Sikkim High Court
    Telangana High Court
    Tripura High Court
    Uttarakhand High Court
Log In Sign Up India Judgments
  • US
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Tenth Circuit Establishes Mandatory Standardized Criteria for Community-Caretaking Vehicle Impoundments

Tenth Circuit Establishes Mandatory Standardized Criteria for Community-Caretaking Vehicle Impoundments

Date: Aug 8, 2015
Tenth Circuit Establishes Mandatory Standardized Criteria for Community-Caretaking Vehicle Impoundments Introduction In United States of America v. Sanders, 796 F.3d 1241 (10th Cir. 2015), the United...
Affirmation of Summary Judgments in NMSU Discrimination and Retaliation Cases

Affirmation of Summary Judgments in NMSU Discrimination and Retaliation Cases

Date: Aug 7, 2015
Affirmation of Summary Judgments in NMSU Discrimination and Retaliation Cases Introduction In the appellate case Yelena Bird; Freedom Cheteni; John Moraros; Satya Rao, Plaintiffs - Appellants, and...
Affirmation of Lanham Act Protections: Burden-Shifting in False Advertising and Disgorgement of Profits

Affirmation of Lanham Act Protections: Burden-Shifting in False Advertising and Disgorgement of Profits

Date: Aug 1, 2015
Affirmation of Lanham Act Protections: Burden-Shifting in False Advertising and Disgorgement of Profits Introduction The case of General Steel Domestic Sales, LLC, d/b/a General Steel Corporation v....
Clarifying Rule 11 Sanctions and Jurisdictional Boundaries in Patent Litigation: Insights from Predator International, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc.

Clarifying Rule 11 Sanctions and Jurisdictional Boundaries in Patent Litigation: Insights from Predator International, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc.

Date: Jul 15, 2015
Clarifying Rule 11 Sanctions and Jurisdictional Boundaries in Patent Litigation: Insights from Predator International, Inc. v. Gamo Outdoor USA, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case Predator...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Bennett v. Windstream Communications: Implications for Employment Discrimination Claims

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Bennett v. Windstream Communications: Implications for Employment Discrimination Claims

Date: Jul 10, 2015
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Bennett v. Windstream Communications: Implications for Employment Discrimination Claims Introduction In the case of Susan G. Bennett v. Windstream Communications,...
10th Circuit Upholds USPS Firearms Ban on Postal Property: Implications for Second Amendment Rights

10th Circuit Upholds USPS Firearms Ban on Postal Property: Implications for Second Amendment Rights

Date: Jun 27, 2015
10th Circuit Upholds USPS Firearms Ban on Postal Property: Implications for Second Amendment Rights Introduction The case of Tab Bonidy v. United States Postal Service addresses the intersection of...
Clarifying Restitution Calculations under MVRA: United States v. Alisuretove

Clarifying Restitution Calculations under MVRA: United States v. Alisuretove

Date: Jun 9, 2015
Clarifying Restitution Calculations under MVRA: United States v. Alisuretove Introduction United States v. Elvin Alisuretove is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirmation of Factual Findings and Judicial Impartiality in Negligence Litigation: Mathis v. Huff & Puff Trucking

Affirmation of Factual Findings and Judicial Impartiality in Negligence Litigation: Mathis v. Huff & Puff Trucking

Date: Jun 3, 2015
Affirmation of Factual Findings and Judicial Impartiality in Negligence Litigation: Mathis v. Huff & Puff Trucking Introduction The case of Melvin L. Mathis v. Huff & Puff Trucking, Inc. involved a...
Browder v. City of Albuquerque: Affirming Police Liability for Substantive Due Process Violations under §1983

Browder v. City of Albuquerque: Affirming Police Liability for Substantive Due Process Violations under §1983

Date: Jun 3, 2015
Browder v. City of Albuquerque: Affirming Police Liability for Substantive Due Process Violations under §1983 Introduction In the landmark case of Browder v. City of Albuquerque, the United States...
Affirmation of Receiver's Authority Under UFTA in Ponzi Scheme Recovery

Affirmation of Receiver's Authority Under UFTA in Ponzi Scheme Recovery

Date: May 28, 2015
Affirmation of Receiver's Authority Under UFTA in Ponzi Scheme Recovery Introduction In the appellate case R. Wayne KLEIN, the Court–Appointed Receiver of U.S. Ventures LC, Winsome Investment Trust,...
Prejudicial Spillover in Conspiracy Charges: Analysis of United States v. Dejuan Leshae Hill

Prejudicial Spillover in Conspiracy Charges: Analysis of United States v. Dejuan Leshae Hill

Date: May 23, 2015
Prejudicial Spillover in Conspiracy Charges: Analysis of United States v. Dejuan Leshae Hill Introduction United States v. Dejuan Leshae Hill, 786 F.3d 1254 (10th Cir. 2015), addresses significant...
Application of Garcetti/Pickering Framework in First Amendment Retaliation Claims: Nixon v. City and County of Denver

Application of Garcetti/Pickering Framework in First Amendment Retaliation Claims: Nixon v. City and County of Denver

Date: May 1, 2015
Application of Garcetti/Pickering Framework in First Amendment Retaliation Claims: Nixon v. City and County of Denver Introduction In the case of Ricky Nixon, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. City and County...
Affirmation of Procedural Deference in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: *Fairchild v. Trammell*

Affirmation of Procedural Deference in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: *Fairchild v. Trammell*

Date: Apr 24, 2015
Affirmation of Procedural Deference in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: Fairchild v. Trammell Introduction The case of Richard Fairchild v. Anita Trammell, adjudicated by the United States...
FIRREA Preempts Shareholder Derivative Claims in Bank Failure Cases: Barnes v. Harris

FIRREA Preempts Shareholder Derivative Claims in Bank Failure Cases: Barnes v. Harris

Date: Apr 22, 2015
FIRREA Preempts Shareholder Derivative Claims in Bank Failure Cases: Barnes v. Harris 1. Introduction In the landmark case of J. Canute Barnes; W. King Barnes; Robert V. Jones, derivatively on behalf...
Affirmation of Heck Doctrine in Excessive Force Claims: Havens v. Johnson

Affirmation of Heck Doctrine in Excessive Force Claims: Havens v. Johnson

Date: Apr 16, 2015
Affirmation of Heck Doctrine in Excessive Force Claims: Havens v. Johnson Introduction The case of Darrell L. Havens v. William Johnson, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Williams v. Trammell: Upholding Intent Requirements in Aiding and Abetting Malice Murder

Williams v. Trammell: Upholding Intent Requirements in Aiding and Abetting Malice Murder

Date: Apr 11, 2015
Williams v. Trammell: Upholding Intent Requirements in Aiding and Abetting Malice Murder Introduction In the case of Jeremy Alan Williams v. Anita Trammell, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary,...
Citizenship Determination of LLCs for Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C. v. Century Surety Company

Citizenship Determination of LLCs for Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C. v. Century Surety Company

Date: Apr 1, 2015
Citizenship Determination of LLCs for Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C. v. Century Surety Company Introduction The case of Siloam Springs Hotel, L.L.C.,...
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Puller v. Baca: Implications for Police Conduct and Probable Cause Standards

Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Puller v. Baca: Implications for Police Conduct and Probable Cause Standards

Date: Mar 21, 2015
Qualified Immunity Affirmed in Puller v. Baca: Implications for Police Conduct and Probable Cause Standards Introduction In Aaron Joel Puller v. Paul C. Baca, 781 F.3d 1190 (10th Cir. 2015), the...
Qualified Immunity in Larceny Sting Operations: Insights from Quinn; La v. Gonzalez

Qualified Immunity in Larceny Sting Operations: Insights from Quinn; La v. Gonzalez

Date: Mar 14, 2015
Qualified Immunity in Larceny Sting Operations: Insights from Quinn; La v. Gonzalez Introduction The case of John Michase Quinn; La v. Lemon Gonzalez adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Riser v. QEP Energy: Tenth Circuit Defines 'Substantially Equal' Work in Equal Pay Act Claims

Riser v. QEP Energy: Tenth Circuit Defines 'Substantially Equal' Work in Equal Pay Act Claims

Date: Jan 28, 2015
Riser v. QEP Energy: Tenth Circuit Defines 'Substantially Equal' Work in Equal Pay Act Claims Introduction The case of Kathy A. Riser v. QEP Energy Company was adjudicated by the United States Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • Judgment Takedown Policy (India)
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases
  • Acts

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert