Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Enhancing Religious Rights of Incarcerated Individuals under RLUIPA: Insights from Williams v. Wilkinson

Enhancing Religious Rights of Incarcerated Individuals under RLUIPA: Insights from Williams v. Wilkinson

Date: Apr 15, 2016
Enhancing Religious Rights of Incarcerated Individuals under RLUIPA: Insights from Williams v. Wilkinson Introduction Williams v. Wilkinson, 645 F. App'x 692 (10th Cir. 2016), marks a significant...
Amendment 782's Non-Applicability to Career Offender Sentencing Under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1

Amendment 782's Non-Applicability to Career Offender Sentencing Under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1

Date: Apr 8, 2016
Amendment 782's Non-Applicability to Career Offender Sentencing Under U.S.S.G. § 4B1.1 Introduction The case of United States of America v. Matthew S. Izenberg (645 F. App'x 614) adjudicated by the...
Excessive Force and Taser Usage: Perea v. City of Albuquerque Establishes New Precedent

Excessive Force and Taser Usage: Perea v. City of Albuquerque Establishes New Precedent

Date: Apr 5, 2016
Excessive Force and Taser Usage: Perea v. City of Albuquerque Establishes New Precedent Introduction In the landmark case of Merlinda Perea; Francine Puentes v. Officers Baca and Jaramillo, the...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Nebeker v. National Auto Plaza: Standards for Wrongful Termination and FMLA/ADA Claims under Utah Law

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Nebeker v. National Auto Plaza: Standards for Wrongful Termination and FMLA/ADA Claims under Utah Law

Date: Apr 2, 2016
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Nebeker v. National Auto Plaza: Standards for Wrongful Termination and FMLA/ADA Claims under Utah Law Introduction In the case of Shauna Nebeker v. National Auto...
Limitation on Federal Sentence Reductions Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2): Insights from United States v. William Kurtz

Limitation on Federal Sentence Reductions Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2): Insights from United States v. William Kurtz

Date: Mar 30, 2016
Limitation on Federal Sentence Reductions Under 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2): Insights from United States v. William Kurtz Introduction The landmark case United States of America v. William Kurtz,...
Statute of Limitations Applied to Clean Air Act Citizen Suits: Insights from Sierra Club v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company

Statute of Limitations Applied to Clean Air Act Citizen Suits: Insights from Sierra Club v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company

Date: Mar 9, 2016
Statute of Limitations Applied to Clean Air Act Citizen Suits: Insights from Sierra Club v. Oklahoma Gas & Electric Company Introduction In the landmark case of Sierra Club, Plaintiff–Appellant, v....
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity and Malicious Prosecution Standards in Cordova v. City of Albuquerque

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity and Malicious Prosecution Standards in Cordova v. City of Albuquerque

Date: Mar 9, 2016
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity and Malicious Prosecution Standards in Cordova v. City of Albuquerque Introduction Cordova v. City of Albuquerque is a significant case adjudicated by the United...
Defining State Action: 10th Circuit Clarifies Limits for Parking Enforcement Officers in §1983 Claims

Defining State Action: 10th Circuit Clarifies Limits for Parking Enforcement Officers in §1983 Claims

Date: Mar 3, 2016
Defining State Action: 10th Circuit Clarifies Limits for Parking Enforcement Officers in §1983 Claims Introduction The case of Diana Sue Schaffer v. Salt Lake City Corporation et al. examines the...
Affirmation of ALJ’s Discretion in Residual Functional Capacity Assessment: Allman v. Colvin

Affirmation of ALJ’s Discretion in Residual Functional Capacity Assessment: Allman v. Colvin

Date: Feb 24, 2016
Affirmation of ALJ’s Discretion in Residual Functional Capacity Assessment: Allman v. Colvin Introduction Michael Allman, the Plaintiff–Appellant, sought Social Security disability benefits,...
Establishing Jurisdiction for Interlocutory Appeals in Water Rights Cases: Insights from State of New Mexico v. Trujillo

Establishing Jurisdiction for Interlocutory Appeals in Water Rights Cases: Insights from State of New Mexico v. Trujillo

Date: Feb 20, 2016
Establishing Jurisdiction for Interlocutory Appeals in Water Rights Cases: Insights from State of New Mexico v. Trujillo Introduction State of New Mexico ex rel. State Engineer, Pueblo de San...
ADA Discrimination Claims Require 'By Reason Of' Proof: Tenth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment

ADA Discrimination Claims Require 'By Reason Of' Proof: Tenth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment

Date: Feb 20, 2016
ADA Discrimination Claims Require 'By Reason Of' Proof: Tenth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment Introduction In the case of J.V. and M. Q., on behalf of their minor child C. v. Albuquerque Public...
Affirmation of Dismissal Under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii): Upholding Strict Pleading Standards in Section 1983 Claims

Affirmation of Dismissal Under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii): Upholding Strict Pleading Standards in Section 1983 Claims

Date: Feb 20, 2016
Affirmation of Dismissal Under 28 U.S.C. §1915(e)(2)(B)(ii): Upholding Strict Pleading Standards in Section 1983 Claims Introduction In the case of Richard C. Olson v. James Carmack et al., the...
Strict Timeliness for Rule 60(b) Relief in ERISA Preemption Cases

Strict Timeliness for Rule 60(b) Relief in ERISA Preemption Cases

Date: Feb 20, 2016
Strict Timeliness for Rule 60(b) Relief in ERISA Preemption Cases Introduction In the case of Trent LEBAHN, Plaintiff–Appellant, v. Eloise OWENS, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Expressive Marketing Statements Classified as Puffery Not Actionable under the Lanham Act: Tenth Circuit Affirms

Expressive Marketing Statements Classified as Puffery Not Actionable under the Lanham Act: Tenth Circuit Affirms

Date: Feb 10, 2016
Expressive Marketing Statements Classified as Puffery Not Actionable under the Lanham Act: Tenth Circuit Affirms Introduction The case of The Intermountain Stroke Center, Inc. and Nancy Futrell v....
Substantial Justification Under EAJA Affirmed in Supplemental Security Income Appeals

Substantial Justification Under EAJA Affirmed in Supplemental Security Income Appeals

Date: Jan 30, 2016
Substantial Justification Under EAJA Affirmed in Supplemental Security Income Appeals Introduction The case of Teva M. Evans v. Carolyn W. Colvin adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Non-Dischargeability of Default Judgments Under Securities Law Violations: Tripodi v. Welch

Non-Dischargeability of Default Judgments Under Securities Law Violations: Tripodi v. Welch

Date: Jan 14, 2016
Non-Dischargeability of Default Judgments Under Securities Law Violations: Tripodi v. Welch Introduction In Robert C. Tripodi, Jr. v. Nathan Welch et al., decided by the United States Court of...
Expansion of §1983 Malicious Prosecution under the Fourth Amendment: Insights from Sanchez v. Hartley

Expansion of §1983 Malicious Prosecution under the Fourth Amendment: Insights from Sanchez v. Hartley

Date: Jan 12, 2016
Expansion of §1983 Malicious Prosecution under the Fourth Amendment: Insights from Sanchez v. Hartley 1. Introduction In Sanchez v. Hartley, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit...
Protectability of Standard Elements in Architectural Copyright: Tenth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment

Protectability of Standard Elements in Architectural Copyright: Tenth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment

Date: Jan 5, 2016
Protectability of Standard Elements in Architectural Copyright: Tenth Circuit Affirms Summary Judgment Introduction The case of Savant Homes, Inc. v. Douglas W. Collins et al. addresses critical...
Affirming Qualified Immunity and Denying §1983 Claims under Ute Treaty in Police Pursuit Fatality

Affirming Qualified Immunity and Denying §1983 Claims under Ute Treaty in Police Pursuit Fatality

Date: Dec 30, 2015
Affirming Qualified Immunity and Denying §1983 Claims under Ute Treaty in Police Pursuit Fatality Introduction The case of Debra Jones and Arden C. Post v. Various Defendants revolves around the...
Defect-at-Sale Doctrine Affirmed in Birch v. Polaris Industries

Defect-at-Sale Doctrine Affirmed in Birch v. Polaris Industries

Date: Dec 24, 2015
Defect-at-Sale Doctrine Affirmed in Birch v. Polaris Industries Introduction In Justin Harrison Birch, Individually and as Personal Representative v. Polaris Industries, Inc., 812 F.3d 1238 (10th...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert