Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Payan v. UPS: Affirming Summary Judgment on Discrimination and Retaliation Claims

Payan v. UPS: Affirming Summary Judgment on Discrimination and Retaliation Claims

Date: Oct 5, 2018
Payan v. UPS: Affirming Summary Judgment on Discrimination and Retaliation Claims Introduction In the case of Charles Payan v. United Parcel Service (UPS); Charles Martinez, the United States Court...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under Title VII: Insights from Diane Smith v. Pointe Frontier

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under Title VII: Insights from Diane Smith v. Pointe Frontier

Date: Sep 26, 2018
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies Under Title VII: Insights from Diane Smith v. Pointe Frontier Introduction In the case of Diane Smith v. Cheyenne Retirement Investors L.P., d/b/a Pointe...
Enforcing AEDPA Standards on Juror Misconduct Claims: Smith v. Aldridge

Enforcing AEDPA Standards on Juror Misconduct Claims: Smith v. Aldridge

Date: Sep 18, 2018
Enforcing AEDPA Standards on Juror Misconduct Claims: Smith v. Aldridge Introduction Raye Dawn Smith v. Debbie Aldridge, Warden (904 F.3d 874) is a significant case decided by the United States Court...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Prolonged Solitary Confinement: An Analysis of Grissom v. Roberts

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Prolonged Solitary Confinement: An Analysis of Grissom v. Roberts

Date: Aug 30, 2018
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in Prolonged Solitary Confinement: An Analysis of Grissom v. Roberts 1. Introduction In the landmark case Richard Grissom, Plaintiff-Appellant v. Raymond Roberts,...
Tenth Circuit Refines Qualified Immunity Standards in Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment Child Seizure Cases

Tenth Circuit Refines Qualified Immunity Standards in Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment Child Seizure Cases

Date: Aug 28, 2018
Tenth Circuit Refines Qualified Immunity Standards in Fourth and Fourteenth Amendment Child Seizure Cases Introduction In the case of FRANK HALLEY, as next friend of J.H., a minor child, Plaintiff -...
Tenth Circuit Overrules Precedent: EEOC Charge No Longer a Jurisdictional Prerequisite Under ADA

Tenth Circuit Overrules Precedent: EEOC Charge No Longer a Jurisdictional Prerequisite Under ADA

Date: Aug 18, 2018
Tenth Circuit Overrules Precedent: EEOC Charge No Longer a Jurisdictional Prerequisite Under ADA Introduction In the landmark case of Lincoln & Mosbrucker v. BNSF Railway Company (No. 17-3120),...
United States v. Austin Ray: Affirming Convictions and Clarifying Legal Standards

United States v. Austin Ray: Affirming Convictions and Clarifying Legal Standards

Date: Aug 7, 2018
United States v. Austin Ray: Affirming Convictions and Clarifying Legal Standards Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Austin Ray, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Due Process Requires Direct Notice of Adverse Blight Determinations under Colorado’s Urban Renewal Statute

Due Process Requires Direct Notice of Adverse Blight Determinations under Colorado’s Urban Renewal Statute

Date: Aug 1, 2018
Due Process Requires Direct Notice of Adverse Blight Determinations under Colorado’s Urban Renewal Statute Introduction The case of M.A.K. Investment Group, LLC v. City of Glendale addresses critical...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Qualified Immunity Standards in §1983 Claims Against Correctional Officers

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Qualified Immunity Standards in §1983 Claims Against Correctional Officers

Date: Aug 1, 2018
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Qualified Immunity Standards in §1983 Claims Against Correctional Officers Introduction In the landmark case of Hazhar A. Sayed v. Lt. Page Virginia et al., the United States...
Underwood v. Royal: Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Standards under AEDPA

Underwood v. Royal: Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Standards under AEDPA

Date: Jul 3, 2018
Underwood v. Royal: Affirmation of Capital Sentencing Standards under AEDPA 1. Introduction In Kevin Ray Underwood v. Terry Royal, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary, 894 F.3d 1154 (10th Cir. 2018),...
Establishing Precedent in Eighth Amendment Protections: Reversing Dismissal in Requena v. Roberts

Establishing Precedent in Eighth Amendment Protections: Reversing Dismissal in Requena v. Roberts

Date: Jun 23, 2018
Establishing Precedent in Eighth Amendment Protections: Reversing Dismissal in Requena v. Roberts Introduction Requena v. Roberts, 893 F.3d 1195 (10th Cir. 2018), addresses significant issues...
Requena v. Roberts: Enhanced Scrutiny of Pro Se Litigation in Prisoners' § 1983 Claims

Requena v. Roberts: Enhanced Scrutiny of Pro Se Litigation in Prisoners' § 1983 Claims

Date: Jun 23, 2018
Requena v. Roberts: Enhanced Scrutiny of Pro Se Litigation in Prisoners' § 1983 Claims Introduction Adrian M. Requena, an inmate incarcerated by the Kansas Department of Corrections (KDOC), filed a...
Establishing Qualified Immunity Standards in Supervisory Liability: Perry v. Durborow

Establishing Qualified Immunity Standards in Supervisory Liability: Perry v. Durborow

Date: Jun 13, 2018
Establishing Qualified Immunity Standards in Supervisory Liability: Perry v. Durborow Introduction In the landmark case of Taunya Perry v. Terry Durborow, 892 F.3d 1116 (10th Cir. 2018), the United...
§924(j) Recognized as a Discrete Crime: Analysis of Melgar-Cabrera v. United States

§924(j) Recognized as a Discrete Crime: Analysis of Melgar-Cabrera v. United States

Date: Jun 9, 2018
§924(j) Recognized as a Discrete Crime: Analysis of Melgar-Cabrera v. United States Introduction The case United States of America v. Francisco Melgar-Cabrera, 892 F.3d 1053 (10th Cir. 2018),...
Waiver of Arbitration Rights: Tenth Circuit Upholds District Court’s Denial to Compel Arbitration

Waiver of Arbitration Rights: Tenth Circuit Upholds District Court’s Denial to Compel Arbitration

Date: May 17, 2018
Waiver of Arbitration Rights: Tenth Circuit Upholds District Court’s Denial to Compel Arbitration Introduction The case of D. Ray Strong, as Liquidating Trustee... v. William H. Davidson et al.,...
Establishing Pretext in Pregnancy Discrimination Claims: Fassbender v. Correct Care Solutions

Establishing Pretext in Pregnancy Discrimination Claims: Fassbender v. Correct Care Solutions

Date: May 16, 2018
Establishing Pretext in Pregnancy Discrimination Claims: Fassbender v. Correct Care Solutions Introduction In Alena Fassbender v. Correct Care Solutions, LLC, 890 F.3d 875 (10th Cir. 2018), the...
No Duty to Disclose Preliminary Merger Discussions Absent Materiality Under Rule 10b-5: A Tenth Circuit Perspective

No Duty to Disclose Preliminary Merger Discussions Absent Materiality Under Rule 10b-5: A Tenth Circuit Perspective

Date: May 12, 2018
No Duty to Disclose Preliminary Merger Discussions Absent Materiality Under Rule 10b-5: A Tenth Circuit Perspective Introduction In the landmark case Employees' Retirement System of the State of...
10th Circuit Rules 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)(B) Unconstitutionally Vague in Salas Case

10th Circuit Rules 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)(B) Unconstitutionally Vague in Salas Case

Date: May 5, 2018
10th Circuit Rules 18 U.S.C. §924(c)(3)(B) Unconstitutionally Vague in Salas Case Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Clifford Raymond Salas, 889 F.3d 681 (10th Cir. 2018),...
Clarifying Limits on Police Use of Force After Subduing Suspect – McCoy v. Meyers

Clarifying Limits on Police Use of Force After Subduing Suspect – McCoy v. Meyers

Date: Apr 11, 2018
Clarifying Limits on Police Use of Force After Subduing Suspect – McCoy v. Meyers Introduction In McCoy v. Meyers, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit addressed critical issues...
Affirmation of Economic Loss Doctrine and Restrictions on Covenants Running with Land in Oil and Gas Agreements: Spring Creek v. Hess Bakken, 887 F.3d 1003

Affirmation of Economic Loss Doctrine and Restrictions on Covenants Running with Land in Oil and Gas Agreements: Spring Creek v. Hess Bakken, 887 F.3d 1003

Date: Apr 11, 2018
Affirmation of Economic Loss Doctrine and Restrictions on Covenants Running with Land in Oil and Gas Agreements Introduction In the case of Spring Creek Exploration & Production Company, LLC; Gold...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert