Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Setting Aside Default Judgments in Fraud Cases: Insights from Toney Gomes Jr. v. Ellen L. Williams

Setting Aside Default Judgments in Fraud Cases: Insights from Toney Gomes Jr. v. Ellen L. Williams

Date: Jan 14, 1970
Setting Aside Default Judgments in Fraud Cases: Insights from Toney Gomes Jr. v. Ellen L. Williams Introduction The case of Toney Gomes Jr., Appellant, v. Ellen L. Williams, Appellee, adjudicated by...
Accountability in Prison Administration: Reversing Summary Judgment in Bethea v. Crouse

Accountability in Prison Administration: Reversing Summary Judgment in Bethea v. Crouse

Date: Dec 4, 1969
Accountability in Prison Administration: Reversing Summary Judgment in Bethea v. Crouse Introduction The cases of Oscar Bethea and James Townsend v. Sherman H. Crouse, Warden, Kansas State...
Defining Constitutional Safeguards in Academic Employment: Tenth Circuit Upholds At-Will Termination

Defining Constitutional Safeguards in Academic Employment: Tenth Circuit Upholds At-Will Termination

Date: May 20, 1969
Defining Constitutional Safeguards in Academic Employment: Tenth Circuit Upholds At-Will Termination Introduction The case of George Jones, Jr. v. Jesse Victor Hopper et al. (410 F.2d 1323, United...
Employee Liability for Corporate Antitrust Violations: Wilshire Oil Co. v. Riffe et al. Commentary

Employee Liability for Corporate Antitrust Violations: Wilshire Oil Co. v. Riffe et al. Commentary

Date: Apr 16, 1969
Employee Liability for Corporate Antitrust Violations: Wilshire Oil Co. v. Riffe et al. Introduction The case of Wilshire Oil Company of Texas v. L.E. Riffe, O. Homer Riffe, and Thomas J. Masterson...
Enhanced Class Action Eligibility under Rule 23(b)(3) in Securities Fraud Cases

Enhanced Class Action Eligibility under Rule 23(b)(3) in Securities Fraud Cases

Date: Mar 25, 1969
Enhanced Class Action Eligibility under Rule 23(b)(3) in Securities Fraud Cases Introduction The case Lee J. Esplin, K.C. Weaver v. Leland (Lee) Hirschi et al., adjudicated by the United States Court...
Clarifying Discovery and Privilege in Patent Interference Proceedings: Natta v. Hogan et al. (1968)

Clarifying Discovery and Privilege in Patent Interference Proceedings: Natta v. Hogan et al. (1968)

Date: Mar 22, 1968
Clarifying Discovery and Privilege in Patent Interference Proceedings: Natta v. Hogan et al. (1968) Introduction The case of Giulio Natta, Piero Pino, Giorgia Mazzanti and Montecatini Societa...
Amendment of Removal Petitions to Uphold Diversity Jurisdiction: Hendrix v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company

Amendment of Removal Petitions to Uphold Diversity Jurisdiction: Hendrix v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company

Date: Feb 9, 1968
Amendment of Removal Petitions to Uphold Diversity Jurisdiction: Hendrix v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company Introduction The case of William H. Hendrix v. New Amsterdam Casualty Company (390 F.2d 299)...
Hyde Construction Co. v. Koehring Co.: Defining Federal Court Injunctions and Res Judicata in State Proceedings

Hyde Construction Co. v. Koehring Co.: Defining Federal Court Injunctions and Res Judicata in State Proceedings

Date: Jan 25, 1968
Hyde Construction Co. v. Koehring Co.: Defining Federal Court Injunctions and Res Judicata in State Proceedings Introduction Hyde Construction Company, Inc. (hereinafter "Hyde") and Koehring Company...
Broad Interpretation of Investment Contracts as Securities: Continental Marketing Corp. v. SEC

Broad Interpretation of Investment Contracts as Securities: Continental Marketing Corp. v. SEC

Date: Dec 27, 1967
Broad Interpretation of Investment Contracts as Securities: Continental Marketing Corp. v. SEC Introduction The case of Continental Marketing Corporation v. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC),...
Voluntariness and Adequate Miranda Advisement in Coyote v. United States

Voluntariness and Adequate Miranda Advisement in Coyote v. United States

Date: Jun 24, 1967
Voluntariness and Adequate Miranda Advisement in Coyote v. United States Introduction The case of Willie Salt Coyote v. United States of America, 380 F.2d 305 (1967), adjudicated by the United States...
Fraudulent Joinder and Summary Judgment in Railroad Liability Cases: Smoot v. Chicago Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.

Fraudulent Joinder and Summary Judgment in Railroad Liability Cases: Smoot v. Chicago Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co.

Date: Jun 1, 1967
Fraudulent Joinder and Summary Judgment in Railroad Liability Cases: Smoot v. Chicago Rock Island & Pacific Railroad Co. Introduction In the landmark appellate case, Jessie Lucille Smoot,...
Strict Standards for Venue Transfer under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a): Insights from Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. Ritter

Strict Standards for Venue Transfer under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a): Insights from Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. Ritter

Date: Jan 4, 1967
Strict Standards for Venue Transfer under 28 U.S.C. §1404(a): Insights from Texas Gulf Sulphur Co. v. Ritter Introduction In the landmark case Texas Gulf Sulphur Company v. Ritter, adjudicated by the...
Establishing Patent Validity and Infringement in Radioactivity Well Logging: Commentary on McCullough Tool Company v. Well Surveys, Inc.

Establishing Patent Validity and Infringement in Radioactivity Well Logging: Commentary on McCullough Tool Company v. Well Surveys, Inc.

Date: Apr 21, 1965
Establishing Patent Validity and Infringement in Radioactivity Well Logging: Commentary on McCullough Tool Company v. Well Surveys, Inc. Introduction The case of McCullough Tool Company versus Well...
Appealability of Subpoena Duces Tecum Orders Against Non-Party Witnesses in Antitrust Litigation

Appealability of Subpoena Duces Tecum Orders Against Non-Party Witnesses in Antitrust Litigation

Date: Apr 6, 1965
Appealability of Subpoena Duces Tecum Orders Against Non-Party Witnesses in Antitrust Litigation Introduction The case of COVENY Oil Company et al. v. Continental Oil Company and Texaco, Inc. (340...
Continental Oil Co. v. Frontier Refining Co.: Establishing Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Antitrust Litigation

Continental Oil Co. v. Frontier Refining Co.: Establishing Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Antitrust Litigation

Date: Dec 2, 1964
Continental Oil Co. v. Frontier Refining Co.: Establishing Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Antitrust Litigation Introduction The case of Continental Oil Company, Appellant, v. The Frontier...
Implied Civil Remedies under SEC Rule 10b-5: Analysis of Trustell v. United Underwriters, Ltd.

Implied Civil Remedies under SEC Rule 10b-5: Analysis of Trustell v. United Underwriters, Ltd.

Date: Apr 22, 1964
Implied Civil Remedies under SEC Rule 10b-5: Analysis of Trustell v. United Underwriters, Ltd. Introduction The case of Harry H. Trustell et al. v. United Underwriters, Ltd. was brought before the...
Establishing Complete Diversity and Fraudulent Joinder in Federal Jurisdiction

Establishing Complete Diversity and Fraudulent Joinder in Federal Jurisdiction

Date: Mar 11, 1964
Establishing Complete Diversity and Fraudulent Joinder in Federal Jurisdiction Introduction The case Carl Dodd v. Fawcett Publications, Inc., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Jurisdictional Authority of Bankruptcy Courts Over Third-Party Funds: O'Dell v. United States (Tenth Circuit, 1964)

Jurisdictional Authority of Bankruptcy Courts Over Third-Party Funds: O'Dell v. United States (Tenth Circuit, 1964)

Date: Jan 10, 1964
Jurisdictional Authority of Bankruptcy Courts Over Third-Party Funds: O'Dell v. United States (Tenth Circuit, 1964) Introduction Norene R. O'Dell v. United States of America and Jack Ruhter, Trustee...
Assignment of Cause of Action and Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Bradbury v. Dennis

Assignment of Cause of Action and Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Bradbury v. Dennis

Date: Oct 16, 1962
Assignment of Cause of Action and Diversity Jurisdiction: Insights from Bradbury v. Dennis Introduction The case of T.O. Bradbury and N.B. Burt, Appellants, v. Frank Dennis, Appellee (310 F.2d 73)...
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Clarifies Applicability of Rule 23(a)(3) Class Actions in Antitrust Litigation

United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Clarifies Applicability of Rule 23(a)(3) Class Actions in Antitrust Litigation

Date: Apr 27, 1962
United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit Clarifies Applicability of Rule 23(a)(3) Class Actions in Antitrust Litigation Introduction The case under consideration involves multiple consolidated...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert