Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Legitimate, Nondiscriminatory Reasons in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Carey v. USPS

Affirmation of Legitimate, Nondiscriminatory Reasons in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Carey v. USPS

Date: Feb 24, 1987
Affirmation of Legitimate, Nondiscriminatory Reasons in Title VII Discrimination Cases: Carey v. USPS Introduction The case of David W. Carey v. United States Postal Service, decided by the United...
Exemption of Professional Services in Government Contract Bidding: Curtis Ambulance v. Shawnee County

Exemption of Professional Services in Government Contract Bidding: Curtis Ambulance v. Shawnee County

Date: Feb 19, 1987
Exemption of Professional Services in Government Contract Bidding: Curtis Ambulance v. Shawnee County Introduction Curtis Ambulance of Florida, Inc. v. Board of County Commissioners of Shawnee...
Dixon v. Heckler: Critical Examination of Literacy Determination in SSI Benefit Eligibility

Dixon v. Heckler: Critical Examination of Literacy Determination in SSI Benefit Eligibility

Date: Feb 3, 1987
Dixon v. Heckler: Critical Examination of Literacy Determination in SSI Benefit Eligibility Introduction Dixon v. Heckler, 811 F.2d 506 (10th Cir. 1987), is a pivotal case that addresses the...
Affirmation of Personal Jurisdiction Limits in Ten Mile Industrial Park Cases

Affirmation of Personal Jurisdiction Limits in Ten Mile Industrial Park Cases

Date: Feb 3, 1987
Affirmation of Personal Jurisdiction Limits in Ten Mile Industrial Park Cases Introduction The cases of Ten Mile Industrial Park, Property Owners Association, Inc. et al. v. Western Plains Service...
Enforcing Arbitration Awards under the Federal Arbitration Act: Insights from Foster v. Turley

Enforcing Arbitration Awards under the Federal Arbitration Act: Insights from Foster v. Turley

Date: Dec 25, 1986
Enforcing Arbitration Awards under the Federal Arbitration Act: Insights from Foster v. Turley Introduction The case of John M. Foster v. C.F. Turley, Jr., adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Redefining Support Obligations in Bankruptcy: A Comprehensive Analysis of In Re Brian Tibbetts Yeates

Redefining Support Obligations in Bankruptcy: A Comprehensive Analysis of In Re Brian Tibbetts Yeates

Date: Dec 20, 1986
Redefining Support Obligations in Bankruptcy: A Comprehensive Analysis of In Re Brian Tibbetts Yeates Introduction The case of In Re Brian Tibbetts Yeates, Debtor versus Paulette B. Yeates,...
Affirmation of Partial Supersedeas Bond Under Rule 62(d): Insights from Miami International Realty Co. v. Paynter

Affirmation of Partial Supersedeas Bond Under Rule 62(d): Insights from Miami International Realty Co. v. Paynter

Date: Dec 20, 1986
Affirmation of Partial Supersedeas Bond Under Rule 62(d): Insights from Miami International Realty Co. v. Paynter Introduction The landmark case of Miami International Realty Co. v. Richard Paynter...
Establishing Likelihood of Confusion: The Tenth Circuit's Ruling in BEER NUTS, INC. v. CLOVER CLUB FOODS COmpany

Establishing Likelihood of Confusion: The Tenth Circuit's Ruling in BEER NUTS, INC. v. CLOVER CLUB FOODS COmpany

Date: Nov 21, 1986
Establishing Likelihood of Confusion: The Tenth Circuit's Ruling in BEER NUTS, INC. v. CLOVER CLUB FOODS COmpany Introduction The case of BEER NUTS, INC. v. CLOVER CLUB FOODS COmpany, decided by the...
Preservation of REA Program Viability through Preliminary Injunction: Tri-State v. Shoshone

Preservation of REA Program Viability through Preliminary Injunction: Tri-State v. Shoshone

Date: Nov 14, 1986
Preservation of REA Program Viability through Preliminary Injunction: Tri-State Generation and Transmission Association, Inc. v. Shoshone River Power, Inc. Introduction The case Tri-State Generation...
Fiduciary Duty Essential for Rule 10b-5 Securities Fraud Claims: Windon Third Oil and Gas Drilling Partnership v. FDIC

Fiduciary Duty Essential for Rule 10b-5 Securities Fraud Claims: Windon Third Oil and Gas Drilling Partnership v. FDIC

Date: Nov 11, 1986
Fiduciary Duty Essential for Rule 10b-5 Securities Fraud Claims: Windon Third Oil and Gas Drilling Partnership v. Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation Introduction The case of Windon Third Oil and...
Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction in United States v. Ortiz: Reinforcing Standards for Entrapment Defense

Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction in United States v. Ortiz: Reinforcing Standards for Entrapment Defense

Date: Nov 6, 1986
Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction in United States v. Ortiz: Reinforcing Standards for Entrapment Defense Introduction The case of United States of America v. Arthur Ortiz (804 F.2d 1161)...
Tenth Circuit Reinforces Substantial Evidence Standard and EAJA Fee Eligibility in Disability Claims

Tenth Circuit Reinforces Substantial Evidence Standard and EAJA Fee Eligibility in Disability Claims

Date: Oct 15, 1986
Tenth Circuit Reinforces Substantial Evidence Standard and EAJA Fee Eligibility in Disability Claims Introduction In the landmark case of George R. Weakley v. Otis R. Bowen, M.D., decided on October...
Limitations on Diversity and Federal Question Jurisdictions in Wrongful Death Actions: Insights from Martinez v. USOC

Limitations on Diversity and Federal Question Jurisdictions in Wrongful Death Actions: Insights from Martinez v. USOC

Date: Oct 7, 1986
Limitations on Diversity and Federal Question Jurisdictions in Wrongful Death Actions: Insights from Martinez v. USOC Introduction Martinez v. United States Olympic Committee, 802 F.2d 1275 (10th...
Jury Selection Standards and Effective Counsel in Capital Cases: An Analysis of COLEMAN v. BROWN

Jury Selection Standards and Effective Counsel in Capital Cases: An Analysis of COLEMAN v. BROWN

Date: Oct 1, 1986
Jury Selection Standards and Effective Counsel in Capital Cases: An Analysis of COLEMAN v. BROWN Introduction The case of Charles Troy Coleman v. John N. Brown, decided by the United States Court of...
Tenth Circuit Affirms Rule 9(b) Particularity Requirement in Securities Fraud Counterclaims

Tenth Circuit Affirms Rule 9(b) Particularity Requirement in Securities Fraud Counterclaims

Date: Sep 9, 1986
Tenth Circuit Affirms Rule 9(b) Particularity Requirement in Securities Fraud Counterclaims Introduction The case of Seattle-First National Bank v. Carlstedt et al. (800 F.2d 1008) presents a pivotal...
Caldo Mares v. Credit Bureau of Raton: Refining Standards for Awarding Attorneys’ Fees Under Consumer Protection Acts

Caldo Mares v. Credit Bureau of Raton: Refining Standards for Awarding Attorneys’ Fees Under Consumer Protection Acts

Date: Sep 9, 1986
Caldo Mares v. Credit Bureau of Raton: Refining Standards for Awarding Attorneys’ Fees Under Consumer Protection Acts Introduction Caldo Mares and Sally Mares, His Wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants v....
Clarifying the 'Clearly Erroneous' Standard in Bankruptcy Appeals: In Re Branding Iron Motel, Inc.

Clarifying the 'Clearly Erroneous' Standard in Bankruptcy Appeals: In Re Branding Iron Motel, Inc.

Date: Aug 27, 1986
Clarifying the 'Clearly Erroneous' Standard in Bankruptcy Appeals: In Re Branding Iron Motel, Inc. Introduction In Re Branding Iron Motel, Inc., a case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction in United States v. Raul Reyes: Establishing Standards for Co-Conspirator Testimony

Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction in United States v. Raul Reyes: Establishing Standards for Co-Conspirator Testimony

Date: Jul 30, 1986
Affirmation of Conspiracy Conviction in United States v. Raul Reyes: Establishing Standards for Co-Conspirator Testimony Introduction In United States of America v. Raul Reyes, 798 F.2d 380 (10th...
Establishing Due Process in Medicare Reimbursement Exclusions: Koerpel v. Heckler

Establishing Due Process in Medicare Reimbursement Exclusions: Koerpel v. Heckler

Date: Jul 24, 1986
Establishing Due Process in Medicare Reimbursement Exclusions: Koerpel v. Heckler 1. Introduction The case of Barry J. Koerpel, M.D., Plaintiff-Appellant v. Margaret M. Heckler, Secretary of Health...
Scope of Employment in Federal Torts: Nichols v. United States Establishes Critical Precedent

Scope of Employment in Federal Torts: Nichols v. United States Establishes Critical Precedent

Date: Jul 19, 1986
Scope of Employment in Federal Torts: Nichols v. United States Establishes Critical Precedent Introduction The case of Randol Nichols v. United States of America, decided by the United States Court...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert