Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Deemed Acceptance of Bankruptcy Plan by Non-Voting, Non-Objecting Creditors

Deemed Acceptance of Bankruptcy Plan by Non-Voting, Non-Objecting Creditors

Date: Jan 9, 1988
Deemed Acceptance of Bankruptcy Plan by Non-Voting, Non-Objecting Creditors Introduction The case In re Ruti-Sweetwater, Inc. (836 F.2d 1263) adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Federal Res Judicata Governs Claim Preclusion in Successive Diversity Actions: Petromanagement Corp. v. Acme-Thomas JV

Federal Res Judicata Governs Claim Preclusion in Successive Diversity Actions: Petromanagement Corp. v. Acme-Thomas JV

Date: Jan 7, 1988
Federal Res Judicata Governs Claim Preclusion in Successive Diversity Actions: Petromanagement Corp. v. Acme-Thomas JV Introduction The case of The Petromanagement Corporation v. Acme-Thomas Joint...
Establishing Mens Rea in Federal Sexual Exploitation Cases: Commentary on UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. William and Linda Esch

Establishing Mens Rea in Federal Sexual Exploitation Cases: Commentary on UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. William and Linda Esch

Date: Jan 5, 1988
Establishing Mens Rea in Federal Sexual Exploitation Cases Commentary on UNITED STATES OF AMERICA v. William and Linda Esch, 832 F.2d 531 (10th Cir. 1987) Introduction United States of America v....
Attorney vs. Client Fault in Default Judgments: Insights from M.E.N. Co. v. Control Fluidics

Attorney vs. Client Fault in Default Judgments: Insights from M.E.N. Co. v. Control Fluidics

Date: Dec 4, 1987
Attorney vs. Client Fault in Default Judgments: Insights from M.E.N. Co. v. Control Fluidics Introduction The case of M.E.N. Co., a Joint Venture, et al. v. Control Fluidics, Inc., et al. (834 F.2d...
Dismissal for Failure to Comply with Pretrial Orders: Smith v. United States

Dismissal for Failure to Comply with Pretrial Orders: Smith v. United States

Date: Dec 3, 1987
Dismissal for Failure to Comply with Pretrial Orders: Smith v. United States Introduction In the case of James L. Smith v. United States of America, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals...
Quantum Meruit and Attorney's Fees under the Miller Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Sanchez, CJC, and Hugg v. Western States Mechanical Contractors

Quantum Meruit and Attorney's Fees under the Miller Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Sanchez, CJC, and Hugg v. Western States Mechanical Contractors

Date: Dec 1, 1987
Quantum Meruit and Attorney's Fees under the Miller Act: Comprehensive Analysis of Sanchez, CJC, and Hugg v. Western States Mechanical Contractors Introduction The case of United States of America,...
Hicks v. Gates Rubber Co.: Expanding the Scope of Hostile Work Environment Under Title VII

Hicks v. Gates Rubber Co.: Expanding the Scope of Hostile Work Environment Under Title VII

Date: Nov 26, 1987
Hicks v. Gates Rubber Co.: Expanding the Scope of Hostile Work Environment Under Title VII Introduction In Hicks v. Gates Rubber Company (833 F.2d 1406, 10th Cir. 1987), Marguerite Hicks, a Black...
Reversal of Invalidity: Tenth Circuit Upholds SSA's Objective Evidence Standards for Pain in Disability Claims

Reversal of Invalidity: Tenth Circuit Upholds SSA's Objective Evidence Standards for Pain in Disability Claims

Date: Nov 25, 1987
Reversal of Invalidity: Tenth Circuit Upholds SSA's Objective Evidence Standards for Pain in Disability Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Magdalena G. Luna, James L. Hambley, and Ronald G....
Sanctions for Frivolous Appeals: Insights from Braley v. Campbell

Sanctions for Frivolous Appeals: Insights from Braley v. Campbell

Date: Nov 10, 1987
Sanctions for Frivolous Appeals: Insights from Braley v. Campbell, 832 F.2d 1504 (10th Cir. 1987) Introduction The case of Jack A. Braley, D.O. v. Garland Campbell, M.D. et al., heard by the United...
Trade Dress and Functionality: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Lanham Act Standards in Brunswick v. Spinit

Trade Dress and Functionality: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Lanham Act Standards in Brunswick v. Spinit

Date: Oct 16, 1987
Trade Dress and Functionality: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Lanham Act Standards in Brunswick v. Spinit Introduction In the landmark case of Brunswick Corporation v. Spinit Reel Company, the United States...
Procedural Safeguards in In Forma Pauperis §1983 Actions: Insights from Gee v. Estes

Procedural Safeguards in In Forma Pauperis §1983 Actions: Insights from Gee v. Estes

Date: Sep 29, 1987
Procedural Safeguards in In Forma Pauperis §1983 Actions: Insights from Gee v. Estes Introduction Donald Gee, a federal prisoner acting pro se and proceeding in forma pauperis, initiated a civil...
Establishing the Continuing Violation Theory under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Bruno v. Western Electric Co.

Establishing the Continuing Violation Theory under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Bruno v. Western Electric Co.

Date: Sep 19, 1987
Establishing the Continuing Violation Theory under the Age Discrimination in Employment Act: Bruno v. Western Electric Co. Introduction In Bruno v. Western Electric Co., 829 F.2d 957 (10th Cir....
Parody and Trademark Confusion: Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. Hogg Wyld, Ltd. Analysis

Parody and Trademark Confusion: Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. Hogg Wyld, Ltd. Analysis

Date: Sep 15, 1987
Parody and Trademark Confusion: Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. Hogg Wyld, Ltd. Analysis Introduction The case of Jordache Enterprises, Inc. v. Hogg Wyld, Ltd. (828 F.2d 1482) adjudicated by the United...
Habeas Corpus Actions Excluded from EAJA's Civil Actions: EWING v. RODGERS Commentary

Habeas Corpus Actions Excluded from EAJA's Civil Actions: EWING v. RODGERS Commentary

Date: Sep 12, 1987
Habeas Corpus Actions Excluded from EAJA's Civil Actions: EWING v. RODGERS Commentary Introduction The case of EWING v. RODGERS consolidates two appeals involving petitioner-appellees Kent Patrick...
Waiver of Statutory Rights under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act: Insights from Yellen v. Cooper

Waiver of Statutory Rights under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act: Insights from Yellen v. Cooper

Date: Sep 12, 1987
Waiver of Statutory Rights under the Interstate Agreement on Detainers Act: Insights from Yellen v. Cooper Introduction The case of Seth Yellen v. Thomas I. Cooper, adjudicated by the United States...
Abuse of Discretion in Denial of Continuance: United States v. West

Abuse of Discretion in Denial of Continuance: United States v. West

Date: Sep 10, 1987
Abuse of Discretion in Denial of Continuance: United States v. West Introduction United States of America v. Harvey Edward West is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Appellate Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Stay Orders: Quinn v. CGR

Appellate Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Stay Orders: Quinn v. CGR

Date: Sep 9, 1987
Appellate Jurisdiction Over Arbitration Stay Orders: Quinn v. CGR Introduction The case of Paul G. Quinn, as Trustee of the Estate of Life Imaging Corporation v. CGR (828 F.2d 1463) presents a...
Collateral Estoppel Limitations in Subrogation Actions: Federal Insurance Co. v. Gates Learjet Corp.

Collateral Estoppel Limitations in Subrogation Actions: Federal Insurance Co. v. Gates Learjet Corp.

Date: Sep 3, 1987
Collateral Estoppel Limitations in Subrogation Actions: Federal Insurance Co. v. Gates Learjet Corp. Introduction The case of Federal Insurance Company v. Gates Learjet Corporation (823 F.2d 383)...
Newcomb v. Ingle: Establishing a Two-Year Statute of Limitations for §1983 and §2520 Claims in Kansas

Newcomb v. Ingle: Establishing a Two-Year Statute of Limitations for §1983 and §2520 Claims in Kansas

Date: Aug 28, 1987
Newcomb v. Ingle: Establishing a Two-Year Statute of Limitations for §1983 and §2520 Claims in Kansas Introduction Harold G. Newcomb initiated legal action against his ex-wife, her father, and an...
Kitchens v. Bryan County National Bank: Establishing Standards for Malicious Prosecution and Service of Process

Kitchens v. Bryan County National Bank: Establishing Standards for Malicious Prosecution and Service of Process

Date: Aug 15, 1987
Kitchens v. Bryan County National Bank: Establishing Standards for Malicious Prosecution and Service of Process Introduction The case of Wayne Kitchens v. Bryan County National Bank (825 F.2d 248)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert