Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Security Interests in Rental Income Under 11 U.S.C. §546(b) in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Affirmation of Security Interests in Rental Income Under 11 U.S.C. §546(b) in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Date: Apr 19, 1990
Affirmation of Security Interests in Rental Income Under 11 U.S.C. §546(b) in Bankruptcy Proceedings Introduction The case of Virginia Beach Federal Savings and Loan Association v. Frank E. Wood et...
Establishing Eighth Amendment Standards and Remedies under Section 1983: The Berry v. City of Muskogee Decision

Establishing Eighth Amendment Standards and Remedies under Section 1983: The Berry v. City of Muskogee Decision

Date: Apr 11, 1990
Establishing Eighth Amendment Standards and Remedies under Section 1983: The Berry v. City of Muskogee Decision Introduction In the landmark case Linnie Kay Berry v. City of Muskogee, Oklahoma (900...
Establishing Limits on Cumulative-Error Doctrine in Defense Counsel Performance: UNITED STATES v. RIVERA

Establishing Limits on Cumulative-Error Doctrine in Defense Counsel Performance: UNITED STATES v. RIVERA

Date: Apr 5, 1990
Establishing Limits on Cumulative-Error Doctrine in Defense Counsel Performance: UNITED STATES v. RIVERA 1. Introduction The case of United States of America v. Luis Anthony Rivera (900 F.2d 1462)...
Absolute Judicial Immunity and the Mootness of Declaratory Relief: Insights from Schepp v. Fremont County

Absolute Judicial Immunity and the Mootness of Declaratory Relief: Insights from Schepp v. Fremont County

Date: Mar 31, 1990
Absolute Judicial Immunity and the Mootness of Declaratory Relief: Insights from Schepp v. Fremont County Introduction Edward G. Schepp, the plaintiff-appellant, filed a lawsuit against Fremont...
Retaliation Protections for Inmates Exercising Court Access: Smith v. Defendants

Retaliation Protections for Inmates Exercising Court Access: Smith v. Defendants

Date: Mar 30, 1990
Retaliation Protections for Inmates Exercising Court Access: Smith v. Defendants Introduction Smith v. Maschner et al. is a landmark 1990 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Good-Faith Exception Applied to Exclusionary Rule: United States v. Corral-Corral

Good-Faith Exception Applied to Exclusionary Rule: United States v. Corral-Corral

Date: Mar 29, 1990
Good-Faith Exception Applied to Exclusionary Rule: United States v. Corral-Corral Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Rene Corral-Corral, 899 F.2d 927 (10th Cir. 1990), the United...
Distinct Boundaries of Judicial Immunity: Absolute vs. Qualified Immunity in Turney v. O'Toole

Distinct Boundaries of Judicial Immunity: Absolute vs. Qualified Immunity in Turney v. O'Toole

Date: Mar 27, 1990
Distinct Boundaries of Judicial Immunity: Absolute vs. Qualified Immunity in Turney v. O'Toole Introduction Rocky James Turney v. James O'Toole is a seminal case adjudicated by the United States...
Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa: Establishing Property Interest and First Amendment Retaliation Under Section 1983

Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa: Establishing Property Interest and First Amendment Retaliation Under Section 1983

Date: Mar 23, 1990
Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa: Establishing Property Interest and First Amendment Retaliation Under Section 1983 Introduction Abercrombie v. City of Catoosa is a pivotal case decided by the United...
Aggregation of Drug Quantities and Role Characterization in Sentencing: United States v. Rutter

Aggregation of Drug Quantities and Role Characterization in Sentencing: United States v. Rutter

Date: Mar 14, 1990
Aggregation of Drug Quantities and Role Characterization in Sentencing: United States v. Rutter Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Ervin Earl Rutter, decided on March...
Distinguishing §1983 and §1985(3) Claims: Harmless Error Affirmed in Dixon v. City of Lawton

Distinguishing §1983 and §1985(3) Claims: Harmless Error Affirmed in Dixon v. City of Lawton

Date: Mar 9, 1990
Distinguishing §1983 and §1985(3) Claims: Harmless Error Affirmed in Dixon v. City of Lawton Introduction Joyce Dixon v. City of Lawton, Oklahoma is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States...
U.S. v. Williams: Upholding Sentencing Guidelines and Good Faith in Racketeering and Drug Conspiracy Conviction

U.S. v. Williams: Upholding Sentencing Guidelines and Good Faith in Racketeering and Drug Conspiracy Conviction

Date: Mar 6, 1990
U.S. v. Williams: Upholding Sentencing Guidelines and Good Faith in Racketeering and Drug Conspiracy Conviction Introduction The case of United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Patricia...
Limitation of §1983 Claims to Personal Rights: Analysis of Archuleta v. McShan

Limitation of §1983 Claims to Personal Rights: Analysis of Archuleta v. McShan

Date: Mar 2, 1990
Limitation of §1983 Claims to Personal Rights: Analysis of Archuleta v. McShan Introduction Archuleta v. McShan, 897 F.2d 495 (10th Cir. 1990), is a pivotal case in understanding the scope and...
Polson v. Davis: Upholding Employment At-Will Doctrine and Exclusive Remedies in Kansas

Polson v. Davis: Upholding Employment At-Will Doctrine and Exclusive Remedies in Kansas

Date: Feb 7, 1990
Polson v. Davis: Upholding Employment At-Will Doctrine and Exclusive Remedies in Kansas Introduction In the landmark case of Polson v. Davis, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Limits on Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Commentary on Plaintiffs v. Independent School District No. 16

Limits on Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Commentary on Plaintiffs v. Independent School District No. 16

Date: Jan 26, 1990
Limits on Municipal Liability under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Commentary on Plaintiffs v. Independent School District No. 16 Introduction The case of Plaintiffs-Appellees v. Independent School District No....
Establishing Liability in Civil Rights Violations: Robinson v. Maruffi et al.

Establishing Liability in Civil Rights Violations: Robinson v. Maruffi et al.

Date: Jan 20, 1990
Establishing Liability in Civil Rights Violations: Robinson v. Maruffi et al. Introduction Robinson v. Maruffi et al. is a significant judicial decision rendered by the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of Constructive Discharge and Liquidated Damages in ADEA Claims: Spulak v. K Mart Corp.

Affirmation of Constructive Discharge and Liquidated Damages in ADEA Claims: Spulak v. K Mart Corp.

Date: Jan 19, 1990
Affirmation of Constructive Discharge and Liquidated Damages in ADEA Claims: Spulak v. K Mart Corp. Introduction The case of Frank L. Spulak v. K Mart Corporation revolves around significant issues...
Accountability of Payor Banks under UCC §4-213(1) Affirmed in Las Vegas Ice v. Far West Bank

Accountability of Payor Banks under UCC §4-213(1) Affirmed in Las Vegas Ice v. Far West Bank

Date: Jan 13, 1990
Accountability of Payor Banks under UCC §4-213(1) Affirmed in Las Vegas Ice v. Far West Bank Introduction The case of Las Vegas Ice and Cold Storage Company v. Far West Bank, decided by the United...
United States v. Beaulieu: Affirmation of Using Separate Trial Testimony in Sentencing Under Federal Guidelines

United States v. Beaulieu: Affirmation of Using Separate Trial Testimony in Sentencing Under Federal Guidelines

Date: Jan 11, 1990
United States v. Beaulieu: Affirmation of Using Separate Trial Testimony in Sentencing Under Federal Guidelines Introduction In United States of America v. Darrell Beaulieu, the Tenth Circuit Court...
Reaffirming Standards for Conflict of Interest in Defense Representation: Insights from United States v. Bowie

Reaffirming Standards for Conflict of Interest in Defense Representation: Insights from United States v. Bowie

Date: Jan 9, 1990
Reaffirming Standards for Conflict of Interest in Defense Representation: Insights from United States v. Bowie Introduction The case of United States of America v. Millard Bowie, adjudicated by the...
Strict Adherence to Rule 60(b) and Reasonable Attorney Fees: Insights from Pelican Production Corp. v. Marino

Strict Adherence to Rule 60(b) and Reasonable Attorney Fees: Insights from Pelican Production Corp. v. Marino

Date: Jan 9, 1990
Strict Adherence to Rule 60(b) and Reasonable Attorney Fees: Insights from Pelican Production Corp. v. Marino Introduction The case Pelican Production Corporation, a Louisiana Corporation; Brent...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert