Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Qualified Immunity and Material Omissions in Arrest Affidavits: Insights from Salmon v. Schwarz & Gonzalez

Qualified Immunity and Material Omissions in Arrest Affidavits: Insights from Salmon v. Schwarz & Gonzalez

Date: Nov 1, 1991
Qualified Immunity and Material Omissions in Arrest Affidavits: Insights from Salmon v. Schwarz & Gonzalez Introduction Parties Involved: Plaintiffs-Appellees: Margarito Salmon, Magdalena Salmon,...
Affirmation of Conviction and Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in United States v. Short

Affirmation of Conviction and Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in United States v. Short

Date: Nov 1, 1991
Affirmation of Conviction and Mandatory Minimum Sentencing in United States v. Short (947 F.2d 1445) Introduction United States v. Short is a significant case adjudicated by the United States Court...
Affirmation of Procedural Default and Abuse of the Writ in Habeas Corpus Petition: William Andrews v. Gary DeLand et al.

Affirmation of Procedural Default and Abuse of the Writ in Habeas Corpus Petition: William Andrews v. Gary DeLand et al.

Date: Nov 1, 1991
Affirmation of Procedural Default and Abuse of the Writ in Habeas Corpus Petition: William Andrews v. Gary DeLand et al. Introduction In the landmark case of William Andrews v. Gary DeLand, Director...
Denial of Judicial Access Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Comprehensive Analysis of Stump v. Gates

Denial of Judicial Access Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Comprehensive Analysis of Stump v. Gates

Date: Nov 1, 1991
Denial of Judicial Access Under 42 U.S.C. § 1983: Comprehensive Analysis of Stump v. Gates Introduction In the landmark case Sara Stump and Andrew M. Ocrant v. Daryl G. Gates, decided on October 31,...
Pre-Petition Tax Refunds as Bankruptcy Estate Property: Analysis of In Re Barowsky et al. v Serelson

Pre-Petition Tax Refunds as Bankruptcy Estate Property: Analysis of In Re Barowsky et al. v Serelson

Date: Oct 25, 1991
Pre-Petition Tax Refunds as Bankruptcy Estate Property: Analysis of In Re Barowsky et al. v Serelson Introduction The case of In Re Barowsky et al. v Serelson addresses a pivotal issue in bankruptcy...
Affirmation of Consent Validity and Waiver of Unlawful Detention in Traffic Stop Searches

Affirmation of Consent Validity and Waiver of Unlawful Detention in Traffic Stop Searches

Date: Oct 16, 1991
Affirmation of Consent Validity and Waiver of Unlawful Detention in Traffic Stop Searches Introduction The case of United States of America v. Kevin Wesly Dewitt, True Name, Kenneth Odell Rison (946...
Confirming the Traditional Test for Lesser Included Offenses and Upholding Conspiracy Convictions: United States v. Horn

Confirming the Traditional Test for Lesser Included Offenses and Upholding Conspiracy Convictions: United States v. Horn

Date: Oct 10, 1991
Confirming the Traditional Test for Lesser Included Offenses and Upholding Conspiracy Convictions: United States v. Horn Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Ronnie Horn,...
Default Judgment Standards and Due Process in In Re Bill W. Rains

Default Judgment Standards and Due Process in In Re Bill W. Rains

Date: Oct 8, 1991
Default Judgment Standards and Due Process in In Re Bill W. Rains Introduction The case of In Re Bill W. Rains, also known as Billy Wayne Rains, deliberated on the propriety of a default judgment...
Combined Evaluation of Nonexertional Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: Hargis v. Sullivan

Combined Evaluation of Nonexertional Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: Hargis v. Sullivan

Date: Oct 5, 1991
Combined Evaluation of Nonexertional Impairments in Social Security Disability Claims: Hargis v. Sullivan Introduction In Donald G. Hargis v. Louis W. Sullivan, 945 F.2d 1482 (10th Cir. 1991), the...
Affirmation of 'Law of the Case' Doctrine: Binding Appellate Decisions on Remand in Criminal Proceedings – United States v. Monsisvais

Affirmation of 'Law of the Case' Doctrine: Binding Appellate Decisions on Remand in Criminal Proceedings – United States v. Monsisvais

Date: Oct 4, 1991
Affirmation of 'Law of the Case' Doctrine: Binding Appellate Decisions on Remand in Criminal Proceedings – United States v. Monsisvais Introduction United States v. Heriberto Fernandez Monsisvais,...
Mandamus Relief in Class Actions: Insights from McNeil v. Guthrie

Mandamus Relief in Class Actions: Insights from McNeil v. Guthrie

Date: Sep 26, 1991
Mandamus Relief in Class Actions: Insights from McNeil v. Guthrie Introduction The case of Michael Douglas McNeil v. William B. Guthrie, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Convictions: Malice Aforethought and Felony Murder under 18 U.S.C. §1111

Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Convictions: Malice Aforethought and Felony Murder under 18 U.S.C. §1111

Date: Sep 25, 1991
Affirmation of First-Degree Murder Convictions: Malice Aforethought and Felony Murder under 18 U.S.C. §1111 Introduction The case of United States of America v. Eugene Mervin Sides, 944 F.2d 1554...
ERISA Preemption and Third-Party Promissory Estoppel Claims: Insights from Hospice of Metro Denver, Inc. v. Group Health Insurance of Oklahoma, Inc.

ERISA Preemption and Third-Party Promissory Estoppel Claims: Insights from Hospice of Metro Denver, Inc. v. Group Health Insurance of Oklahoma, Inc.

Date: Sep 11, 1991
ERISA Preemption and Third-Party Promissory Estoppel Claims: Insights from Hospice of Metro Denver, Inc. v. Group Health Insurance of Oklahoma, Inc. Introduction The case of Hospice of Metro Denver,...
Heightened Standards for Statistical Evidence in Age Discrimination Claims Under ADEA: Fallis v. Kerr-McGee

Heightened Standards for Statistical Evidence in Age Discrimination Claims Under ADEA: Fallis v. Kerr-McGee

Date: Sep 11, 1991
Heightened Standards for Statistical Evidence in Age Discrimination Claims Under ADEA: Fallis v. Kerr-McGee Introduction The Fallis v. Kerr-McGee Corporation case, adjudicated by the United States...
Strict Compliance with Bankruptcy Code §327: Insights from In Re James W. Land and Lois L. Land

Strict Compliance with Bankruptcy Code §327: Insights from In Re James W. Land and Lois L. Land

Date: Sep 11, 1991
Strict Compliance with Bankruptcy Code §327: Insights from In Re James W. Land and Lois L. Land Introduction The case of In Re James W. Land and Lois L. Land represents a pivotal decision by the...
Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Dealer Agreements: Insights from Devery Implement Co. v. J.I. Case Co.

Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Dealer Agreements: Insights from Devery Implement Co. v. J.I. Case Co.

Date: Sep 11, 1991
Breach of Fiduciary Duty in Dealer Agreements: Insights from Devery Implement Co. v. J.I. Case Co. Introduction The case of Devery Implement Company, an Oklahoma General Partnership, versus J.I. Case...
Restricting Access for Repeatedly Abusive Pro Se Litigants: Ketchum v. Dr. Cruz

Restricting Access for Repeatedly Abusive Pro Se Litigants: Ketchum v. Dr. Cruz

Date: Aug 31, 1991
Restricting Access for Repeatedly Abusive Pro Se Litigants: Ketchum v. Dr. Cruz Introduction Ketchum v. Dr. Cruz (775 F. Supp. 1399) is a significant case adjudicated by the United States District...
Hicks v. City of Watonga: Establishing Standards for Qualified Immunity and Due Process in Public Employment Terminations

Hicks v. City of Watonga: Establishing Standards for Qualified Immunity and Due Process in Public Employment Terminations

Date: Aug 20, 1991
Hicks v. City of Watonga: Establishing Standards for Qualified Immunity and Due Process in Public Employment Terminations Introduction Steven R. Hicks, a former police officer for the City of...
Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence in ADEA Cases: Denison v. Swaco Geolograph

Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence in ADEA Cases: Denison v. Swaco Geolograph

Date: Aug 17, 1991
Affirmation of Circumstantial Evidence in ADEA Cases: Denison v. Swaco Geolograph Introduction The case of Richard Paul Denison v. Swaco Geolograph Company (941 F.2d 1416) adjudicated by the United...
State Action and Prima Facie Case in Age Discrimination: Insights from MacDonald v. Eastern Wyoming Mental Health Center

State Action and Prima Facie Case in Age Discrimination: Insights from MacDonald v. Eastern Wyoming Mental Health Center

Date: Aug 16, 1991
State Action and Prima Facie Case in Age Discrimination: Insights from MacDonald v. Eastern Wyoming Mental Health Center Introduction James MacDonald and Janice MacDonald, a married couple employed...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert