Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Allocation of Payments in Bankruptcy and Jurisdictional Limits on Child Support Assessments: In re Fullmer Analysis

Allocation of Payments in Bankruptcy and Jurisdictional Limits on Child Support Assessments: In re Fullmer Analysis

Date: Apr 29, 1992
Allocation of Payments in Bankruptcy and Jurisdictional Limits on Child Support Assessments: Insights from In re Fullmer Introduction The case of In re David Michael Fullmer, et al. v. United States...
Unioil, Inc. v. Elledge: Standards for Amending Proof of Claims and Accord and Satisfaction in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Unioil, Inc. v. Elledge: Standards for Amending Proof of Claims and Accord and Satisfaction in Bankruptcy Proceedings

Date: Apr 25, 1992
Unioil, Inc. v. Elledge: Standards for Amending Proof of Claims and Accord and Satisfaction in Bankruptcy Proceedings Introduction The case of In re Unioil, Inc., Debtor involves complex litigation...
Affirmation of Disability Determination Standards in the Presence of Nonexertional Limitations: Trimiar v. Sullivan

Affirmation of Disability Determination Standards in the Presence of Nonexertional Limitations: Trimiar v. Sullivan

Date: Apr 24, 1992
Affirmation of Disability Determination Standards in the Presence of Nonexertional Limitations: Trimiar v. Sullivan Introduction In the landmark case of Samuel Trimiar v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D. (966...
Hamilton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services: Reinforcing Deference to Administrative Findings in Disability Claims

Hamilton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services: Reinforcing Deference to Administrative Findings in Disability Claims

Date: Apr 18, 1992
Hamilton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services: Reinforcing Deference to Administrative Findings in Disability Claims Introduction In Hamilton v. Secretary of Health and Human Services, the...
Restricting Pro Se Litigation: Analyzing Ketchum v. Cruz (1992)

Restricting Pro Se Litigation: Analyzing Ketchum v. Cruz (1992)

Date: Apr 14, 1992
Restricting Pro Se Litigation: Analyzing Ketchum v. Cruz (1992) Introduction Ketchum v. Cruz, 961 F.2d 916 (10th Cir. 1992), addresses critical issues surrounding the dismissal of frivolous lawsuits...
Collateral Estoppel Applicability from Civil Proceedings in Criminal Prosecution: Insights from United States v. Rogers

Collateral Estoppel Applicability from Civil Proceedings in Criminal Prosecution: Insights from United States v. Rogers

Date: Apr 3, 1992
Collateral Estoppel Applicability from Civil Proceedings in Criminal Prosecution: Insights from United States v. Rogers Introduction United States of America v. Gerald Leo Rogers, also known as T.T....
Oklahoma Bankruptcy Exemption for IRAs and Keoghs Upheld as Constitutional

Oklahoma Bankruptcy Exemption for IRAs and Keoghs Upheld as Constitutional

Date: Mar 27, 1992
Oklahoma Bankruptcy Exemption for IRAs and Keoghs Upheld as Constitutional Introduction In the case of In re Donald Dean Walker, Debtor, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Kenneth G.M. Mather, Trustee,...
Established Constitutional Protections for Foster Children Recognized in Tenth Circuit's Decision

Established Constitutional Protections for Foster Children Recognized in Tenth Circuit's Decision

Date: Mar 25, 1992
Established Constitutional Protections for Foster Children Recognized in Tenth Circuit's Decision Introduction In the landmark case of YVONNE L. and DEMOND L. v. NEW MEXICO DEPARTMENT OF HUMAN...
Credibility Determinations in Social Security Disability Claims: Graham v. Sullivan

Credibility Determinations in Social Security Disability Claims: Graham v. Sullivan

Date: Mar 21, 1992
Credibility Determinations in Social Security Disability Claims: Graham v. Sullivan Introduction Larry A. Graham v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary of Health and Human Services (794 F. Supp. 1045) is a...
Third-Party Consent and Privacy in Container Searches: Salinas-Cano v. United States

Third-Party Consent and Privacy in Container Searches: Salinas-Cano v. United States

Date: Mar 19, 1992
Third-Party Consent and Privacy in Container Searches: Salinas-Cano v. United States Introduction United States of America v. Abel Gilberto Salinas-Cano, 959 F.2d 861 (10th Cir. 1992), addresses a...
Waiver of Jurisdictional Defenses Requires Clear Authorization of Counsel: FDIC v. Oaklawn Apartments

Waiver of Jurisdictional Defenses Requires Clear Authorization of Counsel: FDIC v. Oaklawn Apartments

Date: Mar 18, 1992
Waiver of Jurisdictional Defenses Requires Clear Authorization of Counsel Introduction In Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation v. Oaklawn Apartments, decided by the United States Court of Appeals...
Qualified Immunity Appellate Review: Insights from Workman v. Sheriff Jordan

Qualified Immunity Appellate Review: Insights from Workman v. Sheriff Jordan

Date: Mar 17, 1992
Qualified Immunity Appellate Review: Insights from Workman v. Sheriff Jordan Introduction Workman v. Sheriff Jordan is a seminal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Revisiting Objective Reasonableness in Excessive Force Claims: Frohmader v. Wayne

Revisiting Objective Reasonableness in Excessive Force Claims: Frohmader v. Wayne

Date: Mar 13, 1992
Revisiting Objective Reasonableness in Excessive Force Claims: Frohmader v. Wayne Introduction In the landmark case of Donald Frohmader v. Deputy D. Wayne, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Multiplicity and Sentencing Guidelines in Conspiracy Prosecutions: United States v. Morehead et al. (1992)

Multiplicity and Sentencing Guidelines in Conspiracy Prosecutions: United States v. Morehead et al. (1992)

Date: Mar 5, 1992
Multiplicity and Sentencing Guidelines in Conspiracy Prosecutions: United States v. Morehead et al. (1992) Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Morehead, Sr., Morehead, Jr., and...
Strict Adherence to Post-Judgment Motion Timelines: Van Skiver v. United States

Strict Adherence to Post-Judgment Motion Timelines: Van Skiver v. United States

Date: Feb 22, 1992
Strict Adherence to Post-Judgment Motion Timelines: Van Skiver v. United States Introduction Van Skiver v. United States, 952 F.2d 1241 (10th Cir. 1992), is a pivotal case that underscores the...
Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus: The Dulin v. Cook and Deland Decision

Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus: The Dulin v. Cook and Deland Decision

Date: Feb 19, 1992
Procedural Default in Federal Habeas Corpus: The Dulin v. Cook and Deland Decision Introduction Michael R. Dulin, a petitioner in the case Dulin v. Cook and Deland (957 F.2d 758), challenged the...
Deliberate Indifference to Environmental Tobacco Smoke in Prisons: CLEMMONS v. BOHANNON

Deliberate Indifference to Environmental Tobacco Smoke in Prisons: CLEMMONS v. BOHANNON

Date: Feb 15, 1992
Deliberate Indifference to Environmental Tobacco Smoke in Prisons: CLEMMONS v. BOHANNON Introduction CLEMMONS v. BOHANNON, 956 F.2d 1523 (10th Cir. 1992), is a pivotal case addressing the rights of...
Reinforcement of Rule 9(b) Particularity in Securities Fraud and RICO Claims: Farlow v. Peat Marwick Mitchell Co.

Reinforcement of Rule 9(b) Particularity in Securities Fraud and RICO Claims: Farlow v. Peat Marwick Mitchell Co.

Date: Feb 14, 1992
Reinforcement of Rule 9(b) Particularity in Securities Fraud and RICO Claims: Farlow v. Peat Marwick Mitchell Co. Introduction Farlow et al. v. Peat, Marwick, Mitchell Co. is a pivotal case...
Ensuring Accurate Vocational Assessments in SSI Claims: Insights from Hedstrom v. Sullivan

Ensuring Accurate Vocational Assessments in SSI Claims: Insights from Hedstrom v. Sullivan

Date: Feb 12, 1992
Ensuring Accurate Vocational Assessments in SSI Claims: Insights from Hedstrom v. Sullivan Introduction In the landmark case of Leata Hedstrom, a/k/a Leata McDermott v. Louis W. Sullivan, Secretary...
Clarifying Property Interests in Municipal Employment: Phillips v. Calhoun Establishes Limits on Due Process Protections for Unclassified City Personnel

Clarifying Property Interests in Municipal Employment: Phillips v. Calhoun Establishes Limits on Due Process Protections for Unclassified City Personnel

Date: Feb 12, 1992
Clarifying Property Interests in Municipal Employment: Phillips v. Calhoun Establishes Limits on Due Process Protections for Unclassified City Personnel Introduction Phillips v. Calhoun (956 F.2d...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert