Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of Judicial Discretion in Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction: St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Runyon

Affirmation of Judicial Discretion in Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction: St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Runyon

Date: May 2, 1995
Affirmation of Judicial Discretion in Declaratory Judgment Jurisdiction: St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Co. v. Runyon Introduction The case of St. Paul Fire and Marine Insurance Company v. Philip...
Misrepresentation in Insurance Applications as Grounds for Denial: Insights from International Surplus Lines Insurance Co. v. University of Wyoming Research Corp.

Misrepresentation in Insurance Applications as Grounds for Denial: Insights from International Surplus Lines Insurance Co. v. University of Wyoming Research Corp.

Date: Apr 28, 1995
Misrepresentation in Insurance Applications as Grounds for Denial: Insights from International Surplus Lines Insurance Co. v. University of Wyoming Research Corp. Introduction The case of...
Kunzman v. United States: Affirming Sentencing Guidelines and Evidentiary Standards in Fraud and Money Laundering Cases

Kunzman v. United States: Affirming Sentencing Guidelines and Evidentiary Standards in Fraud and Money Laundering Cases

Date: Apr 27, 1995
Kunzman v. United States: Affirming Sentencing Guidelines and Evidentiary Standards in Fraud and Money Laundering Cases Introduction Kunzman v. United States is a pivotal case adjudicated by the...
Exculpatory Evidence and Ineffective Assistance: Analysis of Banks v. Reynolds

Exculpatory Evidence and Ineffective Assistance: Analysis of Banks v. Reynolds

Date: Apr 27, 1995
Brady Violation and Ineffective Assistance: Precedent in Banks v. Reynolds Introduction Banks v. Reynolds, 54 F.3d 1508 (10th Cir. 1995), is a pivotal case addressing the prosecution's obligation to...
Unisys v. Jones: Upholding At-Will Employment and ADEA Standards in Layoff Disputes

Unisys v. Jones: Upholding At-Will Employment and ADEA Standards in Layoff Disputes

Date: Apr 27, 1995
Unisys v. Jones: Upholding At-Will Employment and ADEA Standards in Layoff Disputes Introduction In the landmark case Rolland Jones et al. v. Unisys Corporation, the United States Court of Appeals...
Judicial Clarification on Sentencing Enhancements for Leadership in Drug Conspiracy: US v. Torres et al.

Judicial Clarification on Sentencing Enhancements for Leadership in Drug Conspiracy: US v. Torres et al.

Date: Apr 26, 1995
Judicial Clarification on Sentencing Enhancements for Leadership in Drug Conspiracy: US v. Torres et al. Introduction The case United States of America v. Raymond Torres, Joseph S. Aflleje, and...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Gender Discrimination Case: Gross v. Burggraf Construction Co.

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Gender Discrimination Case: Gross v. Burggraf Construction Co.

Date: Apr 26, 1995
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in Gender Discrimination Case: Gross v. Burggraf Construction Co. Introduction In the case of Patricia Gross v. Burggraf Construction Company; George Randall Anderson,...
Affirmation of Preemption and Qualification Standards under ADA: Milton & Massey v. Scrivner, Inc.

Affirmation of Preemption and Qualification Standards under ADA: Milton & Massey v. Scrivner, Inc.

Date: Apr 22, 1995
Affirmation of Preemption and Qualification Standards under ADA: Milton & Massey v. Scrivner, Inc. Introduction The case of Charlie Milton and Gary Massey v. Scrivner, Inc. was adjudicated in the...
Qualified Immunity Standard Reinforced in Tenth Circuit: Excessive Force Claims and Duty to Provide Medical Aid under Section 1983

Qualified Immunity Standard Reinforced in Tenth Circuit: Excessive Force Claims and Duty to Provide Medical Aid under Section 1983

Date: Apr 21, 1995
Qualified Immunity Standard Reinforced in Tenth Circuit: Excessive Force Claims and Duty to Provide Medical Aid under Section 1983 Introduction The case of Joyce Wilson et al. v. Luther Donald Meeks...
Clarifying Insurance Coverage: Assault and Battery Exclusion in Professional Liability Policies

Clarifying Insurance Coverage: Assault and Battery Exclusion in Professional Liability Policies

Date: Apr 20, 1995
Clarifying Insurance Coverage: Assault and Battery Exclusion in Professional Liability Policies Introduction The case of Essex Insurance Company v. Williams Street Center, Inc. represents a pivotal...
ERISA Preemption of State Law Claims and Fiduciary Duties: Insights from Maez v. US West Communications, Inc.

ERISA Preemption of State Law Claims and Fiduciary Duties: Insights from Maez v. US West Communications, Inc.

Date: Apr 20, 1995
ERISA Preemption of State Law Claims and Fiduciary Duties: Insights from Maez v. US West Communications, Inc. Introduction In the landmark case Maez v. US West Communications, Inc., 54 F.3d 1488...
Defining 'Sudden and Accidental' in Pollution Exclusions: Insights from Quaker State Minit-Lube v. Fireman's Fund

Defining 'Sudden and Accidental' in Pollution Exclusions: Insights from Quaker State Minit-Lube v. Fireman's Fund

Date: Apr 19, 1995
Defining 'Sudden and Accidental' in Pollution Exclusions: Insights from Quaker State Minit-Lube v. Fireman's Fund Introduction Quaker State Minit-Lube, Inc. v. Fireman's Fund Insurance Company is a...
Enhancements in Drug Conspiracy Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Williamson et al.

Enhancements in Drug Conspiracy Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Williamson et al.

Date: Apr 15, 1995
Enhancements in Drug Conspiracy Sentencing: Insights from United States v. Williamson et al. Introduction United States of America v. Clarissa Williamson et al., 53 F.3d 1500 (10th Cir. 1995), is a...
LUCERO v. GUNTER: Upholding the Constitutionality of Random Urinalysis in Prisons

LUCERO v. GUNTER: Upholding the Constitutionality of Random Urinalysis in Prisons

Date: Apr 13, 1995
LUCERO v. GUNTER: Upholding the Constitutionality of Random Urinalysis in Prisons Introduction Anthony Lucero, a prisoner at the Limon Correctional Facility in Colorado, challenged the constitutional...
Abandonment of Trademark Rights through Naked Licensing: Analysis of Stanfield v. Osborne Industries

Abandonment of Trademark Rights through Naked Licensing: Analysis of Stanfield v. Osborne Industries

Date: Apr 12, 1995
Abandonment of Trademark Rights through Naked Licensing: Analysis of Stanfield v. Osborne Industries Introduction The appellate case of STANFIELD v. OSBORNE INDUSTRIES, INC., 52 F.3d 867 (10th Cir....
At-Will Employment and the Role of Policy Manual Disclaimers: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hatfield v. Converse County Commissioners

At-Will Employment and the Role of Policy Manual Disclaimers: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hatfield v. Converse County Commissioners

Date: Apr 12, 1995
At-Will Employment and the Role of Policy Manual Disclaimers: A Comprehensive Analysis of Hatfield v. Converse County Commissioners Introduction Marjorie Hatfield, the plaintiff-appellant, brought...
Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims: Tenth Circuit Establishes Critical Standards

Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims: Tenth Circuit Establishes Critical Standards

Date: Apr 8, 1995
Qualified Immunity in §1983 Claims: Tenth Circuit Establishes Critical Standards Introduction The case of Richard Albright v. M. Rodriguez et al. adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Espinoza v. United States: Expansion of District Courts' Discretion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m)

Espinoza v. United States: Expansion of District Courts' Discretion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m)

Date: Apr 5, 1995
Espinoza v. United States: Expansion of District Courts' Discretion under Fed.R.Civ.P. 4(m) Introduction Toby J. Espinoza v. United States of America is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United...
Scope of Arbitration Clauses in Antitrust Litigation: Coors Brewing Co. v. Molson Breweries

Scope of Arbitration Clauses in Antitrust Litigation: Coors Brewing Co. v. Molson Breweries

Date: Mar 31, 1995
Scope of Arbitration Clauses in Antitrust Litigation: Coors Brewing Co. v. Molson Breweries Introduction Coors Brewing Company v. Molson Breweries is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court...
Reinforcing Judicial Absolute Immunity and Qualified Immunity for State Defense Attorneys in §1983 Claims: Analysis of HARRIS v. CHAMPION

Reinforcing Judicial Absolute Immunity and Qualified Immunity for State Defense Attorneys in §1983 Claims: Analysis of HARRIS v. CHAMPION

Date: Mar 31, 1995
Reinforcing Judicial Absolute Immunity and Qualified Immunity for State Defense Attorneys in §1983 Claims: Analysis of HARRIS v. CHAMPION Introduction HARRIS v. CHAMPION is a significant appellate...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert