Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Expanding the Boundaries of ADEA Claims: Greene v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

Expanding the Boundaries of ADEA Claims: Greene v. Safeway Stores, Inc.

Date: Oct 16, 1996
Expanding the Boundaries of ADEA Claims: Greene v. Safeway Stores, Inc. Introduction The case of Robert D. Greene v. Safeway Stores, Inc., adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Jury Verdict and High Threshold for Judgment as a Matter of Law in Medical Malpractice: Weese v. Schukman

Affirmation of Jury Verdict and High Threshold for Judgment as a Matter of Law in Medical Malpractice: Weese v. Schukman

Date: Oct 16, 1996
Affirmation of Jury Verdict and High Threshold for Judgment as a Matter of Law in Medical Malpractice: Weese v. Schukman Introduction The case of Calvin L. Weese, Jr. v. Jay S. Schukman, M.D....
Complete Preemption and Jurisdiction in Employment Termination: Curtis Schmeling v. NORDAM

Complete Preemption and Jurisdiction in Employment Termination: Curtis Schmeling v. NORDAM

Date: Oct 5, 1996
Complete Preemption and Jurisdiction in Employment Termination: Curtis Schmeling v. NORDAM Introduction The case of Curtis Schmeling v. NORDAM revolved around the termination of Mr. Schmeling's...
Vesting of Welfare Benefits Under ERISA: Tenth Circuit's Interpretation in Chiles v. Ceridian Corporation

Vesting of Welfare Benefits Under ERISA: Tenth Circuit's Interpretation in Chiles v. Ceridian Corporation

Date: Sep 19, 1996
Vesting of Welfare Benefits Under ERISA: Tenth Circuit's Interpretation in Chiles v. Ceridian Corporation Introduction The case of LEO W. CHILES et al. v. CERIDIAN CORPORATION; SEAGATE TECHNOLOGIES,...
Defining 'Religion' under RFRA: United States v. David Meyers

Defining 'Religion' under RFRA: United States v. David Meyers

Date: Sep 7, 1996
Defining 'Religion' under RFRA: United States v. David Meyers Introduction The case of United States of America v. David Meyers (95 F.3d 1475) presents a pivotal moment in the interpretation of the...
Redefining 'Protected Activity' under FLSA Retaliation: McKenzie v. Renberg's Inc.

Redefining 'Protected Activity' under FLSA Retaliation: McKenzie v. Renberg's Inc.

Date: Sep 5, 1996
Redefining 'Protected Activity' under FLSA Retaliation: McKenzie v. Renberg's Inc. Introduction In the landmark case Lori G. McKenzie v. Renberg's Inc., and Robert Renberg, adjudicated by the United...
Clarifying Reasonable Suspicion in Investigative Detentions: Davis v. United States

Clarifying Reasonable Suspicion in Investigative Detentions: Davis v. United States

Date: Sep 4, 1996
Clarifying Reasonable Suspicion in Investigative Detentions: Davis v. United States Introduction Davis v. United States, 94 F.3d 1465 (10th Cir. 1996), is a pivotal case that addresses the standards...
Interpreter Adequacy in Miranda Waivers: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Hernandez and Silva

Interpreter Adequacy in Miranda Waivers: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Hernandez and Silva

Date: Aug 31, 1996
Interpreter Adequacy in Miranda Waivers: A Comprehensive Commentary on United States v. Hernandez and Silva Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Pablo Hernandez; Suleima Silva, 93...
Affirmation of Disparate Treatment and Impact Standards under Title VII: The York v. AT&T Decision

Affirmation of Disparate Treatment and Impact Standards under Title VII: The York v. AT&T Decision

Date: Aug 28, 1996
Affirmation of Disparate Treatment and Impact Standards under Title VII: The York v. AT&T Decision Introduction The case of Patricia York v. American Telephone & Telegraph Company (AT&T) involves...
First Amendment Parody Exception in Publicity Rights: Cardtoons, L.C. v. MLBPA

First Amendment Parody Exception in Publicity Rights: Cardtoons, L.C. v. MLBPA

Date: Aug 28, 1996
First Amendment Parody Exception in Publicity Rights: Cardtoons, L.C. v. MLBPA Introduction The case Cardtoons, L.C. v. Major League Baseball Players Association (MLBPA) explores the intersection of...
Non-Indispensability of Parties under FRCP 19: Insights from Rishell v. Marriott Corp.

Non-Indispensability of Parties under FRCP 19: Insights from Rishell v. Marriott Corp.

Date: Aug 27, 1996
Non-Indispensability of Parties under FRCP 19: Insights from Rishell v. Marriott Corp. Introduction The case of Max Lee Rishell, Curator of the person and estate of Kathleen Lacey, an incapacitated...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Access to Legal Resources and Limits Qualified Immunity in Prisoner Retaliation Claims

Tenth Circuit Clarifies Access to Legal Resources and Limits Qualified Immunity in Prisoner Retaliation Claims

Date: Aug 27, 1996
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Access to Legal Resources and Limits Qualified Immunity in Prisoner Retaliation Claims Introduction In the case of Donald Adam Penrod v. Aristedes Zavras et al., decided by...
10th Circuit Applies Younger Abstention to ICWA Adoption Proceedings: Morrow v. Winslow

10th Circuit Applies Younger Abstention to ICWA Adoption Proceedings: Morrow v. Winslow

Date: Aug 24, 1996
10th Circuit Applies Younger Abstention to ICWA Adoption Proceedings: Morrow v. Winslow Introduction In the case of Robert Lloyd Morrow, Plaintiff-Appellant v. The Honorable David Winslow; John Doe;...
Grimsley v. Mackay: Clarifying Supervisory Liability and Eighth Amendment Standards in §1983 Claims

Grimsley v. Mackay: Clarifying Supervisory Liability and Eighth Amendment Standards in §1983 Claims

Date: Aug 17, 1996
Grimsley v. Mackay: Clarifying Supervisory Liability and Eighth Amendment Standards in §1983 Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Mike Lee Grimsley v. Terry Mackay et al., adjudicated on...
Adherence to Medical Expertise in Disability Determinations: The Landmark Winfrey v. Chater Decision

Adherence to Medical Expertise in Disability Determinations: The Landmark Winfrey v. Chater Decision

Date: Aug 8, 1996
Adherence to Medical Expertise in Disability Determinations: The Landmark Winfrey v. Chater Decision Introduction In the pivotal case of Winfrey v. Chater, decided by the United States Court of...
Defining 'Crime of Violence' and Prior Convictions under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from United States v. Farnsworth

Defining 'Crime of Violence' and Prior Convictions under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from United States v. Farnsworth

Date: Aug 7, 1996
Defining 'Crime of Violence' and Prior Convictions under U.S. Sentencing Guidelines: Insights from United States v. Farnsworth Introduction United States of America v. Charles Verdel Farnsworth, 92...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies as a Jurisdictional Prerequisite in Title VII Actions: Insights from Janet Jones v. Runyon

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies as a Jurisdictional Prerequisite in Title VII Actions: Insights from Janet Jones v. Runyon

Date: Aug 1, 1996
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies as a Jurisdictional Prerequisite in Title VII Actions: Insights from Janet Jones v. Runyon Introduction The case of Janet Jones v. Marvin T. Runyon, Postmaster...
Application of Colorado's Certificate of Review Statute in Federal Diversity Jurisdiction Cases

Application of Colorado's Certificate of Review Statute in Federal Diversity Jurisdiction Cases

Date: Jul 30, 1996
Application of Colorado's Certificate of Review Statute in Federal Diversity Jurisdiction Cases Introduction In the case of Daniel J. Trierweiler v. Croxton and Trench Holding Corporation et al., the...
Intent to Deceive Essential for Non-Dischargeability Under 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(2)(A) in Attorney-Client Business Transactions

Intent to Deceive Essential for Non-Dischargeability Under 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(2)(A) in Attorney-Client Business Transactions

Date: Jul 27, 1996
Intent to Deceive Essential for Non-Dischargeability Under 11 U.S.C. §523(a)(2)(A) in Attorney-Client Business Transactions Introduction The case of In re: Robert J. Young and Donna M. Young, Debtors...
Affirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard in Prosecutorial Misconduct Cases: United States v. Gabaldon

Affirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard in Prosecutorial Misconduct Cases: United States v. Gabaldon

Date: Jul 27, 1996
Affirmation of Abuse of Discretion Standard in Prosecutorial Misconduct Cases: United States v. Gabaldon Introduction United States of America v. Steve Edward Gabaldon, 91 F.3d 91 (10th Cir. 1996),...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert