Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Promising Leniency to Witnesses: A New Precedent in Section 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2)

Promising Leniency to Witnesses: A New Precedent in Section 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2)

Date: Jul 2, 1998
Promising Leniency to Witnesses: A New Precedent in Section 18 U.S.C. § 201(c)(2) Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Sonya Evette Singleton, the United States Court of Appeals...
Affirmation of District Court's Denial of Qualified Immunity in Baptiste v. Dual

Affirmation of District Court's Denial of Qualified Immunity in Baptiste v. Dual

Date: Jul 1, 1998
Affirmation of District Court's Denial of Qualified Immunity in Baptiste v. Dual Introduction Baptiste v. Dual is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on...
Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Insurance Companies: Tenth Circuit's Analysis in OMI Holdings v. Royal Insurance Co. of Canada

Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Insurance Companies: Tenth Circuit's Analysis in OMI Holdings v. Royal Insurance Co. of Canada

Date: Jul 1, 1998
Personal Jurisdiction Over Foreign Insurance Companies: Tenth Circuit's Analysis in OMI Holdings v. Royal Insurance Co. of Canada Introduction The case of OMI Holdings, Inc. v. Royal Insurance...
Reassessing Procedural Bars on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from English v. Cody

Reassessing Procedural Bars on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from English v. Cody

Date: Jul 1, 1998
Reassessing Procedural Bars on Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Insights from English v. Cody Introduction In the landmark case Gregory Dale English v. R. Michael Cody, decided by the United States...
Reevaluation of Custodial Interrogation Standards for Juveniles: United States v. Erving L.

Reevaluation of Custodial Interrogation Standards for Juveniles: United States v. Erving L.

Date: Jun 27, 1998
Reevaluation of Custodial Interrogation Standards for Juveniles: United States v. Erving L. Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Erving L., decided by the United States Court...
Discretionary Function Exception Affirmed in Federal Tort Claims Act: Aragon v. United States

Discretionary Function Exception Affirmed in Federal Tort Claims Act: Aragon v. United States

Date: Jun 24, 1998
Discretionary Function Exception Affirmed in Federal Tort Claims Act: Aragon v. United States Introduction In Aragon et al. v. United States, 146 F.3d 819 (10th Cir. 1998), the appellants, a group of...
Jeffries v. State of Kansas: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Employer Liability in Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Under Title VII

Jeffries v. State of Kansas: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Employer Liability in Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Under Title VII

Date: Jun 18, 1998
Jeffries v. State of Kansas: Tenth Circuit Clarifies Employer Liability in Sexual Harassment and Retaliation Under Title VII Introduction In Jeffries v. State of Kansas, Department of Social and...
Price-Curtis v. Oklahoma City Public Schools: Clarifying First Amendment Protections for Employee Advocacy in Public Education

Price-Curtis v. Oklahoma City Public Schools: Clarifying First Amendment Protections for Employee Advocacy in Public Education

Date: Jun 17, 1998
Price-Curtis v. Oklahoma City Public Schools: Clarifying First Amendment Protections for Employee Advocacy in Public Education Introduction Price-Curtis v. Oklahoma City Public Schools Board of...
Attorney's Involvement in Drug Distribution Conspiracy: Analysis of United States v. Johnston

Attorney's Involvement in Drug Distribution Conspiracy: Analysis of United States v. Johnston

Date: Jun 6, 1998
Attorney's Involvement in Drug Distribution Conspiracy: Analysis of United States v. Johnston Introduction United States v. Robert Johnston is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Strict Adherence to Daubert Standards in Excluding Unreliable Expert Testimony: In re Breast Implant Litigation

Strict Adherence to Daubert Standards in Excluding Unreliable Expert Testimony: In re Breast Implant Litigation

Date: Jun 4, 1998
Strict Adherence to Daubert Standards in Excluding Unreliable Expert Testimony: In re Breast Implant Litigation Introduction The case titled In re BREAST IMPLANT LITIGATION (No. 96-S-9260) was...
Anticipatory Search Warrants and the Good-Faith Exception: Insights from United States v. Rowland

Anticipatory Search Warrants and the Good-Faith Exception: Insights from United States v. Rowland

Date: Jun 3, 1998
Anticipatory Search Warrants and the Good-Faith Exception: Insights from United States v. Rowland Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. James Frederick Rowland, the United...
Pretext for Discrimination in Reduction in Force: Beaird v. Seagate Technology

Pretext for Discrimination in Reduction in Force: Beaird v. Seagate Technology

Date: May 29, 1998
Pretext for Discrimination in Reduction in Force: Beaird v. Seagate Technology Introduction The case of Beaird v. Seagate Technology, Inc. (145 F.3d 1159) adjudicated by the United States Court of...
United States v. Bautista: Clarifying Miranda and Edwards Rights in Custodial Interrogation

United States v. Bautista: Clarifying Miranda and Edwards Rights in Custodial Interrogation

Date: May 23, 1998
United States v. Bautista: Clarifying Miranda and Edwards Rights in Custodial Interrogation Introduction United States of America v. Michael Bautista, 145 F.3d 1140, decided by the United States...
Punitive Damages in Contractual Violations with Tort Claims: Okland Oil Co. v. Conoco Inc. Commentary

Punitive Damages in Contractual Violations with Tort Claims: Okland Oil Co. v. Conoco Inc. Commentary

Date: May 20, 1998
Punitive Damages in Contractual Violations with Tort Claims: Okland Oil Co. v. Conoco Inc. Commentary Introduction The case of Okland Oil Company v. Conoco Inc. (144 F.3d 1308) adjudicated by the...
Establishing Control Person Liability Under Securities Acts: Insights from Maher v. Durango Metals, Inc.

Establishing Control Person Liability Under Securities Acts: Insights from Maher v. Durango Metals, Inc.

Date: May 20, 1998
Establishing Control Person Liability Under Securities Acts: Insights from Maher v. Durango Metals, Inc. Introduction The case of William J. Maher v. Durango Metals, Inc. addressed pivotal issues...
Employer Liability for Hostile Work Environment under Title VII: An Analysis of Adler v. Wal-Mart

Employer Liability for Hostile Work Environment under Title VII: An Analysis of Adler v. Wal-Mart

Date: May 19, 1998
Employer Liability for Hostile Work Environment under Title VII: An Analysis of Adler v. Wal-Mart Introduction The case of Darla Adler v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc., reported in 144 F.3d 664 by the United...
Crime-Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege in Grand Jury Proceedings

Crime-Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege in Grand Jury Proceedings

Date: May 16, 1998
Crime-Fraud Exception to Attorney-Client Privilege in Grand Jury Proceedings Introduction IN RE: GRAND JURY SUBPOENAS, Jane Roe and John Doe, Intervenor-Appellant v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,...
Qualified Immunity and Motion to Dismiss: Insights from Lowe v. Town of Fairland

Qualified Immunity and Motion to Dismiss: Insights from Lowe v. Town of Fairland

Date: May 15, 1998
Qualified Immunity and Motion to Dismiss: Insights from Lowe v. Town of Fairland Introduction Lowe v. Town of Fairland is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Deliberate Ignorance and Forfeiture in Money Laundering: Insights from U.S. v. Bornfield

Deliberate Ignorance and Forfeiture in Money Laundering: Insights from U.S. v. Bornfield

Date: May 14, 1998
Deliberate Ignorance and Forfeiture in Money Laundering: Insights from United States v. Bornfield Introduction United States of America v. Mikel Bornfield, 145 F.3d 1123 (10th Cir. 1998), is a...
Consent to Search and Its Scope in Motel Rooms: Analysis of United States v. Pena

Consent to Search and Its Scope in Motel Rooms: Analysis of United States v. Pena

Date: May 13, 1998
Consent to Search and Its Scope in Motel Rooms: Analysis of United States v. Pena Introduction The case of United States of America v. Marcos Amabiles Pena, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert