Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Affirmation of the "Three Strikes" Provision under the Prison Litigation Reform Act

Affirmation of the "Three Strikes" Provision under the Prison Litigation Reform Act

Date: Oct 10, 1998
Affirmation of the "Three Strikes" Provision under the Prison Litigation Reform Act Introduction The case of Richard C. White, et al. v. State of Colorado, et al. (157 F.3d 1226) presents a critical...
Sentencing Package Doctrine Affirmed in United States v. Easterling: Implications for Resentencing Procedures

Sentencing Package Doctrine Affirmed in United States v. Easterling: Implications for Resentencing Procedures

Date: Oct 8, 1998
Sentencing Package Doctrine Affirmed in United States v. Easterling: Implications for Resentencing Procedures Comprehensive Commentary on 157 F.3d 1220, United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit,...
Establishing 'Special Need' Requirement for Suspicionless Drug Testing under the Fourth Amendment

Establishing 'Special Need' Requirement for Suspicionless Drug Testing under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Sep 23, 1998
Establishing 'Special Need' Requirement for Suspicionless Drug Testing under the Fourth Amendment Introduction In the case of 19 Solid Waste Department Mechanics v. City of Albuquerque, the United...
Enforcing Indemnification for Joint Negligence: Insights from Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.

Enforcing Indemnification for Joint Negligence: Insights from Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co.

Date: Sep 22, 1998
Enforcing Indemnification for Joint Negligence: Insights from Union Pacific Railroad Co. v. Asplundh Tree Expert Co. Introduction The case of Terry Neustrom v. Union Pacific Railroad Company (156...
Clarifying Hostile Work Environment Under Title VII: Penry v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka

Clarifying Hostile Work Environment Under Title VII: Penry v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka

Date: Sep 16, 1998
Clarifying Hostile Work Environment Under Title VII: Penry v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka Introduction In Penry v. Federal Home Loan Bank of Topeka (155 F.3d 1257, 1998), the United States Court...
Establishing Employer Liability for Supervisors' Racial Harassment under Title VII: Analysis of Wright-Simmons v. City of Oklahoma City

Establishing Employer Liability for Supervisors' Racial Harassment under Title VII: Analysis of Wright-Simmons v. City of Oklahoma City

Date: Sep 16, 1998
Establishing Employer Liability for Supervisors' Racial Harassment under Title VII: Analysis of Wright-Simmons v. City of Oklahoma City Introduction The case of Wright-Simmons v. City of Oklahoma...
Establishing Employee Standing to Challenge Warrantless Searches in Corporate Settings: Insights from United States v. Anderson

Establishing Employee Standing to Challenge Warrantless Searches in Corporate Settings: Insights from United States v. Anderson

Date: Sep 16, 1998
Establishing Employee Standing to Challenge Warrantless Searches in Corporate Settings: Insights from United States v. Anderson Introduction The case of United States of America v. James S. Anderson...
Enforcement of Warrant Restrictions in Secondary Market Transactions

Enforcement of Warrant Restrictions in Secondary Market Transactions

Date: Sep 15, 1998
Enforcement of Warrant Restrictions in Secondary Market Transactions Introduction Joseph Viernow v. Euripides Development Corporation et al. (157 F.3d 785), adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Establishing Boundaries in Hostile Work Environment Claims: Insights from Trujillo v. University of Colorado Health Sciences Center

Establishing Boundaries in Hostile Work Environment Claims: Insights from Trujillo v. University of Colorado Health Sciences Center

Date: Sep 15, 1998
Establishing Boundaries in Hostile Work Environment Claims: Insights from Trujillo v. University of Colorado Health Sciences Center Introduction The case of Eugene Trujillo v. University of Colorado...
Riley Manufacturing Co. v. Anchor Glass: Reaffirming Judicial Authority in Arbitrability Determinations

Riley Manufacturing Co. v. Anchor Glass: Reaffirming Judicial Authority in Arbitrability Determinations

Date: Sep 12, 1998
Riley Manufacturing Co. v. Anchor Glass: Reaffirming Judicial Authority in Arbitrability Determinations Introduction Riley Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Anchor Glass Container Corporation is a...
Protected Property Interests in Collective Bargaining Agreements: Insights from Hennigh v. Shawnee

Protected Property Interests in Collective Bargaining Agreements: Insights from Hennigh v. Shawnee

Date: Sep 10, 1998
Protected Property Interests in Collective Bargaining Agreements: Insights from Hennigh v. Shawnee Introduction Hennigh v. Shawnee (155 F.3d 1249) is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court...
Affirmation of High Standards for Presumed Prejudice from Pretrial Publicity in United States v. McVeigh

Affirmation of High Standards for Presumed Prejudice from Pretrial Publicity in United States v. McVeigh

Date: Sep 9, 1998
Affirmation of High Standards for Presumed Prejudice from Pretrial Publicity in United States v. McVeigh Introduction The case of United States of America v. Timothy James McVeigh, decided by the...
Webb v. ABF Freight System: Establishing Standards for Duty of Fair Representation in Hybrid §301/DFR Claims

Webb v. ABF Freight System: Establishing Standards for Duty of Fair Representation in Hybrid §301/DFR Claims

Date: Sep 5, 1998
Webb v. ABF Freight System: Establishing Standards for Duty of Fair Representation in Hybrid §301/DFR Claims Introduction In the landmark case of Webb v. ABF Freight System, Inc., the United States...
Revising the Statute of Limitations for Securities Fraud: Inquiry Notice and Reasonable Diligence in Sterlin v. Biomune Systems

Revising the Statute of Limitations for Securities Fraud: Inquiry Notice and Reasonable Diligence in Sterlin v. Biomune Systems

Date: Sep 3, 1998
Revising the Statute of Limitations for Securities Fraud: Inquiry Notice and Reasonable Diligence in Sterlin v. Biomune Systems Introduction The case of Roman Sterlin v. Biomune Systems et al....
Probable Cause and Admissibility of Competency Evaluation Evidence: Insights from United States v. Vazquez-Pulido

Probable Cause and Admissibility of Competency Evaluation Evidence: Insights from United States v. Vazquez-Pulido

Date: Sep 2, 1998
Probable Cause and Admissibility of Competency Evaluation Evidence: Insights from United States v. Vazquez-Pulido Introduction United States of America v. Jose Vazquez-Pulido, 155 F.3d 1213 (10th...
Federal Enclave Jurisdiction and Federal Officer Removal: Insights from Akin et al. v. Ashland Chemical Company et al.

Federal Enclave Jurisdiction and Federal Officer Removal: Insights from Akin et al. v. Ashland Chemical Company et al.

Date: Sep 1, 1998
Federal Enclave Jurisdiction and Federal Officer Removal: Insights from Akin et al. v. Ashland Chemical Company et al. Introduction The case of Akin et al. v. Ashland Chemical Company et al....
First Amendment Retaliation and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Dennis Dill v. City of Edmond

First Amendment Retaliation and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Dennis Dill v. City of Edmond

Date: Aug 29, 1998
First Amendment Retaliation and Qualified Immunity: Insights from Dennis Dill v. City of Edmond Introduction The case of Dennis Dill v. City of Edmond, Oklahoma, et al., reported at 155 F.3d 1193...
FDIC v. United Pacific Insurance Co. and Reliance Insurance Co.: Establishing Precedents on Rule 60(b) Motions and Bond Recovery Allocations

FDIC v. United Pacific Insurance Co. and Reliance Insurance Co.: Establishing Precedents on Rule 60(b) Motions and Bond Recovery Allocations

Date: Aug 25, 1998
FDIC v. United Pacific Insurance Co. and Reliance Insurance Co.: Establishing Precedents on Rule 60(b) Motions and Bond Recovery Allocations Introduction In the landmark case of Federal Deposit...
Defense Counsel's Authority to Challenge Competency Without Client Consent Affirmed

Defense Counsel's Authority to Challenge Competency Without Client Consent Affirmed

Date: Aug 22, 1998
Defense Counsel's Authority to Challenge Competency Without Client Consent Affirmed Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Walter Scot Boigegrain, adjudicated by the United...
Affirmation of County Immunity in Fourth and Eighth Amendment Claims: Myers v. Oklahoma County

Affirmation of County Immunity in Fourth and Eighth Amendment Claims: Myers v. Oklahoma County

Date: Aug 21, 1998
Affirmation of County Immunity in Fourth and Eighth Amendment Claims: Myers v. Oklahoma County Introduction The case of Myers v. Oklahoma County, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert