Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Revisiting Rule 19: The Indispensability of Tribal Sovereignty in Civil Litigation - Davis v. Dosar-Barkus Band of the Seminole Nation

Revisiting Rule 19: The Indispensability of Tribal Sovereignty in Civil Litigation - Davis v. Dosar-Barkus Band of the Seminole Nation

Date: Sep 22, 1999
Revisiting Rule 19: The Indispensability of Tribal Sovereignty in Civil Litigation Analysis of Davis v. Dosar-Barkus Band of the Seminole Nation of Oklahoma Introduction Case: SYLVIA DAVIS, as...
Wallace v. Warden: Upholding AEDPA Standards and Competency Assessments in Capital Cases

Wallace v. Warden: Upholding AEDPA Standards and Competency Assessments in Capital Cases

Date: Sep 11, 1999
Wallace v. Warden: Upholding AEDPA Standards and Competency Assessments in Capital Cases Introduction Wallace v. Warden is a significant judicial decision rendered by the United States Court of...
Clarifying the Lanham Act: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Cottrell v. Biotrol and Pro-Dex

Clarifying the Lanham Act: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Cottrell v. Biotrol and Pro-Dex

Date: Sep 11, 1999
Clarifying the Lanham Act: Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Cottrell v. Biotrol and Pro-Dex Introduction Cottrell, Ltd., a Colorado corporation, initiated a lawsuit against Biotrol International, Inc., a...
Defining Consent and Excessive Force in Eighth Amendment §1983 Claims: Giron v. Corrections Corporation of America

Defining Consent and Excessive Force in Eighth Amendment §1983 Claims: Giron v. Corrections Corporation of America

Date: Sep 11, 1999
Defining Consent and Excessive Force in Eighth Amendment §1983 Claims: Giron v. Corrections Corporation of America Introduction Tanya Giron, an inmate at the New Mexico Women's Correctional Facility...
Comprehensive Analysis of Smallwood v. Gibson: Procedural Barriers in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Comprehensive Analysis of Smallwood v. Gibson: Procedural Barriers in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Sep 11, 1999
Comprehensive Analysis of Smallwood v. Gibson: Procedural Barriers in Habeas Corpus Petitions Introduction Dion A. Smallwood, the petitioner-appellant, challenged his convictions for First Degree...
Appellate Court Mandates In Camera Review of Attorney-Client Privileged Documents in Individual Bankruptcy Cases

Appellate Court Mandates In Camera Review of Attorney-Client Privileged Documents in Individual Bankruptcy Cases

Date: Sep 9, 1999
Appellate Court Mandates In Camera Review of Attorney-Client Privileged Documents in Individual Bankruptcy Cases Introduction In the case of BRYAN K. FOSTER; REINHART, BOERNER, VAN DEUREN, NORRIS...
Affirmation of Original Source Requirement under the False Claims Act: Hafter v. Spectrum Healthcare

Affirmation of Original Source Requirement under the False Claims Act: Hafter v. Spectrum Healthcare

Date: Sep 8, 1999
Affirmation of Original Source Requirement under the False Claims Act: Hafter v. Spectrum Healthcare Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America, ex rel. Lance E. Hafter, D.O.;...
Limits of Brady Obligations for Federal Prosecutors Regarding State-Controlled Evidence

Limits of Brady Obligations for Federal Prosecutors Regarding State-Controlled Evidence

Date: Sep 8, 1999
Limits of Brady Obligations for Federal Prosecutors Regarding State-Controlled Evidence Introduction In the case of United States of America v. Timothy M. Beers, decided on September 7, 1999, the...
Protecting Public Employees' First Amendment Rights in Political Association: Insights from Jantzen v. Hawkins

Protecting Public Employees' First Amendment Rights in Political Association: Insights from Jantzen v. Hawkins

Date: Sep 1, 1999
Protecting Public Employees' First Amendment Rights in Political Association: Insights from Jantzen v. Hawkins Introduction The case of Jantzen Jantzen; Richard Haugland; William Gabriele Moulton;...
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Insights from United States v. Charley

Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Insights from United States v. Charley

Date: Aug 28, 1999
Admissibility of Expert Testimony in Child Sexual Abuse Cases: Insights from United States v. Charley Introduction The case of United States of America v. Wayne Lewis Charley (189 F.3d 1251)...
Totality of Circumstances Approach and OWBPA Release Validation in Bennett v. Coors Brewing Company

Totality of Circumstances Approach and OWBPA Release Validation in Bennett v. Coors Brewing Company

Date: Aug 28, 1999
Totality of Circumstances Approach and OWBPA Release Validation in Bennett v. Coors Brewing Company Introduction Bennett v. Coors Brewing Company is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court...
Enhanced Scrutiny on Money Laundering Convictions: Insights from United States v. Sylvester Anderson

Enhanced Scrutiny on Money Laundering Convictions: Insights from United States v. Sylvester Anderson

Date: Aug 25, 1999
Enhanced Scrutiny on Money Laundering Convictions: Insights from United States v. Sylvester Anderson Introduction The case of United States of America v. Sylvester Anderson (189 F.3d 1201, 10th Cir....
Establishing Probable Cause Thresholds for Traffic Stops Based on Lane Deviations under the Fourth Amendment

Establishing Probable Cause Thresholds for Traffic Stops Based on Lane Deviations under the Fourth Amendment

Date: Aug 25, 1999
Establishing Probable Cause Thresholds for Traffic Stops Based on Lane Deviations under the Fourth Amendment Introduction In the landmark case of United States of America v. Ted Kenton Ozbirn, the...
Punitive Damages and Vicarious Liability under the ADA: Insights from Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Punitive Damages and Vicarious Liability under the ADA: Insights from Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc.

Date: Aug 24, 1999
Punitive Damages and Vicarious Liability under the ADA: Insights from Equal Employment Opportunity Commission v. Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. Introduction The case of Equal Employment Opportunity Commission...
Affirming ADA's Valid Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity and Defining Essential Job Functions: Martin v. Kansas

Affirming ADA's Valid Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity and Defining Essential Job Functions: Martin v. Kansas

Date: Aug 20, 1999
Affirming ADA's Valid Abrogation of State Sovereign Immunity and Defining Essential Job Functions: Martin v. Kansas Introduction Martin v. Kansas, 190 F.3d 1120 (10th Cir. 1999), is a pivotal case...
Sheila Shorter v. ICG Holdings, Inc.: Establishing Precedents in Employment Discrimination Law

Sheila Shorter v. ICG Holdings, Inc.: Establishing Precedents in Employment Discrimination Law

Date: Aug 18, 1999
Sheila Shorter v. ICG Holdings, Inc.: Establishing Precedents in Employment Discrimination Law Introduction The case Sheila Shorter, Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellant, v. ICG Holdings, Inc.,...
Establishing Single Employer Status in Employment Discrimination Cases: Knowlton v. Teltrust Phones, Inc.

Establishing Single Employer Status in Employment Discrimination Cases: Knowlton v. Teltrust Phones, Inc.

Date: Aug 17, 1999
Establishing Single Employer Status in Employment Discrimination Cases: Knowlton v. Teltrust Phones, Inc. Introduction The case of Pierre Knowlton v. Teltrust Phones, Inc. (189 F.3d 1177, 10th Cir....
McAlpine v. Thompson: Mootness and Supervised Release in Injunctive Relief Claims

McAlpine v. Thompson: Mootness and Supervised Release in Injunctive Relief Claims

Date: Aug 13, 1999
McAlpine v. Thompson: Mootness and Supervised Release in Injunctive Relief Claims Introduction In the landmark case of McAlpine v. Thompson, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit...
Tenth Circuit Affirms Denial of Class Certification and Upholds EX PARTE YOUNG Exception in Child Welfare System Accountability Case

Tenth Circuit Affirms Denial of Class Certification and Upholds EX PARTE YOUNG Exception in Child Welfare System Accountability Case

Date: Aug 13, 1999
Tenth Circuit Affirms Denial of Class Certification and Upholds EX PARTE YOUNG Exception in Child Welfare System Accountability Case Introduction In the landmark case J.B. et al. v. Valdez et al.,...
Refining the Boundaries of Disparate Impact and Continuing Violation Doctrine in Employment Discrimination: Bullington v. United Airlines, Inc.

Refining the Boundaries of Disparate Impact and Continuing Violation Doctrine in Employment Discrimination: Bullington v. United Airlines, Inc.

Date: Aug 13, 1999
Refining the Boundaries of Disparate Impact and Continuing Violation Doctrine in Employment Discrimination: Bullington v. United Airlines, Inc. Introduction Bullington v. United Airlines, Inc., 186...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert