Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Establishing Voluntary Consent in Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Zubia-Melendez

Establishing Voluntary Consent in Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Zubia-Melendez

Date: Aug 25, 2001
Establishing Voluntary Consent in Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Zubia-Melendez Introduction The case of United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo Zubia-Melendez,...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Claims: Erikson v. Pawnee County

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Claims: Erikson v. Pawnee County

Date: Aug 24, 2001
Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal counsel, please consult a qualified attorney. Affirmation of Qualified Immunity...
AEDPA's One-Year Limitation on Habeas Petitions: Strict Enforcement and Limited Equitable Tolling in Fisher v. Gibson

AEDPA's One-Year Limitation on Habeas Petitions: Strict Enforcement and Limited Equitable Tolling in Fisher v. Gibson

Date: Aug 23, 2001
AEDPA's One-Year Limitation on Habeas Petitions: Strict Enforcement and Limited Equitable Tolling in Fisher v. Gibson Introduction John Hadley Fisher, the petitioner-appellant, is currently serving...
Restricting Appellate Attorneys' Fees Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c): The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Huffman v. Saul Holdings

Restricting Appellate Attorneys' Fees Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c): The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Huffman v. Saul Holdings

Date: Aug 23, 2001
Restricting Appellate Attorneys' Fees Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c): The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Huffman v. Saul Holdings Introduction The case of Marshall Huffman and Virginia Newton v. Saul...
Affirmation of Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: MILLER v. CHAMPION

Affirmation of Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: MILLER v. CHAMPION

Date: Aug 22, 2001
Affirmation of Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: MILLER v. CHAMPION Introduction The case of Arthur Donnell Miller, Jr. v. Ron Champion, reported at 262 F.3d 1066,...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in §1983 Claims Against Public School Employers: Bartell v. Aurora Public Schools

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in §1983 Claims Against Public School Employers: Bartell v. Aurora Public Schools

Date: Aug 22, 2001
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in §1983 Claims Against Public School Employers: Bartell v. Aurora Public Schools Introduction In Bartell v. Aurora Public Schools, the United States Court of Appeals...
Standing in Defendant Class Action Appeals: Insights from In re Integra Realty Resources, Inc.

Standing in Defendant Class Action Appeals: Insights from In re Integra Realty Resources, Inc.

Date: Aug 22, 2001
Standing in Defendant Class Action Appeals: Insights from In re Integra Realty Resources, Inc. Introduction The case of In re Integra Realty Resources, Inc. addresses significant issues surrounding...
Excited Utterance Exception Reinforced in Confrontation Clause Analysis

Excited Utterance Exception Reinforced in Confrontation Clause Analysis

Date: Aug 18, 2001
Excited Utterance Exception Reinforced in Confrontation Clause Analysis Introduction David Woodward, the petitioner-appellant, was convicted of murdering his wife, Deborah Woodward, in a case handled...
Affirmation of Medicare Antikickback Violations: United States v. LaHUE

Affirmation of Medicare Antikickback Violations: United States v. LaHUE

Date: Aug 18, 2001
Affirmation of Medicare Antikickback Violations: United States v. LaHUE Introduction In the landmark case United States of America v. Robert C. LaHUE, adjudicated on August 17, 2001, the United...
Cindy Rice v. Office of Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance: Establishing Federal Presumptions on Mental Capacity and Undue Influence in SGLI Beneficiary Designations

Cindy Rice v. Office of Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance: Establishing Federal Presumptions on Mental Capacity and Undue Influence in SGLI Beneficiary Designations

Date: Aug 15, 2001
Cindy Rice v. Office of Servicemembers' Group Life Insurance: Establishing Federal Presumptions on Mental Capacity and Undue Influence in SGLI Beneficiary Designations Introduction Cindy Rice v....
Implementation of KYLES v. WHITLEY in Capital Sentencing: The Mitchell v. Gibson Decision

Implementation of KYLES v. WHITLEY in Capital Sentencing: The Mitchell v. Gibson Decision

Date: Aug 14, 2001
Implementation of KYLES v. WHITLEY in Capital Sentencing: The Mitchell v. Gibson Decision Introduction The case of Alfred Brian Mitchell v. Gary Gibson, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Courts vs. Arbitrators in Determining Arbitrability: Insights from Dean Witter Reynolds v. Karen Howsam

Courts vs. Arbitrators in Determining Arbitrability: Insights from Dean Witter Reynolds v. Karen Howsam

Date: Aug 10, 2001
Courts vs. Arbitrators in Determining Arbitrability: Insights from Dean Witter Reynolds v. Karen Howsam Introduction The landmark case Dean Witter Reynolds, Inc. v. Karen Howsam (261 F.3d 956) before...
Affirmation of Procedural Bars and Due Process in Death Penalty Cases: Analysis of Cannon v. Gibson

Affirmation of Procedural Bars and Due Process in Death Penalty Cases: Analysis of Cannon v. Gibson

Date: Aug 8, 2001
Affirmation of Procedural Bars and Due Process in Death Penalty Cases: Analysis of Cannon v. Gibson Introduction Cannon v. Gibson (259 F.3d 1253, 10th Cir. 2001) is a pivotal appellate case...
Rule 54(b) Certification Requirements Clarified in Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. Bruner

Rule 54(b) Certification Requirements Clarified in Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. Bruner

Date: Aug 7, 2001
Rule 54(b) Certification Requirements Clarified in Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. Bruner Introduction The case of Oklahoma Turnpike Authority v. Bruner adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of the "Learned Intermediary Doctrine" and Kansas Product Liability Standards in Abbott Laboratories v. Wright

Affirmation of the "Learned Intermediary Doctrine" and Kansas Product Liability Standards in Abbott Laboratories v. Wright

Date: Aug 7, 2001
Affirmation of the "Learned Intermediary Doctrine" and Kansas Product Liability Standards in Abbott Laboratories v. Wright Introduction Abbott Laboratories v. Wright is a significant case adjudicated...
Bennett v. Quark, Inc. (10th Cir. 2001): Reaffirming Strict Compliance with ADEA Procedural and Substantive Requirements

Bennett v. Quark, Inc. (10th Cir. 2001): Reaffirming Strict Compliance with ADEA Procedural and Substantive Requirements

Date: Aug 4, 2001
Bennett v. Quark, Inc. (10th Cir. 2001): Reaffirming Strict Compliance with ADEA Procedural and Substantive Requirements Introduction In Bennett v. Quark, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for...
Application of the Colorado Ski Safety Act in Doering v. Copper Mountain, Inc.

Application of the Colorado Ski Safety Act in Doering v. Copper Mountain, Inc.

Date: Aug 1, 2001
Application of the Colorado Ski Safety Act in Doering v. Copper Mountain, Inc. Introduction In the case of Richard Albert Doering et al. v. Copper Mountain, Inc. et al., the plaintiffs, including...
Insufficient Allegations under 42 U.S.C §1983: Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal in Smith v. Plati

Insufficient Allegations under 42 U.S.C §1983: Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal in Smith v. Plati

Date: Jul 31, 2001
Insufficient Allegations under 42 U.S.C §1983: Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal in Smith v. Plati Introduction The case of Theodore M. Smith v. David Plati, decided by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 Conviction: Balancing Fifth Amendment Rights and Vienna Convention Provisions in Illegal Reentry Cases

Affirmation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 Conviction: Balancing Fifth Amendment Rights and Vienna Convention Provisions in Illegal Reentry Cases

Date: Jul 28, 2001
Affirmation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 Conviction: Balancing Fifth Amendment Rights and Vienna Convention Provisions in Illegal Reentry Cases Introduction The case of United States of America v. Mario...
Defining Adverse Employment Action in Retaliation Claims: Aquilino v. University of Kansas

Defining Adverse Employment Action in Retaliation Claims: Aquilino v. University of Kansas

Date: Jul 24, 2001
Defining Adverse Employment Action in Retaliation Claims: Aquilino v. University of Kansas 1. Introduction The case of Marie Aquilino, Ph.D. v. University of Kansas (268 F.3d 930, 10th Cir. 2001)...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert