Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Fields v. Gibson: Upholding Standards for Voluntary Guilty Pleas and Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing

Fields v. Gibson: Upholding Standards for Voluntary Guilty Pleas and Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing

Date: Jan 18, 2002
Fields v. Gibson: Upholding Standards for Voluntary Guilty Pleas and Effective Counsel in Capital Sentencing Introduction Bobby Joe Fields, the petitioner-appellant, challenged his death sentence in...
Younger's Abstention Doctrine Refined: Eleventh Amendment Does Not Bar Class Actions Against State Child Welfare Departments

Younger's Abstention Doctrine Refined: Eleventh Amendment Does Not Bar Class Actions Against State Child Welfare Departments

Date: Jan 8, 2002
Younger's Abstention Doctrine Refined: Eleventh Amendment Does Not Bar Class Actions Against State Child Welfare Departments Introduction The case of Joseph A. et al. v. Lawrence B. Ingram et al....
Remand Granted for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Presentation of Steroid-Use Mitigation Evidence: Sallahdin v. Gibson

Remand Granted for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Presentation of Steroid-Use Mitigation Evidence: Sallahdin v. Gibson

Date: Jan 5, 2002
Remand Granted for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Presentation of Steroid-Use Mitigation Evidence: Sallahdin v. Gibson Introduction In the landmark case of Sharieff Imani Sallahdin v. Gary...
Establishing Standards for Computer Evidence Seizure and Scope of Search Warrants in United States v. Walser

Establishing Standards for Computer Evidence Seizure and Scope of Search Warrants in United States v. Walser

Date: Dec 29, 2001
Establishing Standards for Computer Evidence Seizure and Scope of Search Warrants in United States v. Walser Introduction In the landmark case of United States v. Russell Lane Walser, 275 F.3d 981...
Preclusion of Bivens Claims by Section 2676 in the Tenth Circuit: Farmer v. Perrill

Preclusion of Bivens Claims by Section 2676 in the Tenth Circuit: Farmer v. Perrill

Date: Dec 27, 2001
Preclusion of Bivens Claims by Section 2676 in the Tenth Circuit: Farmer v. Perrill Introduction Dee Deidre Farmer, a transsexual inmate, initiated a lawsuit against William Perrill, the Warden of...
Reaffirming Expert Qualification Standards in Failure to Warn Claims: Ralston v. Smith Nephew

Reaffirming Expert Qualification Standards in Failure to Warn Claims: Ralston v. Smith Nephew

Date: Dec 27, 2001
Reaffirming Expert Qualification Standards in Failure to Warn Claims: Ralston v. Smith Nephew Introduction Ralston v. Smith Nephew, Inc., 275 F.3d 965 (10th Cir. 2001) is a pivotal case addressing...
Appellate Review Limitations on Remand Orders: Kennedy v. Lubar

Appellate Review Limitations on Remand Orders: Kennedy v. Lubar

Date: Dec 18, 2001
Appellate Review Limitations on Remand Orders: Kennedy v. Lubar Introduction In the case of Lisa T. Kennedy v. Clemence Lubar, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on...
Private Cause of Action under Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act Denied in Sheldon v. Vermonty

Private Cause of Action under Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act Denied in Sheldon v. Vermonty

Date: Dec 11, 2001
Private Cause of Action under Section 15 of the Securities Exchange Act Denied in Sheldon v. Vermonty Introduction Sheldon v. Vermonty is a significant case adjudicated in the United States District...
Tenth Circuit Affirms Oklahoma's Retrospective Victim Impact Evidence Admission in Capital Sentencing

Tenth Circuit Affirms Oklahoma's Retrospective Victim Impact Evidence Admission in Capital Sentencing

Date: Dec 8, 2001
Tenth Circuit Affirms Oklahoma's Retrospective Victim Impact Evidence Admission in Capital Sentencing Introduction In the case of Jay Wesley NEILL v. Gary GIBSON, the United States Court of Appeals...
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion in Routine Traffic Stops: United States v. Callarman

Establishing Reasonable Suspicion in Routine Traffic Stops: United States v. Callarman

Date: Dec 8, 2001
Establishing Reasonable Suspicion in Routine Traffic Stops: United States v. Callarman Introduction United States v. Curtis Dennis Callarman, 273 F.3d 1284 (10th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case that...
Federal Jurisdiction and Diversity in Intellectual Property Disputes: Insights from AMAZON, INC. v. DIRT CAMP, INC.

Federal Jurisdiction and Diversity in Intellectual Property Disputes: Insights from AMAZON, INC. v. DIRT CAMP, INC.

Date: Dec 7, 2001
Federal Jurisdiction and Diversity in Intellectual Property Disputes: Insights from AMAZON, INC. v. DIRT CAMP, INC. Introduction The case of AMAZON, INC., Plaintiff-Counter-Defendant-Appellee, v....
Reversing Summary Judgment in Racial Discrimination Case: McCowan, Luna & Guerrero v. All Star Maintenance

Reversing Summary Judgment in Racial Discrimination Case: McCowan, Luna & Guerrero v. All Star Maintenance

Date: Dec 1, 2001
Reversing Summary Judgment in Racial Discrimination Case: McCowan, Luna & Guerrero v. All Star Maintenance Introduction The case of Warren N. McCowan, Johnny P. Luna, and Steve E. Guerrero v. All...
Affirmation of ALJ's Discretion in Evaluating Disability Claims: White v. Massanari

Affirmation of ALJ's Discretion in Evaluating Disability Claims: White v. Massanari

Date: Nov 29, 2001
Affirmation of ALJ's Discretion in Evaluating Disability Claims: White v. Massanari Introduction Parties Involved: Plaintiff-Appellant: Barbara J. White Defendant-Appellee: Larry G. Massanari, Acting...
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Traffic Stops: Williams v. United States

Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Traffic Stops: Williams v. United States

Date: Nov 29, 2001
Affirmation of Reasonable Suspicion in Traffic Stops: Williams v. United States Introduction Williams v. United States (271 F.3d 1262, United States Court of Appeals, Tenth Circuit, 2001) is a...
Adams v. United States: Tenth Circuit Affirms Exclusion of Expert Psychological Testimony on Credibility

Adams v. United States: Tenth Circuit Affirms Exclusion of Expert Psychological Testimony on Credibility

Date: Nov 28, 2001
Adams v. United States: Tenth Circuit Affirms Exclusion of Expert Psychological Testimony on Credibility Introduction In United States v. Dale L. Adams, 271 F.3d 1236 (10th Cir. 2001), the United...
Recognition of Exclusive Remedy Provisions Across State Lines: Stuart v. Colorado Interstate Gas Company

Recognition of Exclusive Remedy Provisions Across State Lines: Stuart v. Colorado Interstate Gas Company

Date: Nov 28, 2001
Recognition of Exclusive Remedy Provisions Across State Lines: Stuart v. Colorado Interstate Gas Company Introduction The case of Gerald Shane Stuart v. Colorado Interstate Gas Company (CIG) explores...
Admissibility of Dissimilar Accident Evidence and Burden Shifting in Products Liability: Tenth Circuit's Decision in BLACK v. M W Gear Co.

Admissibility of Dissimilar Accident Evidence and Burden Shifting in Products Liability: Tenth Circuit's Decision in BLACK v. M W Gear Co.

Date: Nov 8, 2001
Admissibility of Dissimilar Accident Evidence and Burden Shifting in Products Liability: Tenth Circuit's Decision in BLACK v. M W Gear Company Introduction The case of Carolyn BLACK, indi v. Dually...
Affirmation of Arbitration Panel’s Authority to Dismiss Claims with Prejudice Under NASD Rules: Da v. Sheldon

Affirmation of Arbitration Panel’s Authority to Dismiss Claims with Prejudice Under NASD Rules: Da v. Sheldon

Date: Nov 1, 2001
Affirmation of Arbitration Panel’s Authority to Dismiss Claims with Prejudice Under NASD Rules: Da v. Sheldon Introduction The case of Da v. Sheldon, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Kapoors v. ENMMC: Reinforcing State Responsibility in Workplace Harassment under Section 1983

Kapoors v. ENMMC: Reinforcing State Responsibility in Workplace Harassment under Section 1983

Date: Nov 1, 2001
Kapoors v. ENMMC: Reinforcing State Responsibility in Workplace Harassment under Section 1983 Introduction In Anna Nieto, Betty DelosSantos, Patrick Sanchez, Sally Netsch, Phyllis DeBaun, and Mary...
Reaffirming Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Contractual Arbitration: Dominion Video Satellite v. EchoStar

Reaffirming Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Contractual Arbitration: Dominion Video Satellite v. EchoStar

Date: Oct 26, 2001
Reaffirming Standards for Preliminary Injunctions in Contractual Arbitration: Dominion Video Satellite v. EchoStar Introduction The case of Dominion Video Satellite, Inc. v. EchoStar Satellite...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert