Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

State Action Doctrine Clarified in Adoption Context: JOHNSON v. RODRIGUES

State Action Doctrine Clarified in Adoption Context: JOHNSON v. RODRIGUES

Date: Jun 19, 2002
State Action Doctrine Clarified in Adoption Context: JOHNSON v. RODRIGUES Introduction Victor Johnson v. Monica Rodrigues (Orozco), et al. is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Establishing Precedent on Second Degree Murder Instructions and AEDPA Limitations in Willingham v. Mullin

Establishing Precedent on Second Degree Murder Instructions and AEDPA Limitations in Willingham v. Mullin

Date: Jun 18, 2002
Establishing Precedent on Second Degree Murder Instructions and AEDPA Limitations in Willingham v. Mullin Introduction Willingham v. Mullin, 296 F.3d 917 (10th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Relief in Knighton v. Mullin: Upholding AEDPA and Brady Standards

Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Relief in Knighton v. Mullin: Upholding AEDPA and Brady Standards

Date: Jun 15, 2002
Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Relief in Knighton v. Mullin: Upholding AEDPA and Brady Standards Introduction Robert Wesley Knighton v. Mike Mullin, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary is a pivotal...
Establishing Pretext in Age Discrimination Claims: Insights from Danville v. Regional Lab Corporation

Establishing Pretext in Age Discrimination Claims: Insights from Danville v. Regional Lab Corporation

Date: Jun 13, 2002
Establishing Pretext in Age Discrimination Claims: Insights from Danville v. Regional Lab Corporation Introduction The case of Inga F. Danville v. Regional Lab Corporation, decided by the United...
Application of Equitable Tolling Under AEDPA Limitations Period: Hall v. Scott

Application of Equitable Tolling Under AEDPA Limitations Period: Hall v. Scott

Date: Jun 13, 2002
Application of Equitable Tolling Under AEDPA Limitations Period: Hall v. Scott Introduction The case of Raymond J. Hall v. H.N. Sonny Scott, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Strict Scrutiny Applied to Municipal Petition Circulation Ordinances: Tenth Circuit's Arvada Decision

Strict Scrutiny Applied to Municipal Petition Circulation Ordinances: Tenth Circuit's Arvada Decision

Date: Jun 12, 2002
Strict Scrutiny Applied to Municipal Petition Circulation Ordinances: Tenth Circuit's Arvada Decision Introduction The case of Da v. CHANDLER; Daniel Hayes; Cheryl St. John; Robert G. Prokop,...
Gaines v. Stenseng: Establishing Standards for §1983 Due Process Claims in Disciplinary Segregation

Gaines v. Stenseng: Establishing Standards for §1983 Due Process Claims in Disciplinary Segregation

Date: Jun 8, 2002
Gaines v. Stenseng: Establishing Standards for §1983 Due Process Claims in Disciplinary Segregation Introduction In Gaines v. Stenseng, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit...
ERISA's Strict Preemption and Limited Remedies Affirmed in Moffett v. Halliburton

ERISA's Strict Preemption and Limited Remedies Affirmed in Moffett v. Halliburton

Date: May 30, 2002
ERISA's Strict Preemption and Limited Remedies Affirmed in Moffett v. Halliburton Introduction In Douglas W. Moffett v. Halliburton Energy Services, Inc., 291 F.3d 1227 (10th Cir. 2002), the United...
Hawkins v. Mullin: Tenth Circuit Upholds Inclusion of Kidnapping for Extortion in Oklahoma's First-Degree Felony Murder Statute

Hawkins v. Mullin: Tenth Circuit Upholds Inclusion of Kidnapping for Extortion in Oklahoma's First-Degree Felony Murder Statute

Date: May 23, 2002
Hawkins v. Mullin: Tenth Circuit Upholds Inclusion of Kidnapping for Extortion in Oklahoma's First-Degree Felony Murder Statute Introduction Hawkins v. Mullin is a seminal case adjudicated by the...
Limitations on RICO Claims in Legal Malpractice Cases: Analyzing Diaz v. The Paul J. Kennedy Law Firm

Limitations on RICO Claims in Legal Malpractice Cases: Analyzing Diaz v. The Paul J. Kennedy Law Firm

Date: May 15, 2002
Limitations on RICO Claims in Legal Malpractice Cases: Analyzing Diaz v. The Paul J. Kennedy Law Firm Introduction In Carlos L. Diaz; Myrna Diaz v. The Paul J. Kennedy Law Firm, 289 F.3d 671 (10th...
Strengthening Daubert's Gatekeeping in Pharmaceutical Liability: Insights from Hollander v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Strengthening Daubert's Gatekeeping in Pharmaceutical Liability: Insights from Hollander v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp.

Date: May 11, 2002
Strengthening Daubert's Gatekeeping in Pharmaceutical Liability: Insights from Hollander v. Sandoz Pharmaceuticals Corp. Introduction The case of Dee Hollander and Don Hollander v. Sandoz...
Brillhart Doctrine Applied in Federal Declination of Declaratory Judgment on Water Rights

Brillhart Doctrine Applied in Federal Declination of Declaratory Judgment on Water Rights

Date: May 8, 2002
Brillhart Doctrine Applied in Federal Declination of Declaratory Judgment on Water Rights Introduction The case United States of America v. City of Las Cruces et al., adjudicated by the United States...
Affirmation of Inmate Privacy Rights in Strip Searches: Farmers v. Perrill

Affirmation of Inmate Privacy Rights in Strip Searches: Farmers v. Perrill

Date: May 4, 2002
Affirmation of Inmate Privacy Rights in Strip Searches: Farmers v. Perrill Introduction Farmers v. Perrill (288 F.3d 1254, 10th Cir. 2002) is a pivotal case that addresses the balance between...
Reevaluating Disability Determinations: Insights from McGoffin v. Barnhart

Reevaluating Disability Determinations: Insights from McGoffin v. Barnhart

Date: May 4, 2002
Reevaluating Disability Determinations: Insights from McGoffin v. Barnhart Introduction McGoffin v. Barnhart, 288 F.3d 1248 (10th Cir. 2002), is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court of...
Clingman v. United States: Standards for Timely Objections and Ineffective Assistance in §2255 Proceedings

Clingman v. United States: Standards for Timely Objections and Ineffective Assistance in §2255 Proceedings

Date: May 2, 2002
Clingman v. United States: Standards for Timely Objections and Ineffective Assistance in §2255 Proceedings Introduction Clingman v. United States is a pivotal case decided by the United States Court...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies 'Own Occupation' and 'Any Occupation' Standards in Disability Benefits under ERISA

Tenth Circuit Clarifies 'Own Occupation' and 'Any Occupation' Standards in Disability Benefits under ERISA

Date: May 1, 2002
Tenth Circuit Clarifies 'Own Occupation' and 'Any Occupation' Standards in Disability Benefits under ERISA Introduction The case of Rufus A. Caldwell, III v. Life Insurance Company of North America...
Affirmation of Church Autonomy Doctrine in Sexual Harassment Claims

Affirmation of Church Autonomy Doctrine in Sexual Harassment Claims

Date: May 1, 2002
Affirmation of Church Autonomy Doctrine in Sexual Harassment Claims Introduction In the case of Lee Ann Bryce and Reverend Sara Smith v. Episcopal Church in the Diocese of Colorado et al., the...
Strict Application of 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(2): Entire Habeas Petitions Must Be Denied or Dismissed

Strict Application of 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(2): Entire Habeas Petitions Must Be Denied or Dismissed

Date: Apr 30, 2002
Strict Application of 28 U.S.C. §2254(b)(2): Entire Habeas Petitions Must Be Denied or Dismissed Introduction The case of Edwin L. Moore v. Captain Schoeman; Attorney General of the State of...
Conditional Habeas Relief for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Johnson v. Champion

Conditional Habeas Relief for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Johnson v. Champion

Date: Apr 27, 2002
Conditional Habeas Relief for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel: Johnson v. Champion Introduction Robert Grady Johnson, an Oklahoma state prisoner, appealed the dismissal of his habeas corpus...
Probable Cause Derived from Immigration Status Admission Validates Lawful Arrest

Probable Cause Derived from Immigration Status Admission Validates Lawful Arrest

Date: Apr 25, 2002
Probable Cause Derived from Immigration Status Admission Validates Lawful Arrest Introduction In the case United States v. Oraldo Treto-Haro, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert