Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Enhancing Intervention Rights in Environmental Litigation: Tenth Circuit's Landmark Decision on Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument

Enhancing Intervention Rights in Environmental Litigation: Tenth Circuit's Landmark Decision on Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument

Date: Jul 11, 2001
Enhancing Intervention Rights in Environmental Litigation: Tenth Circuit's Landmark Decision on Grand Staircase-Escalante National Monument Introduction The case of Utah Association of Counties v....
Turnbull v. Topeka State Hospital: Redefining Employer Liability for Sexually Hostile Work Environments in Healthcare Settings

Turnbull v. Topeka State Hospital: Redefining Employer Liability for Sexually Hostile Work Environments in Healthcare Settings

Date: Jul 6, 2001
Turnbull v. Topeka State Hospital: Redefining Employer Liability for Sexually Hostile Work Environments in Healthcare Settings Introduction Turnbull v. Topeka State Hospital is a pivotal case...
Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Relief in Moore v. Marr: Implications of AEDPA and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Relief in Moore v. Marr: Implications of AEDPA and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel

Date: Jul 4, 2001
Affirmation of Denial of Habeas Relief in Moore v. Marr: Implications of AEDPA and Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Introduction Stephen Moore, the petitioner-appellant, was convicted in 1988 by a...
Possession of Firearm in Furtherance of Drug Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Iiland

Possession of Firearm in Furtherance of Drug Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Iiland

Date: Jul 4, 2001
Possession of Firearm in Furtherance of Drug Trafficking: Insights from United States v. Iiland Introduction United States v. Sidney Ronnell Iiland, 254 F.3d 1264 (10th Cir. 2001), presents a pivotal...
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Inmate Bivens Actions: Tenth Circuit Upholds Dismissal Post-BOOTH v. CHURNER

Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Inmate Bivens Actions: Tenth Circuit Upholds Dismissal Post-BOOTH v. CHURNER

Date: Jul 3, 2001
Exhaustion of Administrative Remedies in Inmate Bivens Actions: Tenth Circuit Upholds Dismissal Post-BOOTH v. CHURNER Introduction The case of Ramzi Ahmed Yousef v. Janet Reno presents a pivotal...
Admissibility of Prior DUI Convictions to Prove Malice Affirmed by 10th Circuit

Admissibility of Prior DUI Convictions to Prove Malice Affirmed by 10th Circuit

Date: Jul 3, 2001
Admissibility of Prior DUI Convictions to Prove Malice Affirmed by 10th Circuit Introduction In the case of UNITED STATES of America v. Raymond Tan, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Clarifying Nominal Damages and Attorney’s Fees under Title VII: Insights from T.D. Williamson, Inc. v. Barber

Clarifying Nominal Damages and Attorney’s Fees under Title VII: Insights from T.D. Williamson, Inc. v. Barber

Date: Jul 3, 2001
Clarifying Nominal Damages and Attorney’s Fees under Title VII: Insights from T.D. Williamson, Inc. v. Barber Introduction The landmark case of Lenard Barber v. T.D. Williamson, Inc. (254 F.3d 1223)...
Non-Retroactivity of Apprendi under AEDPA §2255: Ste v. Alan Daniels Analysis

Non-Retroactivity of Apprendi under AEDPA §2255: Ste v. Alan Daniels Analysis

Date: Jun 26, 2001
Non-Retroactivity of Apprendi under AEDPA §2255: Ste v. Alan Daniels Analysis Introduction Ste v. Alan Daniels, 254 F.3d 1180 (10th Cir. 2001), is a pivotal case that examines the interplay between...
Recognition of Tribal Motor Vehicle Registrations Under Federal Law: Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. Secretary of Revenue

Recognition of Tribal Motor Vehicle Registrations Under Federal Law: Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. Secretary of Revenue

Date: Jun 26, 2001
Recognition of Tribal Motor Vehicle Registrations Under Federal Law: Prairie Band of Potawatomi Indians v. Secretary of Revenue Introduction PRAIRIE BAND OF POTAWATOMI INDIANS, Plaintiff-Appellee, v....
Jurisdictional Limits in Qualified Immunity for Eighth Amendment Bivens Actions: Garrett v. Stratman

Jurisdictional Limits in Qualified Immunity for Eighth Amendment Bivens Actions: Garrett v. Stratman

Date: Jun 21, 2001
Jurisdictional Limits in Qualified Immunity for Eighth Amendment Bivens Actions: Garrett v. Stratman Introduction Garrett v. Stratman is a landmark decision by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Affirming FAA's Limited Judicial Review: Bowen v. Amoco Pipeline Company

Affirming FAA's Limited Judicial Review: Bowen v. Amoco Pipeline Company

Date: Jun 21, 2001
Affirming FAA's Limited Judicial Review: Bowen v. Amoco Pipeline Company Introduction The case of Ernest Bowen and Mary Bowen v. Amoco Pipeline Company (254 F.3d 925, 10th Cir. 2001) presents a...
Affirmation of D'Oench Doctrine and FIRREA's Impact on Third-Party Beneficiary Claims in Breach of Contract Actions

Affirmation of D'Oench Doctrine and FIRREA's Impact on Third-Party Beneficiary Claims in Breach of Contract Actions

Date: Jun 15, 2001
Affirmation of D'Oench Doctrine and FIRREA's Impact on Third-Party Beneficiary Claims in Breach of Contract Actions Introduction The case of Dwight A. Harrison v. Wahatoyas, L.L.C. addressed...
Affirmed: Necessity to Exhaust Bureau of Indian Affairs Procedures for Tribal Recognition Claims

Affirmed: Necessity to Exhaust Bureau of Indian Affairs Procedures for Tribal Recognition Claims

Date: Jun 14, 2001
Affirmed: Necessity to Exhaust Bureau of Indian Affairs Procedures for Tribal Recognition Claims Introduction The case of United Tribe of Shawnee Indians, a United States Treaty Tribe, on our behalf...
Drapeau v. Massanari: Enhanced Standards for Evaluating Listed Impairments in Social Security Cases

Drapeau v. Massanari: Enhanced Standards for Evaluating Listed Impairments in Social Security Cases

Date: Jun 13, 2001
Drapeau v. Massanari: Enhanced Standards for Evaluating Listed Impairments in Social Security Cases Introduction The case of Marlene A. Drapeau v. Larry G. Massanari addresses critical issues in the...
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases: Insights from Ernest Medina v. Cram

Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases: Insights from Ernest Medina v. Cram

Date: Jun 13, 2001
Clarifying Qualified Immunity in Excessive Force Cases: Insights from Ernest Medina v. Cram Introduction The case Ernest Medina v. Michael Cram, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Strengthening Protections Against Retaliatory Termination: The Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.

Strengthening Protections Against Retaliatory Termination: The Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp.

Date: Jun 12, 2001
Strengthening Protections Against Retaliatory Termination: The Tenth Circuit's Ruling in Bausman v. Interstate Brands Corp. 1. Introduction The case of Cynthia M. Bausman v. Interstate Brands...
Limits of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Challenging Prisoner Transfers and Conditions: Boyce v. Ashcroft

Limits of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Challenging Prisoner Transfers and Conditions: Boyce v. Ashcroft

Date: Jun 5, 2001
Limits of Habeas Corpus Under 28 U.S.C. § 2241 in Challenging Prisoner Transfers and Conditions: Boyce v. Ashcroft Introduction Christopher John Boyce v. John Ashcroft is a significant case...
Martins v. Franklin Capital: Clarifying Diversity Jurisdiction in Class Actions

Martins v. Franklin Capital: Clarifying Diversity Jurisdiction in Class Actions

Date: May 30, 2001
Martins v. Franklin Capital: Clarifying Diversity Jurisdiction in Class Actions Introduction Juana M. Martin and Gerald T. Martin, individually and on behalf of all persons similarly situated,...
Tenth Circuit's Affirmation in United States v. Haber: Defining Schemes to Defraud and Abuse of Trust in Mail and Wire Fraud

Tenth Circuit's Affirmation in United States v. Haber: Defining Schemes to Defraud and Abuse of Trust in Mail and Wire Fraud

Date: May 25, 2001
Tenth Circuit's Affirmation in United States v. Haber: Defining Schemes to Defraud and Abuse of Trust in Mail and Wire Fraud Introduction The case of United States of America v. Avraham Ben-Zion...
Application of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) to First Amendment Claims: SEARLES v. VAN BEBBER

Application of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) to First Amendment Claims: SEARLES v. VAN BEBBER

Date: May 15, 2001
Application of 42 U.S.C. § 1997e(e) to First Amendment Claims: SEARLES v. VAN BEBBER Introduction SEARLES v. VAN BEBBER is a pivotal case adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals, Tenth...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert