Log In
  • India
  • UK & Ireland
CaseMine Logo
Please enter at least 3 characters.
Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Hi, I'm AMICUS. Your GPT powered virtual legal assistant. Let's chat.
  • Parallel Search NEW
  • CaseIQ
  • AMICUS (Powered by GPT)
  • Federal
    U.S. Supreme Court
    Federal Circuit
    1st Circuit
    2d Circuit
    3d Circuit
    4th Circuit
    5th Circuit
    6th Circuit
    7th Circuit
    8th Circuit
    9th Circuit
    10th Circuit
    11th Circuit
    Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit
    Board of Immigration Appeals
    Special Courts
    Bankruptcy
  • State
    Alabama
    Alaska
    Arkansas
    Arizona
    California
    Colorado
    Connecticut
    Delaware
    District Of Columbia
    Florida
    Georgia
    Guam
    Hawaii
    Iowa
    Idaho
    Illinois
    Indiana
    Kansas
    Kentucky
    Louisiana
    Massachusetts
    Maryland
    Maine
    Michigan
    Minnesota
    Missouri
    Mississippi
    Montana
    Nebraska
    North Carolina
    North Dakota
    New Hampshire
    New Jersey
    Northern Mariana Islands
    New Mexico
    Nevada
    New York
    Ohio
    Oklahoma
    Oregon
    Pennsylvania
    Puerto Rico
    Rhode Island
    South Carolina
    South Dakota
    Tennessee
    Texas
    Utah
    Virginia
    Vermont
    Washington
    Wisconsin
    West Virginia
    Wyoming
Log In Sign Up US Judgments
  • India
  • UK & Ireland

Alert

How is this helpful for me?

  • Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
    1. Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
    2. Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
  • Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
  • The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.

  Know more  

Create your profile now
  • Commentaries
  • Judgments

10th Circuit Case Commentaries

Imposition of Additional Filing Restrictions on Pro Se Prisoners: Kinnell v. Graves

Imposition of Additional Filing Restrictions on Pro Se Prisoners: Kinnell v. Graves

Date: Sep 15, 2001
Imposition of Additional Filing Restrictions on Pro Se Prisoners: Kinnell v. Graves Introduction Kinnell v. Graves, decided by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit on September...
ENGBERG v. STATE of Wyoming: Establishing Standards for Procedural Bar and Brady Violations in Habeas Corpus Petitions

ENGBERG v. STATE of Wyoming: Establishing Standards for Procedural Bar and Brady Violations in Habeas Corpus Petitions

Date: Sep 13, 2001
ENGBERG v. STATE of Wyoming: Establishing Standards for Procedural Bar and Brady Violations in Habeas Corpus Petitions 1. Introduction Roy Lee ENGBERG v. STATE of Wyoming, 265 F.3d 1109 (10th Cir....
Affirmation of Tribal Sovereign Immunity under Intergovernmental Agreements

Affirmation of Tribal Sovereign Immunity under Intergovernmental Agreements

Date: Sep 12, 2001
Affirmation of Tribal Sovereign Immunity under Intergovernmental Agreements Introduction E.F.W.; and A.T.B. v. St. Stephen's Indian High School et al. is a seminal case adjudicated by the United...
Federal Amendment to Medicaid Settlement Law Limits Individual Claims: Harris v. Owens

Federal Amendment to Medicaid Settlement Law Limits Individual Claims: Harris v. Owens

Date: Sep 11, 2001
Federal Amendment to Medicaid Settlement Law Limits Individual Claims: Harris v. Owens Introduction The case of Wilfred L. Harris v. Bill Owens et al. adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Affirmation of Dismissal Highlights Strict Scienter Pleading Standards under PSLRA in City of Philadelphia v. Fleming Co.

Affirmation of Dismissal Highlights Strict Scienter Pleading Standards under PSLRA in City of Philadelphia v. Fleming Co.

Date: Sep 8, 2001
Affirmation of Dismissal Highlights Strict Scienter Pleading Standards under PSLRA in City of Philadelphia v. Fleming Co. Introduction The case of City of Philadelphia, acting through its Board of...
Reinforcing the 'Original Source' Mandate: Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of False Claims Act Qui Tam Action in King v. Hillcrest Health Center

Reinforcing the 'Original Source' Mandate: Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of False Claims Act Qui Tam Action in King v. Hillcrest Health Center

Date: Sep 8, 2001
Reinforcing the 'Original Source' Mandate: Tenth Circuit Affirms Dismissal of False Claims Act Qui Tam Action in King v. Hillcrest Health Center Introduction The case of United States of America ex...
Holt v. United States: En Banc Tenth Circuit Allows Weapons Questions During Traffic Stops Without Specific Suspicion

Holt v. United States: En Banc Tenth Circuit Allows Weapons Questions During Traffic Stops Without Specific Suspicion

Date: Sep 6, 2001
Holt v. United States: En Banc Tenth Circuit Allows Weapons Questions During Traffic Stops Without Specific Suspicion Introduction In United States v. Holt, 264 F.3d 1215 (10th Cir. 2001), the United...
Retaliatory Prosecution Under the First Amendment: Analysis of Poole v. County of Otero

Retaliatory Prosecution Under the First Amendment: Analysis of Poole v. County of Otero

Date: Sep 6, 2001
Retaliatory Prosecution Under the First Amendment: Analysis of Poole v. County of Otero Introduction In the landmark case of Adam Poole v. County of Otero, adjudicated by the United States Court of...
Defining Statute of Limitations for Rule 41(e) Motions: Insights from U.S. v. Rodriguez-Aguirre

Defining Statute of Limitations for Rule 41(e) Motions: Insights from U.S. v. Rodriguez-Aguirre

Date: Sep 6, 2001
Defining Statute of Limitations for Rule 41(e) Motions: Insights from U.S. v. Rodriguez-Aguirre Introduction The case of UNITED STATES of America v. Gabriel Rodriguez-Aguirre et al. (264 F.3d 1195),...
Enforcement of Appellate Waivers in Plea Agreements: U.S. v. Elliott

Enforcement of Appellate Waivers in Plea Agreements: U.S. v. Elliott

Date: Aug 31, 2001
Enforcement of Appellate Waivers in Plea Agreements: United States v. Travis Elliott Introduction In the case United States of America v. Travis Elliott, 264 F.3d 1171 (10th Cir. 2001), the United...
Constructive Submission and EPA's Duty Under the Clean Water Act: Hayes v. Whitman (10th Cir. 2001)

Constructive Submission and EPA's Duty Under the Clean Water Act: Hayes v. Whitman (10th Cir. 2001)

Date: Aug 30, 2001
Constructive Submission and EPA's Duty Under the Clean Water Act: Hayes v. Whitman (10th Cir. 2001) Introduction Hayes v. Whitman, a 2001 decision by the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth...
Burden of Proof in ADA Title III Barrier Removal: Analysis of Colorado Cross Disability Coalition v. Hermanson Family Limited Partnership I

Burden of Proof in ADA Title III Barrier Removal: Analysis of Colorado Cross Disability Coalition v. Hermanson Family Limited Partnership I

Date: Aug 30, 2001
Burden of Proof in ADA Title III Barrier Removal: Analysis of Colorado Cross Disability Coalition v. Hermanson Family Limited Partnership I Introduction The case of Colorado Cross Disability...
Establishing Voluntary Consent in Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Zubia-Melendez

Establishing Voluntary Consent in Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Zubia-Melendez

Date: Aug 25, 2001
Establishing Voluntary Consent in Vehicle Searches: Insights from United States v. Zubia-Melendez Introduction The case of United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Lorenzo Zubia-Melendez,...
Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Claims: Erikson v. Pawnee County

Affirmation of Qualified Immunity in § 1983 Claims: Erikson v. Pawnee County

Date: Aug 24, 2001
Disclaimer: This commentary is intended for informational purposes only and does not constitute legal advice. For legal counsel, please consult a qualified attorney. Affirmation of Qualified Immunity...
AEDPA's One-Year Limitation on Habeas Petitions: Strict Enforcement and Limited Equitable Tolling in Fisher v. Gibson

AEDPA's One-Year Limitation on Habeas Petitions: Strict Enforcement and Limited Equitable Tolling in Fisher v. Gibson

Date: Aug 23, 2001
AEDPA's One-Year Limitation on Habeas Petitions: Strict Enforcement and Limited Equitable Tolling in Fisher v. Gibson Introduction John Hadley Fisher, the petitioner-appellant, is currently serving...
Restricting Appellate Attorneys' Fees Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c): The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Huffman v. Saul Holdings

Restricting Appellate Attorneys' Fees Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c): The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Huffman v. Saul Holdings

Date: Aug 23, 2001
Restricting Appellate Attorneys' Fees Under 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c): The Tenth Circuit's Decision in Huffman v. Saul Holdings Introduction The case of Marshall Huffman and Virginia Newton v. Saul...
Affirmation of Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: MILLER v. CHAMPION

Affirmation of Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: MILLER v. CHAMPION

Date: Aug 22, 2001
Affirmation of Prejudice Standard in Ineffective Assistance of Counsel Claims: MILLER v. CHAMPION Introduction The case of Arthur Donnell Miller, Jr. v. Ron Champion, reported at 262 F.3d 1066,...
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in §1983 Claims Against Public School Employers: Bartell v. Aurora Public Schools

Affirmation of Summary Judgment in §1983 Claims Against Public School Employers: Bartell v. Aurora Public Schools

Date: Aug 22, 2001
Affirmation of Summary Judgment in §1983 Claims Against Public School Employers: Bartell v. Aurora Public Schools Introduction In Bartell v. Aurora Public Schools, the United States Court of Appeals...
Standing in Defendant Class Action Appeals: Insights from In re Integra Realty Resources, Inc.

Standing in Defendant Class Action Appeals: Insights from In re Integra Realty Resources, Inc.

Date: Aug 22, 2001
Standing in Defendant Class Action Appeals: Insights from In re Integra Realty Resources, Inc. Introduction The case of In re Integra Realty Resources, Inc. addresses significant issues surrounding...
Excited Utterance Exception Reinforced in Confrontation Clause Analysis

Excited Utterance Exception Reinforced in Confrontation Clause Analysis

Date: Aug 18, 2001
Excited Utterance Exception Reinforced in Confrontation Clause Analysis Introduction David Woodward, the petitioner-appellant, was convicted of murdering his wife, Deborah Woodward, in a case handled...
Previous   Next
CaseMine Logo

Know us better!

  • Request a Demo
  • Watch Casemine overview Videos

Company

  • About Us
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms
  • Careers
  • Columns
  • Contact Us

Help

  • Pricing
  • Help & Support
  • Features
  • Workflow
  • CaseMine API
  • CaseMine's Bespoke AI Solutions
  • Judge Signup
  • Student Signup

CaseMine Tools

  • CaseIQ
  • Judgment Search
  • Parallel Search
  • AttorneyIQ
  • Browse Cases

© 2023 Gauge Data Solutions Pvt. Ltd.

Summary

Alert