Parallel Search is an AI-driven legal research functionality that uses natural language understanding to find conceptually relevant case law, even without exact keyword matches.
Creating your profile on CaseMine allows you to build your network with fellow lawyers and prospective clients. Once you create your profile, you will be able to:
Claim the judgments where you have appeared by linking them directly to your profile and maintain a record of your body of work.
Interact directly with CaseMine users looking for advocates in your area of specialization.
Creating a unique profile web page containing interviews, posts, articles, as well as the cases you have appeared in, greatly enhances your digital presence on search engines such Google and Bing, resulting in increased client interest.
The cases linked on your profile facilitate Casemine's artificial intelligence engine in recommending you to potential clients who might be interested in availing your services for similar matters.
Affirmation of Dismissal in Hartman v. Kickapoo Tribe Gaming Commission Establishes No Private Right of Action Under IGRA Introduction The case of Hartman v. Kickapoo Tribe Gaming Commission, decided...
Protected Property Interests and Procedural Due Process: Insights from Crown Point I, LLC v. Intermountain Rural Electric Association Introduction The case of Crown Point I, LLC v. Intermountain...
Affirmation of Judicial Absolute Immunity in §1983 Claims: Ledbetter v. City of Topeka Introduction In the case of Joseph R. Ledbetter v. City of Topeka, Kansas, decided by the United States Court of...
Establishing Racial Discrimination Standards in Airline Customer Service under 42 U.S.C. §1981: Commentary on Sawyer and Fuller v. Southwest Airlines Co. Introduction The case of Louise Sawyer and...
Reinforcing Fourth Amendment Standards: Consent, Curtilage, and Protective Sweeps in United States v. Cavely Introduction United States of America v. Everett Lee Cavely is a significant case...
Cumulative Error in Capital Cases: The Cargle v. Warden Judgment Introduction The case of Marcus L. Cargle v. Mike Mullin, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary (317 F.3d 1196) serves as a pivotal...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies ADA Employer Definition in Trainor v. Apollo Metal Specialties Introduction In Randy Trainor v. Apollo Metal Specialties, Inc., the United States Court of Appeals for the...
Affirmation of Habeas Corpus Standards Under AEDPA in Torres v. Mullin, 317 F.3d 1145 (10th Cir. 2003) Introduction Osbaldo Torres, the petitioner-appellant, was convicted by an Oklahoma jury of two...
Equitable Tolling in Habeas Corpus Petitions: A Comprehensive Analysis of Burger v. Scott Introduction The case of Derek D. Burger v. H.N. Scott, adjudicated by the United States Court of Appeals for...
Expectation of Privacy for Social Guests and Exigent Circumstances in Methamphetamine Manufacturing Cases Introduction In United States v. Joel Dean Rhiger, 315 F.3d 1283 (10th Cir. 2003), the United...
Limiting Vicarious Liability under the Lanham Act: Procter & Gamble Co. v. Haugen Introduction In the landmark case The Procter & Gamble Company v. Randy L. Haugen, adjudicated by the United States...
Equitable Tolling in Federal Habeas Corpus Petitions: York v. GaLetka Introduction Donald William York v. Hank GaLetka, 314 F.3d 522 (10th Cir. 2003), is a seminal case addressing the application of...
Preferential Transfer and Financial Conduit: Insights from In re Wayne R. Ogden Introduction The case of In re Wayne R. Ogden, Debtor. Steven R. Bailey, Trustee of the Estate of Wayne R. Ogden,...
Tenth Circuit Upholds Class Action Settlement Approval Despite Objector Appeals Introduction In the landmark case of Rutter Wilbanks Corp. v. Shell Oil Co. (314 F.3d 1180, 2002), the United States...
Tenth Circuit Clarifies Interpretation of Forum Selection Clauses: Mandatory vs Permissive Introduction The case of K V Scientific Co., Inc. v. Bayerische Motoren Werke Aktiengesellschaft (BMW)...
Claim Preclusion in Employment Litigation: Insights from Wilkes v. Wyoming Department of Employment Division of Labor Standards Introduction The case of Lorna Wilkes v. Wyoming Department of...
Establishing Standards for Ineffective Assistance of Counsel in Capital Sentencing: Hooper v. Mullin Introduction The case of Michael Edward Hooper v. Mike Mullin, Warden, Oklahoma State Penitentiary...
Rooker-Feldman Doctrine Enforced Against Intertwined Federal Claims in KENMEN ENGINEERING v. CITY OF UNION Introduction The case KENMEN ENGINEERING, a partnership composed of Kenneth Miles and Ken...
Defining Employer under the ADA: County Board of Commissioners Lacks Duty to Sheriff's Employees Introduction The case of Gary Bristol v. Board of County Commissioners of Clear Creek County addresses...
Deliberate Indifference to Mental Health Conditions: Insights from Olsen v. Layton Hills Mall Introduction Carl Kipp Olsen and his family filed a lawsuit against multiple defendants, including...